Cheap, safe drug kills most cancers
I am very interested in how effective this dichloroacetate is and am determined to follow it up.
OCKHAM said:
I don’t trust this information at all. This could be a cover for two things. One, the chlorinating of water supplies and two, the cancer industry, of which only last night reported that cancer was dropping in the U.S. [Don’t believe a word of it.]
And there is another thing people have to be aware of too, and that is to be careful of generalisations. What may be poison for one person, could well cure another. What is cancer anyway? Well, one definition that I have of it is:
Cancer is a group of more than 200 diseases charactierised by uncontrolled and unregulated growth of cells.
200 diseases doesn't necessarily equate with 200
different cells going 'wonky', but it could well equate with 200 different 'effects' of of these cells going 'wonky'. Some are very rare, and some, unfortunately are common. Interstingly enough, just because a cancer occurs frequently in a population, the mortality rate (deaths) from it may not coincide with its occurance. For example, melanoma in Australia is in the 'top 5' when it comes to occurances, but people who die from it are near the bottom of statistics. This has to do with when a cancer is discovered. It also has the advantage of being visible, whereas other cancers, are only discovered after a long period of time and sometimes after metastisis to other organs has occured.
OCKHAM said:
Many years ago I researched cancer and the industry. One thing that came up was the cancer clinics in America and who was doing what. I found there were clinics in the U.S. who actually cured cancer but their existence was carefully kept from the media. In these clinics cancer was cured by changing the body state from acidity to alkalinity, and adjusting the pH of the body water.
It may be that in the U.S. things are more 'profit driven' than elsewhere. This could explain why they might try and hide their research. But there is also quite a bit of compeditiveness between scientists unless they were 'controlled' in some way and that would most likely mean government control. An example of this that comes to mind is the Chinese managing to hide a 'cure' for malaria for 30 years. Why did they do this? Because of U.S. military presence in the WHO.
Artemisinin was first isolated in 1972 by scientists working for the Chinese Military (People’s Liberation Army). The herb qing hao (sweet Annie) has been used in Traditional Chinese Medicine for more than 2000 years to treat fevers. The Pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China states that quing hao (Herba Artemisiae Annuae, its pharmacopeial name in the Pharmacopoeia monograph) is indicated to treat malaria with chills and fever.3 Because of the plant’s traditional use, it has not been a surprise for the herb and medicinal plant research community to learn that, when used in ACT, artemisinin and its synthetic derivatives are finally gaining international acceptance and recognition as an effective alternative in eliminating susceptible and multi-drug resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria
From here:
http://www.herbalgram.org/herbalgram/articleview.asp?a=2733
For years the U.S. military tried to discover what plant the Chinese were using only to find that it actually grew wild on the Potomac.
Btw, the average cancer 'cure' rate (5 year survival rate) is 62% in Australia, but this depends on the type of cancer and when found.
OCKHAM said:
In what I have found, cancer cannot live in an alkaline state, only an acidic state inside the body. So those who had cancer, could change their body state by drinking water that contained a product called coral calcium of an extreme high grade, such as made in Japan. There are also other products that perform this function. By the way, indigestion is a calcium deficiency of the sphincter.
The body, in order to keep a healthy state needs to regulate blood pH between 7.35-7.45 (slightly alkaline). Going outside these boundaries inevitably has chemistry effects that are very serious. The two most important organs in the body for maintaining pH are the lungs and the kidneys. You can work out whether a person's pH 'state' is caused by either metabolic (kidney) problem or a respiratory problem by measuring CO2 and HCO3 (bicarbonate). They are on a feedback system and many things can influence this, but they are supposed to work together to maintain the pH balance in the body. Interestingly, a change in blood pH will effect the strength that calcium binds to the protein albumin. Acidosis produces more 'unbound' (ionised or metabolically active) calcium and alkalosis, less.
Hypercalcaemia (elevated calcium levels - normal is between 2.25-2.75mmol/L) is a condition, 2/3 rds of which is caused by an overactive thyroid (hormonal effects), the other 1/3 is caused by malignancy (cancer). So, it is very common in cancer patients and is considered a medical emergency.
OCKHAM said:
You can easily check your own pH by purchasing test strips and testing the urine. You will be shocked when you see your pH below 6 points, which most humans live in. Your pH must be higher, around 6.5 to 7.3 points and remain in the state. Drinking lots of water that has been pH tested to a satisfactory level heals the body by itself. Of course if your diseases are too prolonged, this may become more difficult to stop the invasion.
What is being measured is the product of an organ that plays a HUGE part in regulating the body's acids and bases as well as other electrolyte levels, water levels and getting rid of toxins (this includes many if not most drugs) - the kidneys! Urine pH may therefore vary, but should be between 4.5 and 8. A pH of over 8 may indicate bacterial infection and less than 4.5 might indicate metabolic acidosis - this is where the kidneys are working very hard to retain bicarbonate (negative) ions for the body.
Peoples calcium level should be between 2.25 - 2.75 mmol/L, although this reflects the total 3 ways calcium exists in the body. Ionised calcium is the metabolically active one. Anything above this, the kidneys will try to excrete. The consequences of hypercalcaemia are: "Too much calcium in the body blocks the effect of sodium in skeletal muscles, which leads to reduced excitability of both muscles and nerves. Manifestations of hypercalcaemia include decreased memory, confusion, disorientation, fatigue, muscle weakness, constipation, cardiac arrhythmias and renal calculi"
I can understand why some sections of the world elite may want to hide effective cancer cures because they are more intersted in population reduction and control (sick people are easier to control). I also strongly suspect that many cancers can be 'triggered' by either 3rd density factors and also (easily) by 4th density factors (if they can be bothered).
What does cancer 'mean' esoterically about the individual? Well, Cancer the crab of astrology has a strong nurturing link. Does it depend where the individual gets cancer? It may. Cancer is a disease of unregulated cell growth. Cell growth and multiplication (to me) connects with expansiveness. This could mean that a person with cancer may have been blocked of from their creative principle or higher self or even forgotten to be 'grounded' in some way (this is something that could reflect the increase in numbers in western cultures).
http://www.themystica.org/mystica/articles/h/healing_and_transformation.html
Even with these speculations, I have to keep reminding myself not to generalise because each person may have a different 'reason' for having this disease and I'm sure generalisations are what 4D STS would want us to do because it is entropic rather than expansive.
