Cancer: causes and cures

  • Thread starter Thread starter alchemy
  • Start date Start date
Re: Sunlight and cancer - turnabout?

Vitamin D was also mentioned in articles regarding flu protection.
My summers in the sun, village , mountain or sea , always helps me survive winters without cold.
 
Re: Sunlight and cancer - turnabout?

There is also this: Full Spectrum Sunlight and Inner Health
http://www.second-opinions.co.uk/full_spectrum_sunlight.html
 
Re: Cancer is really a Fungus

Here is some information on Vitamin b17/laetrile, originally brought up by goatz.

From http://curezone.com/foods/laetrile.asp
Laetrile -Vitamin B17 -amygdalin

The diet of primitive man and most fruit-eating animals was very rich in nitrilosides. They regularly ate the seeds (and kernels) of all fruits, since these seeds are rich in protein, polyunsaturated fats, and other nutrients. Seeds also contain as much as 2 per cent or more nitriloside. There are scores of other major foods naturally, or normally, very rich in nitriloside.


Vitamin B-17 (nitriloside, amygdaline) is a designation proposed to include a large group of water-soluble, essentially non-toxic, sugary, compounds found in over 800 plants, many of which are edible. These factors are collectively known as Beta-cyanophoric glycosides. They comprise molecules made of sugar, hydrogen cyanide, a benzene ring or an acetone. Though the intact molecule is for all practical purposes completely non-toxic, it may be hydrolyzed by Beta-glycosidase to a sugar, free hydrogen cyanide, benzaldehyde or acetone.

Apricot Kernels (Vitamin B17)
Apricot Kernels are the richest source of B17 (Laetrile). Ernst Krebs is the world's leading authority on the relationship between cancer and nitrilosides, and the inventor of laetrile.

G. Edward Griffin's book World Without Cancer (American Media, 1974), available from Health World
Ernst Krebs discussion of The Nature of Cancer
Ernst Krebs discussion of the Trophoblast Theory of Cancer
Ernst Krebs discussion of Trophoblasts and Morning Sickness
Ernst Krebs discussion of the Metabolism of nitrilosides (Vitamin B17)
Charles Gurchot's explanation of How Vitamin B17 Works

Apricot kernels are known to prevent and cure cancer, even though the medical establishment has worked night and day and even lied to suppress it. Vitamin B17 is found in most all fruit seeds such as the apple, peach, cherry, orange, nectarine and apricot. It is found in some beans and many grasses such as wheat grass. The hard wooden pit in the middle of the peach is not supposed to be thrown away. In fact, the wooden shell is strong armor protecting one of the most important foods known to man, the seed. It is one of the main courses of food in cultures such as the Navajo Indians, the Hunzas the Abkhasians and many more. Did you know that within these tribes there has never been a reported case of cancer. (And there are doctors and scientists from the U.S. living within these tribes right now studying this phenomena) We don't need to make the seed a main course but we do need the equivalent of about seven apricots seeds per day to nearly guarantee a cancer free life. Other foods that contain vitamin B-17 are: bitter almonds, millet, wheat grass, lima beans and more. (The bitter almond tree was banned from the U.S. in 1995.) The kernel or seed contains the highest amounts of vitamin B17.

One of the most common nitrilosides is amygdalin. This nitriloside occurs in the kernels of seeds of practically all fruits. The seeds of apples, apricots, cherries, peaches, plums, nectarines, and the like carry this factor; often in the extraordinary concentration of 2 to 3 per cent. Since the seeds of fruits are possibly edible, it may be proper to designate the non-toxic water soluble accessory food factor or nitriloside that they contain as vitamin B-17. The presence of nitriloside in the diet produces specific physiologic effects and leaves as metabolites specific chemical compounds of a physiologically active nature. The production by a non-toxic, water-soluble accessory food factor of specific physiological effects as well as identifiable metabolites suggests the vitamin nature of the compound.

In metabolism, nitriloside is hydrolyzed to free hydrogen cyanide, benzaldehyde or acetone and sugar. This occurs largely through the enzyme Beta-glucosidase produced by intestinal bacteria as well as by the body. The released HCN [hydrocyanide] is detoxified by the enzyme rhodanese to the relatively non-toxic thiocyanate molecule. The sugar is normally metabolized. The released benzaldehyde in the presence of oxygen is immediately oxidized to benzoic acid which is non-toxic. Thus this newly designated vitamin B-17 (nitriloside) could account for:

The thiocyanates in the body fluids--blood, urine, saliva, sweat, and tears;
For part of the benzoic acid (and subsequently hippuric acid); salicylic acid isomers;
For the HCN that goes to the production of cyanocobalamin from hydrocobalamin, or production of vitamin B12 from provitamin B12.
These are the physiological properties of the common nitriloside amygdalin. Before considering the possible antineoplastic activity of this vitamin B-17, let us recall that the benzoic acid arising from it has certain antirheumatic and antiseptic properties. It was rather widely used (in Germany and elsewhere) for rheumatic disease therapy prior to the advent of the ortho-hydroxy addition product of benzoic acid known as ortho-hydroxybenzoic acid or salicylic acid. It was originally obtained from beech-wood bark. As a matter of interest, the para- hydroxy isomer of benzoic acid occurs in the para hydroxybenzaldehyde aglycon (non-sugar) of the nitriloside found in the cereal millet. Millet was once more widely used in human nutrition than wheat. Wheat seed contains little or no nitriloside.

Recall now, that thiocyanate also was once widely used, in both Germany and American medicine, as an effective agent for hypertension. Used as such, as the simple chemical, the dosage was difficult to control. Obviously, this difficulty does not arise from the thiocyanate usually produced in the body through metabolizing vitamin B-17 (nitriloside). However, chronic hypotension has been reported in Nigerians who eat quantities of the nitriloside-containing manioc (cassava)--especially that of the bitter variety.

Let us pause to reflect upon this question: Might not the rheumatic diseases as well as certain aspects of hypertension be in some cases partially related to a dietary deficiency in nitrilosides? One can hardly deny that the ingestion of a sufficient quantity of nitriloside-containing foods will metabolically yield sufficient benzoic acid and/or salicylic acid isomers to palliate rheumatic disease and certainly to decrease, however temporarily, hypertension as well as to foster the nitrilosation of provitamin B-12 to active vitamin B-12: cyanocobalamin.

Despite all this, are we justified in suggesting that cancer itself might be another chronic metabolic disease that arises from a specific vitamin deficiency--a deficiency specifically in vitamin B-17 (nitriloside)?

There are many chronic or metabolic diseases that challenge medicine. Many of these diseases have already been conquered. What proved to be their solution? By solution we mean both prevention and cure. What really cures really prevents. Let us think of some of these diseases that have found total prevention and hence cure. We are speaking of metabolic or non-transmissible diseases. At one time the metabolic disease known as scurvy killed hundreds of thousands of people, sometimes entire populations. This disease found total prevention and cure in the ascorbic acid or vitamin C component of fruits and vegetables. Similarly, the once fatal diseases so aptly called pernicious anemia, pellagra, beri beri, countless neuropathies, and the like, found complete cure and prevention in specific dietary factors, that is, essential nutrients in an adequate diet.

Let's go a step further, almost to the border of dogmatism, to advance an axiom in medicine and biology:

No chronic or metabolic disease has ever found cure or prevention, that is, real cure and real prevention--except through factors essential to an adequate diet and/or normal to animal economy.

I would welcome a contradiction to this principle; but even an exception would "prove the rule."

Does it seem likely, therefore, that cancer will be the first exception to this generalization that to date has not had a single known exception? In my humble opinion, certainly not. But does it follow from this that vitamin B-17 (nitriloside) is the specific antineoplastic vitamin? Logically, by itself, alone, this conclusion that nitriloside is the specific antineoplastic vitamin does not follow. However, examine the brilliant laboratory studies of Dr. Dean Burk of the Department of Cytochemistry of the National Cancer Institute in Washington. I believe that in light of the experimental evidence that he has produced, you might agree that vitamin B-17 (nitriloside) is indeed the antineoplastic vitamin.*
Click to expand...
 
Re: Cancer is really a Fungus

Here's a 7-part video of with Dr. Simoncini who wrote Cancer is a Fungus. Video (by internal scope) of fungus tumors are included. Quite interesting.

http://wideeyecinema.com/?p=4262


Edit: woops, link to same video was already given in reply#7
 
Re: Cancer is really a Fungus

Not sure if this is off topic or scientific enough, but was looking for something else and discovered this article on Natural News (wasn't reported by SOTT), which kind of fits the current subject.

_http://www.naturalnews.com/027088_cancer_laetrile_health.html (excerpt)


What is B17, or Laetrile Anyway?

In 1952, a biochemist named Dr. Ernst Krebb, Jr. in San Francisco decided that cancer was a metabolic reaction to a poor diet, and a missing nutrient from modern man's diet could be the key to overcoming cancer. His research led to a compound found in over 1200 edible plants throughout nature. That compound is amagdylin,

Amagdylin is found with the highest concentration and necessary enzymes in apricot seed kernels. A primitive tribe, the Hunzas, were known to consume large amounts of apricot seed kernels. The hard pit had to be broken to get into the soft kernels. There was no incidence of cancer with them at all, ever. And they had long, healthy life spans. Laetrile was created by simply extracting amagdylin from the soft apricot kernels, purifying it and putting it into a concentrated form.

Amagdylin is a nitrioloside. Nitriolisides are difficult to categorize since they are in foods but not foods themselves. As a nitrioloside, amagdylin resembled the B complex structures, so Dr. Krebb called it B17 since by that time 16 types of B vitamins had been isolated.

Dr. Krebb injected himself with laetrile to ensure there would be no toxic side effects. He conducted further lab animal and culture experiments to conclude that laetrile would be effective in the treatment of cancer. By the way, the FDA standard for drug safety is known as LD 50, LD stands for lethal dose, and the 50 is the percentage threshold of lab animals poisoned to death by the drug tested. As long as the percentage killed is under 50%, FDA will approve it!

Since laetrile is derived directly from a food substance in nature and not chemically developed in a laboratory, it is impossible to patent. And of course it's not toxic. In other words, just as with all natural healing substances, Big Pharma and the AMA can't make a fortune from the substance and from the remedies for the long term side effects. There have been several testimonies from cancer victims who cured themselves by chewing large quantities of the apricot seeds alone.

The seeds are more available to consumers now than laetrile because in 1971 the FDA banned laetrile. Laetrile is difficult, but not impossible, to purchase. The seeds are actually the soft almond shaped, bitter tasting kernels from inside the pits. A few users prefer extracting those soft kernels from the pits themselves. But the soft kernels are available and inexpensive.


So How Does It Work?

Amagdylin contains four substances. Two are glucose; one is benzaldyhide, and one is cyanide. Yes, cyanide and benzaldyhide are poisons if they are released or freed as pure molecules and not bound within other molecular formations. Many foods containing cyanide are safe because the cyanide remains bound and locked as part of another molecule and therefore cannot cause harm.

There is even an enzyme in normal cells to catch any free cyanide molecules and to render them harmless by combining them with sulfur. That enzyme is rhodanese, which catalyzes the reaction and binds any free cyanide to sulfur. By binding the cyanide to sulfur, it is converted to a cyanate which is a neutral substance. Then it is easily passed through the urine with no harm to the normal cells.

But cancer cells are not normal. They contain an enzyme that other cells do not share, beta-glucosidase. This enzyme, virtually exclusive to cancer cells, is considered the "unlocking enzyme" for amagdylin molecules. It releases both the benzaldyhide and the cyanide, creating a toxic synergy beyond their uncombined sum. This is what the cancer cell's beta-glucosidase enzyme does to self destruct cancer cells.

Amagdylin or laetrile in conjunction with the protective enzymes in healthy cells and the unlocking enzymes in cancer cells is thus able to destroy cancer cells without jeopardizing healthy cells. Chemotherapy, on the other hand, kills a lot of other cells and diminishes one's immune system while killing an undetermined amount of cancer cells.

Those cancer cells tend to return elsewhere because the patient's general health was reduced from the pervasive chemo toxins. The cancer industry has declared the bench mark for curing cancer as being cancer free for 5 years. It's estimated that of those who undergo the AMA big three for curing cancer, surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy, no more than 3% make the 5 year cancer free mark. Besides the treatments' debilitating effects, they are much more expensive!

But for someone with cancer, it takes a considerable amount of daily B17 consumption to enable the amagdylin to reach the cancer cells with beta-glucosidase. That's because some of the amagdylin molecules will be neutralized by the normal cells containing rhodanese.

Many practitioners who use laetrile have an 85% cure rate among cancer victims who did not undergo much of the standard cut, burn, and poison that is main-stream - while the cure rate for those who come to laetrile therapy as a last resort after all that conventional medicine could only have a 15% recovery rate. There is a clinic in Mexico that claims a 100 percent cure rate!
Click to expand...


Funny thing is that we use to eat apricot seeds as kids fairly often, and they were quite tasty as I can remember.
Later on they were proclaimed poisonous, so no one ate them any more.
 
Re: Sunlight and cancer - turnabout?

To add one more - just came across this one in my bookmarks:

"Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma prevented by natural sunlight, but doctors still don't teach it"
http://www.naturalnews.com/008567.html
 
Mobile phones and cancer

Headlines -

Long-term use of mobile phones 'may be be linked to cancer'

Long-term use of mobile phones may be linked to some cancers, a landmark international study will conclude later this year.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/mobile-phones/6420093/Long-term-use-of-mobile-phones-may-be-linked-to-cancer.html#

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

As with pesticides and artificial additives in food, the general public are effectively being treated as guinea pigs. The focus always seems to be, let's wait and see if any heath problems arise and then (maybe) we'll do something about it. Don't own a mobile phone myself but you can't escape from them. I spent 20 minutes on a the bus the other day right next to a guy who was on his mobile the whole time. Couldn't help but wonder about the possible effects it (or rather the radio waves) was having on me.
 
Re: Mobile phones and cancer

I usually keep mine open and about five meters away when I'm at home. I try to keep my calls less than 5 minutes. If I have to take it with me, I'll turn it off and turn it on only when I have to use it. People do mention having problems contacting me but I've tried explaining the matter and surprisingly they seem to be "okay" with it.
 
Re: Curry kills gullet cancer cells

Tanks for the article , Treesparrow! :)
I love curry! I have all kinds of curry at home.
I buy curry-paste(Chinese), saute onions put the curry paste with it, melt in the olive oil, and pour a can of coconut milk on it. Then you put meat and/or vegetables in it, then simmer it until gets cooked.
Yummm! :flowers:
 
Re: Curry kills gullet cancer cells

anothermagyar said:
I buy curry-paste(Chinese), saute onions put the curry paste with it, melt in the olive oil, and pour a can of coconut milk on it. Then you put meat and/or vegetables in it, then simmer it until gets cooked.
Click to expand...

Do you buy the curry paste from the grocery store? I know their are some "not-ok" ingredients in them. Or, do you make your own paste? I love curry too but stopped using the store-bought paste because of its evil-ness.
 
Re: Curry kills gullet cancer cells

Since curcumin inside turmeric is identified as the main useful ingredient in this regard, a direct use of turmeric may suffice. Turmeric powder is one of the main ingredients in cooking in some parts of India. Turmeric powder is yellow in colour and is usually available in Indian grocery stores. Sprinkling a bit of that powder in curry type dishes and then cooking the curry should give the benefits imo. That way one can use healthy curry ingredients and not require to buy off the shelf curry pastes. Lots of simple curry recipes can be found in google. Just be careful to not use turmeric powder too much as then it will taste weird and can also lead to some stomach problems. Another note of caution is to handle the powder with care - it can stain counter tops and utensils if the raw powder gets in contact with water.
Turmeric supplements are available as well - I do not know much about them. Also I find that wikipedia expresses reservations regarding "the documented concerns regarding the heat stability of curcumin and its degradation in the gut". Like I mentioned before that turmeric is used extensively in many Indian curry dishes and these are all cooked thoroughly - don't know if this removes/reduces the therapeutic value.
fwiw
 
Re: Curry kills gullet cancer cells

Wow, the logical ineptitude of this woman astounds me.

Dr Sharon McKenna, lead study author, based at the Cork Cancer Research Centre, University College Cork, said: “These exciting results suggests scientists could develop curcumin as a potential anti-cancer drug to treat oesophageal cancer.
Click to expand...

Suggesting using tumeric in cooking as preventative medicine doesn't even occur to her, the first thing that comes to mind is "Oh use this knowledge to make a drug!" :::THWACK:::

Or using tumeric itself as a treatment, or at least doing a study...

Perhaps that's the telegraph selectively publishing her commentary, but man it just struck me that anytime scientists find a natural way to treat something they immediately want to turn it into some sort of chemical/drug. ::picks up a large sledgehammer and eyes Allopathy menacingly::
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom