The Living Force
You seem quite certain about this. Why is that so?Bholanath said:But, not only is the scientific point of view not universally considered singularly most important, but is, in other world-views, a definite obstacle to the actual living/being in what is here referred to as "the Work" (or the Path, the Road, the Dharma, the Tao, etc.).
This appears to be quite the stretch, based on what appears to be a limited understanding of science and equating it to 'knowing about' as opposed to 'knowing' - now - why would you make such a statement?b said:This is just making a distinction between "knowing about" a "thing" and dropping all separateness. Dropping the separateness renders irrelevant such concepts as "success" and "individual-collective" responsibility dualisms. No status, comfort involved. No map, guidebook either.
Unless you are fully awake, which you clearly stated earlier was not the case, such a thing is not possible, though dreaming one is concerning oneself with 'this moment' in 'this density' is quite possible indeed.b said:I personally prefer to concern myself with this moment in this density.
ok - - and?b said:Many people and societies, myself incl., feel it (LHC) is definitely "esoterically" a "bad thing".
I must admit to being rather confused by the inclusion of 'white' in this sentence..... ...... ...... Also, your point is lost on me - perhaps you could elaborate?b said:Einstein....time....common sense....hyperdimensionality. I'm afraid the world is much bigger than 'our' totally lost white 'civilization', and much wiser too.
Thus, you are including yourself in this 'We'? There appears to be a rather 'flat' current understanding in these statements of yours. Perhaps it is a matter of word usage?b said:'We' just assumed our brilliancy, others' stupidity, 'cause we can waste 'em, dem primitives and their simple superstitions.