Civil War in Ukraine: Western Empire vs Russia

Status
Not open for further replies.
So, Poroshenko is now calling for a "Day of Silence" for East Ukraine, according to this RT article (http://rt.com/news/211511-ukraine-halt-fire-east/). It has been evident that Kiev uses these "ceasefires" as public relations gimmicks (aka, propaganda) or for reinforcements of their positions in Eastern Ukraine.

In this article, it states that outgoing EU Pres. Von Rompuy, is even now calling for federalization of Ukraine. He's only about a year too late.
 
Phaneron said:
So, Poroshenko is now calling for a "Day of Silence" for East Ukraine, according to this RT article (http://rt.com/news/211511-ukraine-halt-fire-east/). It has been evident that Kiev uses these "ceasefires" as public relations gimmicks (aka, propaganda) or for reinforcements of their positions in Eastern Ukraine.

In this article, it states that outgoing EU Pres. Von Rompuy, is even now calling for federalization of Ukraine. He's only about a year too late.

While Von Rompuy & Co are slowly waking up for federalization, DPR says they will only provide Ukraine with coal, if Kiev pays first:

DONETSK, December 5. /TASS/.

The self-proclaimed Donetsk People’s Republic (DPR) is ready to sell coal to Ukraine, but only on the prepayment basis, the republic’s head Alexander Zakharchenko told reporters on Friday.

“First money — then coal,” he said. Without prepayments, DPR will not give the product to Kiev, he said. “We are not a Mother Teresa foundation.”

Besides, he said the Ukrainian side had approached the republic about it. “Ukraine’s representatives have been here. But one condition is a must: first money, then the coal is loaded. But Ukraine, unfortunately, does not have money even to buy coal,” the republic’s head said.
 
Siberia said:
DONETSK, December 5. /TASS/.

The self-proclaimed Donetsk People’s Republic (DPR) is ready to sell coal to Ukraine, but only on the prepayment basis, the republic’s head Alexander Zakharchenko told reporters on Friday.

“First money — then coal,” he said. Without prepayments, DPR will not give the product to Kiev, he said. “We are not a Mother Teresa foundation.”

Besides, he said the Ukrainian side had approached the republic about it. “Ukraine’s representatives have been here. But one condition is a must: first money, then the coal is loaded. But Ukraine, unfortunately, does not have money even to buy coal,” the republic’s head said.

about an hour ago, I read that Kiev is going to take for free 2 million tons of coal from Donbas.
 
"cessation of hostilities":

Sergey, 18 years old was killed in his home by shrapnel from the Ukrainian "Grad".
Total in Donetsk 2 killed, many wounded. All civil.

https://twitter.com/Kosarev_RT/status/540878904886833153
 
Director of the company "Ukrinterenergo" arrested for embezzlement of procurement low-quality coal from South Africa, according to the website of the Prosecutor General of Ukraine.

Actions of Director "Ukrinterenergo" qualified as embezzlement of state enterprise on a large scale, that is punishable by imprisonment for up to 12 years with confiscation of property. On the basis of the court's decision Dec 4, 2014 suspect arrested, reports RIA Novosti.

http://russian.rt.com/article/62980
 
ANYONE dealing in any way with Kiev for any transaction should ensure they are paid first. At the very least until the junta is out of power.
 
Lumiere_du_Code said:
about an hour ago, I read that Kiev is going to take for free 2 million tons of coal from Donbas.

How cute. Is this a new synonym of stealing? They are masters of linguistics. I hope that DPR will not allow this to happen.

Lumiere_du_Code said:
Director of the company "Ukrinterenergo" arrested for embezzlement of procurement low-quality coal from South Africa, according to the website of the Prosecutor General of Ukraine.

Actions of Director "Ukrinterenergo" qualified as embezzlement of state enterprise on a large scale, that is punishable by imprisonment for up to 12 years with confiscation of property. On the basis of the court's decision Dec 4, 2014 suspect arrested, reports RIA Novosti.

http://russian.rt.com/article/62980

There is an interesting article in Russian explaining why Ukrainian Minister of Energy has been charged in a similar manner in November (simply because he was not Poroshenko's man).

Also, there is a great new Sott article along the same line, but in a broader context.
 
Siberia said:
Also, there is a great new Sott article along the same line, but in a broader context.

here's about how wonderful to live in Ukraine:

Poroshenko today solemnly handed the passport to citizen of Belarus Sergey Korotkih (Сергей Коротких), which is involved in the military operation against the militia of Donbass consisting in "Azov" battalion. According to media reports, Russian law enforcement officers suspect him of organizing a terrorist attack on Moscow's Manezh Square in 2007.

[I remind you that Azov - the most odious and inhuman grouping that consists entirely of European mercenaries and amnestied the most "hardened" criminals and other ragtag of bastards.]

"To be a citizen of Ukraine has become fashionable, prestigious, I'm proud of it and happy to present you passport of Ukrainian citizen," - said Poroshenko to Korotkih, handing the document. [ :headbash: :curse: :curse: :curse: ]
Himself Korotkih thanked Poroshenko with words "I serve the people of Ukraine", and later said: "I am very pleased to have received the citizenship of Ukraine. I went to this for eight months."

B4GYtvSCMAE8mt0.jpg


https://twitter.com/poroshenko/status/540881342968639488

Meanwhile, in Russia citizen of Belarus - and now a citizen of Ukraine Sergey Korotkih nicknamed "Malyuta" ("Smally"), suspected of organizing the terrorist attack on Moscow's Manezh Square in 2007. According to media reports, a member of the National Socialist organization and associate nationalist Maxim Marcinkiewicz nicknamed "Slasher" pressed the button and triggered a massive explosion in the center of the Russian capital. Fortunately, as a result of a terrorist attack, no one was hurt.

http://russian.rt.com/article/63014
 
In this post there was
http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic said:
http://www.sott.net/article/288677-Vladimir-Putins-historic-defiance-of-the-Anglo-American-Axis-and-their-New-World-Order said:
Particularly in light of their recent destruction of Gaza, Israel has essentially sealed its fate. Consequently, the Middle East has morphed into a HUGE powder keg ready to blow whenever Israel decides to cross one too many red lines for the umpteenth time. Any normal person living in such a volatile environment would only want to far remove themselves from such a precarious state of affairs, which is why there is now a very quiet movement of Ashkenazi Jews back to the Ukraine, their ancestral homeland.
[...]
Only time will show if a scenario of a Euro Israel or something along those lines wil materialize in the area that until recently was Ukraine.
Today, I found another article with a few more pieces of information. Compared to the previous post the following gives reasons to believe that the idea of resettling some Jews in other places is indeed being considered, Ukraine plays an important role but is not the only option.
_http://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2014/12/03/israel-secret-plan-for-second-israel-in-ukraine.html said:
Illegitimate Jewish Regime’s Secret Plan for a 2nd Zionist Entity in Ukraine
December 3, 2014

by Wayne Madsen, Strategic Culture

The Times of Israel, an independent Israeli newspaper that counts among its staff a number of former reporters for the Israeli daily Ha’aretz, published a fascinating but largely overlooked story datelined Jerusalem and Zhitomir, Ukraine, March 16, 2014, and which was written by its respective Russian and Ukrainian correspondents, Hirsh Ostropoler and I. Z. Grosser-Spass, citing a secret report provided to the Israeli government. The report, written by a select panel of scholars of Jewish history drawn from academia and other research centers, concluded that that European Jews are in fact descended from Khazars, a war-like Mongol-Tatar group that ruled over Ukraine and southern Russia, which mass-converted to Judaism in the eighth century AD.

Zionists have long argued that the land claimed by Israel was the biblical birthright of the Jewish people who were forced from the land in a so-called «diaspora» after repeated conquests by various empires. Proof that Ashkenazi Jews, which make up a majority of the Israeli Jewish population, have no historical link to Palestine would call into question the entire premise of Israel as the historical «5,000-year old» homeland of the Jewish people.

The Israeli journalists noted that any conversation of the Khazars and modern Israel has always been met with disdain by Israeli leaders. They quote Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir as once saying, «Khazar, Schmazar. There is no Khazar people. I knew no Khazars. In Kiev. Or Milwaukee. Show me these Khazars of whom you speak». DNA proof that a migratory Khazar population from Europe is now claiming ancient roots in Palestine largely eliminates Zionist claims to the region.

The evidence that eastern and central European Jews have no historical claim to Palestine has resulted in a flurry of activity in Israel and abroad. The Israeli Knesset will soon vote on a bill passed by the Israeli Cabinet that legalizes Israel as a Jewish «national state». Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, who read the secret report on the Khazars, has declared that «Israel is the Jewish, nationalist state for the Jewish people». With the Ashkenazi claims to Israel tenuous, at best, Netanyahu, his Likud Party, and his Jewish Orthodox and West Bank settler party allies have no other choice but to aggressively stake their nationalist claims to not only Israel but also to the West Bank – which the nationalists refer to as «Judea and Samaria».

However, some Israelis and Jews abroad are not taking any chances. One of the main reasons why Ukrainian Jewish billionaire tycoon Ihor Kolomoisky, the governor of Ukraine’s Dnipropetrovsk province and citizen of Ukraine, Israel, and Cyprus, is spending tens of millions of dollars on the recruitment of right-wing Ukrainian nationalists and neo-Nazis from other parts of Europe to fight against the Russian-speaking majority in the Donbass region of eastern Ukraine, is a fear that plans to turn Ukraine into a «second Israel» will be derailed. Russia’s protective measures for the Donbass, as well as its incorporation by referendum of Crimea, the latter prized by the resurgent Khazarian Jewish nationalists, threaten the transformation of Ukraine into a second homeland for Ashkenazi Jews who are finding their hold on Israel prime tenuous, at best.

The Times of Israel’s explosive story about the Khazarian roots of the Ashkenazis also revealed that Israel, knowing that a Palestinian state is inevitable considering the increasing pressure for it from Europe, is preparing to resettle Ashkenazi settlers in the West Bank to Ukraine. Israel’s advanced research in genetics resulted in a direct DNA line being established between Israel’s Ashkenazis and the Khazars who were dispersed across eastern and central Europe after Russia conquered the Khazarian Empire in the 11th century.

Israelis and their Zionist allies around the world have always accused proponents of the Khazarian-Ashkenazi genetic connection of deep-rooted anti-Semitism. However, the genetic research contained in the secret Israeli report confirms what Israeli historian Shlomo Sand revealed in his book, «The Invention of the Jewish People». The concept of the Khazarian bloodline was first broached by Hungarian historian Arthur Koestler in his 1976 «The Thirteenth Tribe».

The Times of Israel reporters quoted an unnamed aide to Netanyahu who revealed the plans for Israeli emigration to Ukraine: «We first thought that admitting we are really Khazars was one way to get around [Palestinian President Mahmoud] Abbas’s insistence that no Jew can remain in a Palestinian state. Maybe we were grasping at straws. But when he refused to accept that, it forced us to think about more creative solutions. The Ukrainian invitation for the Jews to return was a godsend. Relocating all the settlers within Israel in a short time would be difficult for reasons of logistics and economics. We certainly don’t want another fashlan like the expulsion of the settlers in the Gaza Hitnatkut [disengagement]».

Ostropoler and Grosser-Spass also quoted an anonymous Israeli intelligence source as saying: «We’re not talking about all the Ashkenazi Jews going back to Ukraine. Obviously that is not practical. The press as usual exaggerates and sensationalizes; this is why we need military censorship».

The Israeli and Ukrainian Jewish plan is to resettle the Ashkenazis from the West Bank in the Russian autonomous republic of Crimea after what they see will be an eventual retrocession of the peninsula to Ukraine. The ultimate plans of Ukrainian Zionists such as Kolomoisky, in addition to such American allies as Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs Victoria Nuland and U.S. ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey Pyatt, is to establish an autonomous Jewish region of Crimea and restore to the peninsula the original Khazarian name of Chazerai. Although the Tatars who live in Crimea and elsewhere today are largely Muslims, the plans to create a Khazar nation in Ukraine will also likely involve global proselytization by Israelis and Ukrainians who are bent on restoring Khazaria as an alternative to Israel. Current Jewish proselytization efforts among «crypto-Jewish» Catholic mestizos in Mexico; Christians, Hindus, and Buddhists in India; Russian Orthodox and Buddhists in Birobidzhan, Siberia; Muslims in Pakistan and Afghanistan; and Christians, Muslims, and animists in Uganda, Ghana, Mali, Nigeria, Zimbabwe, Mozambique, and Malawi; and among small pockets of alleged Jewish descendants in China, Sao Tome and Principe, Tahiti, Suriname, Vietnam, Brazil, and Peru point to an Israeli plan intent on increasing Jewish numbers for the purpose of settlement in a number of locations outside the illegally-occupied West Bank and the Golan Heights. In addition to Ukraine, northern Iraq, eastern Libya, Alexandria in Egypt, parts of Turkey, Patagonia in Argentina, and Uganda are all being considered for potential Jewish settlements to complement the West Bank or replace it. The so-called «Lost Tribe of Israel,» the Bnei Menashe of Mizoram and Manipur states of northeast India are viewed by many Indians as not actually Jewish but desperate economic migrants looking for better lives in Israel. So desperate are the Israeli expansionists to increase their numbers, dubious Jewish DNA studies have attempted to classify the Sorbs of eastern Germany; the Bantu Lemba people of Zimbabwe, Malawi, and Mozambique; and certain groups of southern Italians, Armenians, and Greeks as «lost tribes» of Israel in order to increase Judaism’s numbers and geographical land claims.

In Ukraine, the so-called «second Israel,» Kolomoisky and Kiev have enlisted a number of ex-Israel Defense Force members in their volunteer battalions, including the Azov Battalion, One of the Israeli units is known as the «Blue Helmets of Maidan» and is commanded by an Israeli using the pseudonym «Delta». If Israel did not have a vested interest in expanding its influence in Ukraine it could easily prevent these units from going to Ukraine.

There are also Sephardic Jewish settlers in the West Bank who are descended from the Jewish Marranos of Moorish-ruled Spain who were expelled from the Iberian Peninsula during the Spanish and Portuguese inquisitions of the 15th century who have no ties to Ashkenazis or Khazaria. Recently, in a move similar to Ukraine’s invitation to the Ashkenazis from the West Bank to settle in Ukraine, Spain and Portugal have enacted legislation that would permit any Sephardic Jew anywhere in the world who can prove their descent from the Marranos expelled during the Inquisition to obtain citizenship in the two countries.

Some Russian speakers in the Donbass are wary of the intentions of pro-Israelis in the Kiev government. Oddly, Kolomoisky has recruited a number of neo-Nazis from western Ukraine and Europe to fight in his battalions whose right-wing organizations have always subscribed to the notion of a future «battle royale» between Russia and the remnants of Khazaria in Israel, Ukraine, Poland, and the Republic of Georgia to avenge Khazaria’s defeat in the 11th century by the Russian Empire.

Israel provided the Georgian government of President Mikheil Saaakashvili, which included a number of dual Israeli-Georgian nationals of Khazar descent, with military and intelligence assistance in its 2008 war against South Ossetia and Abkhazia. Similarly, the Israelis have established close ties with Azerbaijan, a country, which like Georgia and Ukraine, has ancient links to Khazaria through an indigenous group of Azeri Jews known as Subbotniks.

The anonymous Netanyahu aide is also quoted by The Times of Israel journalists as revealing why the Israeli government in making a play for large Israeli settlements in Ukraine: «As the Prime Minister has said, no one will tell Jews where they may or may not live on the historic territory of their existence as a sovereign people. He is willing to make painful sacrifices for peace, even if that means giving up part of our biblical homeland in Judea and Samaria. But then you have to expect us to exercise our historical rights somewhere else. We decided this will be on the shores of the Black Sea, where we were an autochthonous people for more than 2000 years. Even the great non-Zionist historian Simon Dubnow said we had the right to colonize Crimea. It’s in all the history books. You can look it up».

The aide revealed to the two Israeli journalists that Netanyahu appreciates the strength of the ancient Khazars and quote Netanyahu as saying, «we are a proud and ancient people whose history here goes back 4,000 years». But the aide added, «The same is true of the Khazars . . . in Europe and not quite as long. But look at the map: the Khazars did not have to live within ‘Auschwitz borders.’»

To the uninformed, which apparently includes President Barack Obama and U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, the current Israeli desire to create a new nationalist Israeli identity is tied directly to the activities of the Ukrainian leadership of Petro Poroshenko, Arseniy Yatsenyuk, Kolomoisky, and their American supporters, Nuland and Pyatt, in creating a safe haven, temporary or not, for the Ashkenazi settlers of the West Bank. Thanks to the Times of Israel exposé of the secret Israeli report on the Khazars and modern-day Israel, the machinations behind the American and European Union destabilization of Ukraine becomes all the more apparent.
It is to be seen if developements in Israel and Palestine will effect what goes on in Ukraine.
 
For the record: a white book on violations of human rights in Ukraine has been issued in Russian and is available here: _http://www.mid.ru/bdomp/ns-dgpch.nsf/03c344d01162d351442579510044415b/38fa8597760acc2144257ccf002beeb8/$FILE/%D0%91%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%8F%20%D0%BA%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B3%D0%B0%2007.2014-11.2014.pdf It is on the site of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs: _http://www.mid.ru covers the period from July to early November and is 106 pages long.

It ends page 105 with the following from Yandex translation:
All crimes committed during the Ukrainian crisis, should be objectively, local and efficiently investigated.
It is primarily concerned with murders of Russian journalists, "the works of snipers" in Kiev, the tragedy with burned alive by people in the trade Union House in Odessa, the shooting of a peaceful citizens in Mariupol, disaster Malaysian airliner, burials, found in Donetsk and Lugansk regions with evidence of mass executions, the deaths of children under artillery shells, disproportionate the use of force, use of prohibited weapons, including cassette, incendiary, white phosphorous munitions, tactics wow weapons, ballistic missiles and other.

It is crucially important that the Ukrainian authorities stopped "roll" conduct independent, impartial, effective and transparent investigation on the above facts. Call upon the international media rights azasite UN, OSCE and BEHOLD, the organization of the NGO sector to be active, fair and non-politicized approach to assessments reasons Ukrainian the crisis and its development. Convinced that detachment from the realities of trying them to hide from the worlds Oh the public or to manipulate public opinion
the path hypocritical and futile.

And in spite of the silence in the medias, the bombing raids of civilian targets continue as can be seen on this alledgely recent photo: https://www.facebook.com/TruthfromUkraine/photos/pcb.1581516828738330/1581516525405027/?type=1
 
This is a piece of history about the Ukrainian Holodonor and the a group of people who participated in good numbers. There are very many links and sources,

_http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/TPV3/Voices.php/2009/05/26/holocaust-holodomor-origins-of-anti-semi by Nicholas Lyssson said:
Some Ukrainian accounts, and that of Muggeridge, who covered the holodomor for the Manchester Guardian, take the trouble to say that this mass starvation was imposed largely by Jews. Lazar M. Kaganovich is often identified as an architect of the policy. A photograph in Montefiore, Red Tsar, above, shows him personally searching a farm for concealed food. In Muggeridge’s novel Winter in Moscow (1934) he appears as Kokoshkin, “a Jew” and “Stalin’s chief lieutenant.”

In 2003 Levko Lukyanenko, the first Ukrainian ambassador to Canada, was said to have made an anti-Semitic embarrassment of himself on this subject. But see Orest Subtelny, Ukraine: A History, p. 363 (2d ed. 1994)(“Jews were . . . disproportionately prominent among the Bolsheviks, notably in their leadership, among their tax- and grain-gathering officials, and especially in the despised and feared. . . secret police [emphasis added]”); Montefiore, Red Tsar, above, p. 305 (as late as 1937, Jews accounted for only 5.7 percent of Soviet party members, but “formed a majority in the government” [emphasis added]); Yuri Slezkine, The Jewish Century, p. 254 (Princeton University Press, 2004)(the secret police was “one of the most Jewish of all Soviet institutions”); and Arno J. Mayer, Why Did the Heavens Not Darken?, p. 60 (1988)(“As of the late twenties . . . [a] disproportionate number of Jews came to hold high posts in the secret police and to serve as political commissars in the armed services. They. . . were. . . appointed to high-level and conspicuous positions which called for unimpeach-able political loyalty. . . ”). Mayer, a professor emeritus of history at Princeton, is himself Jewish, and had to flee the Nazis as a refugee.

And further back in the 17th century:

II. PEASANT-JEWISH RELATIONS: "ARENDARS"

Shahak, in Three Thousand Years, above, ch. 4, traces Jewish “hatred and contempt” for peasants— “a hatred of which I know no parallel in other societies”—back to the great Ukrainian uprising of 1648-54, in which tens of thousands of “the accursed Jews” (to quote the Ukrainian Cossack leader Bohdan Khmelnytsky) were killed. Some say the number is more accurately stated in the hundreds of thousands. Heinrich Graetz says the number “may well be. . . a quarter of a million.” See his History of the Jews, vol. 5, p. 15 (1856-70, English tr., Jewish Publication Society of America ed., 1956).

The Jews at the time of the massacres were serving the Polish szlachta (nobility) and Roman Catholic clergy on their Ukrainian latifundia as arendars—toll-, rent- and tax-farmers, enforcers of corvee obligations, licensees of feudal monopolies (e.g., on banking, milling, storekeeping, and distillation and sale of alcohol), and as anti-Christian scourges who even collected tithes at the doors of the peasants’ Greek Orthodox churches and exacted fees to open those doors for weddings, christenings and funerals. They had life and death powers over the local population (the typical form of execution being impalement), and no law above them to which that population had recourse. See Graetz, vol. 5, pp. 3-6; Subtelny, pp. 123-38; Norman Davies, God’s Playground: A History of Poland, vol. 1, p. 444 (Oxford University Press, 1982); and Iwo Cyprian Pogonowski, Jews in Poland, pp. 68-79, 283 (1993). According to the last three of these sources, the arendars leased estates for terms of only two or three years and had every incentive to wring the peasants mercilessly, without regard to long-term consequences.
My point in presenting these two excerpts, is to be able to ask the question if the likes of Ihor Kolomoskyi, have learned something from history?
 
Today, I found another article with a few more pieces of information. Compared to the previous post the following gives reasons to believe that the idea of resettling some Jews in other places is indeed being considered, Ukraine plays an important role but is not the only option.
...

Well, the idea of creating a Jewish State at least in the Crimea is not really new. Some of the Soviet Zionists wanted to found in the 20's a Jewish State in the Crimea but this was declined by Stalin. Instead of the Crimea Stalin "offered" them to settle in Birobidjan in the Soviet Far East. Birobidjan became a capital of Jewish Autonomous Region on the territory of the Soviet Russia. This Jewish Autonomous Region is still a part of Russia but it has scarcely any Jews living there since the most of them emigrated to Israel and to the West in the 1990s after the opening of the Iron Curtain. This article describes the history of Birobidjan (_http://www.zionism-israel.com/dic/Birobidjan.htm)

Birobidjan - Birobidjan or Birobizhan, Birobidzhan) is the colloquial name of the district or region (oblast) in the former Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, for which the official designation was the "Jewish Autonomous Region" (JAO) (Avtonomnaya Oblast). Birobidjan was the capital major city in the autonomous region. It is named for the Bira river that flows through the city, and the Bidjan river.

Birobidjan Oblast was part of the Khabarovsk territory (kray) in the former Soviet Far East, the region is located between 47° 40ʹ–49° 20ʹ N. and 130° 30ʹ–135° E. To the west, south, and southeast, it is bordered by the Amur River, the border between the former U.S.S.R. and Manchuria (China). It has an area of 13,900 sq. mi. (36,000 sq. km.)

The "Autonomous Oblast" was created to provide a channel for nationalist tendencies that persisted among Jews in the western Soviet Union. While some Jews dreamed of an autonomous territory in the hospitable Crimea, that was not to be. Any delusions that the Soviet government had benign intentions in setting up this region should be dispelled by a glance at a map of Russia.

Birobidjan_Map.jpg


Birobidjan was evidently deliberately located at the nether end of Russia, far from the traditional regions of Jewish settlement in the West, which centered on the Ukraine and Belorussia, and about 5000 miles from Moscow, in an inhospitable and undeveloped frontier area, on a forlorn stop in the Trans-Siberian railroad. The area became particularly inhospitable, though of greater strategic importance, when the Japanese invaded Manchuria in the 1930s.

Birobidjan was part of a Soviet project to agriculturalize and secularize the Jewish population and wean them away from Zionism and religion. Soviet policies had impoverished Jews who had formerly worked as artisans and tradesmen, and this, it was thought, would be a way to "productivize" the Jews and better their economic condition.

In 1919 the Yevsektsia had advanced proposals to direct Jews to farm work. By 1923, Abraham Bragin, a former Zionist, was advocating for a Jewish autonomous region, which he hoped would be in the Ukraine, specifically, in the Crimea. Yuri Larin likewise advocated Jewish autonomy in the Crimea. He hoped to settle 400,000 Jews there in agriculture.

In 1924, the Soviet government established Komzet - the Committee for settling toiling Jews on the soil. In 1925, Ozet, an allied body was established, with the hope of garnering support from Jewish charities abroad for this project, bringing precious foreign currency to the USSR. Larin was made head of the Ozet, and it looked as though the project of a Jewish autonomous area or state in the Crimea could become a reality. The Communist literary critic Moishe Litvanov enthusiastically referred to the Crimea as "our Palestine."

In a speech delivered at a congress of the society for Jewish agricultural settlement, Ozet, in November of 1926, Soviet President Kalinin had declared: "The Jewish people now faces the great task of preserving its nationality. For this purpose a large segment of the Jewish population must transform itself into a compact farming population, numbering at least several hundred thousand souls." Kalinin noted that Soviet economic policy had impoverished the Jews, but now would give them the chance for economic and social rehabilitation. This speech was greeted with enthusiasm by advocates of the Crimea project and by the rank and file of the Yevsektsia, However, the leaders of the Yevsektsia were cool to the idea, as they were opposed to hints of nationalism. Alexander Chemerisky, First Secretary of the Central Bureau of the Yevsektsia was equivocal. At first he stated:

"The way Comrade Kalinin may talk and needs to talk as the representative of the government...is one thing, and the way we must talk is another...Why do we have to agree with his view about the preservation of the nation? The party has issued no such directive."

It soon became clear that there would be a Jewish "autonomous region" - but not Crimea. Chemerisky, according to his secretary Yasha Rives, told a meeting of the Yevsektzia and the Komsomol that the Central Bureau of the Yevsektiya saw no future in the Crimea and that "other areas must be found." Chemerisky had been secretly called in by Stalin, who told him that he rejected Crimea. "The Jews would have land," but not the Crimea, Stalin decreed. (Levin, Nora, The Jews in the Soviet Union Since 1917: The Paradox of Survival, part I, NYU press, 1988, p 149).

Ukrainian and Belorussian nationalists and anti-Semites wanted no part of Jewish autonomy within their territories, and perhaps Stalin was not interested in a real Jewish autonomy, especially one so close to Moscow. A "scientific" expedition to Birobidjan in 1927 found it suitable for Jewish settlement, either despite or because of its desolate character, swampiness and lack of roads.

The presidium of the Central Executive Committee of the USSR declared the region a "Jewish National District" open for Jewish settlement on March 28, 1928, and in April of that year, the first settlers arrived. Jewish collective farms were established and Yiddish was recognized as an official language. Theaters, newspapers and libraries were established. Birobidjan Yiddish was totally Russified to eliminate all traces of Hebrew. On March (or May) 7, 1934, the Birobidjan Jewish Autonomous Region was created by the Soviet Presidium. Immigration continued in the 1930s, suffered setbacks due to purges and the war, and was revived briefly between 1946 and 1948, just before Stalin "liquidated" the remains of the Yevsektsia, torturing and murdering the last batches of Birobidjan enthusiasts. At the height of Jewish settlement, there were about 40,000 Jews in Birobidjan. In 1959, there were about 14,000 Jews in the Birobidjan area, while today there are perhaps 4,000.
Birobidjan_detail_map.gif



The area is rich in natural resources and does not have a totally inhospitable climate. However, at the time when Jewish settlement began there, there were almost no roads and land suitable for agriculture, insufficient or poor living accommodations, and unsanitary conditions. It was totally isolated from Russian or Jewish culture and the civilized life that its intellectual Jewish settlers, mostly Communists, had been accustomed to. Not surprisingly, over half the 20,000 settlers who arrived shortly after 1928 had left by 1932, with only 7,000 remaining.

Soviet propaganda tried, with some success, to exploit the Birobidjan project to obtain investments from Jews abroad and influence Western public opinion. Jewish organizations outside the U.S.S.R. that participated in Jewish colonization projects in the Soviet Union, such as Agro-Joint (American Jewish Joint Agricultural Corporation) and the Jewish Colonization Association (ICA), generally took a neutral stand. Agro-Joint had contributed $25 Million to Jewish agricultural projects, including those in the pale of settlement area, but it is not clear if any of this money ever reached the intended recipients.

The Ort -Farband gave limited assistance to the development of industry and workshops. Those Jewish organizations abroad whose membership consisted mostly of Communists and their sympathizers supported the plan without reservation. Among the most active organizations was Icor (the American Association for Jewish Colonization in the Soviet Union), which cooperated closely with Ozet. In 1929 Icor organized a scientific delegation consisting of American specialists in agriculture and settlement to investigate the possibilities for further colonization of Birobidjan. Ambidjan (American Committee for the Settlement of Foreign Jews in Birobidjan) supported Jewish settlement in Birobidjan for a short period in the mid-1930s and after World War II. Jewish organizations supporting Birobidjan existed in Canada, Western Europe, and South America. Representatives of the Argentinian Jewish organization Procor (Society to Assist the Productivization of the Economically Ruined Jewish Masses in the Soviet Union) visited Birobidjan in 1929. These organizations, besides holding meetings, issuing publications, and collecting money, also propagandized the colonization of Birobidjan by Jews from abroad. Thus, about 1,400 Jewish immigrants from countries outside the Soviet Union arrived in Birobidjan in the early 1930s, emigrating from the United States, South America, Europe, Palestine, and other places.

The Birobidjan project aroused some opposiition among those active in Jewish settlement in the U.S.S.R. and among Yevsektsiya leaders. Among its critics were Mikhail (Yuri) Larin and Abraham Bragin, both active in the Jewish settlement movement. Larin argued that other areas of the Soviet Union, especially the Crimea, were far more suitable for Jewish colonization.

In a reception given to representatives of Moscow workers and the Yiddish press in May 1934, President Kalinin suggested that the creation of a Jewish territorial center in Birobidjan would be the only way to normalize the national status of Soviet Jews. He also expressed his hope that "within a decade Birobidjan will be the most important and probably the only bulwark of national Jewish socialist culture." and that "the transformation of the region into a republic is only a question of time." The visit of Lazar Kaganovich , a Jew and member of the Politburo, to Birobidjan in February 1936 greatly encouraged the Jewish leadership of the region. Birobidjan aroused wide interest in world Jewry, especially among those who believed in Jewish territorialism . The fact that Jewish settlement in Birobidjan coincided with the intensification of anti-Jewish repressions in Nazi Germany also contributed to support of the idea by Jews outside the Soviet Union. Almost all sectors of the Zionist movement opposed it.

For a time in the 1930s and to a limited extent in the 60s, the Soviets promoted the Jewish character of Birobidjan according to an artificial formula that included only Yiddish culture with no Hebrew and no religious aspects.

Jews served in key positions of the region. Y. Levin, formerly active in the party apparatus in Belorussia and in the secretariat of Ozet, was appointed as first party secretary of the Birobidjan district in 1930. After the establishment of the J.A.O. in 1934, another Jew, M. Khavkin, was appointed first secretary of the regional party committee. Joseph Liberberg, head of the Jewish section of the Ukrainian Academy of Sciences, was appointed at the same time chairman of the regional executive committee. He was one of those intellectuals, who, by settling in Birobidjan, inspired others in their pioneering efforts. A number of resolutions were passed regarding the use of Yiddish as the official language of the region, along with Russian. Schools were established with Yiddish as the language of instruction, and experiments were made to teach Yiddish even in non-Jewish schools. Street signs, rail station signs, and postmarks appeared in both Russian and Yiddish. A Yiddish newspaper and periodicals were published. In 1934 a Jewish state theater was established. A regional library, named after Shalom Aleichem, containing a sizable collection of Judaica and Yiddish works, was founded in the city of Birobidjan. The mid-1930s was a period of great expectations for Birobidjan's development as a center of Jewish settlement and culture in the Soviet Union. However, the purges of 1936–38 delivered a severe blow to the developing and rather weak framework of the nascent Jewish statehood in the JAO.

Leading Jewish personalities of the district, such as Liberberg, were denounced as nationalists and Trotskyites, demoted from their posts, and liquidated. The purges particularly affected the immigrants from abroad. As a result, the late 1930s witnessed a shattering setback in the development of the region. Despite the optimistic plans for continuous settlement of Jews in Birobidjan, their number was only 13,291 in 1939 (18.57% of the total population), with 10,415 (35.13% of the total) in the capital city. The Soviet annexation of the Baltic states and parts of eastern Poland and Bukovina in 1939–40 resulted in a sudden increase in the Jewish population of the U.S.S.R. During that period plans were initiated to transfer Jewish settlers from the annexed territories to Birobidjan. However, the outbreak of the Soviet-German war in 1941 put a fast end to these plans. Although the war years did not witness any sizable increase in the Jewish population of the region, the very idea of Birobidjan as a center for Jewish statehood in the Soviet Union received new meaning.

The Holocaust and growth of antisemitism in the U.S.S.R. during the war resulted in revived interest in the JAO among Soviet Jews. The growth of national feelings and the difficulties faced by Soviet Jews who had fled to the East, upon their return to their prewar homes in the western parts of the U.S.S.R., caused some to turn to Birobidjan. Moreover, since the hopes for a planned settlement of Jews in the Crimea did not materialize, Birobidjan remained the only alternative for a compact Jewish settlement. Numerous requests for immigration to Birobidjan were received by the JAO authorities in the postwar years, and a flow of new Jewish settlers reached the region between 1946 and 1948. Articles in the Eynikayt, organ of the Jewish anti-Fascist Committee, emphasized the idea of Jewish statehood in Birobidjan. The Soviet Jewish writer Der Nister, who accompanied a trainload of new settlers, wrote: "There are some travelers whose intentions are only materialistic, and there are others whose intentions are different, of a national character … and there are also burning enthusiasts, ready to give up everything in order to live there … and among them a former Palestinian patriot…. Although in his fifties, he hustles about during the day and is sleepless at night, hoping to see his new enterprise come true…." The brief postwar migration to Birobidjan increased the local Jewish population by one-third, and by the end of 1948 it was estimated at about 30,000, the largest ever in the district.

During this period there was an increase in the number of Jews in the local administration and an intensification of Jewish cultural activities. Among local Jewish writers active in the Soviet Writers' Association of the JAO were Buzi Miler,Israel Emiot, Hayyim Maltinski, Aaron Vergelis , and others. Assistance from Jews abroad was permitted once again.

The revival of Birobidjan was ended toward the end of 1948, as a result of Soviet policy to suppress Jewish activities throughout the U.S.S.R., and purge those involved. Der Nister and his friends were soon disillusioned. He left Birobidjan after a short stay and died in a prison camp in 1950. (Levin, Nora, The Jews in the Soviet Union Since 1917: The Paradox of Survival, part I, NYU press, 1988, p 213).

Most of the local Jewish writers were imprisoned, the Birobidjan Jewish theater was closed, teaching of Yiddish in local schools was discontinued, and a great number of Yiddish books were removed from the Shalom Aleichem Library. Jewish immigration to Birobidjan ceased, and its Jewish population shrank considerably.

The post-Stalin period did not bring any substantial improvements in Jewish life in Birobidjan. Jewish inhabitants comprised less than one-tenth of the general population of the region in 1959, party and administrative positions were not held by Jews, and Jewish agriculture was almost nonexistent. In 1970 there were about 11,450 Jews.

The sole expression of Jewish cultural activity in 1970 was a two-page Yiddish newspaper, Der Birobidjaner Shtern, nearly devoid of all Jewish content, which appeared three times a week and had a circulation of 1,000. There were also a few street signs in Yiddish, and Shalom Aleichem Street remained one of the thoroughfares of the capital. There was one synagogue. All official and public business was conducted exclusively in Russian. Nikita Sergeyevich Khrushchev, Soviet Prime Minister and First Secretary of the Communist Party of the USSR, stated in an interview for the French newspaper, Le Figaro, on April 9, 1958, that "it must be admitted that if we strike a balance we would have to state that the Jewish settlement in Birobidjan was a failure." He blamed this on the Soviet Jews, who, according to Khrushchev, never liked collective work and group discipline. Some attempts at reviving Birobidjan, at least for international propaganda purposes, were made in the 60s.

There was no reason for Birobidjan to succeed. It was far from centers of Jewish settlement. It was undeveloped, and no funds were forthcoming for development. The difficult physical conditions are attested to by the fact that many settlers, though initially enthusiastic, soon left.

The idea of a Jewish autonomous region made sense as long as it seemed that the regime would be friendly to Jews and the revolution was in part run by Jews. By the end of the 1930s, and if not then, then by 1950, it must've been apparent even to the most enthusiastic Jewish communists, that having a Jewish identity was a liability. Those wishing to be communists and assimilate had no need to single themselves out as Jews and no desire to do so. The examples of Itzik Pfeffer and other unfortunates murdered by Stalin demonstrated that this identity was a distinct liability. Those interested in maintaining a real Jewish identity could not find any satisfaction in the artificial Yiddish culture that had been sanitized of Hebrew and of historic references to Judaism and Jewish content. Yiddish culture, born in the ghettos and urbanized areas of Central and Eastern Europe, was out of place on the Amur river.

Following the fall of the Soviet Union, the Russian government pursued a generally benign policy toward the Jewish inhabitants of Birobidjan, and attempts were made to promote the Jewish identity of the area.


In the 1990s most remaining Jews immigrated to Israel and the West, leaving a population of about 4,000 in Birobidjan. While the Russian government is supportive of Jewish cultural development, the revival seems to be confined to Yiddish culture and religious observances. A Chabad rabbi imported from Israel ministers to religious needs.

References:

"Birobidjan," Encyclopedia Judaica, Vol 4. Keter Publishing, 1973.

Levin, Nora, The Jews in the Soviet Union Since 1917: The Paradox of Survival, part I, NYU press, 1988.

Mendes-Flohr Paul R. and Jehuda Reinharz, The Jew in the modern world: a documentary history, Oxford Univ Press 1995,

Olidort, S, Jewish Revival in Birobidjan Chabad Newsletter, December 6, 2002.

And here is an interesting excerpt from another article (_http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/vjw/Crimea.html)

Crimea as a Potential Jewish Homeland
The Crimean peninsula was, for decades, a potential Jewish homeland. After Catherine the Great conquered Crimea from the Ottomons in 1783, she encouraged Jewish settlement to the region. In the following century, tens of thousands of predominantly young Jews moved to this part of "New Russia." By the late 1800s, Crimea had become a thriving training center for future Zionist pioneers who used the land to test agricultural techniques before they relocated to Palestine. In fact, Joseph Trumpeldor once trained potential migrants in the Crimea. The Soviet Politburo was even behind the idea and accepted a proposal to establish a Jewish Autonomous Region in the Crimea in 1923, though it later reversed the decision. Even so, from 1924 until 1938, the Joint Distribution Committee - through the American Jewish Joint Agricultural Corporation and its American Jewish financiers - supported Jewish agricultural settlements in Soviet Crimea.

The 1941 Nazi invasion of the USSR seemingly squashed the Zionist possibility in the Crimea, and most Jewish colonists fled east to avoid the war's front; and some even traveled as far as Kazakhstan or Uzbekistan. These Jewish migrants reestablished their collective farms in new areas, though, and helped the Red Army fight Hitler's Nazis. After the Red Army's routing the Germans out of the Crimea in 1944, tens of thousands of Jews returned to the peninsula from the east and resettled in their abandoned communities. Somolon Mikhoels and Itsik Fefer, Yiddish actor and poet, respectively - whom Stalin had earlier appointed to represent the Soviet Jewish Antifascist Committee - met with Soviet Foreign Minister Vyacheslav Molotov to discuss the prospect of establishing a Jewish homeland in the Crimea. (The Stalin-appointed Molotov had signed the nonagression pact six years earlier that enabled Germany to invade Poland.) Mikhoels and Fefer left their meeting thinking Molotov would support their plan and send Stalin a memo about the proposal.

Instead, Stalin used the Crimean proposal to attack Soviet Jewry. After the 1947 UN vote to establish the State of Israel, Stalin grew suspicious yet again of Jewish national aspirations, because the UN vote rendered the Crimea proposal moot. On January 12, 1948, Stalin started his vicious anti-Jewish campaign by murdering Mikhoels, and in the next year or so, he arrested and or exiled members of the Jewish Antifascist Committee. He secretly tried fifteen other Jewish people for allegedly conspiring with the U.S. to establish a Jewish republic in Crimea. After the War, in 1952, thirteen of the defendants, including Fefer and other Yiddish thinkers, writers and actors were executed in Moscow on the infamous Night of the Murdered Poets. In 1954, the Kremlin transferred the Crimea to the Ukranian Soviet Socialist Republic, officially extinguishing the flicker of its hope as a Jewish homeland

Is it possible that there are still some parallel zionistic movements who promoting the idea of Crimea (and not Israel) becoming a Jewish State since it is the place where the most of the Ashkenazy Jews really came from?
 
The savage reality of life in 'Novorossiya', as reported by a young volunteer militant from Moscow:

_http://euromaidanpress.com/2014/12/07/22-days-inside-the-donetsk-republic-as-told-by-a-volunteer-militant-from-russia/

"Although the breakup with the Ukrainian past is obvious: Donetsk seems to be moving back in time, gaining speed, back to the 90’s and then to the USSR leaving independent Ukraine behind."
 
Be said:
The savage reality of life in 'Novorossiya', as reported by a young volunteer militant from Moscow:

_http://euromaidanpress.com/2014/12/07/22-days-inside-the-donetsk-republic-as-told-by-a-volunteer-militant-from-russia/

"Although the breakup with the Ukrainian past is obvious: Donetsk seems to be moving back in time, gaining speed, back to the 90’s and then to the USSR leaving independent Ukraine behind."

And where do you see the rest of 'demokratic Ukraine' right now? Like in Germany in 1933?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom