Coronavirus Pandemic: Apocalypse Now! Or exaggerated scare story?

Laura Ingraham - Interview with Sucharit Bhakdi, M.D. on FOX

On Wednesday, The Ingraham Angle on the Fox News channel broadcast a mind-boggling live interview with a world-renowned microbiologist who said the “looming” COVID-19 vaccine is “downright dangerous” and will send you “to your doom.”

Laura Ingraham, Fox News channel host:

"On the social distancing and the mask, just to focus on that for a moment, which of those two in your research and your work has been the most displaced"?

Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi: "Both".

Ingram: "Both. Not backed up by the science".

Bhakdi: "Zero science".
Click to expand...

Read on at 'Humans Are Free'
 
An article from Dec. 2, CNN reports:

Vaccines will come with a card, health officials say.

The article goes on to explain that the DoD is involved with the kitting of covid vaccines for the US population. The cards are “the easiest way to keep track of them,” and will be used to remind vaccine recipients of when and where to get their boosters.

Maybe I’m jumping the gun, but this feels like a soft introduction to what other countries around the world are implementing with health passes.

The US always necessitates a coded message.

www.cnn.com

Vaccination cards will be issued to everyone getting Covid-19 vaccine, health officials say | CNN

The cards will be sent out as part of vaccination kits from Operation Warp Speed, according to a photo caption accompanying the image.
www.cnn.com www.cnn.com
 
I know that there can be no comparison, however working in Africa and South America for the past 20 years, I had to do a series of vaccines (7 or nine, I lost count), refresh them a couple of times and carry a vaccination card, otherwise I would have not been allowed in the various countries, much like it is required do for house pets or horses. What can I say? Vaccines are vaccines. Many are risky, like the yellow fever one, and most of them come with warnings of side effects, moreover when you have to do them in one go (3 in one arm and 4 in the other. LOL! Travel clinincs are not very gentle and they don't come cheap either. ) Touch wood I'm still standing, my husband as well and I would probably do the 'cocktail' again if need be. What I want to say is that one should consider all consequences and proceed accordingly, however proceed, nevertheless.
 
Ursus Minor said:
Laura Ingraham - Interview with Sucharit Bhakdi, M.D. on FOX

On Wednesday, The Ingraham Angle on the Fox News channel broadcast a mind-boggling live interview with a world-renowned microbiologist who said the “looming” COVID-19 vaccine is “downright dangerous” and will send you “to your doom.”
Click to expand...

A fine 1 hour talk with Prof Sucharit Bhakdi by Francis Foster & Konstantin Kisin

"Not only the lockdown is nonsense - everything is nonsense!"
Click to expand...

 
5 Bay Area Counties Implement Strict New Stay-at-Home Orders Ahead of Schedule
Public health officials from five Bay Area counties are moving faster than the state requires to impose stay-at-home orders that they hope will contain the surging coronavirus.

The counties of San Francisco, Santa Clara, Alameda, Contra Costa and Marin, plus the city of Berkeley, have issued a new health order that will shut many indoor businesses, require others to reduce capacity to 20%, and close indoor and outdoor dining except for takeout and delivery. The orders in all the counties except Alameda and Marin take effect Dec. 6. Alameda's order goes into effect on Dec. 7, and Marin's on Dec. 8.

The restrictions will remain in force until Jan. 4, 2021.

Bars, museums and personal care services such as nail and hair salons are among the businesses that will have to suspend services altogether. Also required to shut down are movie theaters, playgrounds and museums. Hotels and lodging will operate only for critical infrastructure support. Religious services will only be permitted outdoors.

In addition, the order prohibits gatherings between people from different households. Read more.
Click to expand...

https://twitter.com/x/status/1334560877564088322

ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
www.zerohedge.com www.zerohedge.com
https://twitter.com/x/status/1335007535070253057

www.snow-forecast.com

Snow-Forecast’s Rolling News on Ski Resorts Re-Opening (2023)

Last Updated 7 February 2023 at 6.20 GMT (Updates so far since commenced on 12 May 2020: 1,529) The web’s most comprehensive guide of ski resorts opening around the world during the pandemic. An estimated 5000 Ski Areas Are Currently Open Worldwide in 65 Countries on 3
www.snow-forecast.com www.snow-forecast.com
 
Ina said:
I know that there can be no comparison, however working in Africa and South America for the past 20 years, I had to do a series of vaccines (7 or nine, I lost count), refresh them a couple of times and carry a vaccination card, otherwise I would have not been allowed in the various countries, much like it is required do for house pets or horses. What can I say? Vaccines are vaccines. Many are risky, like the yellow fever one, and most of them come with warnings of side effects, moreover when you have to do them in one go (3 in one arm and 4 in the other. LOL! Travel clinincs are not very gentle and they don't come cheap either. ) Touch wood I'm still standing, my husband as well and I would probably do the 'cocktail' again if need be. What I want to say is that one should consider all consequences and proceed accordingly, however proceed, nevertheless.
Click to expand...
Were these vaccines compulsory or voluntary? How many years have been studied? How many people have been vaccinated without any side effects? And now a 3-month trial vaccine, a new type, never tested long term.
 
Ina said:
I know that there can be no comparison, however working in Africa and South America for the past 20 years, I had to do a series of vaccines (7 or nine, I lost count), refresh them a couple of times and carry a vaccination card, otherwise I would have not been allowed in the various countries, much like it is required do for house pets or horses. What can I say? Vaccines are vaccines. Many are risky, like the yellow fever one, and most of them come with warnings of side effects, moreover when you have to do them in one go (3 in one arm and 4 in the other. LOL! Travel clinincs are not very gentle and they don't come cheap either. ) Touch wood I'm still standing, my husband as well and I would probably do the 'cocktail' again if need be. What I want to say is that one should consider all consequences and proceed accordingly, however proceed, nevertheless.
Click to expand...
Did you get a text message from Bill Gates? In Poland, exactly the same arguments have appeared recently. An amazing coincidence.
 
Professor Sir John Bell interviewed by Jon Snow of Channel 4 News (UK). Mr Snow looked completely shocked!


Oxford – Designer of Covid Vaccine Admits – “Vaccine Will Only Sterilize 70 Per Cent of The Population”​


healthandmoneynews.wordpress.com

Oxford – Designer of Covid Vaccine Admits – “Vaccine Will Only Sterilize 70 Per Cent of The Population”

Note…. Oxford is where one of the vaccine originates! would like to draw your attention to the fact that Professor Sir John Bell, professor of medicine at Oxford …
healthandmoneynews.wordpress.com healthandmoneynews.wordpress.com

Would like to draw your attention to the fact that Professor Sir John Bell, professor of medicine at Oxford University, and a part of the GAVI team – Sir John is a member of SAGE (Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies) and sits on the government’s vaccine task force that has negotiated the purchase of a handful of proposed vaccines to combat coronavirus – developing AstraZeneca’s coronavirus vaccine, said in an interview with Jon Snow that :

“These vaccines are unlikely to completely sterilize a population. They are very likely to have an effect which works in a %, say 60 or 70%.”

Believe him, someone who has these levels of credentials doesn’t misspeak without correcting himself.




Will they blame infertility on Covid19?

Look at these links on Google :
1. https://www.nationalheraldindia.com/h…
2. https://www.thailandmedical.news/news…
3. https://www.forbes.com/sites/victoria…
4. https://www.urotoday.com/recent-abstr…
5. https://journals.physiology.org/doi/f…
6. https://www.bionews.org.uk
 

Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon request a stop of all corona vaccination studies and call for co-signing the petition​


healthandmoneynews.wordpress.com

Head of Pfizer Research: Covid Vaccine is Female Sterilization

The vaccine contains a spike protein (see image) called syncytin-1, vital for the formation of human placenta in women. If the vaccine works so that we form an immune response AGAINST the spike p…
healthandmoneynews.wordpress.com healthandmoneynews.wordpress.com


1607162151141.png



On December 1, 2020, the ex-Pfizer head of respiratory research Dr. Michael Yeadon and the lung specialist and former head of the public health department Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg filed an application with the EMA, the European Medicine Agency responsible for EU-wide drug approval, for the immediate suspension of all SARS CoV 2 vaccine studies, in particular the BioNtech/Pfizer study on BNT162b (EudraCT number 2020-002641-42).

Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon demand that the studies – for the protection of the life and health of the volunteers – should not be continued until a study design is available that is suitable to address the significant safety concerns expressed by an increasing number of renowned scientists against the vaccine and the study design.

On the one hand, the petitioners demand that, due to the known lack of accuracy of the PCR test in a serious study, a so-called Sanger sequencing must be used. This is the only way to make reliable statements on the effectiveness of a vaccine against Covid-19. On the basis of the many different PCR tests of highly varying quality, neither the risk of disease nor a possible vaccine benefit can be determined with the necessary certainty, which is why testing the vaccine on humans is unethical per se.
Furthermore, they demand that it must be excluded, e.g. by means of animal experiments, that risks already known from previous studies, which partly originate from the nature of the corona viruses, can be realized. The concerns are directed in particular to the following points:
  • The formation of so-called “non-neutralizing antibodies” can lead to an exaggerated immune reaction, especially when the test person is confronted with the real, “wild” virus after vaccination. This so-called antibody-dependent amplification, ADE, has long been known from experiments with corona vaccines in cats, for example. In the course of these studies all cats that initially tolerated the vaccination well died after catching the wild virus.
  • The vaccinations are expected to produce antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2. However, spike proteins also contain syncytin-homologous proteins, which are essential for the formation of the placenta in mammals such as humans. It must be absolutely ruled out that a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 could trigger an immune reaction against syncytin-1, as otherwise infertility of indefinite duration could result in vaccinated women.
  • The mRNA vaccines from BioNTech/Pfizer contain polyethylene glycol (PEG). 70% of people develop antibodies against this substance – this means that many people can develop allergic, potentially fatal reactions to the vaccination.
  • The much too short duration of the study does not allow a realistic estimation of the late effects. As in the narcolepsy cases after the swine flu vaccination, millions of healthy people would be exposed to an unacceptable risk if an emergency approval were to be granted and the possibility of observing the late effects of the vaccination were to follow. Nevertheless, BioNTech/Pfizer apparently submitted an application for emergency approval on December 1, 2020.


The vaccine contains a spike protein (see image) called syncytin-1, vital for the formation of human placenta in women. If the vaccine works so that we form an immune response AGAINST the spike protein, we are also training the female body to attack syncytin-1, which could lead to infertility in women of an unspecified duration.

spikeproteinclose.jpg



Syncytin-1 is also present in sperm, so it's not only women that will be sterilised but men also.

(PDF) Syncytin-1 and its receptor is present in human gametes


CALL FOR HELP: Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon ask as many EU citizens as possible to co-sign their petition by sending the e-mail prepared here to the EMA.
 
I'd like to share some thoughts

  • Just like the recent American elections where it's obvious there was mass fraud, I think we're at the point now where it's obvious the covid vaccines have something in them that's being hidden.
  • I think the population is suffering from the effects of shock doctrine and a huge dose of normalcy bias. People think that things will be okay, eventually.
  • I believe people are using "bad outcomes" from other mass vaccination campaigns as anchors to conceptualise the worst outcome scenario for the covid vaccine.
  • Following from the above, with the anchoring effect, we think that the worst outcome is a few people become disabled following vaccination, eventually this seeps into the mainstream and the government's pull back on the vaccination drive, followed by a witch hunt before things go back to normal. The majority of those vaccinated should be able to walk away scot free as @Ina implied by sharing her experiences.
  • I don't think we're returning to the "old normal" anytime soon... Something has happened that we aren't being told about and whatever it is, or the anticipation of said thing is the justification for what we're seeing from the major governments.

Lastly, I think the vaccination campaign will work. The pandemic is over, it's only kept alive by propaganda.

When they vaccinate, they'll dial back the propaganda, change how they test for Covid (ditch PCR or reduce number of cycles), re-define what a covid case is and voila, the pandemic will be over. They will congratulate themselves and the vaccines thereafter.

I think the aim is to get whatever is in the vaccine into as many people as possible in as short a space of time as possible. They had to create a fake pandemic (either PTB or 4D STS) as justification to achieve this goal. Reasons are unclear as of yet, but it's clear we're being led like sheep...
 
Lucius Lu said:
Were these vaccines compulsory or voluntary? How many years have been studied? How many people have been vaccinated without any side effects? And now a 3-month trial vaccine, a new type, never tested long term.
Click to expand...
Voluntary because I took the job(s) and compulsory because of location(s). I don’t know how for how many years the vaccines I took were studied. How many people have been vaccinated without side effects? I have no idea. I don’t know if anyone has.

Regarding the Covid vaccines, what I know is that in general it takes between 10 to 15 years to develop and test a vaccine. Has anything dramatcally changed in the last year? I think not. However since the corona viruses were known from the late 80s, a vaccine could have been in development for the past at least 10 years if not more. So, my mind, there are two plausible scenarios.
1. All current vaccines are only a year or so old (we are told) and as such they might not be vaccines in the classical sense but some type of biotechnology that will further on act like a clear marker for an initial pool of candidates in ‘personalised tratment and medication’. And the bigger pool of people the better for the ones that want to introduce the novel type of medicine.
2. A vaccine or antidote rather was already developed when the novel Corona Virus was somehow introduced.
Hard to know what’s what, both seem plausible, and only time will tell. The other day I was talking to my husband about the vaccines and we got to the conclusion that if we need to travel and the destination would require a vaccine, we’ll probably do the vaccine. But that is us and I don’t try to sell vaccines to anyone. I hope that moment will arrive later than sooner.
 
Ocean said:
Professor Sir John Bell interviewed by Jon Snow of Channel 4 News (UK). Mr Snow looked completely shocked!


Oxford – Designer of Covid Vaccine Admits – “Vaccine Will Only Sterilize 70 Per Cent of The Population”​

Click to expand...

I'm pretty sure this guy means "sterilizing immunity" (see here for a definition), i.e. that the vaccine is supposed to make sure the vaccinated person cannot infect anyone.

This kind of hyperbole isn't helpful and is easily (and in this case justifiably) labelled fake news. Yes, as Yeadon and Wodarg pointed out, there IS a RISK of the vaccine leading to infertility in SOME women, but we don't know if this will actually happen or in how many cases, or whether it will temporary infertility or whatever. That is one of the reasons why it is extremely unethical to try such a thing out even on large test groups, much less the entire population! But this is still far away from claiming that the vaccine will "make 60% of the population infertile". Frankly, I don't think any such thing will happen, even IF that's the plan of some eugenicist crazies. These people are so, so incompetent and immersed in wishful thinking. But let's wait and see.
 
luc said:
I'm pretty sure this guy means "sterilizing immunity" (see here for a definition), i.e. that the vaccine is supposed to make sure the vaccinated person cannot infect anyone.

This kind of hyperbole isn't helpful and is easily (and in this case justifiably) labelled fake news. Yes, as Yeadon and Wodarg pointed out, there IS a RISK of the vaccine leading to infertility in SOME women, but we don't know if this will actually happen or in how many cases, or whether it will temporary infertility or whatever. That is one of the reasons why it is extremely unethical to try such a thing out even on large test groups, much less the entire population! But this is still far away from claiming that the vaccine will "make 60% of the population infertile". Frankly, I don't think any such thing will happen, even IF that's the plan of some eugenicist crazies. These people are so, so incompetent and immersed in wishful thinking. But let's wait and see.
Click to expand...

If this is what he meant, then it's false

make sure the vaccinated person cannot infect anyone.
Click to expand...

www.bitchute.com

HOW EFFECTIVE IS THE COVID-19 VACCINE?

HOW EFFECTIVE IS THE COVID-19 VACCINE? New details from the #Covid19 trials have revealed troubling details in the clinical trial design. This new revelation calls into question the real efficacy of the Covid vaccine. #Covid19Vaccine #Pfizer #Moderna #VaccineTrials
www.bitchute.com www.bitchute.com

metro.co.uk

Dr Hilary warns vaccine ‘won’t stop coronavirus infections’

He also said Christmas ‘can’t be the exception’.
metro.co.uk metro.co.uk

The aim of the vaccine is to supposedly stop the mild expression of the disease in the form of mild symptoms (e.g. fever or headaches) not to stop infections, hospitalisations from severe symptoms (e.g. viral pnemonia) or death.

The Oxford professor knows this, so either he's lying or he meant something else 🤷
 
Last edited:

I wondered how long it was going to be before the Carrot of Money was dangled. ​

1607190117378.png

Would you be willing to get a Covid vaccine in exchange for a $1,500 stimulus check? How one bold proposal would work​

PUBLISHED THU, DEC 3 20202:17 PM ESTUPDATED FRI, DEC 4 20205:09 PM EST

  • Americans are eager for more one-time stimulus checks, while the U.S. government is working to get Covid-19 vaccinations to the American public.
  • Now, one proposal from former congressman John Delaney aims to help both sides by providing stimulus checks in exchange for getting vaccinated.
  • The goal: to reach a 75% vaccination rate faster, which could save both lives and the U.S. economy.
Millions of Americans are still hoping for a second round of stimulus checks to help them cope with the financial fallout of the Covid-19 pandemic.
Meanwhile, the U.S. government is preparing to distribute vaccinations to the American public in order to put an end to the public health crisis.

Now, one proposal aims to help both efforts by giving people $1,500 stimulus checks in exchange for getting immunized.
The idea comes from entrepreneur John Delaney, a former Democratic congressman for Maryland who also ran for president in 2020.
“The faster we get 75 percent of this country vaccinated, the faster we end Covid and the sooner everything returns to normal,” Delaney said in an interview with CNBC.com.
[...]
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom