Coronavirus Pandemic: Apocalypse Now! Or exaggerated scare story?

[Michael B-C]

Trump knows more about this virus that the entire MSM, apparently.

Sorry, but this has been bugging me for a long time.

For some reason, when someone is pcr tested at more than 35 amplification cycles and dead RNA of the SARS-CoV-2 virus (or RNA from any similar virus) is found, that is consistently reported as the person testing "positive for Covid-19".

But 'covid-19' refers specifically to 'coronavirus disease' a respiratory disease with sometimes severe immune response symptoms (almost invariably in the elderly with serious health problems and therefore compromised immune systems) that is caused by largely unrestrained reproduction of the SAR-CoV-2 virus.

A pcr test does not test for the symptoms of unrestrained reproduction of the SAR-CoV-2 virus (e.g. a fever or difficulty breathing). The 'tests' for that are a thermometer, self-reporting by the patient or clinical observation.

In short, no one has, or ever can, "test positive for Covid-19".

Of course, the media reports all positive tests in precisely this way, or calls them "cases" (i.e "cases of covid-19) because it's great for ramping up the fear factor.

View attachment 40584View attachment 40585

Joe one simple observation on this whole issue is that you have identified the key tool in the perpetual blindsiding. The old 'hidden in blind plain sight'. You being technically smart used logic and accurate scientific language - let me try the layman's version; put simply:

SAR-CoV-2 is the correct term used to describe the actual virus - which people may have quite safely in their body in that they are not sick with it.

COVID 19 is the correct term for the symptoms if and when the virus becomes infectious/the carrier becomes infected i.e. becomes symptomatic.

Thus you can 'have' SAR-CoV-2 but not have any signs of COVID 19!

This simple difference is repeatedly used to bemuse and confuse - in that they are used either interchangeably or as with the now icurrent lie - the vaccine being 95% effective against COVID 19 = its claiming only 95% effectiveness to reduce the symptoms not to combat the actual virus. But I guarantee you 95% of people think it kills the virus/or makes you immune. It does not. It makes you an asymptomatic potential carrier that's all. If it doesn't kill you that is!

I've watched these variants used repeatedly and how it suits perfectly to obfuscate and deceive. I wonder how many folks even here have missed this most basic issue around this subject (no criticism intended).

 

[SOTTREADER]

Joe one simple observation on this whole issue is that you have identified the key tool in the perpetual blindsiding. The old 'hidden in blind plain sight'. You being technically smart used logic and accurate scientific language - let me try the layman's version; put simply:

SAR-CoV-2 is the correct term used to describe the actual virus - which people may have quite safely in their body in that they are not sick with it.

COVID 19 is the correct term for the symptoms if and when the virus becomes infectious/the carrier becomes infected i.e. becomes symptomatic.

Thus you can 'have' SAR-CoV-2 but not have any signs of COVID 19!

This simple difference is repeatedly used to bemuse and confuse - in that they are used either interchangeably or as with the now icurrent lie - the vaccine being 95% effective against COVID 19 = its claiming only 95% effectiveness to reduce the symptoms not to combat the actual virus. But I guarantee you 95% of people think it kills the virus/or makes you immune. It does not. It makes you an asymptomatic potential carrier that's all. If it doesn't kill you that is!

I've watched these variants used repeatedly and how it suits perfectly to obfuscate and deceive. I wonder how many folks even here have missed this most basic issue around this subject (no criticism intended).

Del Big tree touches upon what you've just said in the first few minutes of this segment.

Covid-19 is the symptoms, Sar-Cov-2 is the infection.

HOW EFFECTIVE IS THE COVID-19 VACCINE?

HOW EFFECTIVE IS THE COVID-19 VACCINE? New details from the #Covid19 trials have revealed troubling details in the clinical trial design. This new revelation calls into question the real efficacy of the Covid vaccine. #Covid19Vaccine #Pfizer #Moderna #VaccineTrials

www.bitchute.com

 

[Michael B-C]

This is worth a watch just to see how the other side talks to itself about the impending impact of the vaccine (all thoroughly efficient and without any concern or moral ownership... its all just data).

The FDA safety surveillance systems department briefing the CDC on vaccine roll out and the monitoring of AE's (I assume 'Adverse Effects'). Best bit is at 43mins 22 seconds when they list no less than 21 preliminary AE's - ranging from such casual things as death, stroke, adverse pregnancy effects, seizures, narcolepsy... but nothing to be worried about here (and by the way those in blue like these listed above are of 'special interest' in terms of monitoring. Narcolepsy? Makes one think that all those Zombie films were really about the post-vaccinated all along....

 

[Michael B-C]

If this is what he meant, then it's false

HOW EFFECTIVE IS THE COVID-19 VACCINE?

HOW EFFECTIVE IS THE COVID-19 VACCINE? New details from the #Covid19 trials have revealed troubling details in the clinical trial design. This new revelation calls into question the real efficacy of the Covid vaccine. #Covid19Vaccine #Pfizer #Moderna #VaccineTrials

www.bitchute.com

Dr Hilary warns vaccine ‘won’t stop coronavirus infections’

He also said Christmas ‘can’t be the exception’.

metro.co.uk

The aim of the vaccine is to supposedly stop the mild expression of the disease in the form of mild symptoms (e.g. fever or headaches) not to stop infections, hospitalisations from severe symptoms (e.g. viral pnemonia) or death.

The Oxford professor knows this, so either he's lying or he meant something else

I'm with Luc on this one SOTTREADER and had deduced as much when I watched the video prior to looking at this thread and comments here. When Prof. Bell uses the words 'these vaccines are unlikely to completely sterilize a population' yes, it is tempting to take him on face value but the context was clear to me - he means sterilize the virus from the population and not sterilize male or female capacity to reproduce (a subject never previously raised by him or the interviewer). I now see this interpretation is doing the rounds on the alternative media but as with the situation in the US elections and the more extreme jumping to conclusions around this tweet or that leak, its really important we don't try and use easily debunked material as proof of a vast overt conspiracy. There's plenty of genuine material for us out there without resorting to wishful thinking (the bad guys just outed their plans!), which can lead one open to ridicule in the normie world where they just wont get such an interpretation of this. Yes its possible they will impact some people's fertility as the ex science officer of Pfizer is suggesting - but no, I don't see complete sterilization as a known and now leaked plan. FWIW.

 

[SOTTREADER]

I'm with Luc on this one SOTTREADER and had deduced as much when I watched the video prior to looking at this thread and comments here. When Prof. Bell uses the words 'these vaccines are unlikely to completely sterilize a population' yes, it is tempting to take him on face value but the context was clear to me - he means sterilize the virus from the population and not sterilize male or female capacity to reproduce (a subject never previously raised by him or the interviewer). I now see this interpretation is doing the rounds on the alternative media but as with the situation in the US elections and the more extreme jumping to conclusions around this tweet or that leak, its really important we don't try and use easily debunked material as proof of a vast overt conspiracy. There's plenty of genuine material for us out there without resorting to wishful thinking (the bad guys just outed their plans!), which can lead one open to ridicule in the normie world where they just wont get such an interpretation of this. Yes its possible they will impact some people's fertility as the ex science officer of Pfizer is suggesting - but no, I don't see complete sterilization as a known and now leaked plan. FWIW.

I don't think what the prof said actually matters.

What matters is that there is deep and profound doubt about the impact of this vaccine on fertility. That isn't in dispute now.

Del Bigtree interviewed Wolfgang Wodarg where this was touched upon. Very informative interview in my opinion.

HEALTH EXPERT: “STOP COVID VAX EXPERIMENTS”

HEALTH EXPERT: “STOP COVID VAX EXPERIMENTS” World renowned German epidemiologist, Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, recently submitted a petition to the European Medicines Agency requesting that all #Covid19 vaccine distribution and trials be halted until serious safety concerns are addressed, including the...

www.bitchute.com

Whatever this particular professor from Oxford meant doesn't actually matter. Different people will interpret it differently. OSIT.

Ps, no scientist can as of yet definitively claim to know impact on fertility as not enough duration has passed since the trials begun and also trial participants were put on contraceptive measures. So it's an open question regarding what the impact would be!!!

 

[Nucifera]

Del Big tree touches upon what you've just said in the first few minutes of this segment.

Covid-19 is the symptoms, Sar-Cov-2 is the infection.

HOW EFFECTIVE IS THE COVID-19 VACCINE?

HOW EFFECTIVE IS THE COVID-19 VACCINE? New details from the #Covid19 trials have revealed troubling details in the clinical trial design. This new revelation calls into question the real efficacy of the Covid vaccine. #Covid19Vaccine #Pfizer #Moderna #VaccineTrials

www.bitchute.com

As I read early on, COVID-19 is a disease. SARS-CoV-2 is the alleged virus that causes that disease. One can carry pathogens without having a disease that they cause AFAIK. An example is HIV. If one tests positive, they are described as "HIV-positive," not as having AIDS — unless and until that also is diagnosed.

 

[Joe]

Excellent graph showing that not only does mask wearing do nothing to stop people getting a pcr test at 35+ cycles that detects dead viral RNA from any kind of coronavirus, it actually dramatically increases such behavior. Who knew?!

 

[rs]

Excellent graph showing that masks do nothing to stop people getting a pcr test at 35+ cycles that finds dead viral RNA from any kind of coronavirus. Who knew?!

View attachment 40603

As usual, the issue is not the number of positive tests, but the number of deaths. The death rate is constant, with the odd characteristic that it is spikily correlated strongly with a week time frame, so who should care what the positive rate is if people are not dying? And if you take into account the fact that many of the deaths attributed to Covid are either stretching the truth or outright fake, the magnitude of the problem blows away into the mist.

 

[Joe]

Another amazing graph, this time showing that, not only does stopping people from dining indoors NOT prevent them from getting positive pcr tests that detect dead viral RNA of coronaviruses, it actually increases such strange behavior. Amazing!

 

[Meg]

I didn't see this posted already. Denis Rancourt posted a poll on Twitter called World Vaccine Polls.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1336030351160979459

Geographical statistics:

World Vaccine Polls

Official Trusted World Vaccine Polls for the Covid-19 Virus. Get the official thoughts of the World about Coronavirus.

www.worldvaccinepoll.com

 

[Nucifera]

Urgent message from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.: Avoid the Corona vaccine at all costs​

Even though the media and politicians are currently trivializing the problem and even foolishly calling for a new type of vaccine to return to normality, this vaccination is problematic in terms of health, morality and ethics, but also in terms of genetic damage which, unlike the damage caused by previous vaccines, will be irreversible and irreparable.

Dear patients, after an unprecedented mRNA vaccine, you will no longer be able to treat the symptoms of the vaccine in a complementary way.

You will have to live with the consequences because you will no longer be able to be cured simply by removing toxins from the human body, just like a person with a genetic defect like Down syndrome, Klinefelter syndrome, Turner syndrome, stopping genetic heart disease, hemophilia, cystic fibrosis, Rett syndrome, etc.), because the genetic defect is eternal!

This clearly means: if a vaccination symptom develops after an mRNA vaccination, neither I nor any other therapist will be able to help you, as the damage caused by this vaccination will be genetically irreversible.

In my opinion, these new vaccines represent a crime against humanity that has never been committed in such a significant way in history.

Why you should avoid the Corona vaccine at all costs - Strange Sounds

This is why you should avoid the corona vaccines at all costs. The new vaccines are genetic engineering

strangesounds.org

 

[Ruth]

So they don't know if it could reduce fertility? So conspiracy theorists might be right?

Plus if I'm reading it correctly, is it not saying that women of child bearing age should be excluded?

They are probably worried about the immediate reaction of the public, if they observe pregnant women having spontaneous abortions post vaccination. That would put many people off having vaccinations at all.

That being said, a researcher has pointed out that one of the proteins in the human placenta is very similar to that of the virus. So mass vaccination of women of childbearing age may very well lead to mass infertility. Once these things are injected, they can't be removed and may very well be 'passed on' to future generations, if not causing immediate reproductive problems in the first vaccinated generation.

Apparently all that was needed was the scientists to catch up with the 'conspiracy theorists'.

HEALTH EXPERT: “STOP COVID VAX EXPERIMENTS”

HEALTH EXPERT: “STOP COVID VAX EXPERIMENTS” World renowned German epidemiologist, Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, recently submitted a petition to the European Medicines Agency requesting that all #Covid19 vaccine distribution and trials be halted until serious safety concerns are addressed, including the...

www.bitchute.com

 

[Ca.]

When you worship at the altar of a corrupt state, don't be surprised when they sacrifice you.

Four current front pages of the feeding.

 

[SOTTREADER]

They used a 90yr old as the first non-trial guinea pig

90-yo woman becomes first person in UK to receive newly-approved Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine

A 90-year-old woman has become the first person in the United Kingdom to be injected with Pfizer’s coronavirus jab who was not part of a clinical trial, as the country begins a mass inoculation program against the illness.

www.rt.com

The injections have officially started in the UK.

I wonder if that woman will survive the 2nd injection in 3 weeks let alone see another whole year.

Whoever her kids are have failed their mother in the name of government.

 

[Jones]

Dr Lyons-Weiler, research scientist, author, president and CEO of The Institute of Pure and Applied Knowledge talks at a medical conference. He starts out with a rant condemning the politicisation and commercialisation of health and say's 'shame on you' to those who are holding on to the wrong opinions in the face of evidence simply because they disagree with President Trump.

"Shame on you, you're hurting people, you're hurting society, you're destroying businesses, shame on you."

He covers the history of coronavirus, the coronavirus vaccines, disease enhancement due to pathogenic priming and covers the current vaccine. He's very direct and to the point, and doesn't seem to be someone who would suffer fools gladly. Covers a lot in a short time frame.

Edited to add: he claims that 21% of those in vaccine trials had serious adverse reactions and that 51% of people will refuse the vaccine.

14mins.