The vaccine outlook in South Africa. I am reproducing the entire article below as it is a good summary of the spectrum of vaccines in question. It is representative for mainstream thinking, but it is pragmatic and comprehensive. As I mentioned elswhere, we, here, are just shy of ‘window shopping’.

The race for a Covid-19 vaccine has four candidates close to a winning jab, with some getting ready to roll out before the end of 2020. But what do the reported efficacy results mean and how much will doses cost?​


A vaccine is our most powerful tool in the fight against Covid-19 and our biggest hope for at least some normality.

But the data we have so far are not final. These results were shared in press releases, not in peer-reviewed scientific journals. Although the urgent need for a Covid-19 vaccine has necessitated the release of the data as they become available, the figures can change as they go through more checks and balances.


There are also questions that we can’t answer yet, such as how long the immunity provided by any of the four frontrunner vaccines can protect people, without monitoring them in the long term. There is also more about the studies that we will only learn once the final results have been shared in a scientific paper, including detail on what each study was measuring, such as whether a jab influenced how severe Covid-19 cases were. Once these finer points have been shared, it will be easier to assess efficacy.

Efficacy refers to how well a vaccine works in a controlled, trial setting. The effectiveness of a jab, on the other hand, is something different. That tells us how well a vaccine performs in the real world, where things like the level of training of healthcare workers who give the shots or the quality of cold-chain systems can interfere with the vaccine’s outcomes.

So, efficacy does not necessarily translate to effectiveness in real life.

It is only once a jab has been rolled out on a large scale that we would begin to see how it performs outside these ideal clinical conditions.

While countries like the United States and UK are speeding ahead with approval, this will not be South Africa’s plan of action, says Barry Schoub, chair of South Africa’s ministerial advisory committee on coronavirus vaccines. In large part it is because South Africa does not have the expendable income to buy massive amounts of multiple vaccine candidates and will instead be taking a more considered approach to selecting which jabs should be procured, he says.

“We have to think very, very carefully about what vaccine to recommend and what to go for. At this point, we still need to know a lot more about the vaccines before we think about procuring one,” cautions Schoub.

With all that in mind, what do these results mean?

We’ve broken it down to help you keep track of the vaccine frontrunners.

Pfizer/BioNTech

What were the results?

Pfizer and BioNTech were the first to announce their vaccine results. They reported95% efficacy in their mRNA-based jab, when measured from 28 days after participants received the first injection. But it would probably start to offer some protection and begin to stimulate an immune response from as early as 10 days after the first dose, says Schoub. Efficacy was slightly lower (94%) in people over the age of 65.

How many Covid-19 cases were analysed?

All studies have specific “endpoints” to measure. In this case, one of them was to see how many people in the vaccinated trial group got Covid-19 and compare that with the Covid-19 cases in the control group who received a dummy vaccine.

This analysis was done once 170 cases had been reported, representing roughly 0.4% of the people in the study. Of these, 162 infections were in people who received a placebo and eight were among those who were injected with the vaccine.

How soon will it be available?

Pfizer and BioNTech received authorisation to market and distribute their vaccine in the UK on 2 December. The temporary approval for emergency use, which comes from the country’s regulatory body, means the UK is set to begin rolling out the first of its 40-million doses on Tuesday, according to a statement from the country’s National Health Service. The UK government has said that it will initially prioritise elderly people in long-term care homes and healthcare workers, in line with recommendations its independent Joint Committee for Vaccination and Immunisation.

Pfizer and BioNTech have also applied for emergency-use authorisation with the US’s medicine regulator, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). If their application is successful, they will be allowed to market and distribute their vaccine among high-risk populations such as health workers. According to the director of the US’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Anthony Fauci, the vaccine will probably be rolled out before the end of 2020 if the application is approved. The companies have also begun seeking regulatory approval in other countries, including Australia, Canada, Europe and Japan.

What will it cost?

The US government paid $1.95-billion for the first 100 million doses of the vaccine, averaging out to roughly $20 per dose (about R305).

Schoub says that while South Africa is not looking to secure this vaccine directly from Pfizer/BioNTech, the country has submitted a non-binding confirmation of intent to participate in COVAX and will be making its first payment by 15 December 2020.
COVAX is an initiative run by the vaccine alliance GAVI, which aims to ensure equitable access to a vaccine when it is available. This agreement allows for some lower- and middle-income countries to secure doses for as little as $2, or R30. South Africa, a higher-income country, does not qualify for these rates.

What would the rollout involve?

This is a two-dose vaccine, with the second given at three weeks after the first, which poses a potential logistical challenge. South Africa’s immunisation programme, which focuses on children, would have to devise a strategy aimed at adults and create a system to ensure people return for the second dose.

Another challenge is that the vaccine needs to be kept at below freezing temperatures, or it could be damaged and become less effective. It must be stored and transported at -70C, a feat for which South Africa is ill-equipped. Although Pfizer says it has designed special shipping containers to help maintain this temperature, the shot still requires specialised freezers, which are not readily available in South African healthcare facilities. These unfeasible requirements and the high price mean the jab will probably not be South Africa’s first choice, says Schoub.

Moderna/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases

What were the results?

Moderna reported 94.1% efficacy in its mRNA-based candidate, just slightly less than Pfizer/BioNTech’s. The analysis looked at how much protection the vaccine could offer from two weeks after the second shot. Data also show the jab couldprevent people from developing more serious Covid-19 symptoms. All the participants who developed severe cases were in the placebo group. According to the company’s analysis, it does not look like age, race or gender made any difference to the vaccine’s efficacy.

How many Covid-19 cases were analysed?

The study found 94.1% efficacy based on the analysis of 196 Covid-19 cases observed among participants. This represents roughly 0.7% of those in the trial. A total of 185 cases were among those who did not receive the real vaccine and 11 were in those who did.

Of the reported cases, 30 people, all in the placebo group, had severe symptoms. One death was reported. The participant had not received the vaccine.

How soon will the shot be available?

Moderna submitted applications for emergency-use authorisation with the FDA at the end of November. It is applying for similar approvals in Europe, Canada, Switzerland, the UK, Israel and Singapore. It is also applying for emergency-use listing with the World Health Organisation. Distribution of doses in the US could begin by the end of 2020, pending approval.

What will it cost?

The US government paid $1.525-billion for the first 100 million doses of the vaccine – an average of $15 per dose (about R229). In October, the company said it was still in discussions with COVAX regarding tiered pricing for the jab.

Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel told Science the company would charge developed countries between $32 and $37 per dose (R488 and R565), but offer the vaccine at a lower cost to developing countries.

What would rolling out the vaccine involve?

This is also a two-dose regimen, with the second shot given after 29 days. This poses the same follow-up challenges as the Pfizer/BioNTech jab.

Although nowhere near the requirements of Pfizer/BioNTech’s candidate, this jab needs to be kept at -20C during transport and for long-term storage. For up to 30 days the doses can be kept between 2 degree Celsius and 8 degree Celsius, the temperature of a standard fridge. South Africa will probably not buy this vaccine owing to the transport requirements.

AstraZeneca/Oxford University

What were the results?

The preliminary data showed 62% efficacy when people received two full doses one month apart. The study was originally designed to only look at the efficacy of this regimen.

But an error – which was not initially disclosed by either party – resulted in some participants being given different dosages – a half-dose and a full dose a month later.

While they were never meant to receive the lower dose, the research team decided to continue the trial after discovering the mistake, Mene Pangalos, head of AstraZeneca’s non-oncology research and development, told Reuters.

Pangalos told the New York Times no participants were in danger and the dosing change was not disclosed because “it actually doesn’t matter whether it was done on purpose or not”.

The same article refers to a statement from AstraZeneca’s spokesperson, which had been attributed to Oxford University, that says the mistake was due to a manufacturing error and had since been fixed.

The regimen showed 90% efficacy. Combining the results of the two different doses gives an average efficacy of 70%.

One possible reason for this higher protection rate is that the group that received the half-dose was roughly a third of the size of the other and had probably been followed up for a shorter period, meaning they may not have developed any Covid-19 symptoms yet.

Another limitation on the data is that those who received the half-dose were all under 55 and less likely to develop severe Covid-19, according to Moncef Slaoui, head of Operation Warp Speed, which aims to fast-track the development of Covid vaccines in the US. Slaoui was speaking on 24 November.

The company’s CEO, Pascal Soriot, told Bloomberg News it would be pursuing an additional global study to confirm the results seen in people who first received a half-dose.

How many Covid-19 cases were analysed?

A full analysis of the data has yet to be released. The current efficacy reported is based on 131 Covid-19 cases among participants. But details on how these cases were split between the placebo group and those who got the vaccine, as well as between the two dosing regimens, have not yet been made public.
AstraZeneca’s statement also said the data from two different trials – in the UK and Brazil – were being combined in the analysis.

How soon will the shot be available?

AstraZeneca has announced it has begun seeking regulatory approval for its candidate. Although the countries to which it is submitting applications have not been disclosed, the vaccine will probably be approved by the UK or the European Union first. AstraZeneca will also apply for an emergency-use listing from the WHOand would require FDA approval to market its vaccine in the US.

What will it cost?

AstraZeneca and Oxford’s vaccine is the cheapest – a tenth of the cost of Moderna’s jab. The firm has already committed to being part of the COVAX agreement at between $2 and $3 (R30 and R45) per dose.

In June, AstraZeneca reached an agreement with GAVI and its COVAX partner, the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, to provide 300 million doses starting at the end of 2020 for $750-million, and 1 billion doses for low- and middle-income countries.

What would the rollout involve?

Like the other leading jabs, this vaccine involves two doses a month apart. This is a longer gap but presents the same logistical follow-up challenges.

Unlike its mRNA counterparts, this viral vector jab can be stored at between 2 degree Celsius and 8 degree Celsius. Given that this is the standard temperature at which most vaccines in South Africa’s childhood immunisation programme are kept, and that it does not need specialised cooling equipment, the AstraZeneca/Oxford candidate is the most accessible to developing countries so far.

As one of the trial sites, there is a higher likelihood that South Africa will be able to secure doses in recognition of its contributions to the results, but access to the shot is not necessarily guaranteed. The country’s involvement also means there will be data showing the safety and protection the jab can offer its population.

Gamaleya Centre for Epidemiology and Microbiology

What were the results?

In late November, Russia’s Sputnik V candidate, developed by the Gamaleya Centre for Epidemiology and Microbiology in Moscow, reported 91.4% efficacy in participants 28 days after the first dose. Preliminary data show the efficacy could increase to more than 95% at 42 days after participants are first injected.

The data follow scepticism from researchers in the field about the validity and significance of the numbers because of the small sample group on which they were based.

How many cases were analysed?

Although the efficacy reported is on par with its peers, the sample group here is much smaller. The analysis includes 39 confirmed Covid-19 cases among the 40,000 participants. Of these, 31 had received the placebo and eight had been vaccinated.

Another interim analysis will be released once 78 Covid-19 cases have been observed.

How soon will it be available?

The jab gained notoriety as the first registered Covid vaccine in Russia, before phase three clinical trials had concluded. This phase is usually considered the final stage before seeking regulatory approval if the vaccine turns out to be effective.

Preliminary approval documents have been submitted to Brazil’s regulatory body, along with an application for emergency use from the WHO.

The Russian Direct Investment Fund (RDIF) is looking to have doses ready forrollout by March 2021.

What will it cost?

Although the cost is still unknown, the RDIF has committed to providing doses forless than $10 each.

What would rollout involve?

The jab is given in two doses, with the second given three weeks later.

This jab relies on the same technology as the Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine. Its use of an adenovirus viral vector design makes it more stable at lower temperatures, eliminating the need for specialised storage equipment. DM/MC

This story was produced by the Bhekisisa Centre for Health Journalism.
 
Here's UK Health Sec. Matt Hancock trying really hard to appear "emotional" (and failing badly, he actually seems to be laughing) about the first man in England receiving the human gene-modifying Pfizer vaccine.

By a strange coincidence (of course) the man chosen to be the first to receive the vaccine, with media cameras rolling, is called William Shakespeare. This is the level of extreme propaganda to which people are being subjected. I mean, William Shakespeare! No wonder Hancock found it difficult to suppress a laugh!

 
Last edited:
Here's UK Health Sec. Matt Hancock trying really hard to appear "emotional" (and failing badly, he actually seems to be laughing) about the first man in England receiving the human gene-modifying Pfizer vaccine.

By a strange coincidence (of course) the man chosen to be the first to receive the vaccine, with media cameras rolling, is called William Shakespeare.

Not a joke. Yes, it clearly is a joke, but they're pretending it's not.

That is the most surreal and outlandish moment I think I have ever seen! That pathological man pretending to weep with joy at the Christmas present he's giving the world is one thing but aligning it with the name of the chosen first victim... William Shakespeare!!! Its not April 1st is it and I somehow missed the 4 months in between!? That choice is obviously not by chance to put it mildly. Its like watching an occult, black magic spell being played out in public in the most grotesquely obvious way... as someone who has spent the past 9 months digging down into the W.S. phenomenon and finding all the occult paths that were planted 400 years ago leading to our here and now, I'm just jaw on the floor at the implications of this 'joke'!

I assume someone somewhere thought what better name to get the Brits to line up and do their patriotic duty... but beyond that gratuitous piece of string pulling I detect a grimmer more perverse joke (yes you tried all those years ago to stave off this moment Mr WH but actually we've won in the end - and look how we have now used your 'name' to prove it!) How sick can you get!
 
That is the most surreal and outlandish moment I think I have ever seen! That pathological man pretending to weep with joy at the Christmas present he's giving the world is one thing but aligning it with the name of the chosen first victim... William Shakespeare!!! Its not April 1st is it and I somehow missed the 4 months in between!? That choice is obviously not by chance to put it mildly. Its like watching an occult, black magic spell being played out in public in the most grotesquely obvious way... as someone who has spent the past 9 months digging down into the W.S. phenomenon and finding all the occult paths that were planted 400 years ago leading to our here and now, I'm just jaw on the floor at the implications of this 'joke'!

I assume someone somewhere thought what better name to get the Brits to line up and do their patriotic duty... but beyond that gratuitous piece of string pulling I detect a grimmer more perverse joke (yes you tried all those years ago to stave off this moment Mr WH but actually we've won in the end - and look how we have now used your 'name' to prove it!) How sick can you get!
Poor man... He looks so fragile. Will he survived?
 
Here's UK Health Sec. Matt Hancock trying really hard to appear "emotional" (and failing badly, he actually seems to be laughing) about the first man in England receiving the human gene-modifying Pfizer vaccine.

By a strange coincidence (of course) the man chosen to be the first to receive the vaccine, with media cameras rolling, is called William Shakespeare. This is the level of extreme propaganda to which people are being subjected. I mean, William Shakespeare! No wonder Hancock found it difficult to suppress a laugh!

To be or not to be.
 
Something is making the rounds:

photo_2020-12-07_04-58-23.jpg

So the idea is to pull off a Europe-wide (!) blockade between 20-31 December, and announce it on very short notice, presumably so that the authorities can't prepare. Will be interesting to see if these people manage to pull it off.

I'm not sure what to think of that. I can understand the frustration, but I think the authorities will be merciless. This is going to be ugly. And of course it is an excellent pretext to go even further towards full-blown fascism. Then again, perhaps there are still people out there who need to see such an escalation to "wake up".
 

COVID-19: US FDA Lists 27 Expected Adverse Reactions to New Vaccines, Including Death​


1607448140139.png


The linked article explains what the above terms actually mean, although some are self-evident (e.g., death is fairly unambiguous).

It goes on to discuss squalene and its effects. [According to the New York Times at least two pharmaceutical companies, GlaxoSmithKline and Seqirus, produce COVID-19 vaccines that contain squalene as an adjuvant.]
According to an article by The Guardian from July 30, 2001 “the illness known as Gulf war syndrome looks likely to have been caused by an illegal vaccine ‘booster’ given by the [UK] Ministry of Defence to protect soldiers against biological weapons ... The common factor for the 275,000 British and US veterans who are ill appears to be a substance called squalene, allegedly used in injections to add to their potency. Such an action would have been illegal. Squalene is not licensed for use on either side of the Atlantic because of potential side effects.“
The US Department of Veteran Affairs claims that the following illnesses are known long-term side effects associated with the GWS, and thus squalene (and some of these are not even listed yet by the above FDA report):
These squalene "side effects" include:
  • Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS)
  • Fibromyalgia
  • Functional gastrointestinal disorders
  • Other undiagnosed illnesses.
 
Here's UK Health Sec. Matt Hancock trying really hard to appear "emotional" (and failing badly, he actually seems to be laughing) about the first man in England receiving the human gene-modifying Pfizer vaccine.

By a strange coincidence (of course) the man chosen to be the first to receive the vaccine, with media cameras rolling, is called William Shakespeare. This is the level of extreme propaganda to which people are being subjected. I mean, William Shakespeare! No wonder Hancock found it difficult to suppress a laugh!



Step grandfather


Here at 1.27 he explains that Derek was his step sisters step father... So that makes him his step grandfather. I'm lost 😭

I'd like to think that Boris is thinking this guy is even more psycho than he thought. What a display of fake emotions in front of the public.

Screenshot_20201208_185202.jpg
 
Ohio Lawmakers Push To Impeach Gov. DeWine Over Lockdown Orders, ‘Meddling’ In Presidential Primary

Four Ohio GOP lawmakers are leading an effort to impeach Republican Gov. Mike DeWine over his alleged “abuse of power” during the coronavirus pandemic.

State Rep. John Becker introduced 12 articles of impeachment against DeWine on Monday. Becker was joined by state Reps. Candice Keller, Nino Vitale, and Paul Zeltwanger, according to Ohio’s 19 News. Becker also accused DeWine of “meddling” in the presidential primary and harassing people with strict regulations, especially business owners.

“Governor DeWine’s mismanagement, malfeasance, misfeasance, abuse of power, and other crimes include, but are not limited to, meddling in the conduct of a presidential primary election, arbitrarily closing and placing curfews on certain businesses, while allowing other businesses to remain open,” Becker’s office said in a statement. “He weaponized the Ohio Bureau of Workers’ Compensation to bully and harass businesses and the people; to enforce a statewide mask mandate and other controversial measures of dubious ‘value,’ making Ohio a hostile work environment.”

“Additionally, Governor DeWine had the further audacity to include congregants at places of worship, forcing citizens to choose between worshiping their God and worshiping at the alter [sic] of unbridled government. Many Ohioans find the controversial mask mandate offensive, degrading, humiliating, and insulting,” the statement continued.

“Rather than hearing the cries of Ohioans, Governor DeWine continues to stifle those cries by finding more inventive ways to use masks to muffle the voices of the people,” Becker’s office said. “He continues to have callous disregard for the fact that his isolation policies have led to a shockingly high number of suicides, alarming rates of drug abuse, persistently high unemployment, and the forced abandonment of the elderly by their loved ones.”

DeWine dismissed the impeachment effort, which has been threatened before by Becker, in a news conference on Monday.

“At some point, this foolishness has got to stop,” DeWine said, according to The Washington Post. “I’m not talking about most Ohioans — just a small number of people who for whatever reason just continue to think and act this is some big joke and this is all some fantasy.”

Before the pandemic, Ohio was already recognized as a hotspot of the opioid epidemic, and evidence suggests that opioid abuse in the state has gotten worse since the outbreak of the pandemic and subsequent shutdowns that cut off or distanced people from many opioid addiction services.

“In Franklin County, Ohio, the number of deadly overdoses through August of this year nearly matched the total number of opioid deaths in all of 2019,” The Daily Wire reported in September.

Becker’s impeachment push in Ohio comes on the heels of a similar effort in Michigan as GOP lawmakers fight to impeach Democratic Gov. Gretchen Whitmer over her response to the pandemic and strict lockdown orders that have continued despite a state Supreme Court ruling restricting her use of emergency powers. As The Daily Wire reported:

A little good news to report. I went to the eye doctor yesterday. There's a sign on the door saying "masks required to enter". I kept walking, of course, without a mask. The receptionist was wearing one, but said nothing to me about not wearing one. So I sat and waited. Then I was taken back and first seen by a tech who was wearing one, but gladly took it off when I told her OK. She spoke a lot about how they hated it. The doctor came in and she, too, took her mask off. After that, another tech didn't take hers off, but did discuss how stupid it all is and also went into the vaccine question, and that she would not be taking one. She did say she had been sick with something like flu so of course, she was positive for "covid". But she recovered, as most do from a flu.

It was good to see that some of the mask wearers do see the stupidity of it all. The doctor said she thought this mask business would be over by now. I replied that I don't think it will be over until people just STOP wearing the masks. She agreed.

Here's UK Health Sec. Matt Hancock trying really hard to appear "emotional" (and failing badly, he actually seems to be laughing) about the first man in England receiving the human gene-modifying Pfizer vaccine.

By a strange coincidence (of course) the man chosen to be the first to receive the vaccine, with media cameras rolling, is called William Shakespeare. This is the level of extreme propaganda to which people are being subjected. I mean, William Shakespeare! No wonder Hancock found it difficult to suppress a laugh!

Ridiculous. They are fools. I think a lot of people see through this, more than we
think.
 
Who let the dogs out?
Woof, woof woof!

The rats can be heard singing an alternate version.

Who let the cats out?
Roar, fft fft!

I have to laugh. Our cats haven't been looking for food lately, as much as usual. Hunting must be good. As above so below!
 
Back
Top Bottom