Coronavirus Pandemic: Apocalypse Now! Or exaggerated scare story?

[Woodsman]

I watched the above clip of the Finnish MP's calm, factual speech. Then I went to share it, but YT has already censored it. Bunch of a$$hats!

This is such an on-going issue these days, that when I come across something interesting, I immediately make a copy of it for my own files so I can watch it later or make it available if it gets censored.

I use this tool:

4K Video Downloader Plus | Free Download from YouTube, TikTok, Facebook, SoundCloud

The simplest video downloader, ever! Download video and audio from YouTube and similar services on macOS, PC and Linux absolutely for free!

www.4kdownload.com

It's fast, and the free version lets you download 30 videos a day, (I might only do one or two on average, no more than a half dozen, so it's perfect for my use).

And it works on YouTube, which I've found to be extremely difficult to copy from, with the recommended 3rd party tools either not working, or failing after a short time. This one appears to be regularly updated. I think if I'm still using it in a few months, I'll buy a copy to support their efforts.

It's annoying that you even NEED a tool; you should be able to save a YouTube video from your browser, and the fact that you cannot do so easily is a testament to the clever work performed by these video hosting services to prevent something which should be a very basic operation. (Video data downloads and then plays. Where did it download to on your hard drive? Well, save a copy of that, right? No so fast, there buddy!)

The user's ability to control the data which moves through their own computer is clearly a valuable resource which must be restricted! The fact that industry even thinks this way, let alone moves to make it so difficult, is revealing. The entire Apple iPad product line was created from the ground up to make it near impossible for the user to control their own data. Even a file of a picture you might be drawing is hidden away and can only be called up by the drawing program itself, allowing some third party to control whether or not you have access to your own work. But that's another whole rant...

James Corbett has made several podcasts about the subject of "The Digital Library of Alexandria". Here's one of them...

Episode 384 – The Library of Alexandria is on Fire | The Corbett Report

www.corbettreport.com

 

[Hi_Henry]

Anybody lives in Moscow from this group and can you please tell us WTH is going on?
RT appears to be aggressively pushing the Covid Jab as it would save people, while lamenting that Russians are avoiding the jab. Why?
Moscow hospitals to deny routine treatment to patients who refuse Covid-19 vaccines, as Kremlin warns skepticism is costing lives

Moscow grapples with record rise in Covid-19 cases, new curfew extended as bosses told they can lay off employees who refuse jab

This one is written - "By Paul Robinson, a professor at the University of Ottawa. He writes about Russian and Soviet history, military history, and military ethics, and is author of the Irrussianality blog." - and RT is very ready to pick him up:

With vaccines widely available in Russia, dying of Covid-19 has become optional. So why are so many intent on making that choice?

With worrying vaccine hesitancy & recorded cases rising, Moscow mayor says city essentially battling Covid-19 ‘from scratch’

Judging from the above flurry of articles today, apparently Moscow is done in, if the Kremlin doesn't order mandatory vaccination, so everybody in the capitol will be safe..

What the heck is going on in Moscow ? Their average day temperatures are around 30's C and we are to believe that this is leading to an explosion of infections.

Here are some observations as to why, in Northern climates, flue season ends in March. This was Science BEFORE 2020.

The study tested the survival time of different viruses (i.e. the amount of time the virus remains viable and capable of causing disease) at contrasting temperatures and levels of humidity. The results from the study suggest that influenza actually survives longer at low humidity and low temperatures. At 43°F with very low humidity, most of the virus was able to survive more than 23 hours, whereas at high humidity and a temperature of 90°F, survival was diminished at even one hour into incubation (3).

link

Post-2020 Science on TV sees the flu season lasting all year everywhere.

As I was searching, I came across this interesting gem from 2013,

Abstract
Aims: To investigate norovirus (NoV) and F-specific RNA (FRNA)
bacteriophage inactivation in seawater under simulated sunlight and
temperature conditions representative of summer (235 W m2; 17°C) and
winter (56 W m2; 10°C) conditions in Ireland.
Methods and Results: Inactivation experiments were carried out using a
collimated beam of simulated sunlight and 100 ml of filtered seawater seeded
with virus under controlled temperature conditions. NoV concentrations were
determined using RT-qPCR, and FRNA bacteriophage concentrations were
determined using RT-qPCR and by plaque assay. For all virus types, the
fluence required to achieve a 90% reduction in detectable viruses (S90 value)
using RT-qPCR was not significantly different between summer and winter
conditions. S90 values for FRNA bacteriophage determined by plaque assay
were significantly less than those determined by RT-qPCR. Unlike S90 values
determined by RT-qPCR, a significant difference existed between summer and
winter S90 values for infectious FRNA bacteriophage.
Conclusions: This study demonstrated that RT-qPCR significantly overestimates
the survival of infectious virus and is therefore unsuitable for determining the
inactivation rates of viruses in seawater.

paper link

 

[lilies]

As I was searching, I came across this interesting gem from 2013,

paper link

Excellent find! A very sensible position, I agree! I'm way too slow on the uptake and needed a couple days to ponder.
I figured RT is apparently run by authoritarian bosses, who desperately wanna be saved and who can't wait to follow the government's dictates. They feel their government isn't doing enough to protect them. So they may be desperately urging their journalist colleagues to fill the news with pro-Covid-Jab propaganda thus placing pressure on the government for not fulfilling their Authoritarian wishes: "Make the jabs mandatory so we all can be saved!" (What will these authoritarians make of the winter statistics?)
Then I also remembered how faulty the PCR tests are. Your find makes the PCR-fact clear.

Unless Sputnik literally neutralizes or erases the Covid infection, like Ivermectin or Hydroxychloroquine does. I doubt that Sputnik does anything else than lessen the symptoms in a much less destructive way than the Western jabs do and graciously gifts you a Jab-pass.
We will see if the people jabbed with Sputnik will be spared of the projected fatalities of wild Covid-reinfections - "vaccine breakthroughs"[sic] - this autumn-winter.

 

[KJS]

It is starting to be really interesting in Poland:

Maltese Baths open a special cash desk only for those who are vaccinated. Thanks to this, more people will be able to enter the premises. During the heat wave, more people want to use the services of Termy Maltańskie in Poznań. Therefore, the facility authorities decided to set up a special fund for vaccinated people. The vaccinated are given the opportunity to enter each of the zones of the facility regardless of the limit already reached, i.e. 50%. maximum attendance (which means exactly 904 people). This solution is a chance for more people to be able to use the thermal attractions at the same time.

Full article here:

Termy Maltańskie otwierają specjalną kasę tylko dla zaszczepionych. Dzięki temu na teren obiektu będzie mogło wejść więcej osób

translate.google.com

 

[SOTTREADER]

 

[dredger]

Found this PDF in a french article, quickly searched on PDF name and it seems this wasn't yet posted, so here it is :

https://www.globaljustice.org.uk/sites/default/files/files/resources/pharma_covid-19_report_web.pdf

It's a 46p document which gives a summary of 7 pharma companies (Johnson & Johnson, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead, Pfizer, Moderna, Sanofi) mainly in relation with covid, a nice summary report, the number of references is impressive.

 

[XPan]

What the heck is going on in Moscow ? Their average day temperatures are around 30's C and we are to believe that this is leading to an explosion of infections.

Here are some observations as to why, in Northern climates, flue season ends in March. This was Science BEFORE 2020.

link

Post-2020 Science on TV sees the flu season lasting all year everywhere.

As I was searching, I came across this interesting gem from 2013,


paper link

A Can of Worms

Sometimes I wonder, if not the PCR technology opened up a can of worms, which (obviously) can be made into anything and everything, in light of the past (and presence).

I mean it seems a great tool, right... but is it really ? That's not quite what I see.

I wonder who far away has medical science gotten with all their genetic letters on computer screens, compared to real medical observations and investigations. What are things really ? And what is it we trust in here ? It becomes all more abstract... Can we even apply 'the findings' from genetic sequences into good medicine and science ? I see that "new technologies" often are going into the direction of becoming/being tools and toys by the Frankenstein PTB and their scientific puppets playing in theoretical wonderland (often without ever having seen a single patient in their life). Not to mention that the abstractions become so complicated, so extremely expensive... and often also unaffordable for most people to investigate / test / prove - if that, what is claimed to be, really is what they claim.

How much is a virus a virus, and how much is it just "models" and "genetic sequences made out of letters" ?

Where is all this really going ? I see a world obsessed with "science" who appears to have forgotten to connect/relate to the basics. I am not saying it is just one or the other thing... but I start to question that fantastic ultra-scientific tools really are so fantastic. Or how far genetic sequences really do mirror the (3D) reality that surrounds us, when I see how it mainly ends up being misused.

I want to see virus, bacterias and fungus. I want to see what they are doing during their whole lifetime. I want to see apples, oranges and pears. Stuff that is tangible, kind of real.

Like a guy I once heard in a podcast saying "Now that is something I can use in my kitchen".

 

[XPan]

Investigative Corona Committee Berlin
-> Session No 57 • "Under Pressure"

INTRO CONTENTS

Vivianne Fischer is talking about Dr Drosten (the guy who faked his doctor title in 2002/03, is considered to be the EU Expert on Corona Virus, and created the specific guidelines for his erroneous RT-PCR Test with 45 cycles, immediately adopted by the WHO within 23 hours of "peer review", which then would shape the whole world of what we have seen ever since. Plus he is also the creator of the infamous as well false "asymptomatic contagion" paper, which though WHO and governments lead to the excuse to lock down healthy people "to flatten the curve" - in large parts of the world, and far longer than the original 2 weeks) as we all know.

His Drosten guy, went though a hearing in Germany (but no really serious questions were asked by the politicians. The Green party didn't ask anything from what I remember from the previous meeting).

What Drosten said was first glance all quaint and dandy. However, Fischer says, they later transcripted the hearing, and analyzed it - and that is when the rabbits jump out of the box; with rather interesting details (I have to guess here, that the science wasn't so sound in what Drosten said). Vivianne Fischer doesn't go further into the details, the what and how.

Reiner Füllmich
He refers to Hal Turner Radio show; About an infectious disease specialist in New Jersey, who does not wish to be named by name, otherwise he would loose his job. This man claims that when he went through the paper (autopsy report) of a diseased after "vaccination". Clearly shaken up, he reports:

"People think that only a minority of people get adverse effects from the vaccines. Based on the new research, everyone will eventually develop adverse effect, due to the spike protein binding to the ACE2 receptors everywhere in the body... The FDA has been knowing this all along, since the beginning of the Plandemic. The mRNA that was supposed to stay at the injection site / muscle - is spread - and therefore the resulting creation of (artificial) spike protein is created everywhere in the body.

That the mRNA is found throughout the body can mean two things:
Either the "vaccine" doesn't work at all / does nothing - or - the virus is enjoying the effect of Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE); meaning the virus is spreading much faster in vaccinated people. This is a global time bomb"

*

(Here I add what Dr Stephanie Seneff has said earlier about the spike proteins: they are not your normal from nature created spike proteins easily broken down by the body. The mRNA vaccines lead to artificial, sturdy, inflexible spike proteins, which like arrows attach to the human cells via the ACE2 receptors - and stay there attached. That means the ACE2 receptors stay occupied. Also; she said that the genetic sequences in the mRNA have been manipulated in such a way which instructs the cell to make proteins are highly unnatural - in the sense of creating 1000 times more spike proteins than what nature does.

Vivianne Fischer also added, that findings from the first autopsy in Germany, on an 86 year old deceased after vaccination, confirms that the spike protein was found in all organs except in the scent nerve in the nose, and liver (? unclear).

Additionally, a new study showed that the spike protein in fact is binding to 12 different receptors in the whole body.
That is new.


Interview with Dr Peter Kuit • HollandDr. Peter Kuit | Sitzung 57: Unter Druck
english + german

Then it goes over to an interesting interview with Dr. Peter Kuit and his daughter, who in Dec 2020 created a kind of > Dutch Extra Parliamentarian Investigative Corona Committee. Here you get to hear about highly disturbing things about Holland, the Dutch Police, the extreme violence being sponsored from higher levels in the administration, 0-tolerance against citizens, and that they managed to align 80 dutch policemen into one group, all together coming out, revealing themselves and the bad conditions behind what is going on in the dutch police. Apparently this will be held in their committee by the end of this month. They work very professionally with lawyers, doctors etc - and are transparent. Very interesting indeed !

There are more interviews. This is just intro + part 1

 

[XPan]

Found this PDF in a french article, quickly searched on PDF name and it seems this wasn't yet posted, so here it is :

https://www.globaljustice.org.uk/sites/default/files/files/resources/pharma_covid-19_report_web.pdf

It's a 46p document which gives a summary of 7 pharma companies (Johnson & Johnson, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead, Pfizer, Moderna, Sanofi) mainly in relation with covid, a nice summary report, the number of references is impressive.

Interesting report... in a sort of way.

But there is just just something...I don't know... A kind of duality speak. At the very end of the report it says

"Everyone wants to end this pandemic as quickly as possible. Most of us are excited by the positive vaccine trial results and amazed by the ingenuity of the scientists who have got us to this stage so quickly. And yet, we could do better and help end the pandemic in a fair and equitable way".

Seriously !?

I just got a Geert Vanden Bossche dejavu, where he in between (also said) How great the mRNA tech is, how great the scientists behind the mRNA technology are.

Imagine if the drive of the pharmaceutical corporations for ever greater profit was removed from the equation. Imagine if we could replace cutthroat competition and secrecy with collaboration and openness. Imagine if our Research was driven solely by the desire to rid the world of disease and suffering, starting with the most serious and deadly conditions. [ My question here is - how do you define "deadly conditions" ? Corona is defined like that... just sayin'] When combined with our technological knowhow, the dedication of our brilliant researchers and the trust which such a model could inspire in the population at large, imagine what we could achieve.

Coronavirus gives us the opportunity to reset the way we produce medicines. [There it is again...this weird duality: It is for Big Pharma much cheaper to do the mRNA route - and that is why are they so eager (while killing off people in the long haul); going the mRNA route is easier and much faster, costs a fraction of conventional vaccine and medication developments and investments. And who needs permission to let it loose on humanity, now that Covid-19 vaccines are kind of the new standard... ]

If we seize the opportunity, the health of people across the world could look very different. If we achieve that, this awful pandemic could give way to a better, fairer world"

Is this the effect what in english is called "knee jerk reaction" ?

Then i just got one.

 

[Pictishbroch]

 

[gottathink]

Interesting report... in a sort of way.

But there is just just something...I don't know... A kind of duality speak. At the very end of the report it says



Seriously !?

I just got a Geert Vanden Bossche dejavu, where he in between (also said) How great the mRNA tech is, how great the scientists behind the mRNA technology are.




Is this the effect what in english is called "knee jerk reaction" ?

Then i just got one.

Yeah I agree XPan, I have an uneasiness about the reports that conclude how amazing the mRNA technology is. I’m open to the idea because one has to be disciplined to make critical arguments by looking at the evidence, not cherry picking ideologies. As we must hold ourselves to standards of calm critical thinking and look at the evidence before believing anything. Otherwise one does not have a case i.e. “don’t have a leg to stand on” so to speak.
Many professionals who are anti COVID-19 mRNA prophylactics seem very enthusiastic about the potential of mRNA treatments and I question whether they are objective about this. I feel like the ultimate goal is to normalise the controlled medicalisation of gene therapies and thus genetic engineering of the human population. This is certainly what I have understood from the statements made by the people representing the companies involved.

Perhaps people are seduced by the idea of longevity and youth through gene treatments—it’s clouding judgement?

 

[gottathink]

I’m listening to this podcast. It is interesting because when you “read between the lines” the debate seems to be about whether the evidence shows intentional subversion of science to promote the mRNA prophylactics or not. Whether “there is something going on here” or not.

 

[XPan]

Virus vs mRNA Tech

Both natural Corona viruses as well the artificially manipulated ones came on stage - but none of them truly accomplished very much in terms of global damages and death (in relative terms and compared to other major diseases and conditions) - given that most people didn't die OF the Corona virus, but maybe with it though PCR testing. For example Dr Püschel, Patology, said that in Bergamo 97% died of something else, not form the Corona Virus. The CDC said 92% of the American who died, didn't die from the Corona Virus. Plus all the huge amount of money put onto Corona virus, especially Spike-Protein research in the past 20 years...

Regardless natural and/or manipulated corona viruses - what it did it really open the door to ?

It is the mRNA technology.

And that one opens a can of worms in terms of manipulations of our human genome.

As if that isn't bad enough - they also made the artificial sturdy spike proteins becoming the main actor in terms of death and damages. So, the globally distributed "vaccines" end up being what is touching more people around the world, than any other virus. Then who is the real enemy, and has been all along ? The mRNA jabs and other genetic altered jabs - being injected into healthy people.

I simply do not trust, not even in the slightest, that solutions and answers are to be found, by altering the human genome. It was not long time ago a totally forbidden zone - accepted to be off limits for the wider general public. They used to understand this.

Now they don't.

And suddenly - just like that - doors were broadly opened everywhere, even juridically when the EU changed the laws on 20 July 2020 revolving that very mRNA technology to be ok to use. Anything goes. The more the merrier. You do not even have to have final studies ready, to jab children, then babies.

That's not science. Not even by a long shot.

 

[Natus Videre]

BAD NEWS: Judge rules Trudeau's airport COVID jails are legal — but we're fighting back!​

The judge, Chief Justice Paul Crampton, ruled that jailing healthy people, law-abiding citizens who have done nothing wrong, jailing them for up to three days and billing them thousands of dollars for the cost of it, is just a minor inconvenience, not an important violation of our liberties.

Here’s what Justice Crampton said:

“...like times of war and other crises, pandemics call for sacrifices to save lives and avoid broad based suffering. If some are unwilling to make such sacrifices, and engage in behaviour that poses a demonstrated risk to the health and safety of others, the principles of fundamental justice will not prevent the state from performing its essential function of protecting its citizens from that risk…”

Save lives by destroying lives?
How far is too far?

Spoiler

Wait and see!

 

[Bluegazer]

Another drug that adds to the list that helps.

Hallazgo de investigadores de la UBA: lograron reducir un 81% el riesgo de muerte por COVID-19 y acortar el tiempo de internación

Utilizaron una droga originalmente diseñada para tratar la hipertensión. El estudio comenzó en abril de 2020 y participaron del ensayo clínico 158 pacientes

www.infobae.com

Full translated:

UBA researchers' finding: they were able to reduce the risk of death from COVID-19 by 81% and shorten hospitalization time.

They used a drug originally designed to treat hypertension. The study began in April 2020 and 158 patients participated in the clinical trial.

Doctors noticed the first effects in patients within the first 24 to 48 hours. They had contracted COVID-19, had to be hospitalized and observed that they began to feel better, were more animated and even had an appetite. They were hospitalized at the Hospital de Clínicas and the Hospital Español, and voluntarily participated in a novel and unique study conducted by researchers from the University of Buenos Aires, which showed that by applying a drug normally used to treat hypertension, it is possible to reduce the risk of death in hospitalized patients by up to 81% and drastically reduce the number of days of hospitalization.

The research began in April 2020 and 158 patients over 18 years of age - the average age was 65 - with COVID-19 participated in the trial. The volunteers were divided into two groups. One received twice-daily Telmisartan, a drug given to correct high blood pressure. And the other group was treated conventionally.

Telmisartan was given in much higher doses than those received by hypertensives, and the team of researchers succeeded in counteracting the inflammatory attack usually produced by infection with SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. This inflammatory process of the respiratory system is one of the main causes of death.

By day 5, inflammation levels had been reduced in the group treated with the drug, and by day 8 the reduction was even greater. What encouraged the researchers was that the length of hospitalization was reduced to 9 days, compared to 15 or more in the other group. As a consequence, the need for oxygen was reduced and the odds of death fell by 81%.

The results of the study had international repercussions and were published in the scientific journal EClinicalMedicine, one of the 22 publications edited by The Lancet. Participating in the research were cardiologist Mariano Duarte, head of the Hypertension Department at the Clinicas; pathologist Facundo Pelorosso; UBA professor Liliana Nicolosi, medical director of the Hospital Español; and pharmacologist Rodolfo Rothlin, professor and researcher at the School of Medicine.

An important finding

The study describes that the virus uses the Spike protein to bind to an enzyme found in mucosal cells known as angiotensin, and can trigger an inflammatory attack suffered by a percentage of patients. This blocking of the enzyme by the virus generates an accumulation of angiotensin II, which causes inflammation, while at the same time lowering the concentration of enzyme 1-7, which reduces inflammation. If the levels of angiotensin II rise in the lungs, due to the virus, a cascading inflammatory process is triggered which ends up causing severe respiratory failure or severe acute respiratory syndrome.

The virus prevents the enzyme from degrading from angiotensin II to 1-7. The latter is a natural vasodilator, and it is the target of the drug Telmisartan.

The team found that the drug used could become an important contribution in the fight against Covid-19 and there will certainly be further studies to delve into a field that undoubtedly opens up a horizon of hope.