Dr Wolfgang Wodarg talked about this as well during one of the meetings in the Investigative Corona Committee in Berlin. He even made a sheet of paper - but I am not sure if that is what you seek, @dredger.

I wrote about it here, including the forms, in the "Stories of Covid vaccination effects or worse" thread.

_-2021-07-01-english.gif _-2021-07-01german-1.gif


The form is more for documentation (proof)

keeping track of the blood test results of both D-Dimere and Thrombocyte counts, vaccine charge numbers, name of doctor, etc - before vs after the genetic injections. This form is however neutral, because it does not rely on doctors opinion regarding 'vaccination'.

Doctors do know about D-Dimere tests as such (I asked a nurse several weeks ago when they took blood samples, albeit the D-Dimere test wouldn't be performed other than on request). What I believe (assume) they do not know about, is the direct correlation between D-Dimere, Thrombocyte counts to Covid-19 vaccine damages.

* * *

On an indirect related (blood) topic, I too have a question:

When I asked the nurse, about my blood type - she said, that is something they do not, nor give out information on (here in Sweden), not even to me. Only prior an operation, they determine the blood type. I was a bit baffled - about why is there so much secrecy involved ?

Is there a sensible reason for this ?
 
I have a question :based on some last news that the % of the D Dimers in the blood (Quick definition : D dimers result from the degradation of fibrin in clots), is it a good think to say to a Doctor (who still believe the big lie) to recommend him to verify this with his patients when doing blood test ?
I based on a kind of conf call with Pr Bhakdi, I can give a link but you'll not be able to see the video as it's a Telegram news, just french traduced passage : Silvano Trotta Officiel

My idea here is to create a document, a one page PDF document with the less words possible, written in big letters, that could be used by anyone who would send it to his doctor, so they could verify by themselves ... and maybe open their eyes.

The sub-question I have here is : do any classic doctor knows about the D Dimers and what this means when you have so much found in the blood ? Is it a common knowledge or just reserved to blood specialists ? I ask because my ex sister in law is gynecologist working at Bruxelles, her new husband is chief of department - with my brother, they have 2 children, 2 girls, one is 21and the other is 17. This ex sister in law get vaccinated and her new husband too, so we have here 2 blinded doctors, and I would like to know if I recommend her to investigate about this is easy for her to verify, if, being gynecologist, the results will alarm her or not ? The main objective is that she STOP to incite her 2 girls (my nieces so) to get the vaccine, because this is were it's horrible, she's pushing her 2 childs to get the jab ! (grrrr) So i try to find something pertinent to send her...
Good idea, what with the reported blood clotting abnormalities, and even strange clotting found on autopsy if reports are true.

Excerpts from the introduction from the Wikipedia page- on d-dimer

D-dimer (or D dimer) is a fibrin degradation product (or FDP), a small protein fragment present in the blood after a blood clot is degraded by fibrinolysis. It is so named because it contains two D fragments of the fibrin protein joined by a cross-link.[1]
[...]
D-dimer levels are used as a predictive biomarker for the blood disorder, disseminated intravascular coagulation and in the coagulation disorders associated with COVID-19 infection.[1][3] A four-fold increase in the protein is an indicator of poor prognosis in people hospitalized with COVID-19.[1][3][4]
Will try to follow-up with any more relevant material. Off-hand, as I recall d-dimer is tested for another time, but not used all that often.

My question is: what are you hoping to show with D-dimer test?
Are you thinking the recently vaccinated Dr.'s will show elevated D-dimer from vaccine?

In my opinion, and I'll say here also that I think the Wikipedia information is valid, you would find elevated D-dimer in the midst of active problem, as in more like during an infection, or something else causing clotting/lysing [see: thrombostasis/lysis]. I don't think it's likely you'll be able to demonstrate to these Dr. relations of yours that their D-dimer is elevated, thus it should be avoided by your younger relations.

Rather search, if I may suggest, on products of mRNA vaccine accumulating in unwanted places : Objective:Health: - Cardiovascular Side Effects From mRNA Vaccines -- Sott.net

You'll have to verify, but I think there are indications of accumulation (of mRNA products) in certain other organs, and reports of adverse effects in young people by percentage that were significant.
 
That basically summarizes the problem as seen by us Little People. Even though we have the numbers, the Merkel's of this World have the heavy power, and don't worry much about lying. However, when things get to the point where the Little People have nothing to lose (South Africa) then these "you can't touch me" people have a problem. I'm willing to be surprised, but I think we are far from that.
I'd call that the Solzhenitsyn Problem, referring to the famous 'And how we burned in the camps later, thinking..."

And far from an absolute rule, but with enough awareness and being, I feel the experience 'having nothing to lose' can help to flip that switch, where the nothing-to-lose people feel and behave as 'you can't touch me'. Because once there is nothing left to be rendered onto Cesar, the rest is private between the individual and God...
 
Last edited:
1)
2)
It is reaching a high degree of ponerization.

Translation:
1) Dear *@alferdez: it doesn't matter if they call it authoritarian: the scavenger opposition needs dead people. The vaccine MUST BE MANDATORY to protect our people.

*twitter account of the president of Argentina

2) Ladies and gentlemen, whether you like it or not, the Covid vaccine MUST BE MANDATORY. Because the virus mutates all the time. And because it is more burdensome to be economically and psychologically set back than to be called authoritarian.
 
Malfunction at the podium? Psaki announces vaccines ‘can still kill you’ in eyebrow-raising slip-up
“We are quite focused on communicating directly with those people, hence our special guest today, about why it’s important to get vaccinated, why these vaccines are safe, why they can still kill you even if you are under the age of 27,” Psaki declares, seemingly unaware there is anything odd about her words before concluding
I'm surprised she didn't make more Freudian slips so far. In the last couple years we had those videos about talking heads suffering brain freezes LIVE on TV, and malfunctioned, as if they were robots low on battery power, remember?

Then a moment later, she announced:
We need to be clear and direct about our messaging.

I guess next time we'll hear from the dutiful Army of Proud Authoritarian Door Knockers, that:
- Its a very good idea to take the vaccine, because all vaccines have the very healthy electrolytes, which help you keep hydrated! If you are hydrated you pay less Climate Water Tax!
 
Last edited:
My manipulative government just sent me a poll about what the EU leaders and the Globalists want us to do:
Prez. Orban, our proud leader asks us:
"- Please my proud compatriot! Lets vote if we wanna accept their dictates or not?!"

[.. I chortled reading their 14 points..]

Do you think we should prepare the country for the New Normal or do you think everything will get back as it was, the Old Normal?:
Should we raise the minimum pay?
Should we raise taxes on salaries because of the pandemic?
Should mothers raising their children receive a % of their already paid taxes back, as they bore the brunt of the hardships during the pandemic?
Should we push out the deadline [of payback] further for the famous Swiss & other predatory Globalist loans that were designed to attack poor countries in 2007? And into which Swiss predatory loan schemes most Authoritarian Followers jumped into with no abandon?
Should we bend over for Bruessels, so they can hump our behinds more or not?
Should we accept lots of refugees as the EU Leaders want us to do?
Should we play along with Bruessels to pay our ever increasing New Climate Taxes - either as blue collar workers built into our utilities bills or the big companies should pay them, in which case they will raise prices, so blue collars will pay New Climate Tax anyway..

..this when I posted here that our proud Prez. accepted billions of EU Climate Politics Money from Bruessels recently, using which our proud gov. insiders will fatten themselves even more using their gov.insider companies to fill their pockets with EURO millions, while the hapless Unwashed Masses / Blue Collar Workers will pay New Climate Taxes to become impoverished even more? :/

Should we accept the Globalist Pedophiles Decree that children must be taught about LGBTQ+? Or should be children protected from the LGBTQ+ menace?

Bruessels want us to accept lots of refugees freely and EU leaders want free travel into our country for anyone without any restrictions or protections: should we accept that or not? Even if allowing it will clearly enable the risky new viral strains to flood our country?

Should we open vaccine-factories in our country, so we can be super safe in the future from any new viral strains?

:D :D :D

As this poll is anonymous, I decided that instead of checking their precious little manipulative marks created for good doggie Authoritarian Followers, I'll write short summaries with a black felt marker, like:
- You Are Damned if You Do and Damned if you don't, buddy! You have no choice.
- You decided to Vaxx more than half of the country with RNA jabs! Of those unfortunates: 70% are expected to die or suffer debilitating illnesses as the autumn arrives. Are you ready for them?
[they used the expression / wording "After the end of the pandemic" three times]
- What End of Pandemic are you talking about, buddy?
 
Last edited:
The Health Service Executive in Ireland has announced it's teaming up with dating apps to promote the uptake in vaccinations:

"Starting this week, the dating platforms will share vaccine resources and offer vaccination badges for people in Ireland to display on their profiles.
On Tinder, for example, members will be able to add a variety of stickers to their profile including “vaccinated” or “vaccines save lives”.
Tinder will also give those who support the campaign a free ‘Super Like’ to help them stand out among potential matches starting this week."

I guess the phrase 'toxic relationship' will be taking on a whole new meaning :-O
 
Le vaccin et le pass sanitaire avec le QR code est la marque de la bête : « Et elle fit que tous, petits et grands, riches et pauvres, libres et esclaves, reçoivent une marque sur leur main droite ou sur leur front, et que personne ne puisse acheter ni vendre, sans avoir la marque, le nom de la bête ou le nombre de son nom » (Apocalypse 13:16-17). Ceux qui ne porteront pas cette marque ne pourront pas légitimement acheter ou vendre. Ils éprouveront de grandes difficultés à travailler, à trouver un emploi ou à avoir un commerce.

The vaccine and health pass with the QR code is the mark of the beast: "And he caused all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark on their right hand or on their foreheads; and that no one should be able to buy or sell, unless he has the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name" (Revelation 13:16-17). Those who do not bear this mark will not be able to buy or sell legitimately. They will have great difficulty working, finding a job or having a business
 
So the un-vaxed are the new resistance.

Prosecutor 〓Micronus〓 - микрон @Micronus4 In response to @Ecoute51 @LCI and 2 other people You nostalgia for Vichy ... it will calm you down right away

Sharon Kirkey Publishing date: Jul 15, 2021 • 11 hours ago • 7 minute read
Vaccination certificates, immunity passes, green passes, health passes — the case for and against can be as polarizing as lockdowns
Like the shoeless and shirtless, the unvaccinated could soon find themselves being denied service at some establishments across Canada.

Vaccination certificates, immunity passes, green passes, health passes — the case for and against can be as polarizing as lockdowns.
From the pandemic’s outset, some have warned COVID-19 immunity or vaccination certificates would lead to a two-tier society, where some get to live normal lives and others don’t. “Passport, please,” raises privacy considerations and questions over data ownership. Others argue concerns over privacy and liberty rights are being overplayed.

Domestic vaccine passports up to provinces Trudeau...
Video

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau indicated Tuesday he has no plans for a national domestic vaccine passport program and would leave any such system up to the provinces. But while provinces grapple with whether or not to afford more freedom to the fully vaccinated, some private businesses are making up their own rules.

Quebec was the first province to dip its toes into a domestic COVID-19 vaccine passport scheme, announcing last week that it would permit the “fully protected” access to gyms, bars, restaurants, festivals, sporting events and other non-essential services and activities in the event of a fourth wave or fall surge in cases.

Due to take effect Sept. 1, the program would be mandated in COVID hot zones only and won’t apply to essential services. The “fully protected” would include those who have already been infected with COVID.

In Manitoba, digital and physical immunization cards for the fully vaxxed enable holders to skip self-isolation after inter-provincial travel. The fully vaccinated (two weeks from the time of their second dose) can also dine indoors at restaurants and bars with other fully vaxxed friends and family from outside their household. Restaurant operators can use an app to scan immunization cards, which show only the person’s name and a QR code confirming he or she is fully vaccinated.

“There are discrimination concerns, there are equality concerns and fundamentally it undermines the idea that (vaccination) is a choice that people make for themselves,” said lawyer Cara Zwibel, of the Canadian Civil Liberties Association.

Throughout the pandemic, governments and public health authorities have based decisions on the population as a whole, she said. “We could have done things differently right from the outset. We might have said everyone over 65 has to stay home, and the rest of you can go on and live your lives. Because at least at the very beginning — I know now variants have changed things — at least at the very beginning it was really those people that were most seriously at risk from COVID. But we didn’t do that,” Zwibel said.

Montrealers react to Quebec's proposed vaccine passport system
Video

Governments saw the pandemic as a population issue, “and we closed and opened things based on how the population was doing,” she said.

“So I don’t think now we’re justified in saying, ‘Well, if you’ve been vaccinated, you get access to X, Y and Z and if you haven’t, then you don’t get access to those things.’”

There is obviously no constitutional right to go to a restaurant, she said. “I wouldn’t bring it to that level. But, socially, I think it’s a dangerous idea.”

In the absence of government guidelines, can private businesses just go it alone?
That depends, Zwibel said. Generally, a private business doesn’t have to serve you. “They can refuse service, as long as they don’t refuse service based on a prohibited ground of discrimination under our human rights laws,” for example, such as religion or creed.

But businesses have to think about what they’re taking on, in terms of privacy and the obligations to maintain the personal health information they’re provided with, Zwibel said.

“I think the answer is, they can (make up their own rules). Our answer would probably be, we hope they don’t, and we don’t think they should,” Zwibel said.

The activities being targeted by Quebec’s vaccination passports aren’t essential services, but any intrusion on fundamental rights, like the right to privacy, integrity and freedom, should be minimal, said Yann Joly, research director of the Centre of Genomics and Policy at Montreal’s McGill University. For example, it could be argued that denying the unvaccinated entry to gyms is not such a big intrusion.

“The fact that you’re not allowed at your local gym doesn’t prevent you from just running outdoors, or (exercising) at home,” Joly said. “That’s less important, less intrusive than not being allowed to work, or prevented from going into some public services establishment, like to renew your driver’s license. That would be a much bigger problem.”

Gyms are reopening in Ontario Friday at 50 percent capacity, but Goodlife Fitness, one of the country’s largest fitness chains, tweeted that it will not “request or disclose information regarding individual vaccination status.” The company said on its website that while it “strongly encourages everyone to get vaccinated” once eligible, and that it will continue to follow all public health guidelines set out for fitness facilities, “Currently, those requirements do not require proof of vaccination to enter our locations.”

Businesses wishing to collect proof of vaccination must have a reasonable purpose for doing so, according to the office of Alberta’s information and privacy commissioner. Accommodations must be made for people who cannot be vaccinated for health reasons and any passport system should be based on evidence, Joly said: Is it the best solution to prevent a fourth wave, or to stop one? The process itself has to be rigorous, he added, so there are no breeches of confidential information, “no way that the list of people that have not been vaccinated becomes available to a broad circle of the population.”

1626392075402.png

Quebec would likely rely on QR codes the province issues upon full vaccination. “When you scan all that information, where is it going to go,” Joly asked. “Are you going to delete it?” (Alberta’s privacy commissioner has said proof of vaccination information should be securely destroyed “once its business purpose has been achieved.”)

“And what do you do when the scan shows somebody has not been vaccinated twice,” Joly said. “How can you notify them they can’t enter this or that activity, without other people noticing, without signalling them out? These are the kinds of questions that they should be able to answer in order for the process to be resistant to any challenge.”

Quebec’s passports won’t make vaccination a condition of employment. A person’s vaccine status will be neither a cause for dismissal nor a bar to their being hired, Quebec Labour Minister Jean Boulet said last week. The system would only be implemented once the entire population, aged 12 and over, has had the opportunity to get doubly dosed.

“Of course, there is a positive point, the fact that our restaurants will stay open should COVID cases increase by far in the fall, in September,” said Bourbeau, of Restaurants Canada. “Our priority is to reopen our restaurants and to keep them open for good. Because every time that a government closes non-essential businesses, our workers start finding jobs in a different industry.”

But Quebec needs to clarify exactly how the program would be implemented, Bourbeau said. “We will be the ones that will be asked to verify if people have their passport and their two doses.”

Quebec isn’t alone. After pledging that vaccine passports would never “divide” the French people,
French president Emmanuel Macron this week announced that proof of vaccination, recovery from COVID or a negative PCR test will be necessary for entry into bars, restaurants, cafes and shopping centres as of August. Greece has also unveiled a similar program.

Canada’s privacy guardians have cautioned that privacy “must be front and centre” as governments and businesses mull proof of vaccination. But fully vaccinated people have a dramatically decreased risk of infection and likely have a decreased risk of spreading the infection to others, an expert panel on COVID convened by Canada’s chief science advisor reported in the spring.

How long immunity lasts remains an open question, any passport scheme must ensure authenticity and minimize fraud and, if vaccination certificates become more common, groups or communities that have suffered historic biases and profiling must not face increased scrutiny, the panel said.


Thank you Momotchi on Telegram, a doctor had the D-dimere test carried out to find out if there are blood clots invisible to the scanner, 62% of the vaccinated had these micro clots, all the more reason to stand firm in the face of vaccine injunctions, in 8 months, we will have won .

By Lionel Laurent July 13, 2021, 9:00 AM GMT+2 LISTEN TO ARTICLE RT 4:30

UK / Media Mainstream: several people in intensive care ("rea") after having had the 2 doses of vaccine



https://twitter.com/GreatResetMood
Great Reset Mood @GreatResetMood
Jul 14 Replying to @GovCanHealth and @JustinTrudeau

1626394111286.png

 
I think to myself that the vaccinated will have an easier and more enjoyable life as a reward for allowing control over them.
This control can be caused by:
-the effect of the vaccine itself
-the fact of being vaccinated indicates susceptibility to control
-the ability of the individual to be controlled by technology linked to the vaccine.
It doesn't look good for uninformed people.
I feel most sorry for those who don't do it just out of fear that something will go wrong after vaccination because they accidentally heard something like that from better informed people.
I've heard stories about how some people pay vaccine administers bribes to inject the contents into their clothes or next to their arm.
Truly being unvaccinated will be an act of heroism in the near future.

Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom