Ok - I'm going to tackle this, but first an explanation as to what I'm referencing:Don't have time now, but later want to post about federal money to colleges/universities requiring incentives for Covid vaxxination. Hubby is involved with that and on the fly I told him it's mandatory to have informed consent.
ARP: American Rescue Plan (HEERF III)
My hubby tells me that one of the previous HEERFs requires that a portion of these funds be used to incentivize student vaccination. I've only located FAQ documentation in HEERF III that says "may" use the funds for that purpose:Introduction
The Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund III (HEERF III) is authorized by the American Rescue Plan (ARP), Public Law 117-2, signed into law on March 11, 2021, providing $39.6 billion in support to institutions of higher education to serve students and ensure learning continues during the COVID-19 pandemic.
ARP funds are in addition to funds authorized by the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2021 (CRRSAA), Public Law 116-260 and the Coronavirus Aid, Recovery, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, Public Law 116-136. Emergency funds available to institutions and their students under all emergency funds total $76.2 billion.
Note: This page is dedicated to the new funding (HEERF III) established by the ARP. Information about the HEERF II established by the CRRSAA can be found at this link. HEERF I established by the CARES Act can be found at this link.


What I'm noticing is no mention whatsoever of the required informed consent in regards to a EUA inoculation. I asked hubby about that and he wasn't aware of that being addressed as far as he knew. Shocking - no? That little detail being completely ignored across the board everywhere. And then there's that pesky little detail that nullifies EUAs if there are other viable treatments i.e. HCQ, Ivermectin, etc. Is anybody informing students that the vax they are getting is, in fact, EUA and not the FDA approved Comirnaty?
Frankly, I'm thinking by not providing adequate/realistic informed consent, these higher ed institutions are leaving themselves wide open to lawsuits when the inoculated start having adverse events/deaths. The Federal government could say it was the institutions' responsibility to provide informed consent and failing to do so is their liability. But, I guess the injured inoculants would have to make their case against their signing off on getting the vax. How nice that being age 18+ gives one legal status as opposed to formerly 21 - an age one must be to buy tobacco products in Ohio!
I'm giving my hubby grief as I write all this including the Ten Stages of Genocide! If he's helping, even indirectly, to promote vax without truthful/factual/accurate informed consent, then he's guilty of crimes against humanity as are all others involved.
So, my thought was to compose a document/graphic that outlines truthful/factual/accurate informed consent - perhaps something that could be posted on Sott even. Sottreader's observations can be useful in addressing the highly misinformed notions among the younger set particularly (college to middle age) -
So that's going to take some time and effort to get going. I have some ideas, but need to pause for now. Please think on this as well as input from the group could prove most productive. I do think whatever is produced has to reflect hard, cold substantiated facts suitable for an informed consent document to be presented to a potential vax recipient.None was aware about the situation in Israel. None was aware the effectiveness of the jab wears off in a couple of months after the second jab. ADE might as well be an alien concept. All think there's scientific consensus. No one thinks about the long-term to their health from the jab even though most said they had severe reactions to the jab which cleared by itself. Very few are aware they are being injected by a genetic product. Adverse effects might as well be alien concepts. None know anything about the spike protein. Very few appreciate that they will be asked to take a 3rd shot.
- No one who's ever taken Pfizer and got covid has ended up in hospital or died from covid. This is because the vaccine stops severe illness and death.
- Ivermectin is for animals, not humans. In America a lot of anti vaxxers are overdosing from ivermectin and clogging up hospital resources.
- Don't read or research, just take the jab.
- The vaccine has been tested and is safe. 3 billion people have received it and this shows it's safe. If it isn't then it'd be known by now.
- Anti vaxxers are killing people with their refusal to take the jab.
- If you took the vaccine you'd never have got covid.
- If you take the vaccine now that you've had covid, your smell will come back almost immediately.
- Vaccine induced immunity is better than immunity induced by natural infection.
- I wasn't drinking because I have an elevated heart rate post covid, I was told if I took the jab, my heart rate will go back to normal. 🤦
To be continued. BTW - I have no experience doing anything like this, but will give it my best effort. 🙂