"The problem" is that this is part of the plan. The health-care system becomes defunct, people will be suffering and they will put it on the "non-vaxxed". Well played, i have to admit.
It
may be part of the plan. But I would hesitate to make such a confident statement. Why? My reasoning comes from reflecting on what was said in the following C's session, back around the time when this whole circus was getting warmed up:
(Joe) Well, what reason then are the leaders of Western nations being given that is making them agree to shut down large parts of their countries?
A: There are several complexes of agendas in play, as well conflicts.
Q: (L) Well... We've got some questions from forum members, and maybe if I just kinda go through them it'll get things sorted out. Or do you have something really specific to ask?
(Pierre) I wanted to ask about, "several complex factors in play". It made me think that two factors were mentioned several times: the economic factor, and on the political level a way to increase the power of the authorities.
(L) Okay, so is one of these factors that it was seen that this was a good opportunity to reset the economy?
A: Yes
Q: (L) And they think that they're going to reset the economy and just put everything back together when they decide to?
A: Yes. Wishful thinking.
Q: (L) Is another factor to reinforce their power to be able to lock down, impose restrictions, control people... Is that another part of it?
A: Yes but that too will backfire due to exposure.
Q: (Pierre) About the financial markets or reset: They comment, "wishful thinking". So the idea is to burst the bubble now and then to regrow the markets and make a lot of profit down and up - both ways. Is it an allusion to the previous session where it was said that the next crash will be engineered in the beginning, but then an unexpected factor will enter in and the downward spiral will get out of control?
A: Possible, but the exposure factor will also enter in.
So from this we can learn that there is a complex of agendas, as well as internal conflict at the higher levels of the power structure. So when I hear talk of 'The Plan', to me this errs by assuming a 'homogeneity of interest' or 'unity of purpose' at the top of the pyramid. I think it may be more accurate to assume a network of psychopathic tribes, all attempting to steal each other's territory and resources. I picked up some good hints from the
Consortium series about this.
It is also said in this session that population control, lockdowns, and restrictions
will backfire. We have already been seeing the pushback in numerous ways: the Florida and Texas Executive Orders, nurses resigning in protest, Joe Rogan's alternative treatment, school board meetings across the US, Reiner Fuellmich's ongoing case, all the people in the streets in France, etc.
It doesn't make any sense to me to unequivocally state that nurses acting on conscience against mandatory vaccinations is 'part of the plan'.
However, it should be said - just because there's been a big pushback doesn't mean that the push for population control via lockdowns and restrictions will fail. After all, the
session of 16 Oct 1994 indicates the 'mark-of-the-beast' future we may be headed for. In light of the information in this session, the pushback looks more like a temporary delay for the PTB.
Rather than the nurses unwittingly ushering this scenario in, like marionettes on a string, I moreso see them as becoming a force and a voice against it. I do think you have a point in saying that nurses, like the 'non-jabbed sub-humans', could quite easily be turned into targets of public angst.
Finally, Pierre asked a compound set of questions in this session, ending with the query:
Pierre: Is it an allusion to the previous session where it was said that the next crash will be engineered in the beginning, but then an unexpected factor will enter in and the downward spiral will get out of control?
The answer was:
A: Possible, but exposure factor will also enter in.
So I don't really know what this all means. It may indicate that the global crash
will be engineered, but decent human beings will smell the rat and amp up their resistance to whatever measures may be imposed. And maybe if there
is a downward spiral it will at least be mitigated somewhat, and not get out of control.
The discussion of the exposure factor indicates that there
is a wildcard at play in all this. To me, this implies that I should carefully question the idea of an 'all-powerful, unified Consortium with an unstoppable plan' and seeing everything through that lens.
It's this weird balance where the future is open - but closed. Dark - but bright. Painful - joyful. These days, I think that if I can match that cosmic openness internally, in a state of Faith - and do so without denying the real horrors this world is in for - I think that engenders a mental state where it's much easier to identify the limitations of my thinking, my Seeing, and my Being. The limitations, in other words, of anticipation. And ain't that kinda like the main prerequisite to merging into a realm of service to others, where our hearts will find healing?