Coronavirus Pandemic: Apocalypse Now! Or exaggerated scare story?
- Thread starter wanderingthomas
- Start date
naorma
The Living Force
Another report from Austria. The Vorarlberger Nachrichten - a newspaper from the county of Vorarlberg - brought that big advertisement, payed by the companies that signed it.
The headline says: An initiative of Vorarlberg companies against the splitting of society
The other text says:
For the immediate abolition of discrimination against healthy people!
For free access to public life for verifiable* healthy people.
*) tested and/or confirmed antibodies and tested vaccinated people, of course
The headline says: An initiative of Vorarlberg companies against the splitting of society
The other text says:
For the immediate abolition of discrimination against healthy people!
For free access to public life for verifiable* healthy people.
*) tested and/or confirmed antibodies and tested vaccinated people, of course
I thought this was worth posting in the thread:
The CBC gave only a footnote to the above vandalism.
The behavior of the vaxxed is evidently mean and selfish and lacking in self awareness. They just look bad.
As to people waking up when they see the numbers, when the mask of sanity slips all the way from their leaders, (and hangs under the chin for long enough that many cameras see and spread the ugly reality far and wide), will people not wake up to the truth?
No!
But why..?
I found this quote from Jon Rappoport's interview with retired propagandist, Ellis Medavoy, eye-opening. We always knew, but to see it explained and crystalized in such a way makes the cult-like behavior easier to understand and recognize. -Especially in a population which has cleaved to atheism, brought up on the honeyed tales of Star Trek socialism... (Which the C's advised as being deliberate programming, something I didn't understand at the time..).
~~~
A: I would recommend an in‐depth study of the Vatican for anyone. The doctor is
built of course on the idea that a person must consult an intermediary, a priest, if he
wants to make contact with the Ultimate.
Q: And who is the Ultimate supposed to be, in the case of the doctor? Who is the
doctor receiving his Word from?
A: Mythically speaking, God. It’s still God, although no one says it. Understand, I’m
just talking about the myth. This is my area. I’ve done the propaganda in this area,
and I see that the doctor is still the contact point for God. That’s the unspoken
feeling. God and deliverance from suffering and salvation. This is not just the
subconscious expression of a need by the patient. It is that, but it’s more. The
medical superstructure is built that way. It’s puzzling to me in a way, because it’s so
brilliant. You search and you don’t find a hidden history about this. You really don’t.
In the case of the Vatican you can find it, if you look hard enough. You can see how
those very brilliant people built their edifice. And what you can’t see, you can infer
quite easily. But here...it’s different. It’s almost as if the builders were following a
blueprint that was invisible. They had other historical examples to work from. The
Vatican, Egypt, Sumer. So perhaps that’s it. You see, every PR man needs a hook. He
needs leverage. He needs to feel it, to use it, to imply it, to bring it in behind his
message. Science, absolute science and rationality. That’s one strong hook. It’s hard
to challenge that. It’s very useful as a myth. But behind that is God saving the
patient. If you can tap into that—and I have, many times, in my work, even though
I’m an atheist—the opposition withers in front of you. They feel it. They don’t want
to be seen opposing THAT. Politicians back off. That’s why they will never challenge
the role of medicine in this century. They would be seen as evil. In terms of sheer
manipulation it’s a winner like none other I’ve ever seen. So you see, we have here a
global program that is going full steam ahead in this century. And it has the power of
a religion, an unspoken religion, a global religion. I can’t say this too strongly. It is a
hidden religion, and that kind of force is even stronger than a religion that has all
the trappings and the doctrine and the cathedrals. Walk into the Anderson Cancer
Center in Texas sometime. I haven’t been there in years, but you get a strange
feeling...we are dealing here with a myth that can overcome countries without a
single scripture. This is a PR man’s dream...you see, there are always layers of
hidden factors. Sometimes it's just political.
~Page 25, THE MATRIX REVEALED, JON RAPPOPORT Interviews ELLIS MEDAVOY
~~~~~~~~~~
We are not built to exist without a spiritual connection to the Universe. Kill god, and you leave a god-shaped hole in yourself. The strictest atheists are the worst because they have done the most work in removing all evidence of God from within themselves, which just creates a more powerful vacuum to be filled. And so you get really intelligent, data-rich people stumbling and grasping like desperate fools when faced with paradoxes in their fields of study. Just look at the evolutionary biologists trying to deal with the shortcomings of their science-faith!
For many, the way out of the vaccination trap isn't going to be one of merely adding up the numbers and making a rational choice. No. It must be an experience on the order of serious crisis of faith. -For which they know they will be exiled from their church and their community.
On the up side, I would imagine that those who escape will do so with explosive energy. Good luck to them.
More Kennedy:
Switzerland is set to hold a public vote at the end of this month to decide whether the government’s newly proposed Covid laws can go into effect. If they are enacted, then Switzerland would adopt many of the restrictions that have been imposed throughout the EU, even though the country has navigated through the pandemic very successfully with limited mandates to this point.
RFK Jr. Completely DISMANTLES the “Covid Misinformation” Narrative – “It’s a Euphemism For Any Statement That Departs From Official Government Policy” – “They Are Engineering Destruction of Democracy Worldwide”
Earlier this week, Democrat Robert F. Kennedy Jr. spoke out against authoritarian covid measures at a protest in Switzerland. He spoke alongside a panel of local leaders and called for citizens to resist mandates as thousands gathered outside the building, standing together for their freedom.Switzerland is set to hold a public vote at the end of this month to decide whether the government’s newly proposed Covid laws can go into effect. If they are enacted, then Switzerland would adopt many of the restrictions that have been imposed throughout the EU, even though the country has navigated through the pandemic very successfully with limited mandates to this point.
Last edited:
naorma
The Living Force
This is a translation of one part of the Austrian law concerning the new covid laws: As one can see one can still do things without 2G. .
"Customer areas
§ (1) Customers may only enter customer areas of business premises for the purpose of purchasing goods or
for the purpose of obtaining services only if they have a 2G certificate.
(2) Paragraph 1 shall not apply to:
1. public pharmacies,
2. food retailers (including sales outlets of food producers) and farm-based direct marketers,
3. drugstores and drugstores,
4. sales of medical and sanitary products, therapeutic aids and appliances,
5. health and nursing services,
6. services for persons with disabilities, which are provided by the Länder within the framework of the
disability assistance, social assistance, participation, or equal opportunity laws,
7. veterinary services,
8. sale of animal feed,
9. sale and maintenance of safety and emergency products, which are in particular fire extinguishers,
protective equipment, illuminants, combustibles, fuses, salt spreaders, but not weapons and
accessories, unless their acquisition for professional purposes for legal reasons is mandatory and cannot be postponed.
for professional purposes, unless their acquisition is absolutely necessary and cannot be postponed,
10. emergency services,
11. agricultural trade, including animal auctions, as well as the horticultural business and the
Land products trade in seeds, fodder and fertilizers,
12. gas stations and electric filling stations and car washes,
13. banks,
14. postal service providers including their postal partners, insofar as these postal partners fall under the
5 Par. 2, as well as postal service outlets as defined in § 3 No. 7 PMG that are operated by a municipality or are located in municipalities. operated by a municipality or located in municipalities in which the provision of postal services is not
by any other postal service point falling under § 5 Par. 2, but which are used exclusively for the provision of postal services and which do not fall under § 5 Par. 2. provision of postal services and the activities permitted under § 5 par. 2, and providers of
of telecommunications,
15. services related to the administration of justice,
16. public transport,
17. tobacco stores and newsstands,
18. hygiene and cleaning services,
19. waste disposal services,
20. automobile and bicycle repair shops,
21. the collection of pre-ordered goods, whereby customers in enclosed spaces are required to wear a mask"
---------------
Providers of mobile nursing and care services are only allowed to enter external workplaces workplaces if they present a 2G certificate and wear a tight-fitting mechanical protective device that covers the mouth and nose area.
If a 2G certificate cannot be presented, proof from an authorized agency of a negative result of a molecular biology test for SARS-CoV-2, which must have been taken no more than 72 hours ago. and a mask must be worn when in direct contact with customers.
Concerning gastronomie, culture etc. the rules are: Only 2G.
"Customer areas
§ (1) Customers may only enter customer areas of business premises for the purpose of purchasing goods or
for the purpose of obtaining services only if they have a 2G certificate.
(2) Paragraph 1 shall not apply to:
1. public pharmacies,
2. food retailers (including sales outlets of food producers) and farm-based direct marketers,
3. drugstores and drugstores,
4. sales of medical and sanitary products, therapeutic aids and appliances,
5. health and nursing services,
6. services for persons with disabilities, which are provided by the Länder within the framework of the
disability assistance, social assistance, participation, or equal opportunity laws,
7. veterinary services,
8. sale of animal feed,
9. sale and maintenance of safety and emergency products, which are in particular fire extinguishers,
protective equipment, illuminants, combustibles, fuses, salt spreaders, but not weapons and
accessories, unless their acquisition for professional purposes for legal reasons is mandatory and cannot be postponed.
for professional purposes, unless their acquisition is absolutely necessary and cannot be postponed,
10. emergency services,
11. agricultural trade, including animal auctions, as well as the horticultural business and the
Land products trade in seeds, fodder and fertilizers,
12. gas stations and electric filling stations and car washes,
13. banks,
14. postal service providers including their postal partners, insofar as these postal partners fall under the
5 Par. 2, as well as postal service outlets as defined in § 3 No. 7 PMG that are operated by a municipality or are located in municipalities. operated by a municipality or located in municipalities in which the provision of postal services is not
by any other postal service point falling under § 5 Par. 2, but which are used exclusively for the provision of postal services and which do not fall under § 5 Par. 2. provision of postal services and the activities permitted under § 5 par. 2, and providers of
of telecommunications,
15. services related to the administration of justice,
16. public transport,
17. tobacco stores and newsstands,
18. hygiene and cleaning services,
19. waste disposal services,
20. automobile and bicycle repair shops,
21. the collection of pre-ordered goods, whereby customers in enclosed spaces are required to wear a mask"
---------------
Providers of mobile nursing and care services are only allowed to enter external workplaces workplaces if they present a 2G certificate and wear a tight-fitting mechanical protective device that covers the mouth and nose area.
If a 2G certificate cannot be presented, proof from an authorized agency of a negative result of a molecular biology test for SARS-CoV-2, which must have been taken no more than 72 hours ago. and a mask must be worn when in direct contact with customers.
Concerning gastronomie, culture etc. the rules are: Only 2G.
The above video done by After Skool in cooperation with Academy of Ideas is informative. It seems to me it can be viewed from two perspectives in this situation. One is becoming mentally infected by a mistaken social narrative about a pandemic, the other is opposing the falseness, but in a way that one ends up loosing balance and connectedness with reality oneself. The video does not mention the Covid issue, so anyone can watch and think about how it might apply to past and present social conditions.The 20-minute video, “Mass Psychosis — How an Entire Population Becomes Mentally Ill,” is a fascinating illustration of how mass psychosis can be induced.
Dr Joseph Mercola: Mass Psychosis — How to Create an Epidemic of Mental Illness - NewsVoice
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=09maaUaRT4M&t=1snewsvoice.se
At the end, there are concepts about how a society can exit a mass psychosis. Among the steps, they mention: ordering one's own minds, being a good example, sharing knowledge to counter mistaken notions, using humor, the establishment of parallel structures within the official world of the totalitarian state, and finally the possibility of opposition to totalitarianism.
There is a discussion of the concept of mass psychosis in this article and interview where at the end, following references, the above video is included.
Last edited:
I don't know if this has been posted earlier, or discussed, this is a post from SOTT earlier today, which I found, regarding the disturbing so called vaccine rollout for 5-11 year olds
www.sott.net
One thing that comes immediately to mind, is this. Why would an ingredient be added to a so called vaccine, be used to stabilize "Heart Attacks" in an age group of 5-11 year olds in which there is very little information if any, or statics to prove this is and issue and would be of benefit?
Snips from the article:
Pfizer have modified the formulation of their injection for children to include an ingredient that reduces the acidity of blood and is used to stabilise people who have suffered a heart attack.
"To provide a vaccine with an improved stability profile, the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine for use in children 5-11 years of age uses tromethamine (Tris) buffer instead of the phosphatebuffered saline (PBS) as used in the previous formulation and excludes sodium chloride and potassium chloride".
However, with overwhelming evidence against the safety of the vaccine and now a change in the formula used in clinical trials EUA should never have been granted.
The UKs Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) have said that the evidence strongly indicates that almost all children and young people are at very low risk from COVID-19.
The rates in 5 to 11 are so low that there were no "cases" of severe COVID-19 or death from either the treatment (n= 1,518) or control group (n= 750), this renders the "90% effective" claim, meaningless. This should have stopped an EUA application in its tracks, as clearly there is no emergency for this age group in particular and therefore no benefit either.
Additionally, Pfizer admit that the number of participants in the current clinical development program is too small to detect any potential risks of myocarditis associated with vaccination or long-term safety of COVID-19 vaccine in participants 5 to 11 years old.
THE INGREDIENTS
When the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine was granted an EUA from the FDA, its ingredients list was published online along with other safety data. The list included the now excluded ingredients sodium chloride and potassium chloride and includes the additional ingredient Tromethamine.
So this begs the question from me, has this drug ever been approved in this age group? And as noted above, the side effects are horrific, and will only muddy the waters further concerning the side effect already reported IMO. Talk about the psychopathic as reaction machines. Problem Reaction Solution. The solutions in all probability concerns more suffering for humanity.
This information should be posted fare and wide throughout the world, so parents can make an informed choice, on the benefit risk ratio of allowing their child to receive this jab. Of course this will not happen, too much at stake, for those that make a profit from human suffering, with no consequences.
Why has Pfizer changed the formulation of its Covid-19 vaccine for children to include an ingredient that stabilises people suffering a heart attack?
A document prepared for the FDA Advisory Committee meeting, in which members voted seventeen to zero in favour of giving emergency use authorization for the administration of the Pfizer Covid-19 injection to children aged 5 to 11, confirms that...
www.sott.net
One thing that comes immediately to mind, is this. Why would an ingredient be added to a so called vaccine, be used to stabilize "Heart Attacks" in an age group of 5-11 year olds in which there is very little information if any, or statics to prove this is and issue and would be of benefit?
Snips from the article:
Pfizer have modified the formulation of their injection for children to include an ingredient that reduces the acidity of blood and is used to stabilise people who have suffered a heart attack.
"To provide a vaccine with an improved stability profile, the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine for use in children 5-11 years of age uses tromethamine (Tris) buffer instead of the phosphatebuffered saline (PBS) as used in the previous formulation and excludes sodium chloride and potassium chloride".
However, with overwhelming evidence against the safety of the vaccine and now a change in the formula used in clinical trials EUA should never have been granted.
The UKs Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) have said that the evidence strongly indicates that almost all children and young people are at very low risk from COVID-19.
The rates in 5 to 11 are so low that there were no "cases" of severe COVID-19 or death from either the treatment (n= 1,518) or control group (n= 750), this renders the "90% effective" claim, meaningless. This should have stopped an EUA application in its tracks, as clearly there is no emergency for this age group in particular and therefore no benefit either.
Additionally, Pfizer admit that the number of participants in the current clinical development program is too small to detect any potential risks of myocarditis associated with vaccination or long-term safety of COVID-19 vaccine in participants 5 to 11 years old.
THE INGREDIENTS
When the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine was granted an EUA from the FDA, its ingredients list was published online along with other safety data. The list included the now excluded ingredients sodium chloride and potassium chloride and includes the additional ingredient Tromethamine.
So this begs the question from me, has this drug ever been approved in this age group? And as noted above, the side effects are horrific, and will only muddy the waters further concerning the side effect already reported IMO. Talk about the psychopathic as reaction machines. Problem Reaction Solution. The solutions in all probability concerns more suffering for humanity.
This information should be posted fare and wide throughout the world, so parents can make an informed choice, on the benefit risk ratio of allowing their child to receive this jab. Of course this will not happen, too much at stake, for those that make a profit from human suffering, with no consequences.
Great article by Nick Fenton and Martin Neil regarding statistical bias. It is quite a long read, but it's mind-blowing how simple bias introduced into their model of placebo vaccinations introduced a perception of highly efficient vaccines. Are researchers aware of that kind of systemic errors? It seems not...
Is vaccine efficacy a statistical illusion?
To evaluate the risk/benefit of a vaccine for treating a virus, such as covid-19, we can compare the all-cause mortality rate of vaccinated against unvaccinated people on a periodic basis. If the mortality rate for those vaccinated is consistently lower than that for unvaccinated then we might conclude the vaccine must be beneficial.
Placebo Vaccination
Imagine that a placebo rather than a vaccine is quickly rolled out to a population of one million people of similar age and health. Let’s assume the weekly non-virus mortality rate for this population is 15 per 100,000 (100k), so we would expect about 150 out of the million to die in any given week. Because the placebo changes nothing, the mortality rates for both vaccinated and unvaccinated average the same 15 per 100k, each week every week. Hence, on average, what we should observe – as the ‘vaccination’ programme rolls out to most of the population - is shown in Table 1. Notice that the placebo vaccine roll-out programme is enacted at pace and the cumulative percentage of the population vaccinated rises to 98% within 12 weeks.
Table 1. Roll out of placebo ‘vaccine’. No observed differences in mortality rates (no population growth and each week total population reduced by previous week’s deaths).
Now suppose there is a one-week delay in the reporting of deaths. Such delays are routine in statistical reporting of mortality and vaccine data. Then the data reported by the authorities is different from reality, here shown in Table 2, which is the same as Table 1 but where the death totals are simply ‘shifted’ down one week.
Table 2. Death reporting delayed by one week.
Figure 1. Reported weekly mortality rates vaccinated against unvaccinated.
We might conclude that those who remain unvaccinated look to be suffering much higher levels of mortality than the vaccinated. The reporting delay therefore creates a completely artificial impression that the vaccine must be highly effective. In fact, it looks like a magic ‘cure all’ wonder drug!
The fact that the mortality rate of the unvaccinated peaks when the percentage of those vaccinated peaks should ring some alarm bells that something strange is going on (unless there is independent evidence that the virus was peaking at the same time).
ONS data on Covid-19 Vaccination
While the placebo vaccine example was purely hypothetical, Figure 2 shows the vaccinated against unvaccinated mortality using the data in the latest ONS report mortality in England by Covid-19 vaccination status (weeks 1 to 38)[1], complemented by NIMS vaccination survey data (up to week 27 only). Here we show other-than covid mortality to remove the virus signal.
Figure 2. Reported weekly other-than covid mortality rates for vaccinated versus unvaccinated for 60-69 age group for weeks 1-38 2021.
Note that we see the same features as the shifted graph in Figure 1. In other words, a perfectly reasonable explanation for what is observed here could be that there is no difference in mortality rates between vaccinated and unvaccinated and the mortality differences are simply a result of a delay in death reporting. Moreover, given we have removed covid deaths (which were only a small percentage of all-cause deaths in the reported data) we get a near identical result for non-covid mortality to that which would result if the vaccine were a placebo! Thus, we appear to have created a statistical illusion of vaccine efficacy.
If this is not a statistical illusion how is it possible that the unvaccinated are dying from non-covid causes at a higher rate than vaccinated? Also how is it possible that, at the time vaccination rates are ramped up to nearly 100% of the population, the nonvaccinated are dying from non-covid deaths at almost twice the rate of those who are vaccinated?
These same patterns are also observable in the 70-79 and 80+ age groups (with the mortality peaks for the unvaccinated appearing at different weeks because these age groups received vaccinations earlier). This strongly suggests that what we are observing is a genuine statistical illusion unexplainable by any real impact of the vaccine on mortality rates. There could, of course, be reasons other than just delays in death reporting or misclassification. For example, any systematic underestimation of the actual proportion who remain unvaccinated would lead to a higher mortality rate for unvaccinated higher than that for the vaccinated, even if the mortality rates were equal in each category.
Consider a deadly placebo
It is also important to note that even if the actual mortality rate for the vaccinated was higher than that of the unvaccinated, where the vaccine was causing death, as a side effect, we would still likely observe the same illusion.
To see this effect let’s revisit our placebo vaccine example and make a small change to Table 1 where instead of a mortality rate of 15 per 100k for the vaccinated, suppose it is 17 per 100k (a rise in mortality of approximately 13%). So, the placebo vaccine is killing two more people per 100k and gives no mortality benefit otherwise. In this scenario the reported mortality rate for the ‘deadly placebo’ is compared to the first ‘placebo’ scenario, in Figure 3. Even here we see the illusion that the mortality rate for the vaccinated is lower than unvaccinated. Both scenarios are the opposite of reality, and both look interchangeable. This means the chance of picking up a vaccine side effect signal is close to impossible and instead the illusion is created of vaccine efficacy.
Figure 3. Reported weekly mortality rates vaccinated against unvaccinated for ‘placebo’ scenario and ‘deadly placebo’ scenarios.
The illusion of declining vaccine efficacy
Finally, it is important to note that the same statistical illusion applies to all measures of vaccine efficacy whether they be cases, hospitalizations, or deaths. In fact, replacing the number of deaths in Table 1 with number of cases, with a one week reporting delay, would result in vaccine efficacy rates as shown in Figure 4.
Figure 4. Reported vaccine efficacy rates equivalent for placebo vaccine.
This occurs when the actual placebo vaccine efficacy for cases is zero.
This reporting bias is one type of bias that might be called ‘reporting lag censoring’, a phenomenon whereby structural or process factors systematically interfere with when data is handled and reported with the consequential effect that it is then misinterpreted, leading to false conclusions.
[1] Deaths involving COVID-19 by vaccination status, England - Office for National Statistics
On a personal note, my 95 yr old mother-in-law was taken to the hospital due to a fall and AFIB. She's had the 2 Pfizer jabs thanks to son and nurse practitioner wife's insistence. I immediately thought the AFib could be an adverse event and found this - a website by Sharyl Attkisson who was the investigative reporter who blew open the CDC swine flu statistical fraud:
Atrial fibrillation is an abnormal heart rhythm characterized by rapid and irregular beating of the atrial chambers of the heart. It often begins as short periods of abnormal beating, which become longer or continuous over time. It may also start as other forms of arrhythmia such as atrial flutter that then transform into AF.
So it appears AFib is an adverse event of the jabs. Of course, no one is associating this with the vax and I certainly won't be the one to say otherwise. In the process of saving this info and PCR test info posted in this thread, I came across some Fauci vids that are just startling as he is telling the truth about the vaxxes:
ADE anyone? Rumble vid:
Fauci Admits Covid Vaccines Can Trigger Death - 3237
You can become infected and transmit even though you're vaxxed:
FAUCI ADMITS COVID JAB DOESN'T CAUSE IMMUNITY
I mentioned the above fact to my hairdresser and she didn't believe it.
It does fly in the face of logic after all.
Covid-19 Vaccine Analysis: The most common adverse events reported so far
Most common Covid-19 vaccine adverse events reported as of July 19, 2021
25,319 Heart failure, heart rhythm and rate abnormalities, atrial fibrillation, palpitations, flutter, murmur, pacemaker added, fluid in heart, abnormal echocardiogram including:- 3,105 Heart attack or cardiac arrest, sudden loss of blood flow from failure to pump to heart effectively, cardiac failure, disorder
Atrial fibrillation is an abnormal heart rhythm characterized by rapid and irregular beating of the atrial chambers of the heart. It often begins as short periods of abnormal beating, which become longer or continuous over time. It may also start as other forms of arrhythmia such as atrial flutter that then transform into AF.
So it appears AFib is an adverse event of the jabs. Of course, no one is associating this with the vax and I certainly won't be the one to say otherwise. In the process of saving this info and PCR test info posted in this thread, I came across some Fauci vids that are just startling as he is telling the truth about the vaxxes:
ADE anyone? Rumble vid:
Fauci Admits Covid Vaccines Can Trigger Death - 3237
You can become infected and transmit even though you're vaxxed:
FAUCI ADMITS COVID JAB DOESN'T CAUSE IMMUNITY
I mentioned the above fact to my hairdresser and she didn't believe it.
It does fly in the face of logic after all.
My assumption, from the information gathered, in this prolific thread. Is that the word, placebo, is an aberration, and concerning drug trials, does not exist.. it is merely a concoction of the pharmaceutical industry to validate there self monitored research. As in the case of the fox guarding the hen house. Just my opinion.
Yep - MSM doing all it can to cover up what's happening:
Media Blitz: Surge in Heart Disease Due to 'Climate Change,' 'Broken Heart Syndrome,' 'Pandemic Anxiety'
The media is looking for absolutely anything (other than the obvious) to blame for the sudden surge in heart attacks, myocarditis, pericarditis and assorted heart diseases throughout the West.Access link to see all the absurd spin being put on the various adverse event heart conditions!
Edit add - these headlines are so outrageous, just had to show them:
Last edited:
OK, so no eating out or entertainments? Essential stuff is OK (for now)?
Yup, and in my daily conversations/interactions with Singaporeans i come across a lot of frustration with the situation - as there are still restrictions on gatherings and events in Singapore; due to this current spike. In Singapore there is already a kind of lockdown against the unvaccinated though not official. Without vaccination you can't enter many places, except hospitals and supermarkets and beginning January next year you wont be able to go to office/work if you are not vaccinated. Sometimes in my conversations with them i point out this fact - and immediately you can the see the programming take over. They start to rationalize and mention "its the delta variant; we relaxed restrictions too soon; its the unvaccinated that are causing this spike ...etc" ...programming is definitely complete.
However there is growing awareness here about the mRNA vaccines through word of mouth as many have suffered side effects....hence thats why the vaccination rate hasnt reached 100%. In response to this - the government actually finally allowed the Sinovac (non-mRNA) vaccines to be part of the National Vaccination program where previously it was only Pfizer or Moderna jabs.
Heads up, it's gotten a bit long and I didn't know where it would fit best, so if it fits better somewhere else, feel free to move it.
Now it has also arrived in my microcosm. I live in a community and we had once taken it upon ourselves to be solidary and open-minded. Everyone knows everyone and everyone helps everyone. Since I moved in in 2015, we've had a lot of fun together and everything has always been a bit "different" than in an anonymous apartment block.
At the beginning of the Corona period everyone was looking for ways out and there were concerts in our garden during the lockdown and singing from the balconies. My naive little mind had thought that even with the vaccination it would be different from somewhere else. Since yesterday I know that I seem to have been completely wrong.
About 100 people including children live here. We are a colourful average of humanity, there are all here families, couples, pensioners, disabled, gay, people from all over the world etc. As far as I know there are currently 6 unvaccinated people here in the house. Some time ago one of them started a group to network (at that time there were still 10 people not vaccinated) we met in our common room to exchange ideas. There were also a few like-minded people from "outside" (that's what they always call it when someone comes to visit).
A few "vaccinated" people noticed this and got terribly upset about the people we were bringing into the house... Words such as "lateral thinkers", "conspiracy theorists", "Nazis", etc. .... were used... At the next meeting, a flatmate who wanted to check things out "happened" to be in the common room right at the beginning of the meeting to look something up in the calendar.
This story alone shocked me, but I thought well, it's a few individuals....
Far from it... The day before yesterday, one of the unvaccinated shared an article on our in-house sharing forum, which I link here: 30 reasons why I don't vaccinate at the moment (nachdenkseiten.de).
And then came the comments:
When I read these comments I was really shocked, but it gets even better. We also have a solidarity working group in our house, it was held last night and my husband (vaccinated with AZ himself) went and faced the issue, which of course came up. He was there for 2.5 hours. When he came back, he drove in in his wheelchair with his hand raised and said: "I defended you to the death and really went out of my way.
He then told me about the talks... Everyone just parrots the mainstream without thinking, or even having any accurate information. Since he studies the subject a lot and also reads on sites other than MSM, he was able to refute all their arguments and they were, according to him, irritated that he knew so much. I looked at him and listened to him and was just happy that he is my husband and stands by me like that. And while telling them, it struck me HOW MUCH he actually knows. So we already talk a lot about what we think and I knew he knew a lot. But the fact that he can bring it across and completely invalidate their arguments, I didn't expect to the same extent. He said that with every argument he refuted, they were just silent. I am a bit proud of my brave hero.
What disappoints me though is that it is now hitting me in my closest environment, here was somehow still such a "free zone". I am very curious to see how this will continue. For me, I will continue to handle it the same way as before, I haven't changed my way of dealing with people and I will continue to be friendly, respectful and helpful and if direct attacks should actually happen (which I haven't experienced so far, fortunately), then I will hopefully also keep the calmness that my husband has displayed.
Please excuse the long post and I congratulate everyone who made it to the end here.
Now it has also arrived in my microcosm. I live in a community and we had once taken it upon ourselves to be solidary and open-minded. Everyone knows everyone and everyone helps everyone. Since I moved in in 2015, we've had a lot of fun together and everything has always been a bit "different" than in an anonymous apartment block.
At the beginning of the Corona period everyone was looking for ways out and there were concerts in our garden during the lockdown and singing from the balconies. My naive little mind had thought that even with the vaccination it would be different from somewhere else. Since yesterday I know that I seem to have been completely wrong.
About 100 people including children live here. We are a colourful average of humanity, there are all here families, couples, pensioners, disabled, gay, people from all over the world etc. As far as I know there are currently 6 unvaccinated people here in the house. Some time ago one of them started a group to network (at that time there were still 10 people not vaccinated) we met in our common room to exchange ideas. There were also a few like-minded people from "outside" (that's what they always call it when someone comes to visit).
A few "vaccinated" people noticed this and got terribly upset about the people we were bringing into the house... Words such as "lateral thinkers", "conspiracy theorists", "Nazis", etc. .... were used... At the next meeting, a flatmate who wanted to check things out "happened" to be in the common room right at the beginning of the meeting to look something up in the calendar.
This story alone shocked me, but I thought well, it's a few individuals....
Far from it... The day before yesterday, one of the unvaccinated shared an article on our in-house sharing forum, which I link here: 30 reasons why I don't vaccinate at the moment (nachdenkseiten.de).
And then came the comments:
1. It makes me sad and angry how you can still deny the pandemic. We have residents in our house whose friends and relatives have died of Corona. And in our common room you meet with 'unvaccinated people' who do not live in the Martha Housing Project.
In your complaint to the MV you write: "...as long as the health salvation of society is propagated and accepted solely in the eradication of the unvaccinated by injections and fear drives us further apart".
I don't understand your views! Greetings R.
2. "...as long as the health salvation of society is propagated and accepted solely in the eradication of the unvaccinated by injections, and fear drives us further apart."
What language! Extermination in the context of human beings. Are you crazy?! To me it almost feels more like a tyranny of the anti-vaccinationists at the moment. Like this
In my opinion, the only ones who create division/split and fear are the (Ver)leaders and rulers of the so-called lateral thinkers, the party "die Basis", the AfD and self-proclaimed health experts who were kicked out of university at some point. On their head go: Manslaughter, verbal and physical attacks on journalists, hospital staff being threatened and insulted, aggressive behaviour in front of schools, no clear demarcation from right-wing radicals, harbouring Q-Anon supporters, fake news, denigration of victims of National Socialism, ...
Thought pages... well... reminds me partly of a few scenes from the film "The Life of Brian". I clicked on the article anyway. It makes you dizzy with all the numbers and links. Are they all serious? Or did he just pick out the ones that suited him? Can lay people, like us, judge the work and statements of virologists? So I don't understand you any better.
Oh well, you can follow the measures and get vaccinated and still be critical.
Get out of there
Greetings S.
3. Dear H,
Enough!
I don't want any contrarian/conspiracy theorist talk here in the house. It doesn't fit with the diversity here.
It's not "fear" that is ruining our coexistence, it's your aggressive demand to scatter attachments in minutes and your sharing frenzy.
Don't you realise that the majority in Martha neither understands nor shares your opinion?
If you want to inform us about Mr. unknown's reasons against everything, including the Corona vaccination, what do you want to tell us?
No, I understand you less and less!
E.
4. Various aspects to H's contribution, which left me almost speechless in view of his otherwise so esteemed and grandiose intelligence and immense knowledge:
- In the article cited (which I must admit I have not listened to in its entirety), the argument against vaccination is teeming with words like "could" "probably" "possible" etc.
- What is almost completely missing is an approach on how to contain the virus, except perhaps for the propagated herd immunity, where as many as possible get infected - and accordingly many die in the process. What cynicism! In past plague epidemics, for example, it was not uncommon for up to a third of the population to be wiped out. I prefer even the dilettantism of the current politicians.
- The fact that people do not trust the figures published in the "normal" news is completely incomprehensible to me.
In Germany we have - thank God - a pretty well-functioning journalism. And it thrives on exposing everything that is not going well: "Only bad news are good news". I can't for the life of me imagine that no one from BILD to FAZ, SZ to TAZ would have noticed if there was anything even remotely wrong. Instead, people trust people they've never heard of before. Not to mention arguments like "I know someone there".
- It often sounds like the vaccinated are being accused of being a bit stupid and spreading the virus faster than the unvaccinated. How is it then that there are countries where at the same time the vaccination rate is very high and the incidence very low? E.g. Portugal, Spain but also Cambodia.
- Sometimes rules (= restrictions) are needed in a community to make living together better and safer for everyone. Just imagine if there were no speed limits, with the justification (which we have already had): "Free travel for free citizens".
- But it is also clear that there is no such thing as one hundred percent safety. Not against a virus, not even against side effects. But should we therefore go for zero safety?
I have no FEAR of Corona, but great RESPECT. Admittedly, I have also been a bit lax in using Covid lately. The measures are annoying, of course. But I just stick to the rules for reasons of solidarity, because they seem (for the most part) reasonable and understandable to me.
So dear(!) unvaccinated people: think again. Take a close look at the official figures and weigh up the risk: of contracting covid, or of side effects. And the risk of infecting others.
Here's to a - despite all this - good, mindful coexistence.
Greetings
S.
PS: Phew, that had to come out!
When I read these comments I was really shocked, but it gets even better. We also have a solidarity working group in our house, it was held last night and my husband (vaccinated with AZ himself) went and faced the issue, which of course came up. He was there for 2.5 hours. When he came back, he drove in in his wheelchair with his hand raised and said: "I defended you to the death and really went out of my way.
He then told me about the talks... Everyone just parrots the mainstream without thinking, or even having any accurate information. Since he studies the subject a lot and also reads on sites other than MSM, he was able to refute all their arguments and they were, according to him, irritated that he knew so much. I looked at him and listened to him and was just happy that he is my husband and stands by me like that. And while telling them, it struck me HOW MUCH he actually knows. So we already talk a lot about what we think and I knew he knew a lot. But the fact that he can bring it across and completely invalidate their arguments, I didn't expect to the same extent. He said that with every argument he refuted, they were just silent. I am a bit proud of my brave hero.
What disappoints me though is that it is now hitting me in my closest environment, here was somehow still such a "free zone". I am very curious to see how this will continue. For me, I will continue to handle it the same way as before, I haven't changed my way of dealing with people and I will continue to be friendly, respectful and helpful and if direct attacks should actually happen (which I haven't experienced so far, fortunately), then I will hopefully also keep the calmness that my husband has displayed.
Please excuse the long post and I congratulate everyone who made it to the end here.
