Florian Schilling • Corona Investigative Committee, Berlin
Session No 143 "Stumbling Blocks / Stolpersteine"
English Version • 1 hour 41 minutes
Hier geht's zum deutschen Stream:
odysee.com
German Version • 1 hour 41 minutes
English Stream:
odysee.com
PART TWO
Myocarditis
e.g. even in children
Florian Schilling refers to an interesting
cohort study made in the
Nordic Countries of Scandinavia, with 23 million people (who where
registered been in contact with the health care systems), above the age of 12 year, from the time between Dec 2020 to October 2021 - in a time of
pre-Omikron Variants; a time frame which was labeled of having had more pathogenic virus, compared to the variants that exist today, which are barely pathogenic by comparison.
The criteria in this study were
registered,
diagnosed Myocarditis and/or Pericarditis up until 28 days after "vaccination" - as well excluded from booster doses. So, they only looked at the Basic "Vaccinations"; dose 1+2)
The control group was made of unvaccinated people during the aforementioned time fame of Dec 2020 to Oct 2021.
www.florianschillingscience.org • 2022
One of the problem was, that people had different "vaccination" protocols, e.g. people got jabs made by different companies, which makes the assessment of damage and their origin more difficult to determine. [Which i consider to be totally unscientific in the first place. If you think about how can you even allow to make people take different Covid-19 jabs and that is supposedly OK !? Which serious scientist / doctor / authority allows something like that in the first place - if you want to be considered to be a serious player in the field of good healthcare ? The official procedure, "anything goes" - was alone a major red flag in my eyes.]
Florian Schilling says, that the authors of the study still tried to distinguish the "vaccine" products as best as it was possible. The data which comes out of this Nordic Study, is to say the least, scary.
Incidence Rate Ratio (IRR)
The
prevalence of
Myocarditis/pericarditis in
12-15 year olds after "vaccination", shows a
enlarged risk by a whopping 850%, or 8.5 times. It that is the ratio among 12-15 year olds injected, showing the kind of damages more often in comparison to the unvaccinated. And when you consider that there is no, and never was any risk from Covid in that age group (0%), while the risk of lifelong damages from the jabs, are absolutely disastrous in terms of risk numbers.
Now when we look at the age group between 16-24 year olds - it is absolutely mind boggling bad, showing a
risk increase of extreme 3560 % or 35.6 times compared to the unvaccinated. [I never thought we would encounter such extreme numbers, I mean, normally we are dealing with faction of a percent or at best a couple percent, but what the global world pulled off with the Covid injections, is so way beyond anything we ever have encountered... and to call this "in the name of health", must be among the worst of all medical interventions ever having been conducted in peace times].
In the age group of
25-39 year olds, the incidence of Myocarditis/pericarditis after the two first jabs, was
23.2 times, or 2320% compared to the unvaccinated.
People
above the age of 40, had a
3.5 times higher risk, or 350%.
Since most of the ages are outside of any risk for Covid, the "medical" intervention of those experimental, genetic injections, is literally brutal, beyond anything that has to do with "medicine", leading to the extreme prevalence of serious damages.
[How can the injections still be defended in the public space by authorities. Even today, in Sweden in Feb 2023, the Health Authorities still recommend people to get injected with this... sorry the expression... shit ! Because that is exactly what it is. On top we are talking about a cohort study made in Scandinavia...with a whopping 23 million people. So, it begs the question: what does all the clear evidence and wisdom actually lead to, while authorities continue to recommend it in the style of "business as usual". It is truly a sobering view, a raw, crude realization, over how dynamics behind our "State of affairs" actually work]
Myocarditis Study from the US
In this study, they have looked at registered and
confirmed cases 519 Myocarditis after "vaccination", with an average age of 17 years. They followed up the people with observations, in which they determine that after 90 days, the authors of this study declare proudly that 81% "considered fully recovered** " (**not really, but that is how they put it - and i'll explain later) They used in their 90 day follow up, electro cardiography, electro echography, MRI's - in order to determine how the Myocarditis developed during the time.
So, while 81% were declared to have "fully recovered", it begs the question in this study, what happened to the other, official 19% of Myocarditis cases later on - which are
one of five young people who
didn't recover we are speaking of ! That is from a perspective of a 17 year old, a dramatic finding.
As we go deeper into this study, the authors are declaring that 68% where "cleared for all physical activity"... which at the same time, also reveals that
a third of the young ones,
are not cleared for all physical activity... and where still significantly restricted in physical activities.
Meaning they got restrictions from the doctors, weren't recommended to do certain physical actives, due to the risk of overloading their hearts.
When we look further into the study, with Follow-up MRI's,
54% show significant anomalies (!) after 90 days. It doesn't say that it is a matter of still having a myocarditis, but clearly shows that their hearts had irregularities/anomalies left, that their hearts are still in a state of conversion processes going on. 13% still showed the presence of a Myocarditis after 90 days, according to this study - which still is a damn high level, Florian Schilling says.
So, when we compare the date from this US study with the data from Scandinavia, we determine that this "vaccination" ain't any good at all for the young ones, and that ⅓ still have serious issues on their hearts after 90 days. It is telling story which lets us forebode what's really going on.
Israel Study
Since there are statements which claim
"... but covid is worse" in comparison to the the side effects above. Then lets have a look at a study which comes from Israel:
The Israeli retrospective cohort study looks at clinically confirmed cases of Covid infection (Mainly during "Alpha" Wuhan and Delta variants) in 196,992 adults - during a time frame between March 2020 and January 2021, and determined up after the 10th day after positive PCR test and a minimum observation time of 18 days
What did they find ?
BAM ! Nothing.
No increased incidence of neither pericarditis nor myocarditis in adults patients recovering from Covid-19.
This all shows us, that there is no medical reason of any kind, which would support the use of Covid-19 injection on people of 40 year and younger - because the risk of severe side effects are endlessly higher after those genetic injections, in age groups where Covid in itself isn't of any large risk to begin with.
The above data which the studies are based on - are publicly published data from the official Health Authorities ! The data cannot be discussed away !
Myocarditis is always a dangerous condition.
Once the heart tissue is damaged, it cannot get regenerated. Which means, the rest of the healthy cells in the heart, have to take over the work load of the tissue that has died and turned into scar tissue, making the heart cells overall having an equally higher work load.
To claim that a myocarditis can heal, is "mild" and that a patient recovers from it - is false.
Myocarditis is always a life shortening event [At least in a 3D realm of sense] and there is always consequential damage involved, Florian Schilling says. Rule of thumb is always with heart damages, that what is destroyed, remains destroyed. This is the same problem with people who had a heart attack, that some heart tissue is getting destroyed in such events. And when a person's lifestyle does not change after such an event, the person enters a circle of increased / more heart attacks in the near future, in which the heart damage increases every time, while the work load on the remaining heart tissue gets more and more overworked / e.g. getting a heart insufficiency. A young / middle aged person (30-40) can get the condition of the heart equally that of an old person (65 yo)
Myocarditis has a similar effect.
To speak about "fully recovered from Myocarditis" is pretty wrong to speak of.
Dr Wolfgang Wodarg, states, that there is a peak of Myocarditis cases topping around the age of 20 in average. That when the experimental, genetic injections are given to the young people, placed into the delta muscle of the arm - that the muscle of an sport athlete has a particularly good Blood circulation - the assumption is that the injected products has a much further spread in the body compared to a normal, average person. And
the injected products go almost immediately into the heart of the athletes and into the lungs, resulting into large/widespread inflammatory damages.
Florian Schilling adds, that a
second factor comes into play with young people:
A phenomena which explains why we see certain overall phenomenas in young people - is - that young people have a much
more active cell activity (cell ? expression) in their
ribosomes which
translate proteins, including those artificially induced genetic strains who hijack the human cells, transcribe the code, into creating toxic spike proteins. All this activity is much stronger taking place in young people, especially athletes.
He says we do not know exactly how many spike proteins are produced in people, because we don't have data on that - so the whole process is a bit nebulous. Young people generally express much higher levels of proteins. Therefore the injections, that the liposomes can result into far stronger/higher expression of spike proteins compared to an older person. This would/could explain why the presence of myocarditis is more prevalent in younger people, compared to older people. It is a double effect in younger people (better blood circulation / lager spread of the toxic products + and higher cell expression ). [Florian Schilling says that is a
plausible hypothesis]
In 12 year olds and younger, they have less muscle masses, and (in average) the spread effect of the toxic products via blood, isn't as active as with young adults around 17-24 of age.
The implications of: First 14 days = counted as "unvaccinated" (after 2nd jab)
Dr Wolfgang Wodarg inserts the comment, to the question how fast does a Myocarditis appear in young people - stating that the peak in average is already reached on day 3, and as early as 1 day. And the sinister in this is, that the official health authorities insisted on not counting the jabbed ones as "vaccinated", not until after day 14 after the second jab ! This means, most of the death cases due to Myocarditis, were not registered under "vaccinated".
[Which I assume lead to the idiotic shouting in public: "Pandemic of the unvaccinated" - being nothing else than a play with statistics, by twisting the requirements of what counts as "vaccinated" and "vaccine" injury. All being put into the same category of "unvaccinated", although many of them already had gotten the toxic injections, including damages and particularly high rates of deaths
- which occurred especially within the first days after even the first injection, as well second ! ]
It is now known that the Nano particles
already after 6 hours after injection, are accumulating in tissue, creating inflammatory processes. The activity of the jabs, the
transcription of the artificial genetic material into the cells, starts immediately after injection.
So, a lot more is now known in the actions of how those injection work into/onto the body. Now since these injected products basically work immediately, the spike proteins get's created and starts immediately - it is then a question when (how long time it takes) the immunological reactions in the body starts to ramp up with inflammatory actions. If all actions peak or align / come together at the same time, that is when the pressure onto the body overall is at the very worst (with risk for death or severe damages). Especially
after the second jab,
prominent damages can already occur
within a half day.
Florian Schilling says, we now know that the
spike protein expression generally starts to get lower after 2 weeks***. But damages can be encountered for very long time after the 2 weeks time span.
*** (However, here he indicates that so called anti-idiotypical (antibody) proteins can turn this 2 week threshold totally obsolete, resulting into the lifelong production of specific proteins, which in the structure are identical to that of the artifical spike protein, but are no spike proteins (yet, induce the same toxicity and damage potential that of the spike proein) 
I get to this in a new entry.
The Nano particles are collected in the liver after several days, and then slowly, laboriously being degraded by the liver, trying to get rid of them which takes many weeks. But they don't circulate in the body anymore.
Inflammatory Heart Conduction nerves !
Dr Wolfgang Wodarg, explains that the
nerves which give the heart the pulse to beat, are located in or near the
right heart chamber - which is the
same chamber where the blood arrives from e.g. the delta muscle in which the injections are injected. So, if the Heart-Conduction system gets affected by the inflammation due to the particles from the jab, resulting into erratic heart rhythms - it can easily lead to death. You do not even need to have damages in the heart muscle itself, if the Heart Conduction nerves are damaged or interrupted though inflammation, this alone can lead to death due to Heart fibrillation. (Sudden heart death, which goes very quickly and doesn't even hurt - Wodarg says. Everything turns black, and then they suddenly collapse).
