Alejo's "We Will Not Comply Again" and Uperios "The Reese Report" video plus Navigator's post mention the entertainment company Lionsgate instituting masks again. This is probably not the right place for this but since Lionsgate keeps coming up right now, I'll just put it here.

Lions Gate Entertainment Corp. is a global mass media and entertainment company but is mostly known for its film division Lionsgate created in Vancouver, BC in 1997, with headquarters in Santa Monica. It is owned by Canadian billionaire Frank Giustra, who is also CEO of Fiore Group of Companies, the co-chair of International Crisis Group, board chairman of Acceso, and a mining financier.

On the ICG:
[A NPO & NGO] think tank used by policymakers and academics, conducting research and analysis on global crises. ICG has described itself as "working to prevent wars and shape policies that will build a more peaceful world".
With the support of Giustra, who sits on the executive committee, and contributions that total $10 million, the International Crisis Group is a leading independent, non-partisan, source of analysis and advice to governments and intergovernmental bodies like the United Nations, European Union, and World Bank on the prevention and resolution of deadly conflict.

On Acceso:
In 2007, Giustra and President Bill Clinton launched the Clinton Giustra Enterprise Partnership, which in 2020 transitioned into a new independent entity named Acceso. Acceso is a social business builder. Acceso, with support from Giustra, invested start-up capital, built from scratch, and manages agribusinesses in Colombia, El Salvador, and Haiti.

A few snips from around the forum on this guy:

"Pizzagate" Link:
PELPIDA HOME PEDO LOGO discovered – Owned by Radcliffe Foundation, Owned by Billionaire Frank Giustra who Donated BIG money to Clinton Foundation!
...
For two decades, the Radcliffe Foundation has been dedicated to enhancing the welfare, health, and education of children; supporting programs to enhance health generally; and financing and promoting education.
...

The Clinton Foundation's Board of Directors governs the work of the Foundation. Our Board shapes the Foundation's direction through its mission, strategy, budget, and key policies; ensures that the leadership, resources, and finances in place match the Foundation's vision; and monitors and improves the performance of the organization. The Foundation Board meets formally three times each year, as well as between the regular meetings as needed to conduct the Foundation's business.

Board of Directors

Bruce Lindsey, Chairman of the Board
Chelsea Clinton, Vice Chair of the Board
President Bill Clinton
Frank Giustra
Rolando Gonzalez-Bunster
Ambassador Eric Goosby, MD
Hadeel Ibrahim
Lisa Jackson
Cheryl Mills
Cheryl Saban, Ph.D.

The Radcliffe Foundation is now known as the Giustra Foundation.
The Vancouver-based foundation supports initiatives focused on women and children, education, homelessness and refugee resettlement in British Columbia and elsewhere in Canada. The Giustra Foundation is involved in the global refugee crisis by providing humanitarian aid, along with being the founding partner in the Global Refugee Sponsorship Initiative.

When it comes to BC homelessness, for those who know Vancouver, I wonder if one should look at East Hastings Street?

"Pizzagate" link:
6 James Achilles Alefantis has visited the White House five times and is working intimately with and on behalf of the Clinton Foundation, Podestas, Carlos Slim, Frank Giustra, Jeffrey Epstein, and Soros.

Topic sur Q in French link: @ 2:03-2:38 (video from June 7, 2016)
Look, I will give you the most extreme example involves her (Hillary Clinton) husband's friend Frank Giustra, a Canadian, who asked Mrs. Clinton, as a foreigner, for permission to own shares in a uranium mine in Utah- Secretary of State has the permission. She granted the permission. He sold 80% of his shares to Vladimir Putin. The Russians now own this uranium mine in Utah. He then gave $145 million dollars from the proceeds to the Clinton Foundation.

This controversy went nowhere and went away.

The Uranium One mine was located at Willow Creek which is in Wyoming not Utah (it doesn't look there has been any uranium mining in Utah since 1989 with renewed interest only as of Jan. 2023). Since 2013, it was 100% owned by Rosatom with its headquarters in Moscow, and has been closed since August 2018. Uranium Energy Corp bought the Uranium One Americas, Inc. portfolio for $112 million + $2.9 million on Dec. 20, 2021, creating America's largest uranium mining company.

2020 US Election - Let The Games Begin! link:
Not only is Bing a big donor to the Democratic Party, he donated more to the Clinton Foundation than they got from Frank Giustra. That’s significant because Giustra gives them a cut of his Uranium One proceeds.
 
More killer facts:

The preprint study mentioned, I think, is one that was available July 5, 2023 from Lancet.com, but it's not there. It was removed within 24 hrs because:

This preprint has been removed by Preprints with The Lancet because the study's conclusions are not supported by the study methodology. Preprints with The Lancet reserves the right to remove a paper that has been posted if we determine that it has violated our screening criteria.

On July 7, Fact Check wrote this article "Fact Check: A 'Lancet Study' Does NOT Show COVID Vaccine Caused 74% Of Deaths In Sample -- Lancet Rejected Paper And Its Methods". From July 5th to the 7th? That's a two day turn around. That study was beaten with the 'shut up stick' quick.

But I downloaded the two files from Zenodo. As the Keymaker from the Matrix says, "There's always another way."

 
Documentary of 2020

This DOCUMENTARY*, intends to be a synthesis, and at the same time, a way of transmitting information, after the impact produced by the unanimous approval, in the National Congress, of the *Law 27.491, called "Public Policy for the Control of Vaccine Preventable Diseases".

Fundamental rights are valuable as long as they contribute to peace, equality, the assurance of the person and, above all, their value as an end and not as a means.
They are based on their universal nature -personal freedom, freedom of thought, political freedom, social rights, including health rights-, they are supranational in nature and intimately related to the guarantee they offer.

They are unavailable, inviolable, intransigible, inalienable. They cannot be limited by third parties, including the State.

In these times of serious ecological, socio-environmental and health emergencies, in which not only our lives but also the life of the Planet itself are at stake, societies should not become less democratic, but quite the contrary.

We believe that defending our fundamental rights is a necessity.
We believe that, just as information makes us Free, so does Truth.
Luciana Gagliardo. President of Conciencia Solidaria NGO.
Dr. Nora Giménez. Legal Advisor.


Now with respect to Law 27.491 in Argentina, on August 31 of 2023 the following occurred:

The President of the Nation, Alberto Fernandez signed the decree regulating the "Law for the Control of Vaccine-Preventable Diseases (27491)" whose author is the current national senator Pablo Yedlin -better known as the Vaccine Law- and which establishes that it is the National State who has to acquire them, the obligatory nature of the national calendar, the distribution and free access for the whole population.

The regulation was made effective through decree 439/2023 published in the Official Gazette, with the signatures of President Alberto Fernández, the Chief of Cabinet, Agustín Rossi, and the Minister of Health, Carla Vizzotti.

With this new regulation of the so-called "Yedlin laws", those already regulated are: the above mentioned Vaccine Law (No. 27,491), the Law for the purchase of COVID-19 vaccines (No. 27,573), the Law for the prevention of Antimicrobial Resistance (No. 27,680). And the Executive Power of the Nation still has to regulate the Law on Digital Prescription-Medical Tele-assistance (27553) and the Law for the Promotion of Training and Development of Nursing (27712).

Article 2 of Law 27.491 understands vaccination as a preventive and highly effective public health strategy. It is also considered a social good, subject to the following principles:

a) Free vaccines and access to vaccination services, with social equity for all stages of life;

b) Compulsory vaccination for the inhabitants;

c) Prevalence of public health over private interests;


d) Availability of vaccines and vaccination services;

e) Participation of all health sectors and others linked to their social determinants, with the aim of achieving satisfactory vaccination coverage on a sustained basis.

Full text of Law 27491 Control of vaccine-preventable diseases:

 
Yesterday during our son`s annual check up all went pretty well until the last 2 minutes where the doc and a nurse practitioner took the time and effort to recommend a flu shot for him. I said politely no and we walked away. Same happened at his school at the beginning of this week. Same answer...no thanks. No law, not even a mandate and this thing is being pushed in again. Of course I have read about other places with similar "requirements" but it didn`t really sink in, until it hit home.
Well, if nothing changes, we will be starting homeschooling which with both of us working is going to be a challenge on its own.
 
The world deserves an explanation of exactly what happened and how this went sideways.
Karen Kingston interview with Mike Adams explaining what happened and why - she states there are more details on her substack - along with an apology for her plea for help video that came from a combination of fear, stress, and sleep deprivation that manifested in fight or flight mode plus exposure to an unknown, possibly neurotoxic substance causing paranoia:

1693671037622.png


Other details of the interview are relevant as to what may be in store for non-conformists in the very near future.
 
David Krayden (Canadian investigative reporter) speaks with Clayton Morris about the nut jobs demonstrating for a return to masking. Also Sherry Lewis's death because the lung transplant she needed was denied because she was unjabbed. Tests showed she had antibodies. She couldn't raise the money in time to have the surgery in the US in time. (14:00 minutes)

 
From zerohedge (and the more info like this gets out, the better!):

Conflicting Evidence Of mRNA Technology Raises Serious Concerns About Rush For Use In New Vaccine Development

Although mRNA platforms are appealing because they reduce costs and shorten the vaccine development timeline, evidence and experience suggest the mRNA technology used for novel COVID-19 vaccines is associated with various harms and neither prevents COVID-19 nor its transmission.

Evidence Challenging Vaccine ‘Safe and Effective’ Narrative

The unprecedented rates of adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination overshadow the benefits, according to researchers from Australia who say the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, whether from the virus or created from genetic code in mRNA and adenovectorDNA vaccines, is toxic and causes a wide array of diseases.

In their recently published paper published in Biomedicines titled, “‘Spikeopathy’: COVID-19 Spike Protein Is Pathogenic, from Both Virus and Vaccine mRNA,” the researchers explored peer-reviewed data countering the “safe and effective” narrative attached to new technologies used to develop mRNA and adenovectorDNA vaccines at “warp speed” to end the pandemic.

Spike protein pathogenicity, termed “spikeopathy,” describes the ability of the spike protein to cause disease, and the researchers say it can affect many organ systems.

Researchers noted the following key problem areas:

  • Spike protein toxicity (spikeopathy) from both the virus and when produced by gene codes in people vaccinated with COVID-19 vaccines.
  • Inflammatory properties in specific lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) used to transport mRNA.
  • Long-lasting action caused by N1-methyl pseudouridine in the synthetic mRNA—also referred to as modRNA.
  • Widespread distribution of mRNA and DNA codes via the LNP and viral vector carrier matrices, respectively.
  • Human cells produce a foreign protein that can cause autoimmunity.
 
Came across this The Epoch Times article today, not sure what to make of it or if it is even correct:


What it is getting at (was it discussed on the forum (not by Steger)? - could not find mention), is the claim that the vaccines and Boosters were never mRNA, they were Modified RNA. Here is what it states (from Klaus Steger, Ph.D.):

Okay, this bothered me and I still don't know, however with his Epoch Times article, there was a link to a paper from here. The paper cited is called “Advances in COVID-19 mRNA vaccine development,” Enyue Fang et al, Nature, March23, 2022: Advances in COVID-19 mRNA vaccine development - Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy

Had slugged my way through it to see if I could understand how this works. The paper itself is a fascinating look at the mRNA development process (Malone is mentioned) and what worked and did not, right into the covid years. Terms will come up, such as saRNA compared to mRNA and in close "Both Moderna and BioNTech use pseudouridine modifications to ensure mRNA stability in their COVID-19 vaccine formulation."


One can read what pseudouridine modification looks like:

Pseudouridine (Ψ) is a post-transcriptional RNA modification that alters RNA–RNA and RNA–protein interactions that affect gene expression. Messenger RNA pseudouridylation was recently discovered as a widespread and conserved phenomenon, but the mechanisms responsible for selective, regulated pseudouridylation of specific sequences within mRNAs were unknown. Here, we have revealed mRNA targets for five pseudouridine synthases and probed the determinants of mRNA target recognition by the predominant mRNA pseudouridylating enzyme, Pus1, by developing high-throughput kinetic analysis of pseudouridylation in vitro. Combining computational prediction and rational mutational analysis revealed an RNA structural motif that is both necessary and sufficient for mRNA pseudouridylation. Applying this structural context information predicted hundreds of additional mRNA targets that were pseudouridylated in vivo. These results demonstrate a structure-dependent mode of mRNA target recognition by a conserved pseudouridine synthase and implicate modulation of RNA structure as the probable mechanism to regulate mRNA pseudouridylation.

Before this paper, the original Epoch Times article seems to mimic, although not exactly, what Klaus had written in PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC back in April:

Within, Klaus cites this Substack article that I did not tackle, and I'm not even understanding of the above, other than this has been lengthy back in time, and to make it work it required a pseudouridine modification process of RNA.

Anyway, I still don't know and do not have the background. If any one with background wants to kick this can, by all means.


Going back to Principia Scientific, Klaus ends with:

The so-called RNA-based vaccines from Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna contain DNA impurities in addition to the active substance modRNA.

As stated in the EMA Assessment Report, “the BNT162b2 [Pfizer vaccine] active substance is manufactured by in vitro transcription using a linear DNA template, produced via plasmid DNA from transformed Escherichia coli cells.”

In a very recent study, researchers demonstrated that the DNA contamination in both the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna injections averages 9.1 nanograms/microliter (ng/µl) mean DNA concentration versus 33.4 ng/µl mean RNA concentration.

This means that approximately one-quarter (9.1 / 33.4 x 100 = 27.3 percent) of the nucleic acids in the analyzed vials can be attributed to DNA impurities. At the same time, the active substance modRNA represents the remaining three-quarters.

Plasmids are circular DNA molecules that can replicate by themselves. It’s assumed that this isn’t the case with linearized DNA. Although the proportion of circular, replication-competent DNA plasmids versus linear DNA templates for the in vitro transcription of modRNA is still unknown, the DNA concentration isn’t only several orders of magnitude over the limit of 330 nanograms/milligram (ng/mg), as specified by the EMA, but also implies that billions of DNA molecules are transferred per shot of the RNA-based vaccines.

This has the following two consequences:

  1. Plasmids generally comprise sequences encoding for antibiotic resistance; this is essential for the production process to avoid the reproduction of other bacteria, which didn’t contain the sequences encoding for the spike protein. In this instance, kanamycin can be exchanged with other bacteria, increasing the risk of developing multiresistant germs.
  2. DNA impurities have the potential to incorporate into the recipient cell genome and, in consequence, may cause mutations that are followed by aberrant gene expression. Reverse transcription by LINE1 is no longer a mandatory step for the integration of spike protein-encoding sequences into the genome. Reverse transcription of modRNA into DNA followed by genome integration is the long way. However, an additional short way may exist—namely, direct integration of DNA contaminants. Both sequences (RNA and DNA) encode for the spike protein.
Finally, the process of in vitro transcription will also result in truncated RNA species as product-related impurities, which will result in the synthesis of imperfect spike proteins.

Summary​

The administered COVID mRNA vaccine is modRNA, which has been optimized for longevity and translational effectiveness, and contradicts the nature of mRNA.

The modRNA forces perfectly healthy cells to produce a viral protein, transforming these cells from friend to foe. Therefore, RNA-based injections aren’t vaccines at all but genetic manipulations. This certainly challenges the political narrative of a powerful next generation of vaccines.

Potential negative consequences are still far from being understood. Numerous adverse effects have already become obvious, shifting the cost-benefit ratio of RNA-based vaccine technology for mass application unequivocally to the negative side.

Acknowledgment​

The highly valuable support and discussion with Andreas Schnepf, University of Tübingen, is gratefully acknowledged.
 
Pretty damning video by "Press for Truth" in Canada. (20 minutes long)

Double masked protester want everyone back in masks. Questions - Scuffle - Police. (Vancouver BC)


Holly Shiite!

One can only speculate what the latter fall has in store, and if this is any sign...

As @Natus Videre said:
⚠️ Zombie Warning
 
Relish the victories!

Fired Professor Wins Key Victory In Free Speech Case Over Mask, Vaccine Policy

A professor who was fired from the University of Southern Maine for challenging COVID-19 mandates has won a critical courtroom victory, after a district judge ruled that her First Amendment lawsuit against the institution can proceed.

Patricia Griffin, who says she was fired for asking valid questions about mask and vaccination policies on campus during the COVID-19 pandemic, was granted the narrow win after the university filed a motion to dismiss the case in part. US District Judge Jon Levy ruled that while Griffin's First Amendment claim can proceed, other charges were dismissed.

On Aug. 18, 2021, the University of Main announced a mandatory mask policy. Six days later, Griffin took part in a luncheon meeting via Zoom, where the speaker was Glenn Cummings, president of the university. Griffin says Cummings wasn't wearing a mask at the time.

Later that day she sent an email to the Dean of the College of Management and Human Service, claiming that she had been following "science, data, and evidence" related to the pandemic. Griffin said in the email that she was "searching for anything that will support wearing a mask while indoors as well as vaccinating an entire school population as the optimal method for stopping the transmission of the virus. The reality is that my research has found no evidence to support these measures."
 
Also Sherry Lewis's death because the lung transplant she needed was denied because she was unjabbed.
Totally crazy the official reasoning of denying a transplant because she wasn't vaxxed, but, was the potential organ from a vaxxed donor? I can't imagine, with the mindset being voiced, that the donor wouldn't have been vaxxed, and that receiving that organ would pass on the "benefits" of the vax. Why wasn't that brought up as a rebuttal to the objections or does that fly against the official science? :huh:

Edit: Just watched the part of the vid where a patient denied a transplant was asked to donate his organs as he lay dying! So I guess you don't have to be vaxxed to donate organs! Of course, those are probably reserved for the elites who know the vaxxed variety are to be avoided at all costs!
 
Just started watching, and wow! Dr. McCullough again does another beat down of the global pandemic conspiracy! He's incredible and God bless him for his courage, determination, and perseverance! He will not stand down against the lies and manipulation, but will and has fought for the absolute truth about the evil that has been perpetrated upon humanity in the name of health!
[31:58]
 
Back
Top Bottom