Won't be hearing about this in those "get the new Covid-19 vax" Pfizer/BioNTech commercials now being aired on TV or from new Jeopardy sponsor, Moderna:
[34:32 - really good science presentation but false view/belief regarding pandemic reality as stated a couple of minutes in - the house wasn't on fire, the vax caused deaths rather than prevented them, and there were much better/safe options available]
Incompetence, not malice . . . surrrre. But, the problem has been identified and an earnest discussion as to how to proceed looks promising, at least for South Carolina residents. Now, if only Ohio would follow suit . . .
I can’t shake off the feeling
that he (Dr Phillip Buckhault) tries to please both sides at the same time. If he says he is an expert in cancers, then he must be utterly aware that the mRNA platform is
toxic by design - and there is no way around that fact anymore !
Alone the artificial nano lipids in which the (any) genetic cargo is held, is so toxic by itself that it alone poses many dangerous, even lethal aspects. (I will get to that in the future).
So while DNA contaminations in the vials is truly a very bad and dangerous thing - it does certainly not explain everything. He somehow appears to blame possible deaths onto that aspect of contamination with DNA (as if saying - without that, it would be a great product, but he didn’t spit that out directly). Or so, i understood that it though my personal filters, i may add.
Yet, any single aspect of the mRNA platform, every larger manipulated, artificial component in itself - poses already a risk for severe damages to human health.
What did the C:s say ?
“To tamper with DNA is at best iffy”
He believes that the mRNA is a terrific platform for the future.
He believes ! Well damn hallelujah, ring my bell.
Is that one of those moments where science shows its dead head, because it was built upon gravestones and wishful thinking ?
It should be all about life. And that includes a healthy dose of humility and respect to begin with, with human life (patient) at the center. But the opposite seems to be true, where the patient is kind of the last thing mainstream medicine science even bothers about.
I will in the future write about a microbiologist/geneticist from Germany, who takes apart this “awesome” mRNA platform into single molecules, and with delight throwing them ‘at the wolves’, it is that bad tech.
This is also the reason why i am highly skeptical of this Dr Phillip Buckhault testimony, despite his awesome presentation.
-
Reminds me a lot of Dr Geert Vanden Bossche who in his first interview 2.5 years ago, which most people have forgotten, stated how awesome the mRNA platform was. (He then never repeated that statement) He was never against those mRNA jabs, only critical towards that a “vaccine” campaign was executed in the middle of a “Pandemic” and would cause lots of variants (well those appear anyway - that is the nature of fast changing Corona viruses. Around 4000 variant per years. So there.
He is for heavens sake a PhD, DVM Independent
Vaccine Research Consultant Vaccine Discovery & Preclinical Research guy. All about vaccines - and always has been.
Yet, suddenly he was made into a hero, and a “critic”. When he was interviewed at the Stockholm Covid summit in Jan 2023, he surely was a snobby person to the Swedish alternative reporters questions. And his speech at the conference was the only weird one among all others. As if “people didn’t understand”.
No. People didn’t understand him in the way
he wanted to be understood, and then showed his arrogance accordingly. Like a miss understood science celebrity