Coronavirus Pandemic: Apocalypse Now! Or exaggerated scare story?

As France passes a law penalising critics of mRNA treatments, will the law, dubbed 'Article Pfizer', set a precedent in the global health policy landscape and raise further questions about individual rights and state control?
Click to expand...

Here's also a segment about it on Redacted. Starts at this particular point.


They talked to Sonia Eligah who wrote this article:
soniaelijah.substack.com

France’s “Pfizer amendment” could turn mRNA critics into criminals

Support independent investigative journalism by becoming a paid subscriber or make a one-off contribution!
soniaelijah.substack.com soniaelijah.substack.com

On Wednesday, February 14th a highly controversial law was pushed through the National Assembly in France, potentially turning a critic of mRNA treatment into a criminal. The draconian law, which was quietly passed with virtually no debate, could throw anyone who advises against the use of therapeutic or prophylactic treatment (including experimental mRNA gene therapy) into prison for up to 3 years and pay a hefty fine of 45,000 Euros.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Keit said:
Here's also a segment about it on Redacted. Starts at this particular point.


They talked to Sonia Eligah who wrote this article:
soniaelijah.substack.com

France’s “Pfizer amendment” could turn mRNA critics into criminals

Support independent investigative journalism by becoming a paid subscriber or make a one-off contribution!
soniaelijah.substack.com soniaelijah.substack.com
Click to expand...

Yuck. Looks to be a bit different than Trudeau and Freeland's freezing of bank accounts, but basically more of the same clown world tyranny. Their use of the Emergency Act against dissenters was just ruled as unlawful based on the CDN Charter of Rights. I wonder if this law will be thrown out in French court as unconstitutional eventually? And hopefully with no dissenters caught in the cross-hairs.
 
This was a good explanation of Geerts current worry in the evolution of the pandemic


The talk aims to explain Geerts thoughts in plain language.

So on one end you've obviously have the adverse effects from the vaccine (including damage to the immune system) which is something Geert doesn't specialise or focus on and on the other end you have an evolution of the "modified" immune system following vaccination against the virus (which is also evolving) and this is what Geert focusses on, more so than anyone else out there that I'm aware of.

Btw, I'd recommend subscribing to this small channel as the host, Dr Phillip McMillan, is really doing a good job. I think he's an unsung hero as he's been at this since the beginning and was the first to interview Geert and also one of the first to interview Robert Malone. I think his channel is shadow banned.
 
Former NY governor Andrew Cuomo has been subpoenaed by Congress regarding the deadly NY state nursing home scandal of 2020. It would be nice to see something done about his apparent crime of sending covid-positive elders into (or back into) nursing homes (and continuing to do it for months), who then infected other residents and led allegedly to thousands of deaths. A few other American governors did the same. I still have a copy of Cuomo's order somewhere, which I saved from the Web at the time - it was deleted from the NY Health Department's website just months after its issuance. I don't have high hopes, but this investigation has so far survived Biden being in office. "Conspiracy theorists" suggest this was done to pump up death numbers/fear of the virus and to cut into a highly active, heavily Trump-leaning voting block.

Again, this theme of evil in the guise of incompetence.

Cuomo has been subpoenaed, cited as crucial to the investigation, but he has thus far been uncooperative. The Cuomo camp maintains that the decision descended from federal guidance of the Trump administration. They also suggest that everyone did this, but I've never seen evidence that's true. They also say that the nursing-home death rate was unaffected by the decision. Furthermore, there was no cause, of which I'm aware, to make this decision, because we know that most hospitals were not actually overcrowded as the media reported.

abcnews.go.com

Andrew Cuomo subpoenaed by congressional subcommittee investigating COVID-era handling of nursing homes

The House panel probing the response to the COVID-19 pandemic has subpoenaed former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo over his handling of nursing homes during the pandemic.
abcnews.go.com abcnews.go.com
In the seven-page letter to Cuomo that accompanied Tuesday's subpoena, the committee said his testimony was "vital" as the panel continues it to investigate "the effectiveness of federal guidance and regulations" that were implemented during the pandemic.

The committee, chaired by Republican Rep. Brad Wenstrup, in its letter directly linked what it called Cuomo's "misguided decision" to "predictable but deadly consequences" in nursing homes, and referenced "troubling evidence" that Cuomo's administration "at best downplayed its impacts and at worst covered them up."
Click to expand...

The charges surfaced publicly no later than early 2021:
apnews.com

AP: Over 9,000 virus patients sent into NY nursing homes

NEW YORK (AP) — More than 9,000 recovering coronavirus patients in New York state were released from hospitals into nursing homes early in the pandemic under a controversial directive that was scrapped amid criticism it accelerated outbreaks, according to new records obtained by The Associated Press
apnews.com apnews.com

NY State Health Department website deleted Coumo's order from March 25, 2020 not long after its issuance.
www.foxnews.com

New York health website deletes Cuomo's order linked to nursing home fatalities

New York officials have scrubbed Gov. Andrew Cuomo's March 25 order requiring nursing homes to take in COVID-19 patients from the state health department website -- even as Cuomo's office has insisted that the order, which has been linked to thousands of nursing home deaths, remains in effect.
www.foxnews.com www.foxnews.com
 
Last edited:
Had wondered earlier in this thread whether stated vaccination statistics were correct. My sense was that there were fewer people that took the vaccination than govt agencies were claiming.

Dr David Cartland recently posted the following on X.

I am hearing disturbing reports of unvaccinated patients notes having covid vaccines recorded in them. Have any of you pure bloods come across this personally or family members? This is fraud if not he reports are true. Disturbing malpractice to claim for injectables not administered! The sinister plot continues!
Click to expand...

I don't doubt that this has happened given evidence that Drs were probably getting kickbacks for administering vaccines. Question is, how much has it happened? Some financially motivated Drs might do it to increase their kickbacks, others who just plain disagreed with the vaccination might do it just to keep their heads down and the system off their back.

Even though it's fraud either way, it might not be such a bad thing to have a false entry on your file if the system sees you as vaxx compliant.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom