Could it be that since this whole action started, some corona strains have been created and/or distributed as a bio/economic weapon by the US Deep State against different countries to destabilize situation there and take advantage?

Thanks for the post anka,. Some very interesting points brought up by Igor Panarin. As usual the devil's in the details but his take on current world events and actions taken by world leaders leading up to these events is very lucid. This of course leaves you wondering how much is his personal take on things, but his reading of the actions of TPB and their efforts to topple Xi Putin and Trump are very instructive.

Adding this post to the video of the ex-Russian officer mentioned earlier who used the word PARASITES sums up the present situation in a very clear package. The information that an attempt on Trump's life was thwarted and connecting that to the downing of 2 planes earlier on in the year containing some bad boys was an interesting piece of gossip.
 
LA county in California just completed a large, random antibody test, with the result that infection rates are up to 50x higher than previously reported. In particular, about 400k people in LA (4% of the population) have been infected.

While the lying media is of course burying the lede on this, the takeaway is that the case fatality rate is on the order of 0.1-0.2%.

Coronavirus Infections May Not Be Uncommon, Tests Suggest
 
A forwarded e-mail from a correspondent who cured his hepatitis C with an anti-viral cocktail (sobusuvir and daclasivir) with very few side effects.


Dr James Freeman Copyright © 2020 FixHIV, All rights reserved.

For those of you who like executive summaries, here it is. It may surprise you to know that doctors in Iran have commenced 109 clinical trials on treatments for COVID-19 and have recently announced that they have found a cure, where that cure looks like no ICU deaths and rapid recovery for patients. While Iran has not announced the name of the drug it can be accurately deduced via an analysis of their clinical trials database. The drug is a locally produced fixed-dose combination of Sofosbuvir (Sovaldi) and Daclatasvir (Daklinza) which is normally used to treat Hepatitis C virus. In what I personally consider a staggering oversight doctors in developed countries are not testing this combination. It has been right under our noses the whole time and we have left it to Iran to prove it works.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yes, this is all quite puzzling. My current thinking is that any excess mortality is a consequence of the lockdown (though in my German federal state for example, overall mortality is actually down, even for the elderly (!) which the "experts" explain with the "collateral good effects" of the lockdown...). But there are so many ways in which the lockdown can lead to more mortality: economic crisis (which statistically reduces life expectancy), elderly people not going to hospitals because of fear both of the virus and of being isolated from their loved ones, suicides, weakened immune systems due to stress, etc. etc. This could lead to a "concentration" of deaths that otherwise would be spread out, and/or producing new deaths. It would be interesting to compare mortality after the crisis to these current numbers, per region and per country. But with the global economy in ruins, this wouldn't produce any useful results!

Anyway, all that is pretty strange. At the moment, I don't think this has anything to do with the virus killing people. There could be all kinds of reasons, perhaps even "esoteric" reasons such as people wanting to check out, like the Cs suggested?

The area in which I live is mostly elderly residence, many of them living alone. I have noticed many articles and studies over the past couple of years looking at the effects of loneliness and social isolation, especially in the elderly on mental and physical health. None of the conclusions were good...

In my area there are many isolated elderly who are clearly fearful. Some have even put up notices on their property that they are 'self isolating' and no one should come to the door, deliveries should be left in a safe place once the doorbell is rung and picked up later. Some have families visit on occasion and I have noticed that some have the family in the house while others just talk from across the fence/wall/garden – little real contact at all.

I do wonder what toll this is having on their health in addition to many not wanting to go to hospital out of fear or not being able to see doctors when they need to. My direct neighbours both have obvious lung conditions which I am sure adds to their fear. I also wonder how quickly we would see the health effects of this isolation and loneliness. Generally loneliness is considered to be a long term issue, rather than just over a month or two, but could it already be starting to reflect in the number of 'Covid victims' we have seen over the past 3-4 weeks?. Numerous doctors have already made claims that the lockdowns are far more dangerous in the long run than any virus (as posted many times on this thread).

A few SOTT articles around this topic:

Coronavirus: Lockdown 'hysteria is ruining 10 million lives' -- Sott.net

Looking at changes in gene expression due to loneliness:
Under the microscope: The effect of loneliness on physical and mental health -- Sott.net
Even more interesting is the implication of the 1,300 genes that were differentially expressed. Among the genes that had different expression levels in the brains of lonely people are genes associated with psychological disorders like depression. The large set of genes also includes genes associated with health problems like cancer, increased inflammation and an increased likelihood to contract an infection.

Inflammation possibly caused by loneliness/depression and the idea that lonely people may report feeling 'worse when they are sick' as many with depression report more pain:

The toxic effects of loneliness on the human body -- Sott.net
 
Could it be that since this whole action started, some corona strains have been created and/or distributed as a bio/economic weapon by the US Deep State against different countries to destabilize situation there and take advantage?

Russian political analyst Igor Panarin thinks so. Perhaps our Russian forumites can chime in and say whether he is a person of reason but at first quick run through his article I found some of his views very interesting, having read a Czech translation of it. This is a Google translation of the Russian original (I have ran out of my limit for DeepL this month). Hope I copied/pasted everything correctly - it's very long. Questions and subtitles are in bold to keep it a bit organized.
Thanks for the post anka,. Some very interesting points brought up by Igor Panarin. As usual the devil's in the details but his take on current world events and actions taken by world leaders leading up to these events is very lucid. This of course leaves you wondering how much is his personal take on things, but his reading of the actions of TPB and their efforts to topple Xi Putin and Trump are very instructive.

Adding this post to the video of the ex-Russian officer mentioned earlier who used the word PARASITES sums up the present situation in a very clear package. The information that an attempt on Trump's life was thwarted and connecting that to the downing of 2 planes earlier on in the year containing some bad boys was an interesting piece of gossip.
@Tuatha de Danaan I agree that Igor Panarin's analysis posted by @anka was very interesting, however, I want to draw everybody's attention to the fact that in his analysis he seems to be actually pushing for the exact steps described in this post from @Ketone Cop :

"At the Gorbachev-led State of the World Forum in 1995, Council On Foreign Relations member Zbigniew Brzezinski had this to say:

We do not have a New World Order. … We cannot leap into world government in one quick step. … In brief, the precondition for eventual globalization — genuine globalization — is progressive regionalization, because thereby we move toward larger, more stable, more cooperative units.

Regionalization is already occurring as the BRIC nations form their own bilateral trade agreements and their own global bank, and this is by design. The catalyst to trigger the end of the dollar and the dominance of a global currency system, I believe, will be the false East/West paradigm."
_________________________________________________________________________

Here's the excerpt from Igor Panarin's analysis that caught my attention:

Third, the creation of a new model of the world, which could be expressed on the Eurasian continent, including in the geopolitical union of Germany, Austria, Italy, Russia and Belarus (I call this GIArussia). Another likely alliance is the Balkan Confederation, centered in Belgrade. Then “Franconia” - France, Belgium, Spain, Scotland. In the north - the conditional "Hanseatic League" - Scandinavia and the Baltic countries. Well, England and Holland - they also could have formed an alliance. Plus the Arian space - Turkey, Iran, Iraq, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Bahrain. And in the Middle East - Assyria (Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, Cyprus, Palestine), etc. All this is necessary in order to completely cut off the possibility for Britain to ever organize any kind of war.

I think this shows that we are looking at a very complicated game here, as the C's said:
A: There are several complexes of agendas in play, as well conflicts.
 
I've been thinking, maybe all of those who are interested could get involved in doing a good random scientific poll about this business.

It's a given that we don't trust MSM, so why don't we find out things for ourselves?

We could formulate something like 5 to 10 questions and each person could take those questions and then, under the aegis of QFG, start calling people in their area randomly and asking if they would participate in a poll about COVID virus. If they agree, assure them anonymity and then just ask the questions and record their responses. Might be useful to have multiple choice answers to make it easy, but then ask them if they have any further comments and take that down.

The only thing to record about the person would be age, sex, education level and general location unless somebody thinks there are other important factors to get out of it.

What do you think everyone?

I'm not volunteering to put it together, though! I think Mandatory Intelloctomy could spearhead the formulation of the questions.
 
I agree that Igor Panarin's analysis posted by @anka was very interesting, however, I want to draw everybody's attention to the fact that in his analysis he seems to be actually pushing for the exact steps described in this post from @Ketone Cop :

Agreed, and of course it maybe wishful thinking but as these geopolitical steps are being undertaken time is the key factor. All, including China and Russia may be on the same page but we don't know and can't tell yet. The fact that he mentions strangling the Anglo faction which includes the deep state and Israel shows a divide in the PTB.
That's what I picked up on, the idea of cracks in the plot. That's very tenuous, of course, but hope springs eternal.

"At the Gorbachev-led State of the World Forum in 1995, Council On Foreign Relations member Zbigniew Brzezinski had this to say:

We do not have a New World Order. … We cannot leap into world government in one quick step. … In brief, the precondition for eventual globalization — genuine globalization — is progressive regionalization, because thereby we move toward larger, more stable, more cooperative units.

This is the stated plan and Panarin knows this as does every world leader. But does every world leader want this??
 
I've been thinking, maybe all of those who are interested could get involved in doing a good random scientific poll about this business.

It's a given that we don't trust MSM, so why don't we find out things for ourselves?

We could formulate something like 5 to 10 questions and each person could take those questions and then, under the aegis of QFG, start calling people in their area randomly and asking if they would participate in a poll about COVID virus. If they agree, assure them anonymity and then just ask the questions and record their responses. Might be useful to have multiple choice answers to make it easy, but then ask them if they have any further comments and take that down.

The only thing to record about the person would be age, sex, education level and general location unless somebody thinks there are other important factors to get out of it.

What do you think everyone?

I'm not volunteering to put it together, though! I think Mandatory Intelloctomy could spearhead the formulation of the questions.

Laura think it's a good idea the only issue I see is the cold calling aspect,perhaps people good ask friend of friends etc Facebook etc and just say where doing a wide survey just to see people's points of view under the Quantum Future Group umbrella but lots of folks getting to many cold and unwanted calls and they've been worse since the Covid lockdown.
 
What do you think everyone?
I agree. It should be short enough to be posted in Messenger. I have about 400 connections in my Czech network and believe about at least half of them are authoritarian followers so it would be very interesting to know their answers.

But it should be formulated in a way they don't take it as some kind of provocation - they are really easy to get irritated these days.
I think Mandatory Intellectomy could spearhead the formulation of the questions.
No sarcasm this time please! :-[ (;-D)
 
I've been thinking, maybe all of those who are interested could get involved in doing a good random scientific poll about this business.

It's a given that we don't trust MSM, so why don't we find out things for ourselves?

We could formulate something like 5 to 10 questions and each person could take those questions and then, under the aegis of QFG, start calling people in their area randomly and asking if they would participate in a poll about COVID virus. If they agree, assure them anonymity and then just ask the questions and record their responses. Might be useful to have multiple choice answers to make it easy, but then ask them if they have any further comments and take that down.

The only thing to record about the person would be age, sex, education level and general location unless somebody thinks there are other important factors to get out of it.

What do you think everyone?

I'm not volunteering to put it together, though! I think Mandatory Intelloctomy could spearhead the formulation of the questions.
Hi Laura, my friend and I agree too. We have few connections but would still add to the others...:-D
 
Back
Top Bottom