One of my colleague took his kid to one central jersey hospital, he mentioned that MOST of the hospital is empty. It does looks like there are many variables.
Coronavirus Pandemic: Apocalypse Now! Or exaggerated scare story?
- Thread starter wanderingthomas
- Start date
One of my colleague took his kid to one central jersey hospital, he mentioned that MOST of the hospital is empty. It does looks like there are many variables.
Mandatory Intellectomy
Jedi Master
*** Questions for a poll ***
OK, that didn't even take too long. Here are some suggestions:
**************************************************************************************************************************
- How bad do you think COVID-19 really is?
A. It's very bad. Worse than most viruses we've experienced in the last 10 years.
B. It's worse than the flu, but there are many worse things out there.
C. It's about the same as the flu.
D. It's probably not even as bad as the flu.
- How many people do you personally know (not a friend of a friend's wife etc.) who have tested positive for COVID-19?
- How many people do you personally know (not a friend of a friend's wife etc.) who have died from COVID-19?
- What do you think about the lockdown measures?
A. They should be stricter.
B. They are justified. I agree with them.
C. I agree with them to some extent, but they're also causing damage, so they shouldn't be in place for too long.
D. They're doing more harm than good and should be lifted as soon as possible.
- What do you think about the media's reporting on this crisis?
A. They aren't informing us enough about the dangers.
B. They are doing a good job reporting on the crisis.
C. They're doing mostly OK, but sometimes they are scaring people a bit too much.
D. They are over-hyping the threat and spreading panic.
- What do you think about the restrictions imposed on the people, limiting their freedoms, making them stay at home and keep a distance from other people?
A. The restrictions are necessary and should be in place for months to come.
B. They are needed to get through the worst but should be lifted as soon as possible.
C. They should have been recommended on a voluntary basis rather than made law. Making such restrictions mandatory is unacceptable.
- Do you think the lockdown, social distancing, wearing masks, and so on, have been successful in preventing many deaths?
A. Yes. We would see a lot more people die without these measures.
B. It has made a difference, but the difference isn't too large.
C. It hasn't been very successful and has caused harm in other ways.
- How significant do you think the negative fallout of the measures taken by governments will be?
A. Not very. Things will go back to normal soon.
B. Quite significant, but we will recover in a year or two.
C. Very significant. There will be a lot of damage, and things will not go back to normal anytime soon, if ever.
D. The damage will be massive, worse than the damage caused by the virus itself, things will not go back to normal, and people will suffer because of this for a long time.
- Are you afraid of getting the virus?
A. Yes.
B. No.
(No need to read the options, I think. Note down whatever they answer?)
- What do you think is the best way of protecting yourself from the virus?
(I wouldn't make options for this one. Let's just hear their opinions.)
**************************************************************************************************************************
So these are some suggestions. Feel free to add whatever you think should be included or remove whatever doesn't feel right.
For the fallout question, if D is too much, you can maybe combine it with C into one answer and word it whatever way sounds best.
If you read the questions over the phone, the options may be a bit long, so you can let people answer on their own, and then read the answer(s) that seem the closest to what they said and ask if they more or less agree.
OK, that didn't even take too long. Here are some suggestions:
**************************************************************************************************************************
- How bad do you think COVID-19 really is?
A. It's very bad. Worse than most viruses we've experienced in the last 10 years.
B. It's worse than the flu, but there are many worse things out there.
C. It's about the same as the flu.
D. It's probably not even as bad as the flu.
- How many people do you personally know (not a friend of a friend's wife etc.) who have tested positive for COVID-19?
- How many people do you personally know (not a friend of a friend's wife etc.) who have died from COVID-19?
- What do you think about the lockdown measures?
A. They should be stricter.
B. They are justified. I agree with them.
C. I agree with them to some extent, but they're also causing damage, so they shouldn't be in place for too long.
D. They're doing more harm than good and should be lifted as soon as possible.
- What do you think about the media's reporting on this crisis?
A. They aren't informing us enough about the dangers.
B. They are doing a good job reporting on the crisis.
C. They're doing mostly OK, but sometimes they are scaring people a bit too much.
D. They are over-hyping the threat and spreading panic.
- What do you think about the restrictions imposed on the people, limiting their freedoms, making them stay at home and keep a distance from other people?
A. The restrictions are necessary and should be in place for months to come.
B. They are needed to get through the worst but should be lifted as soon as possible.
C. They should have been recommended on a voluntary basis rather than made law. Making such restrictions mandatory is unacceptable.
- Do you think the lockdown, social distancing, wearing masks, and so on, have been successful in preventing many deaths?
A. Yes. We would see a lot more people die without these measures.
B. It has made a difference, but the difference isn't too large.
C. It hasn't been very successful and has caused harm in other ways.
- How significant do you think the negative fallout of the measures taken by governments will be?
A. Not very. Things will go back to normal soon.
B. Quite significant, but we will recover in a year or two.
C. Very significant. There will be a lot of damage, and things will not go back to normal anytime soon, if ever.
D. The damage will be massive, worse than the damage caused by the virus itself, things will not go back to normal, and people will suffer because of this for a long time.
- Are you afraid of getting the virus?
A. Yes.
B. No.
(No need to read the options, I think. Note down whatever they answer?)
- What do you think is the best way of protecting yourself from the virus?
(I wouldn't make options for this one. Let's just hear their opinions.)
**************************************************************************************************************************
So these are some suggestions. Feel free to add whatever you think should be included or remove whatever doesn't feel right.
For the fallout question, if D is too much, you can maybe combine it with C into one answer and word it whatever way sounds best.
If you read the questions over the phone, the options may be a bit long, so you can let people answer on their own, and then read the answer(s) that seem the closest to what they said and ask if they more or less agree.
Coronavirus Infections May Not Be Uncommon, Tests Suggest (Published 2020)
Two preliminary efforts to survey citizens for antibodies to the virus have produced controversial results.
Don Cesar, what do they say about sott.net? Can you please give us a summary?
dredger
The Living Force
Hello, received the same kind of news from a friend, here it is :A friend of mine just shared this with me, I found it rather interesting, although it can’t help but see a form of scapegoating shaping up on the horizon, it was all China and Gates and they’re who to blame.
as far as the precedents established for the world, they don’t need the virus anymore, they can re open the economies as they’ve already learned how people will respond to an imaginary threat and how easy liberties are removed from the population.
CONFIRMED: Hackers Strike and Leak Bill Gates, WHO, and Wuhan Lab Emails - Fort Russ
Published on: Apr 22, 2020 – FRN has confirmed reports that hackers have successfully hacked accounts belonging to Bill Gates, the WHO, and a lab in Wuhan believed to be the location researching coronavirus that received funding from Dr. Fauci. The event appears to have taken place on or about...www.fort-russ.com
Agen89 : Tempat Permainan Game Slot Online Terbaik 2024
AGEN89 merupakan situs slot game online saat ini yang sedang ramai di mainkan oleh banyak orang khususnya untuk warga indonesia karena situs game online ini sangat mudah di menangkan untuk seluruh pemain yang bermain disini.
I'll review it more deeply later, but found useful to already post it.
Talas
Jedi Master
Lol asocial ok I said friends of friends but see your point at least this poll might be a real and not a Gallup pole where there really isn't much randomness and anyway people seem to be very free to give there opinion in supermarket cues perhaps there's a starter for a random poll.
Probably not a gulag, as that was brutal, however, I would like to point out that even in the darkest times of Communism, at least in Romania, going to Church on Easter was not banned. It was frowned upon, people might have reported you for going, but you could still have gone. Now you can't.
Even in Canada, you can still go to the liquor and even cannabis store, as this is considered essential, but not to Church.
One has to wonder what this means on a spiritual plane...
It was nice @Bernardo had included the Youtube information, though I had difficulties finding the title of the video which along with the date of publishing, and even the name of the channel sometimes can help one locate alternative sources.Removed from YouTube
Below are recent videos which include Judy Mikovits
Coronavirus What You Should Know with Judy Mikovitis PhD from Healthmade 55:06, Feb 24, 2020
FTW Live w/ Researcher Judy Mikovits (LIVE) from framingtheworld 2:29:08, (no date)
Dr. Judy Mikovits (American Researcher) on Coronavirus from framingtheworld 1:58:04 April 5, 2020
Plague of Corruption (Dr. Judy Mikovits) from framingtheworld 55:58, April 15, 2020
Coronavirus Roundtable With Dr. Buttar & Dr. Mikovits - How Your System Is Being Used Against You from The Last American Vagabond 1:36:48 19 Apr, 2020
Fortunately more and more video channels are posting on alternative services.
Issues when posting embedded material - sometimes it is lost
The problem with embedded material is that if it is taken down, it is gone with title and images, thus leaving the post both with much less meaning, but also aesthetically reduced by the grey tube image, something I recently became aware of when looking up an old tread I had made. Perhaps one could make it a habit when posting a video with serious information to include enough details for those who read later to search clues, pretty much like one would if referring to a book. A remedy might be to do a screen dump of a video image, post it as a picture and then put a hyperlink below the picture. Above, I only put the links below the title of the video.
Using other search engines to help find (lost) material
In case one can not find what one is looking for using one search engine, which may downlist material according to its policies one could try a other search engines.
WIN 52
The Living Force
Many of us have been rebelling for years. We need to pass the baton. A general uprising against wrong thinking and status quo is a good place to start. Until it personally effects a person, they think it's all good.
I speak as much French as the average squirrel. In what context did they mentioned Sott.net? In a negative sense or did they refer to us in a positive daylight? I’m curious. Thanks for sharing the video!
Bonjour Bjorn! They talked about Sott in a positive light. Said people had to go there if they wanted informations about mandatory vaccines, the COVID 1984, quantum tatoo and so on.
I saw it on Joes FB page and is imo some shocking news and something many of us feared: That the consequences of the global shutdown socially and economically will take it's toll. Well, it doesn't look good. The ones that should be protected will be suffering even more.
U.N. warns economic downturn could kill hundreds of thousands of children in 2020
And all this is happening because of lies.
Adding to that the US unemployment stats exploded in just one month:
22 million have lost their jobs over the past month—real unemployment rate likely nearing 18%
Another 5.2 million Americans filed initial unemployment claims in the week ending April 11.fortune.com
This is indeed depressing.
Well, it can get even worse than that. David Beasley from the UN said that 256 million people can starve because of corona.
Coronavirus pandemic 'will cause famine of biblical proportions'
Governments must act now to stop 265 million starving, warns World Food Programme boss
Plus, that's comparing the total number of all deaths everywhere, whereas so far, only certain select cities and regions are particularly affected. It makes more sense to compare a single region to itself. Hypothetically, if a virus only strikes a single city, it doesn't make sense to compare those numbers to a virus that pops up in all cities. In the U.S., for example, rural areas have very few Covid-19 cases, but some big cities have a lot. So the best source of comparative data would be those very cities and/or regions. That's what I've tried to do so far in my posts on the numbers. It seems that in big cities/regions that are hard hit (e.g., Bergamo, London, NYC), whatever is going on is at least 2x, and up to 8x worse than any flu season in recent memory. For small towns and rural areas, it is much less than an average flu season.
For example, as I showed in a recent post, in the past 25 years, the worst month of mortality in NYC was in January 1999, which was the peak of the flu season for that year. An average of 218 people died in the city daily of all causes. Over the past three weeks in New York, at least 367 people have died every day, and that's just those attributed to Covid-19, so total mortality is probably something higher than that. (That's assuming that they haven't been ascribing EVERY death to Covid-19, which is unlikely. But even if they have, the current overall mortality rate is about twice what NYC experiences at the peak of an average flu season.)
Here's a graph from the NYT that shows total mortality for NYC over the past 20 years. I can't verify the 9780 figure, because I can't find current total mortality figures for the past month - just mortality allegedly related to Covid-19. But it's similar to the graphs posted earlier in this thread for Bergamo:
For Italy, this last flu season, which usually peaks in February, was relatively mild - below average, which was reflected in overall mortality. Overall mortality seems to be a good indicator of how bad any given flu season is, as far as I can tell. In NYC, this last flu season was on par with the one a couple years ago. Flu season usually peaks in January in NYC. For example, here's the ILI tracker for NYC, showing the peaks of past flu seasons, with the Covid spike directly after the January peak:
Here's respiratory illness:
If you go to the link you can change the metric to 'average ratio' which shows the ratio of the above cases that required emergency room services. Here are the graphs for ILI followed by respiratory:
