Coronavirus Pandemic: Apocalypse Now! Or exaggerated scare story?

[SevenFeathers]

Ursus Minor:

Makes you wonder why millions of people struggling with their face masks hardly ever piped up
to publically tell authorities "I can't breathe"...


Yes, it's quite a sight, seeing protesters wearing their slave gear!

 

[loreta]

Here in my neighbour everyone wears a mask. How is this nausebuntus. Specially women. Women around 60 and more. Today waiting to enter a store, and I kelp my stoic stance and my mask in my hands:

"Me I put my mask and gloves always. I just go outside just one day by month, the day I received the pension pay. I am not afraid at all! When I arrive at home I take out everything, everything I wear, my clothes, my mask, my gloves, and I change myself. I clean everything! No, I am not scare! But I said to my sister "don't come to see me!". I think we have to be responsible. Everyone! Because you can have the virus without symptoms! But oh no, I am not afraid. "

You see?

 

[loreta]

I couldn't resist presenting that picture here although topically it would belong to the George Floyd thread.

Protestors with a sign saying ”I can’t breathe” … while wearing masks
that affect their breathing. Symbolic.

Source: vigilantcitizen.com/George Floyd riots infiltrated...

Makes you wonder why millions of people struggling with their face masks hardly ever piped up
to publically tell authorities "I can't breathe"...

TAKE OUT YOUR MASK, MORON, AND YOU WILL BE ABLE TO BREATH!!!!

Some people are weird.

 

[angelburst29]

The narrative is clearly falling apart and I am not sure how much more nonsense people can take before it is in tatters, but so many also seem perfectly happy with this. Many will be fine with the mainstream narrative when it begins to twist and warp itself
into a form of damage control in order to try to usher in whatever new reality the PTB still have in store.

Sex between people from different households has been banned in England.

Coronavirus: Sex during lockdown with someone outside your household is illegal from today

‎June‎ ‎01‎, ‎2020‎ ‎- Having sex in your own home with someone from a different household is illegal from today, according to new legislation.

At 11.30am on Monday, a new law will be introduced to parliament which bans two people from different households in England gathering in a private place during the coronavirus lockdown.

The amendment to The Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions) Bill states: “No person may participate in a gathering which takes place in a public or private place indoors, and consists of two or more persons.”

It comes as health officials warn that the lockdown is being lifted too quickly.

Previously, going to another person’s home to have sex would have been a breach of coronavirus lockdown restrictions, but now both parties could technically be prosecuted under the law. Having sex in public is already illegal.

Only those with a “reasonable excuse” are permitted to meet in a private place.

This includes those attending a funeral, elite athletes, those caring for a vulnerable person and people who need childcare.

The amended bill reads: “No person may, without reasonable excuse, stay overnight at any place other than the place where they are living.”

This differs from the previous legislation which prohibited people from leaving their home at all without a reasonable excuse.

Anyone breaking the law can be fined £100, halved to £50 if paid within 14 days.

Human rights barrister Adam Wagner tweeted on Sunday: “I can’t believe I’m about to tweet this. “From tomorrow sex between two (or more) people in a private place who do not live in the same household is a ‘gathering’ between 2 or more people and is therefore illegal.” https://t.co/aEiGIoweee pic.twitter.com/b0KZBACSQ4

However, one lawyer pointed out a potential loophole with the legislation.

George Pertez QC tweeted that his reading of the law indicated that someone could potentially have sex with an escort in their home, as it might be deemed legal for work purposes. He said it was “unacceptable” to publish the new legislation at just 14 hours’ notice and that having no vote in Parliament on the amendment was “very likely unlawful”.

As I read this, unless you live together, it’s now unlawful to have sex with your lover indoors, but fine outdoors (subject to public decency offences); but you can have sex with an escort indoors, as that is reasonably necessary for their work purposes (see 7(d)(i)). https://t.co/QXbT1EYikt

The amendments detail how lockdown has been eased, with people in England now allowed to meet up outside in groups of up to six.

The regulations defines a gathering as “when two or more people are present together in the same place in order to engage in any form of social interaction with each other, or to undertake any other activity with each other”.

The government’s official guidelines for lockdown state: “Right now you are only allowed to gather outdoors with people you do not live with.

“Seeing people outside, rather than inside, while obeying the ‘two metre rule’, greatly reduces the risk of transmission. “Close contact with people from other households means a much higher risk of transmission, and according to the scientific advice, we cannot safely allow people to see people they don’t live with indoors without the risk that the virus will spread.”

People cannot participate in a gathering indoors unless they are: attending a funeral; an elite athlete or coach of an elite athlete; facilitating a house move; meeting for necessary work purposes; providing care for a vulnerable person; providing emergency assistance or providing childcare.

Coronavirus: Denmark to let cross-border couples meet - if they show photos, love letters
COPENHAGEN May 25, 2020 - Denmark eased its border controls with other Nordic countries and Germany on Monday (May 25), allowing cross-border couples separated by the coronavirus lockdown to meet again if they can prove they have been in a relationship for at least six months.

The Danish police said couples would need to show shared text messages, private photos or personal information about their partner.

"They can bring along a photo or a love letter," deputy chief Allan Dalager Clausen told Danish broadcaster DR.

"I realize these are very intimate things, but the decision to let in the partner ultimately rests on the judgment of the individual police officer," he said.

While good news for separated couples, the move highlights some of the issues lawmakers and authorities around the world face as they gradually reopen their countries' borders.

Denmark closed its borders for non-citizens on March 14 to curb the spread of the new coronavirus, meaning only people with a clear purpose could enter the country.

Since then, elderly couples have been seen on the Danish-German border drinking coffee on each side of border and holding hands over the barriers to stay in touch with each other.

German Karsten Tuchsen Hansen and his Danish girlfriend Inga Rasmussen at the closed Aventoft border in Germany on April 2, 2020.PHOTO: REUTERS

Some lawmakers took to social media to express their displeasure with the new guidelines, saying it was a violation of the right of privacy.

"I've never heard of a country where entry requires the showing of intimate texts or photos from a partner. We finally allowed couples to visit each other, but did not abolish the right of privacy," Mr Kristian Hegaard of the Social-Liberal Party said on Twitter.

Summer cabin owners and grandparents of Danish citizens will now also be seen as having a creditable purpose to visit Denmark, while the Ministry of Foreign Affairs have issued a new set of guidelines for business travel in and out of Denmark.

 

[manitoban]

Another example of how blind and ignorant I have found people to be recently: While another colleague was talking about worries about finances and the like and how they did not understand why certain prices were changing in shops, I just pointed out a few of the current issues in the global economy during this lockdown. I pointed out that we could be looking at a 1929 type depression would could be devastating. I wasn't pushing any theories, just partaking in the conversation and pointing out that we could have some real financial problems very soon. They then asked what the great depression was, they literally had no idea what it was... Sometimes I do despair...

Yeah, I've noticed the same, whenever I mention the financial implications of the lockdown, which will likely lead to a severe world wide depression the response is along the lines of - "Saving lives is more important! We can't make decisions based on the economy when people's lives are at stake! "

Many people just don't seem to be able to envision anything beyond the immediate future, and even for those who can kind of grasp it, it still is like they are merely spectators to the coming collapse, it has nothing to do with them and they are not particularly worried about it. It really amazes me how many people seem quite confident that the economy will bounce back, that this is just a slight necessary hiccup that will all go away in due time.

 

[Ursus Minor]

At 11.30am on Monday, a new law will be introduced to parliament which bans two people from different households in England gathering in a private place during the coronavirus lockdown.

The amendment to The Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions) Bill states: “No person may participate in a gathering which takes place in a public or private place indoors, and consists of two or more persons.”

It comes as health officials warn that the lockdown is being lifted too quickly.

Previously, going to another person’s home to have sex would have been a breach of coronavirus lockdown restrictions, but now both parties could technically be prosecuted under the law. Having sex in public is already illegal.

Only those with a “reasonable excuse” are permitted to meet in a private place.

I'm stunned. You would have thought that in countries with a shrinking and ageing population "participating in a gathering which takes place in a private place indoors that consists of two or more persons" would be a welcome activity with regard to the number of future taxpayers.

 

[Jones]

Lord Sumpton, retired UK Supreme Court Judge did another interview with BBC on the 18th of May. He's quietly feisty about how the lockdowns are being handled, in more words than one calls the govt cowardly, and speaks sense from a well informed perspective addressing the economical and social costs of the lockdowns for what amounts to a nothing burger virus.

 

[mkrnhr]

For most people, "the economy" refers to what they've seen on TV for decades, strange numbers and strange words like Dow Johns and such. They have seen these things going up and down from day to day, without noticing any changes from month to month. The true meaning has been lost to all those who haven't been touched personally by previous recessions. The awareness that the real economy is related to individual and household access to food an shelter will be a very painful awakening unfortunately.

A few moments ago I've seen families with children and babies sleeping in tents (maybe up to 30 tents and that's just in one place in the close neighborhood), awaiting for buses to take them to their countries of origin (days of travel plus two weeks of quarantine at the frontier). The cause of this misery is a crumbling economy because of the Corona hysterical measures, to which most of people are accomplices to a certain extent. When I talk to locals about this they say "yes they are migrants, it's sad" with an attitude of "no big deal". It touches "migrants" first so its seems to be far away, until it strikes closer and closer.

 

[loreta]

Sex between people from different households has been banned in England.

Coronavirus: Sex during lockdown with someone outside your household is illegal from today

‎June‎ ‎01‎, ‎2020‎ ‎- Having sex in your own home with someone from a different household is illegal from today, according to new legislation.

At 11.30am on Monday, a new law will be introduced to parliament which bans two people from different households in England gathering in a private place during the coronavirus lockdown.

The amendment to The Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions) Bill states: “No person may participate in a gathering which takes place in a public or private place indoors, and consists of two or more persons.”

It comes as health officials warn that the lockdown is being lifted too quickly.

Previously, going to another person’s home to have sex would have been a breach of coronavirus lockdown restrictions, but now both parties could technically be prosecuted under the law. Having sex in public is already illegal.

Only those with a “reasonable excuse” are permitted to meet in a private place.



Coronavirus: Denmark to let cross-border couples meet - if they show photos, love letters
COPENHAGEN May 25, 2020 - Denmark eased its border controls with other Nordic countries and Germany on Monday (May 25), allowing cross-border couples separated by the coronavirus lockdown to meet again if they can prove they have been in a relationship for at least six months.

The Danish police said couples would need to show shared text messages, private photos or personal information about their partner.

"They can bring along a photo or a love letter," deputy chief Allan Dalager Clausen told Danish broadcaster DR.

"I realize these are very intimate things, but the decision to let in the partner ultimately rests on the judgment of the individual police officer," he said.

This is really cute, LOVE LETTERS!!!
Are we in a kindergarten? What is happening? Really, some places are like a Regime worst than what we know. During Franco regime you were not able to kiss your fiancé or even your husband on the street! Now you can not see your husband without the proof of a love letter???? Or your fiancé? And if your husband hates to write a love letter? I see now many men suddenly start to try to write love letters like crazy. You bet, books about "How to write a love letter to your lover" will sell very well. Strange world we are entering where love between two persons has to be prouve in front of a cop.

I think we are entering a circus with clowns and monsters. That's why the C's told us to enjoy the show.

 

[N1mTzo]

Otherwise it outlines the some of the actions of Putin in both rebuilding Russia internally by draining the Russian swamp and internationally through trade, BRICS and building Russian military strength and how Trump is trying to do similar in the US.

I will just give you one link that shows the REAL state of affairs in Russia:

Russian billionaires got rich during the $ 62 billion pandemic

РоÑÑийÑкие миллиаÑдеÑÑ ÑазбогаÑели за вÑÐµÐ¼Ñ Ð¿Ð°Ð½Ð´ÐµÐ¼Ð¸Ð¸ на $62 млÑд

Ðа поÑледние два меÑÑÑа ÑиÑло доллаÑовÑÑ Ð¼Ð¸Ð»Ð»Ð¸Ð°ÑдеÑов в РоÑÑии ÑвелиÑилоÑÑ Ñ 102 до 104 Ñеловек, а Ð¸Ñ ÑовокÑпное ÑоÑÑоÑние вÑÑоÑло Ñ $392 млÑд до $454 млÑд

www.forbes.ru

I don’t know with whom King Pu is “fighting” in his free time (with snakes, pandas, koalas or someone else), but I see that ALL of his friends became billionaires (and they only get rich!), And ordinary people like were poor, and remained.

A couple of days there was such news from Russia:

The draft new code was fined for refusing compulsory vaccination - В проект КоАП внесли штрафы за отказ от обязательной вакцинации

Also, these guys of King Pu (and not Billy Gates!) Concocted a “vaccine” (they’ve even tested a few for now) from the crown and are already going to test it in public - В России создали вакцину от коронавируса, которую можно закапать в нос
The funny thing is that all this nonsense about the vaccine was shown a couple of days ago on the central television of Russia in a program hosted by the new wife of billionaire Kostin (this is one of King Pu’s guys).

 

[N1mTzo]

PS I’ll add a little more:
Entrance to the shopping center in Moscow from June 1 looks something like this (+ gloves and masks!)

Empty GUM and Red Square

Other photos of Moscow on June 1 here - В Москве открылись парки и непродовольственные магазины. Фоторепортаж

 

[Palinurus]

UPDATE on post #10,326.

US pharma firm signs deal with Dutch researchers for coronavirus medicine - DutchNews.nl

US pharma firm signs deal with Dutch researchers for corona virus medicine

May 31, 2020

A big US pharmaceutical company has partnered up with a [team of] Dutch researchers to develop a medicine from an antibody which can block infection by corona virus.

Erasmus university researcher Frank Grosveld told NPO current affairs program Dit is de Dag [in Dutch] on Sunday evening that the company, which he declined to name, would carry out mass production of a medicine deriving from the antibody after initial trials on animals proved positive.

‘We have been negotiating for a while with several pharmaceuticals companies and have now reached agreement with one which will produce a medicine in line with protocols,’ he said. ‘It will first have to be tested on a number of volunteers and then we can start treating patients.’

The company has said it will take five or six months before the medicine has been developed, Grosveld said.

The Dutch team, which is based in Rotterdam and Amsterdam, did receive a grant of ‘several hundred thousand euros’ to carry out the initial research, Grosveld said.

Asked if this meant that the Netherlands would get a cheap deal on the eventual medicine, Grosveld told the program he hoped so, but he did not know.

In an earlier interview, team leader Berend Jan Bosch said that the patent would remain in the hands of the researchers, while the pharmaceutical company in question will take a license to the antibody.

Two uses

The antibody has been shown to both inhibit development of corona virus in hamsters and to combat the disease in animals which have already been infected.

‘This means that the antibody protects in living organisms, which means we can go through to the next stage in the research, with the US pharmaceuticals company,’ Grosveld said.

The team first went public with their finding in mid March. The antibody, a remnant of earlier research into corona viruses like SARS and MERS, was found in a freezer at the Utrecht university lab for animal science.

The presence of the old material meant the team had a head start in the international scramble to find a medicine or vaccine to combat the virus which has killed 370,000 people worldwide so far.

Similar coverage: Coronavirus medicine ready within 6 months, antibody discoverer says

 

[Aniram]

For the past 3 years, the disaffiliation movement has been such in my personal life that I find it difficult to connect with the few people who still remain in my emotional environment. With them, no "real communication" could be established these last months. At the risk of making noise for nothing, I share the observations of many people here. Questioning the relevance of the measures of confinement, of the ban on prescribing to town doctors here in France, of the law of censorship on the Internet (Avia), of social distancing, of masks, of pointing out dissonances... has only reinforced the place of "idiot of service" that I already had in my entourage! I decided to keep my mouth shut and no longer seek his moral support. This kind of self-containment is very emotionally burdensome, but I don't see any other option at the moment.
In my region, the masks which are losing a bit of ground with the sun probably reveal more the desire to return to the routine of before Covid than to wonder what's going on!In a TV programme, one of our pseudo-national philosophers who knows everything about everything, called upon to give his wise word on the circus we live in, said that the mask doesn't change anything in the way we communicate. Immediately to say that never before have we been so much led to speak with our eyes ! It is better to hear that than to be deaf !
That this spectacle is difficult to watch, to hear, to live...

Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)

Spoiler: [SPOILER:"French

"]
Depuis 3 ans, le mouvement de désaffiliation a été tel dans ma vie personnelle que je peine à me connecter avec le peu de personnes qui subsiste encore dans mon environnement affectif. Avec elles, aucune "réelle communication" n'a pu être établie ces derniers mois. Au risque de faire du bruit pour rien, je partage les observations de beaucoup de personnes ici. Interroger la pertinence des mesures de confinement, d'interdiction de prescrire faite ici en France aux médecins de ville, de la loi de censure sur Internet (Avia), de distanciation sociale, des masks, pointer les dissonances... n'a fait que conforter la place de "débile de service" que j'avais déjà dans mon entourage ! J'ai pris la décision de me taire et de ne plus solliciter son soutien moral. Cette sorte d'auto-confinement est très pesant au niveau affectif mais je ne vois pas d'autre option pour le moment.
Dans ma région, les masques qui perdent un peu de terrain avec le soleil révèlent sans doute plus l'envie de retourner à la routine d'avant Covid que de s'interroger sur ce qu'il se passe ! Dans une émission TV, l'un de nos pseudos philosophes nationaux qui savent tout sur tout, appelé à donner sa sage parole sur le cirque que nous vivons, affirmait que le masque ne changeait rien à notre façon de communiquer. Immédiatement de dire que jamais nous n'avons été autant amenés à parler avec les yeux !! Il vaut mieux entendre cela que d'être sourd !
Que ce spectacle est difficile à regarder, à entendre, à vivre...

 

[WIN 52]

Yeah, I've noticed the same, whenever I mention the financial implications of the lockdown, which will likely lead to a severe world wide depression the response is along the lines of - "Saving lives is more important! We can't make decisions based on the economy when people's lives are at stake! "

Many people just don't seem to be able to envision anything beyond the immediate future, and even for those who can kind of grasp it, it still is like they are merely spectators to the coming collapse, it has nothing to do with them and they are not particularly worried about it. It really amazes me how many people seem quite confident that the economy will bounce back, that this is just a slight necessary hiccup that will all go away in due time.

Just a guess, but that could be 50% of the population. Now, you take the 50% of OP's versus the 50% with soul potential and divide again. You end up with 25% STO candidates who actually care about such things. The rest are living in another world.

It's rudimentary mathematics, but that would leave 1 out of 4 people who think about these things. And, that seems to line up with the reality of the situation.

 

[Matthew]

Just a guess, but that could be 50% of the population. Now, you take the 50% of OP's versus the 50% with soul potential and divide again. You end up with 25% STO candidates who actually care about such things. The rest are living in another world.

It's rudimentary mathematics, but that would leave 1 out of 4 people who think about these things. And, that seems to line up with the reality of the situation.

I have actually been very reassured by the numbers the C's have given. Given the MSM propaganda and social media discourse, it would be easy to think that 99% of the planet's human population has fully bought into the STS programming. Even if most of those who have not are not consciously questioning it and merely have a sense that 'it doesn't add up' that's still a lot of people and is something to build on. It gives me hope.