And the mask has come off, so to speak.D.C. Exempts Lawmakers, Government Employees From New Mask Order
D.C. Exempts Lawmakers, Government Employees From New Mask Order
Washington, D.C., mayor Muriel Bowser (D.) issued a universal masking order for her city Wednesday but exempted lawmakers, judges, and federal employees.freebeacon.com
And the games continue
]:There Is No Science to Support Mandatory Face Masks. A Symbol of Social Submission?
By Renee Parsons
Global Research, July 22, 2020
As the distraction of BLM/Antifa riots and the coronavirus have consumed much attention and energy, the social engineering agenda of the World Economic Forumâs Great Reset has taken a giant step forward in establishing the mandatory face mask as a symbol of submission to their dehumanizing agenda. Beyond Orwellian, the face mask is being used as a guise to re shape our perception of reality in acceptance of a scientific dictatorship as an integral part of a looming totalitarian globalist agenda.
As Democratic Governors have played a leading role in advancing the myth that face masks will save lives, Colorado Gov Jared Polis announced his decision on July 16th to mandate face masks to be worn in all public places in Colorado; thus codifying a medical tyranny world view.
In a July 12th Facebook page, Polis stated that âThe emerging scientific data is clearâ that wearing a mask protects others and reduces the risk of contracting Coronavirus. Polis then referred to those resistant to a face mask as a âselfish bastard.â
[NOTE: DeWine said a mask mandate had been under consideration for several days, and that mounting evidence of the effectiveness of face masks contributed to his decision. âThe evidence is clearer now than it has ever been,â DeWine said. Strikingly similar language, no? And where exactly is that mounting evidence of effectiveness?]
During Polisâs four page Executive Order issued on July 19th, there is not one mention of the âemerging scienceâ as support for his decision to mandate face masks [see above note]; nor does Polis discuss how health effects will improve with masking except as âmitigating effects of the pandemic.â In announcing the mandate, Polis declared that âWearing a mask is not a political statement. I donât know how, in anybodyâs mind, this became a game of political football.â
If the Governor is truly at a loss as to how masking or other lockdown requirements became a political football, he has not been paying attention. Consider the following: on March 20th, California became the first state in the country to order a Lockdown which was quickly followed by other States with Democratic Governors. To date, a majority of those Governors (21 out of 24) have all approved the mandatory wearing of face masks, albeit without applying any science. It is the arbitrary âshutdownâ of business as well as onerous personal requirements (such as social distancing) with a State adopting oppressive dictatorial behavior as if they have the right to make personal decisions about any one life.
Only four states with Republican Governors, some of which may be considered RINOs, have also adopted similar Executive Orders (Alabama, Arkansas, Massachusetts, Maryland). [Left out Ohio]
If CV is merely a variation of an infectious virus, sunshine and warm weather should have already limited its impact; reducing its spread and exposure. Instead, as Red States attempt to re open (ie Texas and Florida), sudden intense CV âhot spotsâ flare which forces the State to delay and increase its shut down requirements. Given an advanced radio frequency weapon ability, those âhot spotsâ may have been generated by 5G at the millimeter level on the electro magnetic Spectrum.
If, in fact, science is not the prime reason for mandatory face masks; that is, if face masks do not provide safety from contagion, then why mandate face masks at all? What other purpose does a face mask have but to protect the wearer or to inhibit spreading the virus? Without evidence that masks have positively reduced exposures and thereby fatalities, then the true purpose of the mandate becomes a more nefarious political and partisan gesture of psychological manipulation and control.
New England Journal of Medicine
On April 1st the prestigious New England Journal of Medicine published its Universal Masking Report including the following highlights:
No Scientific Support for Mask Wearing
- âWe know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection.â
- âThe chance of catching Covid-19 from a passing interaction in a public space is therefore minimal.â
- âIn many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to anxiety over the pandemic.â
- âThe extent of marginal benefit of universal masking over and above these foundational measures is debatable.â
- âWhat is clear, however, is that universal masking alone is not a panacea.â
- âIt is also clear that masks serve symbolic roles. Masks are not only tools, they are also talismans that may help increase health care workersâ perceived sense of safety, well-being, and trust in their hospitals. Although such reactions may not be strictly logical, we are all subject to fear and anxiety, especially during times of crisis. One might argue that fear and anxiety are better countered with data and education than with a marginally beneficial maskâ
Renowned nutritionist Dr. Joseph Mercola has recently reversed his earlier support of face masks and interviewed Dr. Denis Rancourt, PhD who examined the issue on behalf of the Ontario Civil Liberties Association. Rancourt conducted extensive research with an emphasis on masks and did a thorough review of science literature concentrating on whether any evidence exists that masks can reduce infection risk of viral respiratory disease. As a result of examining many controlled trials with verified outcomes, he found no statistical advantage to wearing a mask or not wearing a mask and that masks do no inhibit viral spread.
Rancourt asserted that âthere is no evidence that masks are of any utility for preventing infection by either stopping the aerosol particles from coming out, or from going in. Youâre not helping the people around you by wearing a mask, and youâre not helping yourself avoid the disease by wearing a mask. In addition, Rancourt explained that âInfectious viral respiratory diseases primarily spread via very fine aerosol particles that are in suspension in the air. Any mask that allows you to breathe therefore allows for transmission of aerosolized viruses.â
In conclusion, Rancourt stated
While the ACLU remains absent, OCLA (Ontario Civil Liberties Association) recommends Civil Disobedience against Mandatory Mask Laws. If you are not comfortable with civil disobedience and your local food markets all require a face mask, donât deny yourself the healthy food you and your family need â but DO find ways to register your dissent against being forced to wear a face mask. Write a Letter to the Editor and contact all of your elected political leaders. Be sure they understand your objections that you will not comply with their unconstitutional and immoral behavior.
There Is No Science to Support Mandatory Face Masks. A Symbol of Social Submission? - Global Research
As the distraction of BLM/Antifa riots and the coronavirus have consumed much attention and energy, the social engineering agenda of the World Economic Forumâs Great Reset has taken a giant step forward in establishing the mandatory face mask as a symbol of submission to their dehumanizing...www.globalresearch.ca
I didn't either until it impacted by ability to procure groceries. There are ways around that, but it's not yet time for that battle. So for 15 minutes a week, I appear to be one of the sheep.I never put mine on!
Nucifera - you preempted me! But how about the others below!
End of Part 1 - see next postSaturday satire: When Walmart required customers to wear masks, they had no idea THIS would happenâŚ
(Natural News) If youâve ever wondered why the human race is doomed â and why mask mandates are a complete waste of time â look no further than Walmart, where you will find some of the most hilarious demonstrations of medical illiteracy the world has ever seen.
Last week, Walmart announced that all its customers must wear masks. They mistakenly forgot to define the term âmask,â so Walmart shoppers came up with their own answers to that conundrum.
And they are beyond hilarious.
All photos below courtesy of PeopleofWalmart.com, where youâll find tens of thousands of other photos that are so psychologically tormenting, youâll be begging for a mask to cover your eyeballs.
Just remember what Walmart people say when youâre taking photos of them to post on the Internet: They hate us âcuz they anus.
Lets make Dr. Fauci proud⌠You want masks? We give you masks!
A whole new rendition of the term âbag ladyââŚ
My husband was about to throw these out, but theyâre still usable! The only question is, does the ass side go in front, or back?
[or the ultimate political statement? Maybe that's what I should wear to eye appointment.]
Honey, donât forget the eggplant. Weâll need some on the moon:
[my second favorite but not practical for eye appointment]
White diapers matterâŚ
[literal face diaper - and you thought it was sarcasm - Luvs so apropos]
Luke, I am your pork-devouring father⌠and my tats are epic:
For some reason when I put this bag on my head, the whole Walmart store goes darkâŚ
[Hey - I had that idea first!]
Thereâs a cereal killer on the loose at Walmart:
[Chocolate kills! Oh, wait - people just die for it.]
When we said âair filter,â we didnât mean to take one off your carâs engineâŚ
[American ingenuity! Applied for patent?]
Coronavirus is no match for Storage Bin Man! This guy is like a walking cartoon of comedy:
[and I thought my mask of green butterfly netting was absurd!]
Itâs not quite the Cone of Silence, but rather the Umbrella of Plastic:
[whole body shield]
Did you know that if you attach two yellow masks together with shoe laces, you can make a pair of fashionable shorts?
[no words!]
Odds are, no one needs any special reminder to keep their distance from this guy:
[bring back the engine air-filter mask!]
But hereâs a man with a social distancing idea that might actually work!
[the adult version]
The wings make it work even better, helping you feel fresh and free!
[Now that sanitary!!!]
Everything was going great today until my head got stuck in this fish bowl, so I figured why not just continue shopping with it on?
[Doesn't it fog up?]
The highway construction crew called and they want their road cones backâŚ
[color coordination beats COVID]
Bee happy:
[I actually considered getting one of these - fly swatter ensures SD!]
But officer, I was wearing a mask⌠just not on my face! Does that count?
[Naked Athena needs to talk to this guy]
I know the libtard Left has been destroying the meaning of words, but âmaskâ doesnât mean âsnorkelââŚ
[again, no words]
And finally, like I said earlier, they hate us âcuz they anus.
[the END]
Destroy your day with more eye-wrecking photos at PeopleOfWalmart.com.
Saturday satire: When Walmart required customers to wear masks, they had no idea THIS would happen⌠â NaturalNews.com
If youâve ever wondered why the human race is doomed â and why mask mandates are a complete waste of time â look no further than Walmart, where you will find some of the most hilarious demonstrations of medical illiteracy the world has ever seen. Last week, Walmart announced that all its...www.naturalnews.com
so for him I do it out of respect for his business and our semi-customer-friendship.
Sorry about that! What's the chance of that happening? I'd had that image for a while. Thanks for the new ones!
Does wearing a mask cause diagnostic tests to read false-positive for COVID?
by Jon Rappoport July 23, 2020
Suppose one of the most intense âsafety practicesââwearing a maskâactually inflates the number of COVID diagnoses?
Needless to say, it would be a bombshell. Suppose PCR and antibody tests turn out false positive results because people are wearing masks every day?
How is that possible?
Actually, itâs quite simple. A person wearing a mask is breathing in his own germs all day long. He breathes them out, as he should, but then he breathes them back in.
It seems evident that this unnatural process would increase the number and variety of germs circulating and replicating in his body; even creating active infection.
Along with this, a decrease in oxygen intake, which occurs when a mask is worn, would allow certain germs to multiply in the bodyâgerms which would otherwise be routinely wiped out or diminished in the presence of an oxygen-rich environment.
Hereâs the key: Both the PCR and antibody tests are known for registering false-positive results, since they cross-react with germs which have nothing to do with the reason for the test.
If wearing a mask increases the number and variety of germs replicating in the body, and also increases the chance of developing an active infectionâŚthen the likelihood of a false-positive PCR or antibody test is increased.
In other words, masks would promote the number of so-called COVID cases. This would, of course, have alarming consequences.
People labeled âCOVIDâ face all sorts of negative consequences. I donât have to spell them out.
In past articles, Iâve shown that both PCR and antibody tests DO register false-positives because they react with irrelevant germs.
For example, letâs consider the PCR: From the World Health Organization (WHO): âCoronavirus disease (COVID-19) technical guidance: Laboratory testing for 2019-nCoV in humansâ:
âSeveral assays that detect the 2019-nCoV have been and are currently under development, both in-house and commercially. Some assays may detect only the novel virus [COVID] and some may also detect other strains (e.g. SARS-CoV) that are genetically similar.â
Translation: Some PCR tests register positive for types of coronavirus that have nothing to do with COVIDâincluding plain old coronas that cause nothing more than a cold.
From a manufacturer of PCR test kit elements, Creative Diagnostics, âSARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus Multiplex RT-qPCR Kitâ:
ââŚnon-specific interference of Influenza A Virus (H1N1), Influenza B Virus (Yamagata), Respiratory Syncytial Virus (type B), Respiratory Adenovirus (type 3, type 7), Parainfluenza Virus (type 2), Mycoplasma Pneumoniae, Chlamydia Pneumoniae, etc.â
Translation: Although this company states the test can detect COVID, it also states the test can read FALSELY positive if the patient has one of a number of other irrelevant viruses in his body. What is the test proving, then? Who knows? Flip a coin.
Now letâs consider the antibody testâ
Business Insider, April 3, 202: âSome tests have demonstrated false positives, detecting antibodies to much more common coronaviruses.â
Science News, March 27: âScience News spoke withâŚCharles Cairns, dean of the Drexel University College of Medicine, about how antibody tests work and what are some of the challenges of developing the tests.â
âCairns: âThe big question is: Does a positive response for the antibodies mean that person is actively infected, or that they have been infected in the past? The tests need to be accurate, and avoid both false positives and false negatives. Thatâs the challengeâ.â
Thatâs just a sprinkling of sources on both the PCR and antibody testsârevealing that both of these tests DO spit out false-positive results. Many of those false-positives are the result of cross reactions with irrelevant germs.
And as I stated at the top of this article, if wearing masks increases the number and variety of germs circulating and replicating in the body, then itâs quite likely that masks will, in fact, contribute to false diagnoses of COVID.
Now, we come to a different angle on this story. Everyone is aware that governors and other politicians are ramping up orders to wear masks to new insane levels. If indeed this order will result in more diagnosed COVID casesâŚ
How can we avoid looking at the financial incentives?
It turns out that the states are receiving federal money for EVERY COVID case.
The reference here is Beckerâs CFO Hospital Report, April 14, 2020, âState-by-state breakdown of federal aid per COVID-19 caseâ:
âHHS recently began distributing the first $30 billion of emergency funding designated for hospitals in the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security ActâŚâ
âBelow is a breakdown of how much funding per COVID-19 case each state will receive from the first $30 billion in aid. Kaiser Health News used a state breakdown provided to the House Ways and Means Committee by HHS along with COVID-19 cases tabulated by The New York Times for its analysis.â
âAlabama
$158,000 per COVID-19 case
Alaska
$306,000
Arizona
$23,000
Arkansas
$285,000
California
$145,000
Colorado
$58,000
Connecticut
$38,000
Delaware
$127,000âŚâ
The article goes on to list every state and the money it will receive for EACH DIAGNOSED COVID CASE.
If mask wearing increases the likelihood of a COVID diagnosis, then: those states forcing new widespread mask dictates will be multiplying their federal $$$.
And if you really want to cover the bases, every method of fake case-counting will have the same ballooning $$$ effect for the states.
ALL the so-called containment measuresâmasks, quarantine, isolation, distancing, lockdowns, economic destructionâbring on fear, stress, lonelinessâŚlowering immune-system functionâŚleading to more infectionsâŚwhich means more germs replicating in the bodyâŚwhich means more false-positive COVID diagnostic testsâŚand more human destructionâŚand more $$$ for the states.
SOURCE:
State-by-state breakdown of federal aid per COVID-19 case
HHS recently began distributing the first $30 billion of emergency funding designated for hospitals in the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act. Some of the states hit hardest by the COVID-19 pandemic will receive less funding than states touched relatively lightly, according to an...www.beckershospitalreview.com
Hello Keton Cop, MI gave you really good replies, about wider perspective of it all. From your posts I recognize a lot of what I was dealing with in the past, when things weren't even near as crazy as they are right now, which puts back the importance of learning some crucial lessons, before we are able to graduate, into a perspective. All is intensifying to extremes so that people have to decide either to fall even deeper into ignorance or to finally wake up through pain. Time for group thinking is over, either one takes individual responsibility for his/her own life (physical, emotional and mental integration through actions) or goes quickly down the path of disintegration, becoming the 'dream of the past'.
When you need a break from painful lessons I highly recommend reading 'Oversoul Seven' books by Roberts Jane, if you haven't already (you can loan them free for reading online on the archive org). It's great fun and also a reminder how we are seeing only small parts, in our 3D bodies, of the vast spectrum of life/soul existence.
www.abc.net.au
7news.com.au