In Australia, some people are pushing back against the virus measures being implemented. Another Law firm has come out in support of those who find themselves in trouble for pushing back and standing for their rights - with issues such as border closures, locked down suburbs and businesses making masks a condition of entry. One lass who stood her rights at a border crossing was ultimately waived through without too much drama from the police initially.
The police then caught up with her later, however, and smashed her window in to arrest her. The lawyer that has added her case has rightfully called it an unlawful arrest.
Reading the comments under articles written by those who have bought into the virus narrative is very disturbing. They are calling the women crude names, threatening violence, naming and 'shaming' on many public and personal pages, claiming that they should be charged with murder, etc. It's insane.
One ex-politican and previously shamed business man is mounting a constitutional challenge to border closures.
Interesting thing is, most of the stories in the news here are of women who are challenging the dodgy measures. It's likely that there are men standing against the narrative too, but they don't seem to be making the news. I read one self report of a man who used Article 1. of the Nuremberg code at a chemist to prevent a security guard from taking his temperature as he entered and according to him, the security guard backed down pretty quickly and the manager lost interest in enforcing the measure on him.
Also, the name 'Karen' has been co-opted and instead of describing an authoritarian woman who acts in an overbearing manner towards others for
not following the measures, it is being used for the women who are standing up for themselves
against the measures. To be fair, some of these women are getting a bit reactive and cranky in their approach, particularly if the police or staff member push back repetitively at their explanations, but none of them that I've seen have been overly disrespectful.
Reading through the comments and watching the videos by the lawyers and reading the actual laws that they refer to, it's quite obvious that the virus measures are so far beyond the scope and power of the law it's not funny. Like Catherine Austin Fitts commented, the PTB have no qualms about breaking the law, they just won't want to admit to it openly or in court. One lawyer has called for those who are fined for not wearing the mask or breaching border closures to let them know because the fines themselves are illegal. Under ordinary circumstances it wouldn't be worth fighting a $200 fine, some fines for breaching measures are much higher - a border breach is $10,000. However, these lawyers are now doing class actions and setting up gofundme pages to pay for the action so it's easier for a bunch of people to jump on board. This should make things interesting! Thats if covidiots don't get to the defendants first!
Sometimes it's hard to see how things could pan out without a whole lot of strife, but every now and then there's a flash of hope while watching events unfold. As time goes on I'm feeling less dread and more curiosity.
CAF did say it seems this whole COVID rollout was off in that it seems rushed and sloppy and that there must be something else that hasn't come out yet - she seems to think it's Wuhan related.
Well, I haven't seen anything to corroborate this story yet, but apparently there's CSIRO lab near a military base here in Australia that was working on the 'Wuhan' virus and had connections to Fauci. The video that was talking about it seemed a bit dodgy so I didn't watch it all the way through, but it gave me an idea.
Speculation ahead!
What if the manufactured strain of coronavirus was meant to be released from a number of locations/labs around the world at the same time, and wasn't necessarily spread by travellers at all? CAF mentioned in an earlier video that she didn't expect actions taken to force a market reset until after the US elections, but for some reason the market reset has come early. So maybe they were planning for Trump to be out of the way before releasing the virus and having Biden at the helm for the market reset - but the virus escaped from one lab early and that's why things haven't run so smoothly for the PTB - at the time of lockdown, they were supposed to have another 8 months (until the elections) at least to get everything into place for the covid drama/market reset? Or maybe the virus didn't escape accidentally - what if each country that had the virus in their labs decided to use the threat of releasing it or actually releasing it to put political pressure on other countries. That could be behind the trumped up attempt to impeach Trump. I mean that whole impeachment effort was so clumsy and visibly useless that it could have easily been a - 'sheesh, we can't wait until after the election now - we have to get him out yesterday'.
The other thing is that Trump was originally supportive of JFK and he's not for mandatory vaccination, so it would make sense that the Gates/WHO peeps would want Trump out before they release a vaccine. If they release a vaccine while Trumps at the helm and he doesn't approve mandatory vaccines, then they only get approx half of the population vaccinated, for example, then there'll be a clear difference between the peeps that are vaccinated and those that aren't if CAF is right about the vaccinations - the game would be up. If everyones minds turn to mush after a mandatory vaccination program though, then a country full of mushed minds from mandatory vaccinations wouldn't know the difference.
Just some thoughts rattling around, and maybe nothing to them.
