Update in the Netherlands: While the Dutch research institute RIVM says that there's no evidence about the effectivity of masks outside, annoying 'experts' (and 'journalists') keep pushing for a rule to wear a mask outside. Not that the RIVM is trustworthy, but they're right about this at least. A couple of days ago, the Dutch govt said that there will be no mandatory masks rule in public areas. However, it appears now that they might implement such a rule in certain areas as an experiment. So, let me get this straight:
hydroxychloroquine -> very promising results and safe -> 'experts' claim there's no evidence and therefore not safe -> not allowed to be experimented with
masks -> no evidence of effectivity, can be harmful -> 'experts' want it to be implemented outside as well -> allowed to be experimented with
Amazing logic.
hydroxychloroquine -> very promising results and safe -> 'experts' claim there's no evidence and therefore not safe -> not allowed to be experimented with
masks -> no evidence of effectivity, can be harmful -> 'experts' want it to be implemented outside as well -> allowed to be experimented with
Amazing logic.