Confinement: "It is better to have four customers in 25 stores, than 100 customers grouped together in the same store," says Gilles Platret, Vice President LR
By-laws are multiplying in the communes to challenge the closure of small businesses because of the confinement. The mayor of Chalon-sur-Saône and vice-president of the Republicans denounced the break in equality with hypermarkets and online sales platforms.
The municipal by-laws that, here and there, allow small businesses to open despite the confinement, "it's primarily to protect customers," said Gilles Platret, mayor of Chalon-sur-Saône (Saône-et-Loire) and Vice President of the Republicans, guest of franceinfo this Saturday morning. "It's better to have four customers in 25 shops, than 100 customers grouped in the same shop," he explains, while he also denounces "the breach of equality and unfair competition" between online sales platforms or hypermarkets and small shops.
franceinfo: Did you take this decision for health or economic reasons?
Gilles Platret: No one today can dispute the fact that there is a break in equality and unfair competition, that's for sure. Supermarkets can't, and I don't even blame them, separate essential products from non-essential products in completely open trays. So you have a break in competition with small shops. But the main stake, in my opinion, besides this one, which is an important one, is first of all to protect the customers. Today, the accumulation of customers in supermarkets is more conducive to the spread of the virus than the scattering of customers in the city's small shops, so it is first of all a health reason that leads me to make this decision.
Do you doubt the sanitary utility of closing down small businesses?
Worse than that. It's much better to have four customers in 25 shops than 100 customers in the same shop. It's just common sense. It's neither right nor left. Last night, I encouraged the prefect of Saône-et-Loire to go to the supermarkets, take a cart and sit behind a cash register in the middle of dozens and dozens of customers. Is this the ideal setting to preserve the health of our fellow citizens? I don't think so. And even if the supermarkets only sold essential products... But they sell absolutely all products. You'll see what's going to happen this weekend: people are supposed to be cooped up at home. They don't work for most of them, so they're going to find one way out, and that's to go to the supermarket and get some fresh air. This situation has been caused by this way of being obsessed with the supermarket as the one that has to save health and the economy. This is completely false, it does not correspond to the reality on the ground.
So we are simply asking the State to go out into the field, to go with the real people, to realize what is happening. And automatically it will be led at least to doubt, if not to reconsider its position, and that's why all the associations of elected officials are pushing in the same direction.
Isn't this approach futile when every time the prefects ask the elected officials to withdraw their decrees that they qualify as illegal?
It's a little strong for coffee because I'm just going to remind you of one thing: we are still within the framework of a constitutional state that preserves the free administration of local authorities. It's in the Constitution. That the prefects believe that the decrees are not in conformity with the law, that's their right. But it's not up to them to say whether they are illegal or not. They pass them on to the administrative courts. That's what mine, like many others, I imagine, had to do. And we'll wait for the judge's answer. It is he who will say if the order is illegal. It is certainly not up to the prefect to say it, it is a total abuse of power for the prefect to decide on his own that the decree is illegal.
In any case, the State, faced with all this, must open its eyes. Can it continue to force small businesses to die while remaining closed? Or can it authorize them to reopen, which will also allow to spread out the clientele, to unbundle it and thus to fight more efficiently against the virus? That's the real question.
Translated with
www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)