GAIN-OF-FUNCTION CAT-BIRD-FLU now on the rise as nearly a dozen cats in Colorado “test positive” for Bird Flu due to contaminated cat food
03/27/2025

  1. Alleged Cat-Bird Flu Outbreak – Nearly a dozen cats in Colorado reportedly tested positive for avian flu (H5N1) after consuming contaminated chicken-flavored cat food, with a claimed 90% fatality rate among infected cats.
  2. Conspiracy-Driven Narrative – The article frames the outbreak as a potential "Plandemic," suggesting gain-of-function research (funded by USAID/Biden) engineered the virus to spread from birds to cats to humans, echoing COVID-era fearmongering.
  3. Lockdowns & mRNA Fears – Satirical calls for cat masking, social distancing, and lockdowns are paired with warnings about mRNA vaccines for pets, claiming they may cause "shedding" of spike proteins or prion diseases.
  4. Broader Anti-Pharma Sentiment – Links the incident to past outbreaks (COVID, Ebola, Zika) as part of a pattern of "Big Pharma" and government collusion to profit from bioweapons or forced vaccinations
Are cats in Colorado eating contaminated bat soup? Will the next Plandemic of “Bird Flu” spread because cats are eating infected chicken-flavor cat food and then sneezing the gain-of-function Cat Flu on their human keepers? Be sure to mask up your cats and dogs 24/7/365 and keep them at least 6 feet away from each other and your children until this whole CatBirdFlu-Cov-25 “curve” is flattened out. That’s right, eleven cats have tested “positive,” whatever that means, for bird flu after Big Food recalled more of their contaminated cat food from the markets. Those darned PCR tests keep coming back positive every time. They must be right, right?

Suddenly, now cats are now the new potential vector for transmitting GAIN OF FUNCTION avian influenza that somehow is now jumping from birds to cats to humans, thanks to USAID and Biden funding bioweapon labs around the world to create “novel” viruses that can be used against humanity to kill us off or make us all sick to death for money.

Bird Flu, Cat Flu, Monkey Pox, Zika, Ebola, Covid, and Swine are all coming to a Big Pharma theatre near you – lock’em down Warden


The Colorado Department of Agriculture posted on Facebook on Wednesday that 11 cats, including indoor-only and indoor-outdoor cats, had reportedly contracted the avian flu, and the fearmongering doesn’t stop there. According to the department, only ONE of the cats survived. That’s a 93 percent death rate for cats that catch the Biden Bird Flu.

Will the government have to “put down” a billion cats like they do the chickens every time a few of them catch a virus? Will Cat-Bird-Flu travel to Canada and Mexico, or can it not cross borders and tall walls? Infected cats don’t eat much and they lay around the house all day (don’t they do that anyway?

The most recent recall of toxic cat food applies to specific lots of Savage Cat Food‘s large and small chicken boxes, which were sold at retailers in California, Colorado, New York, Pennsylvania, and Washington.

“Cats appear to be particularly susceptible to severe illness, often resulting in death,” the AVMA said in a statement. “The risk of cat-to-human transmission is considered extremely low but may increase with prolonged, unprotected exposure to infected animals, or if Fauci’s gain-of-function scientists can figure out a way to make it spread easier, like Covid
 
They are using damn PCR tests.

And with that, you can test and find anything and everything while claiming that “outbreaks” occur.

Soon they are going to claim that most people have cancer due to positive PCR tests, followed by specialized genetic injections as the solution. “Making the unthinkable thinkable” - right under our noses in this earthly theatre.

Kind of “funny” as the name is wicked, you know… “Stargate” - like a mega mass transportation project for human beings and pets directly to 5D.

This open evil … is exhausting !
 
These are a couple of articles that come from review of different sites and summarize the ways in which DNA contamination, SV40-linked fragments and the spike protein all interfere with DNA damage and repair, i.e. all the implications for gene therapies - vaccines - to induce cancer.

+
The German study by Simonis et al., published in Molecular Systems Biology reveals that the Covid mRNA shots (Moderna’s Spikevax and Pfizer/BioNTech’s Comirnaty) leave a lasting mark on the immune system.
The paper entitled, "Persistent Epigenetic Memory of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccination in Monocyte-Derived Macrophages" by researchers from the University of Cologne and University Hospital Cologne found that:
“SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination induces innate immune memory by establishing persistent H3K27ac epigenetic marks in human monocyte-derived macrophages.
This increased gene expression and cytokine release (e.g., IL-1β), triggered by re-exposure to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, was seen to boost the cells’ virus-fighting capacity for months

In their discussion, they stated:
“We were able to demonstrate that SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination establishes extensive and persistent H3K27ac at promoters of short-lived macrophages. However, a prime-boost vaccination regimen was required to achieve significant levels of epigenetic reprogramming lasting for several months after application of the second vaccine. The priming vaccine alone had little impact on this epigenetic mark associated with an altered immune response.
In relation to the study- the mRNA shots (two Spikevax doses followed by one Comirnaty dose) introduce spike protein mRNA, prompting an initial immune response. This leaves an epigenetic "memory" via H3K27ac, so when macrophages (immune cells) encounter spike protein again, they overexpress (rev up) immune genes.

H3K27ac and cancer risk

Histone H3 lysine 27 acetylation (H3K27ac) is an epigenetic mark associated with active gene transcription, which is often enriched at enhancers and promoters. The problem with H3K27ac is that it’s not just an immune booster—it plays a role in various cancers. When dysregulated, it can drive the overexpression of oncogenes or other cancer-related genes, contributing to tumorigenesis (process by which normal cells transform into cancerous cells and begin forming a tumor).
There are multiple studies (see list ) that link high H3K27ac to cancers like leukemia and breast cancer, where it sustains inflammation and proliferation. Normally, this happens in genetically altered cells, but the process starts with environmental triggers- potentially vaccination.

The Simonis et al. study shows that the Covid mRNA gene-based shots increase H3K27ac at macrophage gene promoters, particularly for immune genes like IL1B. This boost persists for at least six months after the second dose and surges even higher after a third. This primes macrophages to release inflammatory signals like IL-1β. This can be viewed as a double-edged sword. Chronic inflammation is a known cancer risk factor, and macrophages play a role in feeding growth signals. If this priming becomes permanent or spreads beyond immune genes, it could mimic cancer’s epigenetic playbook.


DNA contamination and cancer risk

Beyond epigenetics, DNA contamination in Pfizer and Moderna vials, first exposed by Kevin McKernan (2023)- adds fuel to the fire. This discovery has since been corroborated by labs worldwide, revealing that residual plasmid DNA from the manufacturing process persists in these gene-based vaccines
While the regulators firmly maintain that the residual DNA levels are safely within the cap of 10ng/dose established by WHO and FDA guidelines- findings from independent labs state otherwise, with DNA levels 100–500 times higher than permitted, based on their testing.
The risk is that the presence of fragmented DNA could integrate into human genomes, potentially causing inflammation, which once again could lead to cancer.


The Simonis et al. study paints mRNA shots as immune champions, rewiring macrophages with H3K27ac to fight SARS-CoV-2 for months. Yet, this persistent epigenetic memory echoes cancer’s playbook. Add in the DNA contamination scandal and SV40-linked fragments at levels independents claim dwarf regulatory caps- then could these shots, hailed as “safe and effective” be priming cells for inflammation or worse, tumorigenesis? The alarm bells are ringing loud and clear, yet there’s deafening silence from the regulators.


 

ABORTION
DEATH by 12 VACCINES SIMULTANEOUSLY: Doctor playing catch-up on jabs injects 1-year-old baby with massive combination of dirty vax cocktails
04/02/2025 // S.D. Wells // 580 Views

Tags: . vaccines, badhealth, chemical violence, Dangerous Medicine, dirty jabs, dirty vaccines, medical violence, mercury in vaccines, multijabs, toxins, vaccine death, vaccine violence, vaccine wars, vax death

  1. Medical Negligence & Over-Vaccination – A 1-year-old girl, Sa’Niya, died shortly after receiving 12 vaccines in 6 shots at Golisano Children’s Hospital in New York, highlighting alleged medical malpractice in aggressive "catch-up" vaccination schedules.
  2. Vaccine Safety Controversy – vaccines contain neurotoxins and carcinogens (such as mercury in some formulations) and are treated as hazardous waste if spilled yet are still injected into infants despite potential dangers.
  3. Lack of Accountability – Doctors and the Vaccine Industrial Complex are legally shielded from lawsuits, allowing reckless over-vaccination without consequences.
  4. Anti-Vaccine Sentiment – vaccines are not "safe and effective" but instead a profit-driven scheme, linking the incident to broader distrust in pharmaceutical companies, the CDC, and WHO
Every medical doctor in the country knows better than to inject a child with multiple vaccines at one time, but the majority of them do it anyway, because sickness and injury pays their bills. Forget about the hypocritical oath. That got buried long ago by the American Medical Association over a century ago when they began calling all natural remedies “quack” and “snake oil” while referring to every lab-concocted pharmaceutical drug and dirty jab as “safe and effective.”

Now, medical doctors are licensed and authorized to inject as many known carcinogens and neurotoxins into pregnant women, newborn babies, and children as they choose, no matter the health detriment. No person can ever sue the Vaccine Industrial Complex, and the doctors are protected also. The latest tragedy of this nature involves a baby that died shortly after a doctor chose to play catch-up and inject the child with 12 vaccines (combo jabs inside of 6 different shots
 
Now, medical doctors are licensed and authorized to inject as many known carcinogens and neurotoxins into pregnant women, newborn babies, and children as they choose, no matter the health detriment. No person can ever sue the Vaccine Industrial Complex, and the doctors are protected also. The latest tragedy of this nature involves a baby that died shortly after a doctor chose to play catch-up and inject the child with 12 vaccines (combo jabs inside of 6 different shots
"Science advances one funeral at a time."
 
GAIN-OF-FUNCTION CAT-BIRD-FLU now on the rise as nearly a dozen cats in Colorado “test positive” for Bird Flu due to contaminated cat food
03/27/2025
The news has been very grim lately. Maybe it's from this lab that people have been worried about. Adding some sort of supplement to pets water would be good. Fort Collins is close to Denver.

Prior Bioweapons Projects and Leaks at CSU​

Michael Nevradakis with Children’s Health Defense has written a comprehensive 11-page overview of the biological research at CSU. In “Plan to Build NIH-Funded Bat Lab Research Lab in Colorado Sparks Fears of Lab Leak,” Francis Boyle, J.D., Ph.D., a bioweapons expert shared his concerns with the CSU facility:

“It is well known that Colorado State University has a long and ongoing history of specialization in weaponizing insects with biowarfare agents for delivery to human beings. This new lab will magnitudinally increase CSU’s offensive biowarfare capabilities, in gross violation of the Biological Weapons Convention of 1972 and my Biological Weapon

 
+ The date of the Second report Welcome to Gilead is Jul 30, 2022 and this is a concrete summary of what corresponds to a crossover of related research in a study to prevent cancer and the implications of the spike vaccine.This review paper is groundbreaking because it summarises all the ways that spike protein interferes with DNA damage and repair.
To read the full report of the investigation and the cover-up you can go to the link.

Welcome to Gilead

TLDR: A paper was published in October showing how the mRNA vaccines could massively impact ovarian and breast cancer risk. Two scientists linked to the NIH and Pharma conspired to remove it from publication - putting a generation of women at risk.


Women with BRCA mutations have a much higher risk of breast and ovarian cancer than those without. A woman with a BRCA-related mutation is likely to get breast or ovarian cancer before age 50 dramatically. The BRCA gene is really important. It is part of the “homologous recombination DNA repair pathway,” which is one of the mechanisms the body uses to prevent its cells from becoming cancerous in response to environmental stress.
One of the most important components of this pathway is p53 (or TP53) which is commonly called the “guardian of the genome”. ( Here a summary ). If there were a new therapy that interfered with the ability of the body's cells to produce p53 and make the BRCA pathway work by defending our genome, this would be important.
A paper entitled “SARS-CoV-2 spike impairs DNA damage repair and inhibits V(D)J recombination IN VITRO” is also known as the Jiang study by authors Hui Jiang and Ya-Fang Mei. At first glance, this study has nothing to do with ovarian cancer or breast cancer, it is about lymphocytes.

0.png
For the record, VDJ recombination is one of the coolest things in nature. It is the mechanism behind the body’s creation of immunity (or what we used to call immunity before Tony Fauci and the WHO changed the definition). It’s how T- and B- cells magically create new proteins to neutralise nasty bugs.
1.png
It also has something really important in common with our ovarian cancer pathway, in that it relies on DNA strand breakage and repair - it’s essential to the process, and it’s the same process seen in p53-dependent ovarian and breast cancer.

2.png

So when Jiang and Mei designed an experiment to look at the possibility that the SARS-CoV-2 proteins might impact this pathway in lymphocytes they were doing an experiment that was of vital importance to world’s population.


What did they find?
Well, unfortunately something really important. That is, of all the proteins produced by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, one of them - the spike protein - obliterated the DNA repair mechanism in lymphocytes. Yeah, that’s really bad. Here is the graph from the paper showing the level of “HR efficiency” (i.e. homologous repair efficiency, i.e. the ability of the cell to repair DNA) seen with the different proteins of the virus. The spike protein was so toxic to this pathway that it knocked 90% of it out. This is an environment that is almost guaranteed to cause cancer.

The Moderna and Pfizer COVID vaccines are exact amino acid replicas of the Wuhan-1 SARS-COV-2 spike protein, apart from one dual-proline amino acid change in a part of the protein that isn’t exposed to receptor binding (i.e. makes no functional difference)

So does it matter that some good guys in a Swedish university (that are experts in the field and have been producing papers on this stuff for years, by the way) published a paper showing that the nasty Ecohealth77(™) virus (aka SARS2, COVID, Wuhan-1 and a few other choice names) produced proteins that - if they hung around long enough - would stop your cells’ protection mechanism against cancer? Well, no - provided that the stuff (the protein it makes) didn’t hang around long, didn’t get into the nucleus, and didn’t get to the ovaries. Fortunately, if you get infected with said virus and your immune system is working the spike protein should be rapidly neutralised and so you shouldn’t be at risk of these cancers from a “COVID-19” infection.
But… What you really, really don’t want in this scenario is:
(1) the spike protein in the vicinity of the nucleus, where the DNA repair happens
(2) the spike protein to be continually produced
(3) a full length spike artificial protein matching the viral spike, because we don’t know which bit of the spike protein is causing this effect.


Well, guess what?
It just so happens that there is a genetic therapy currently in production that
(1) induces spike protein to be produced in and around the cell nucleus
(2) is produced for at least 60 days and almost certainly longer
(3) produces the full length spike exactly matching (amino acid for amino acid1) the full length of the viral spike protein

(...) in fact the Jiang study simply reproduced what Pfizer had already done, proving beyond all doubt that the spike protein gets into the nucleus.
Here is the version of the confocal microscopy study from the Jiang study - blue is the nucleus (the black around is the rest of the cell) and the bright green is the spike protein tagged with a fluorescent marker. As you can see, the spike is completely in the nucleus. There is no doubt. And to reinforce this, the fact that the study showed 90% inhibition of p53 activity means that it had to be active in the nucleus (because that’s where p53 lives)


3.png

Yes but those nice government people that lied about all the other stuff said that the spike protein from the vaccine doesn’t get into the nucleus, right? They didn’t lie about that did they?
Well, I hate to let you down here but this next picture is from the TGA’s document referenced above2 from the pre-clinical studies of the Pfizer mRNA vaccine. This is the document that the TGA had before they authorised the product. The EMA, MHRA and FDA had the same documents. In the TGA version it’s on page 25 of the “BioNtech BNT162 investigator’s brochure” (which sounds like a holiday brochure from the days we could go on holiday, doesn’t it?).

Here you are. I’ve put a big red arrow on to show you that there is plenty of spike protein in the nucleus of the cell shown. It’s a slam dunk.
4.0.png

But that’s just a one-off right?
Wrong. Here is the equivalent slide from the TGA “nonclinical evaluation report” 3, showing the spike protein being produced in the ER near the nucleus (as sold in the glossy brochure) but then being located (again) into the nucleus. This picture is a little faint but I suspect that is by design4.
4.png


OK so it gets into the nucleus, but it doesn’t hang around does it? They said it only lasts hours or days and then disintegrates. That’s true isn’t it?

No. In fact this was shown in a huge study by one of the most respected molecular biology groups in the world at Stanford university in a mammoth paper. They showed that the RNA was still present and active after 60 days. Other researchers have shown activity beyond 28 days and others even longer, so it’s “a thing”. It doesn’t break down in 2 days, that was a lie.

5.png
So now we have the mRNA vaccines producing the same full length spike protein, entering the nucleus where Jiang and Mei proved that the protein stops DNA repair (i.e. induces cancer risk) in lymphocytes.

Well, Jiang did make a mistake. And the mistake he made was to admit in the paper that there was a possibility - or probability - that because the vaccine spike was the same as the virus spike, the vaccine had a real risk of causing cancer-inducing changes in DNA. Well, you see, you are not allowed to do that - because that will upset the pharma companies whose advertising funds nearly every major medical journal.


6.png
And once this paper was published it started dawning on people (and mice) what the implications were

Which meant that the Medical Establishment™ had to act, because we can’t allow those pesky mice to let it slip that this novel therapy (making the Medical Establishment™ billions of dollars) is going to put every woman that takes it at risk of cancers that are unique to them, can we?

At this point in the article, the story explains how the medical establishment began to get nervous and how it intervened by trying to stifle the investigation and gassing the reports and the publication (see).

Thus it concludes:
Well, the spike protein circulating in large quantities, in the direct vicinity of the cell nucleus, for elongated periods of time, has the potential to induce cancer in those cells. Which cells are the most likely to be affected? Any that are known to be affected by p53 and BRCA abnormalities: ovary, pancreas, breast, prostate. lymph nodes. These cancers can take years to develop and so it’s possible that we don’t see much of a safety signal for 5 or 10 years, and then Pfizer and Moderna will claim that it was “COVID” or “lockdowns” that caused the deluge of women’s (and some men’s) cancers.

By then of course, we might be living under the “new normal” touted by so many of our world leaders and health chiefs, with people like Freed and Schildgen in charge. Imagine what kind of medical dystopia we look forward to when the very people who we rely on to keep us safe (or at least be honest and transparent in their attempts) instead ordain the suffering of a generation of women.
Not too far from Gilead, really.

 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom