Don't flatter yourselves.

transientP said:
I'd like to take the opportunity to state my current goal in Work, if I may.

My goal is to be aware as much as possible of the real unity which encompasses all (be aware of non-duality) while "walking" a path in which I strive to help others when asked to the best of my ability.

Hi transientP,

Thank you for your input.

The path you've described is the same path walked by the adept (the Nagual) in Castaneda's material. His terminology is simpler, hence easier to understand. "Controlled folly" is what he said. Being fully engaged in the world and yet--detached from it. This can be a real challenge for many, and it's often misunderstood. It's an idea with an easter flavor. And maybe why I'm more receptive.

Buddhism (nearly all schools) holds the same vision--to be very central in fact. It's a core belief. Their terminology & nuance however, is more complex, hence even greater confusion abound--for the laymen.

A careful read of Seth will show here too, it's a fundamental premise. All physical sensations a means to an end. To make one understand (via sensate, including the hyperkinetic variety) what one has manifested. Hammering home, the importance of individual responsibility. Thoughts then--and its manifestations-- a continuous feedback loop. Cycling ahead from each moment point of existence. In countless iterations. But always with the same purpose.

(BTW, I truly believe Denis innately knows this. His chosen signature not an accident).

Now what of the C's?

They've said all there is is lessons. And lessons again are simply a means to an end. Melted out (by ourselves really) and hopefully learned. Yet this entire play is worked out in an illusory framework. They are very clear on this.

So transientP, with all of the above in mind, I would say your short statement of aim is perhaps not too far off the mark. That's my intuitive sense. But we both could be wrong.

FWIW.

PS
It's very easy to dismiss the above as wishing thinking. I questioned it for a long time so I know that feeling. But I now think it just might be one of those simple understandings the C's have mentioned but have not elaborated upon. Leaving us to find out. And this is what I think I've found thus far. If someone disagrees, please provide sufficient detail and not just a "no". Thanks in advance.
 
Archaea said:
I think this thread is interesting, and I have a question:

Where do people think Doom's attitude comes from? Do people think it's an attack on the forum? Is Doom a paid agent or psychopath? Or do people think Doom is legitimately concerned, but isn't expressing him/herself constructively?

What are your thoughts on these questions Archaea?

Well I think Doom perceived the presence of covert STS machinations on the forum in general, but particularly among the mods and admins.

So what do you think about Doom's perceptions? Do they match with yours?


[quote author=Archaea]
So I have some more questions:

Are Dooms concerns a result of his self importance, or could they be a result of some truma?
[/quote]

No way to answer this question objectively without data. He is not asking - so speculating on this theme is rather useless imo.

[quote author=Archaea]

There's been some mention of attack in this thread, what causes this perception?
[/quote]

Please cite the specific posts you have in mind.

[quote author=Archaea]
If doom is a young person, how could his perceptions be validated, and guided to the truth?
[/quote]

He was not asking - he came here to teach others. There are guidelines which every user here is supposed to read before joining in. If someone does not agree with the basic premises that this forum is based on then there is no common ground for discussion.

[quote author=Archaea]
What would have been an appropriate way for Doom to express himself?
[/quote]

You can answer that yourself. Look at Newbies threads on how others who are sticking here have done it.

[quote author=Arcahea]
Just FYI, my idea of the work is to become at peace with my existence. :)
[/quote]

If you are referring to 4th Way Work, then your idea is different from what it stands for. But that is a different topic for discussion. And a fruitful discussion can take place only when there is some familiarity of the basic reading material suggested.
 
obyvatel said:
...a fruitful discussion can take place only when there is some familiarity of the basic reading material suggested.

I agree.

[quote author=Archaea]
Well I think Doom perceived the presence of covert STS machinations on the forum in general, but particularly among the mods and admins.
[/quote]

I think that's what Doom wanted people to think. If you read the opening post carefully, as well as his reply to Menna, you may glean the answers in his own words. For example, I got that Doom had been reading in a relationship thread where celibacy and possibly casual sex was being discussed. Doom already had strong opinions about celibate priests. His description includes the ideas of competition and wrongly thinking they are the good guys.

So Doom transposes all that onto his perceptions of a certain discussion on here and due to his lack of self-control (he couldn't help but out his feelings), proceeds to vent his judgments and accusations, attempting to both, frame his message and control other's perceptions of it. To me, that suggests little confidence in getting his own meaning across and little trust in a reader's comprehension of it. OSIT.


~Edit: added a clarifying phrase
 
So what do you think about Doom's perceptions? Do they match with yours?

I think Doom's perceptions are valid, even if they're not objective. Sometimes I perceive that the mods and admins, as well as the forum in general, can react emotionally, blocking the higher cognitive faculties. I think an example of this is in this thread: Has anybody from this forum become man number 4 (or higher)? where Highfive and Bluebell get banned. I also think, however, that networking would solve these problems for me and maybe for others as well, so I need to know what an appropriate way to discuss this subject is.

No way to answer this question objectively without data. He is not asking - so speculating on this theme is rather useless imo.

OK, so could self-importance or trauma cause a person in general to have these concerns?

Please cite the specific posts you have in mind.

I thought there was some mention of attack with timejack, but I went back over his posts and couldn't find any mention of it. I may have been projecting.

He was not asking - he came here to teach others. There are guidelines which every user here is supposed to read before joining in. If someone does not agree with the basic premises that this forum is based on then there is no common ground for discussion.

Fair enough, do you think he should have done nothing, or should he have vented himself more constructively, within the premises that this forum is based on?

You can answer that yourself. Look at Newbies threads on how others who are sticking here have done it.

OK :)

If you are referring to 4th Way Work, then your idea is different from what it stands for. But that is a different topic for discussion. And a fruitful discussion can take place only when there is some familiarity of the basic reading material suggested.

I have some books, but haven't got around to reading them yet.

So Doom transposes all that onto his perceptions of a certain discussion on here and due to his lack of self-control (he couldn't help but out his feelings), proceeds to vent his judgments and accusations, attempting to both, frame his message and control other's perceptions of it. To me, that suggests little confidence in getting his own meaning across and little trust in a reader's comprehension of it. OSIT.

I've been reading some of the Seth books and he says that "life is expression." I think Doom did the right thing outing his feelings, but I think he did it in a selfish manner. I think that holding on to feelings and not expressing them leads to blockages, but it's far better to express them constructively. For example, if someone beats their dog because they had a bad day at work, that's really selfish, even though it made them feel better, but if they channel their anger into art, or talk to someone about it, or whatever, then that's less selfish.

So if someone in general, feels there's something wrong with the forum, what's a constructive way to out those feelings? And how could they be validated?

Also, this really has nothing to do with anything, but am I asking loaded questions?
 
DoomAndGloomIsALie said:
Greetings y'all members of the Cassiopaea club,
....etc etc
So please, until you are having personal interdimensional experiences which clears away all the fog about your personal polarity, STOP THIS JUDGEMENTAL BEHAVIOUR which means taking the newbie member messages more seriously aswell as being more questioning of the oldie established member.

Dude busts through the swinging doors into the Cass Salloon, draws his six shooter and judgmentally paints the whole crowd with the same brush, accusing all the bystanders of being judgmental while shouting "Dance to my tune, Suckers!" as he starts shooting up the floor.

I know the dust has pretty much settled at this point, but I am asking myself why didn't I reply?

It felt kind of like a drunk in a bar that you don't really want to interact with knowing it is basically pointless since the drunk is clearly unstable and has an agenda; reason or logic are not going to work since the guy had no interest in any kind of reasoned exchange. The lights were on but nobody was at home.

The people who did respond were very even-handed and level-headed but he saw it as attack and reaction and as proof that he was right since that is what he was predisposed to see.

Very instructive. Thanks to all, including Mr Doom for the graphic display.
 
BHelmet said:
DoomAndGloomIsALie said:
Greetings y'all members of the Cassiopaea club,
....etc etc
So please, until you are having personal interdimensional experiences which clears away all the fog about your personal polarity, STOP THIS JUDGEMENTAL BEHAVIOUR which means taking the newbie member messages more seriously aswell as being more questioning of the oldie established member.

Dude busts through the swinging doors into the Cass Salloon, draws his six shooter and judgmentally paints the whole crowd with the same brush, accusing all the bystanders of being judgmental while shouting "Dance to my tune, Suckers!" as he starts shooting up the floor.

I know the dust has pretty much settled at this point, but I am asking myself why didn't I reply?

It felt kind of like a drunk in a bar that you don't really want to interact with knowing it is basically pointless since the drunk is clearly unstable and has an agenda; reason or logic are not going to work since the guy had no interest in any kind of reasoned exchange. The lights were on but nobody was at home.

The people who did respond were very even-handed and level-headed but he saw it as attack and reaction and as proof that he was right since that is what he was predisposed to see.

Very instructive. Thanks to all, including Mr Doom for the graphic display.
I just read all of this with the grateful dead's US blues in my headphones. The result was cosmically hilarious. :D. I mean this in the sense that US Blues is kinda a western tune.
 
Archaea said:
Well I think Doom perceived the presence of covert STS machinations on the forum in general, but particularly among the mods and admins. So I have some more questions:
Are Dooms concerns a result of his self importance, or could they be a result of some truma?
There's been some mention of attack in this thread, what causes this perception?
If doom is a young person, how could his perceptions be validated, and guided to the truth?
What would have been an appropriate way for Doom to express himself?

Just FYI, my idea of the work is to become at peace with my existence. :)

Hi Archaea,

In all honesty, I think those are really your complaints, but safely couched in Doom's utterances. No?

And that's okay. But you've latched onto a thought that just might be detrimental to your self. It's not that big a deal if some responses are not perfect. Even "wrong" ones can be positive, if it raises the right questions.

The bigger picture matters much much more. I believe you know this. But it's that lingering disdain I detect that holds you back. It can be liberating--if you just let go.

FWIW.

PS
I'm still looking forward to your next Seth summation. It's somewhat overdue. :)
 
Well I think Doom perceived the presence of covert STS machinations on the forum in general, but particularly among the mods and admins.
I would be very interested to see some evidence of this. I realise we are all STS in the end but it was my understanding that people with knowledge of the basic material and what we do here would realise we are striving towards the opposite? I can't get my head round this one.
 
lainey said:
Well I think Doom perceived the presence of covert STS machinations on the forum in general, but particularly among the mods and admins.
I would be very interested to see some evidence of this. I realise we are all STS in the end but it was my understanding that people with knowledge of the basic material and what we do here would realise we are striving towards the opposite? I can't get my head round this one.

Well, if you want my thoughts, "...perceived the presence of covert STS machinations..." is too general to be real - it's not even a 'thing'; more like a statement: "I don't approve of the way y'all talk and run things around here." Self-congratulatory self-flattery. That sort of thing.

Furthermore, since Gloomy Doom refused to provide the requested examples of what he was talking about, he was basically telling us what he was thinking and what he was thinking and feeling about his own thoughts. Internal considering, as it were.

People are often reminded that they are free to start their own forum if they perceive a need that's not being met here, but it's easier to just complain and soapbox, eh? :)
 
Archaea said:
I think Doom's perceptions are valid, even if they're not objective. Sometimes I perceive that the mods and admins, as well as the forum in general, can react emotionally, blocking the higher cognitive faculties. I think an example of this is in this thread: Has anybody from this forum become man number 4 (or higher)? where Highfive and Bluebell get banned. I also think, however, that networking would solve these problems for me and maybe for others as well, so I need to know what an appropriate way to discuss this subject is.

I think that something that would help with that is to cite what you see as evidence of your claims. For example, in the thread you linked to, what made you think that banning these two people was equivalent to "reacting emotionally and blocking the higher faculties". I went back and read it, and don't see exactly how you came to that conclusion.

No way to answer this question objectively without data. He is not asking - so speculating on this theme is rather useless imo.

OK, so could self-importance or trauma cause a person in general to have these concerns?

I think you already know that the answer to that question is Yes. But, if you familiarize yourself with the studies on psychopathy, you can also see that pathological behavior can LOOK the same as well, and be motivated by different reasons. Then, there is a big difference: Is a person asking? If not, there is nothing you can do. A lot of people go through indescribable trauma, but don't go attacking others, and actually WANT to get to the bottom of things. Sure, you could try and help someone who seems stubborn until the comets come. But what if you are forcing them to see something they don't want to see? That would be bad, don't you think? So, until and if people like that are willing to be at least open to some things, the best thing is not to associate with them and feed those parts.

I also think that part of the problem is that you tend to equate defending our path with attacking back. Two very different things. Do you let people step over you in life, just because they may be traumatized?

I thought there was some mention of attack with timejack, but I went back over his posts and couldn't find any mention of it. I may have been projecting.

Yeah, maybe. And maybe if you keep trying to analyze how you reach these types of conclusions, you will see more clearly?

He was not asking - he came here to teach others. There are guidelines which every user here is supposed to read before joining in. If someone does not agree with the basic premises that this forum is based on then there is no common ground for discussion.

Fair enough, do you think he should have done nothing, or should he have vented himself more constructively, within the premises that this forum is based on?

Archaea, I think that what you are missing here is an important difference: It's not so black and white. But you are projecting. He wasn't venting, explaining a misunderstanding, etc. He was preaching (NOT asking). Not doing anything if you are struggling is not so useful. But he didn't seem to be struggling. He was going to "show us", and even laughed about "who will get there first" and all that. How can we have an adult conversation with someone like that?


If you are referring to 4th Way Work, then your idea is different from what it stands for. But that is a different topic for discussion. And a fruitful discussion can take place only when there is some familiarity of the basic reading material suggested.

I have some books, but haven't got around to reading them yet.

THIS maybe be the reason why you are struggling with this. I suggest that you read "In Search of the Miraculous" to understand why being "nice" with everyone doesn't always help.

I've been reading some of the Seth books and he says that "life is expression." I think Doom did the right thing outing his feelings, but I think he did it in a selfish manner. I think that holding on to feelings and not expressing them leads to blockages, but it's far better to express them constructively. For example, if someone beats their dog because they had a bad day at work, that's really selfish, even though it made them feel better, but if they channel their anger into art, or talk to someone about it, or whatever, then that's less selfish.

The problem I see with this is that you are ASSUMING that Doom was hurt, frustrated, etc. Have you considered the possibility that he may simply want to be right, to have followers, etc.? Because we've seen and interacted with hundreds of people who were like that, we tend to see some patterns. It doesn't mean that the door is closed for ever, if they ever get to come here and be a bit more honest.

So if someone in general, feels there's something wrong with the forum, what's a constructive way to out those feelings? And how could they be validated?

Also, this really has nothing to do with anything, but am I asking loaded questions?

Yes you are, but that's ok if it helps you in the end. You have made it clear in this and other threads that you don't like "our approach", and have made not-so-tactful comments regarding Laura and mods in other threads. To me that seems to indicate that you wish to blame someone else for something that is causing tension or hurt within you, but that you can't quite acknowledge yet. It would be more productive, I think, if you could try to observe whatever it is that is bothering you, and say it. NOT attacking or making offensive comments. Just saying, for example: "After this post, I felt hurt and humiliated". And why. Maybe it reminds you of something in the past. Maybe you are angry about something else. Maybe it doesn't fit with the idea you have about being in peace with yourself. Well, if it is the latter, perhaps this forum is not for you, and that is totally ok. If you are open to the possibility that your perception may be skewed, and want to find out why, then maybe sticking around helps. But you cannot "demand" indirectly, with these loaded questions, that people treat you with kids gloves. Because for that, there are many other places. Are YOU asking, or do you feel sympathy for Doom and other "baked noodles" because you wish you could show us what is "right"? In other words, maybe stopping beating around the bushes with questions, and really saying what you feel would contribute to solving this tension you feel.

So, really, what IS the problem, Archaea? Without using others as a reason to "complain" or ask questions?

Another thing to consider, IMO, is that some people have a very sensitive personality, and for them, direct talk and actions can feel very aggressive. Unfortunately, the work we do here doesn't always allow for being "nice" in that sense. In certain cases it does, like when a person is struggling and is already too hard on him/herself, for example. But in other cases, one needs a bit of a shock. It all depends on the situation. If you are a very sensitive person, maybe this type of interaction is too much for you? I don't know.

Anyway, I think that reading "In Search of the Miraculous" will provide you with some interesting insight about humans, the Work, and the things that seem to be bothering you. Hopefully after reading it, you will understand our perspective a little better.
 
Approaching Infinity said:
DoomAndGloomIsALie said:
Yes, ofcourse I must be the one who has the giant spiritual ego, especially since I pointed out that you guys might be suffering from it!

Actually, that's pretty much the truth. If 'DoomAndGloom' didn't have a giant spiritual ego, they certainly wouldn't have posted the way they did.

Great reflection there guys, way to figure it out! It couldn't possibly be you! Nonono, you are too wise for that. And ofcourse you must be very afraid of me, protect your weaker newer members from the dangerous outsider who offers a different perspective which is not so completely distorted towards light/wisdom... BURN THE WITCH!!

Nope, we're not afraid. That's just another sign of said 'giant spiritual ego'. DAGIAL just didn't get what they wanted in terms of response, and so is throwing the 'spiritual' equivalent of a tantrum. (Or, they got exactly what they wanted, and the predictable responses were just a pretext to launch more insults and misguided criticisms.) Most members can see through this all. Pointing out the wrongness of the things written isn't so much for the benefit of 'weaker newer members' (but that's a bonus), but simply for the sake of being objective. Because people without a long familiarity with the material here often get taken in by DAGIAL's sort of nonsense. Thankfully this is a forum where that won't fly.

So basically what I'm trying to say is that all you seem to be doing is REFLECTING everything I said back unto me!

Because DAGIAL is projecting.

Forgot to ask this sooner, but i'm really curious about this. Approaching Infinity, you mentioned the word "DAGIAL" a couple of times in your post. I don't want to speculate on the meaning and origin of that word, so i will directly ask: who or what is DAGIAL? :huh:
Does it have something to do with the predator's mind?
 
Denis said:
Forgot to ask this sooner, but i'm really curious about this. Approaching Infinity, you mentioned the word "DAGIAL" a couple of times in your post. I don't want to speculate on the meaning and origin of that word, so i will directly ask: who or what is DAGIAL? :huh:
Does it have something to do with the predator's mind?

Nope, I think that it was referring to "DoomAndGloomIsALie" = DAGIAL
 
Denis said:
Forgot to ask this sooner, but i'm really curious about this. Approaching Infinity, you mentioned the word "DAGIAL" a couple of times in your post. I don't want to speculate on the meaning and origin of that word, so i will directly ask: who or what is DAGIAL? :huh:
Does it have something to do with the predator's mind?

DAGIAL = DoomAndGloomIsALie
.A
 
Hi, I had another comment I wanted to make and forgot about it so thought I'd throw it in at this late date.

Doom:
So basically what I'm trying to say is that all you seem to be doing is REFLECTING everything I said back unto me!


Approaching Infinity:
Because DAGIAL is projecting.

Projecting...hmm. I know about projecting, its one of those basics in psychological terms and we know its so common in our perceptions of life. Been in my awareness for some time now but somehow this struck me with a new clarity in this situation. Its amazing to me that Doom showed this to us in such a clear and obvious way. Looking at this in a symbolic way, a person looks at the world and only sees their own reflection coming back to them, like the world is full of mirrors... Can you picture that? They don't know at all, they are only seeing themselves. The reflection in mirrors are always reversed, must fit in some way with a bit "off" perspective and the symbology involved but cant put my finger on it. Anyway, this passage in the conversation created this image in my mind and I thought it was interesting. Being a person interested in symbols and images, a little surrealistic maybe.

The issue of projecting is a interesting topic. A illusion created by the mind where a persons beliefs are bounced right back to them. They don't know they're walking in a world made of mirrors. Mirrors are interesting in themselves I think.
 
Chu said:
I've been reading some of the Seth books and he says that "life is expression." I think Doom did the right thing outing his feelings, but I think he did it in a selfish manner. I think that holding on to feelings and not expressing them leads to blockages, but it's far better to express them constructively. For example, if someone beats their dog because they had a bad day at work, that's really selfish, even though it made them feel better, but if they channel their anger into art, or talk to someone about it, or whatever, then that's less selfish.

The problem I see with this is that you are ASSUMING that Doom was hurt, frustrated, etc. Have you considered the possibility that he may simply want to be right, to have followers, etc.? Because we've seen and interacted with hundreds of people who were like that, we tend to see some patterns. It doesn't mean that the door is closed for ever, if they ever get to come here and be a bit more honest.
I think that were DAGIAL to have the necessary skills needed to express himself constructively he probably wouldn't think the way he is thinking. The level of being and knowledge would have to be higher and therefore some kind of self awareness/self reflection?
Buddy said:
lainey said:
Well I think Doom perceived the presence of covert STS machinations on the forum in general, but particularly among the mods and admins.
I would be very interested to see some evidence of this. I realise we are all STS in the end but it was my understanding that people with knowledge of the basic material and what we do here would realise we are striving towards the opposite? I can't get my head round this one.

Well, if you want my thoughts, "...perceived the presence of covert STS machinations..." is too general to be real - it's not even a 'thing'; more like a statement: "I don't approve of the way y'all talk and run things around here." Self-congratulatory self-flattery. That sort of thing.

Furthermore, since Gloomy Doom refused to provide the requested examples of what he was talking about, he was basically telling us what he was thinking and what he was thinking and feeling about his own thoughts. Internal considering, as it were.

People are often reminded that they are free to start their own forum if they perceive a need that's not being met here, but it's easier to just complain and soapbox, eh? :)
Ok so it's an outward blaming for the pain within, he can't bear to look at himself so he is searching for the enemy out there and the biggest enemy is the one who has the potential to expose the predator so he wants to protect himself from that by attacking or teaching us we are wrong.
 
Back
Top Bottom