Earth Changes and the Human-Cosmic Connection

If the Sun, most probably together with its companion, i.e. as a binary system, spins also around Pleiades as suggested, it implies that Pleiades are in some way barycenter of at least that solar 'circular' motion. It thus also implies that the Sun and its binary system, possibly with other objects and systems orbiting the same barycenter, are in some way 'gravitationally' connected to Pleiades.

Yes, except that the theory is that they are electromagnetically connected, not gravitationally. They are parts of the giant plasma filament structure.

Haven't checked the videos you posted yet, so maybe it's explained there in more details.

Yes, you have to see the videos to understand it.

Thanks for posting them anyway, super interesting subject. :flowers:

I wish I found it sooner, but better ever than never. :-)
 
FWIW, the duration of companion's orbit is also the duration of sol's orbit, both orbiting in fact around common center of gravity or barycenter, AFAIK
The brown dwarf has only 0.034% of the Sun's mass, according to the C's. This would place their common center of gravity just 1% of the Sun's radius outside the Sun's center. So while technically correct, in practice it is as if the brown dwarf simply orbits around the Sun.
 
Yes, except that the theory is that they are electromagnetically connected, not gravitationally. They are parts of the giant plasma filament structure.
That's why 'gravitationally" was in quotation marks in that post. ;-)

Regarding the almost "synchronicity" of orbits' durations, of companion around the Sun and the Sun around the Pleiades, in very simplified manner it can be explained or visualized as 'connected' movements, i.e. while the Sun makes the round around Pleiades, companion in that time makes the round around the Sun, all the while being in relatively same position in regard to the system Sun-Pleiades. In other words, if the companion is on outer side of the three body system for example, which is IIRC called "opposition", that is if they form the 'line' Pleiades-Sun-companion in that order looking from the 'center' out, that 'configuration' stays like that throughout the whole Sun's orbit around the Pleiades.
It would be kind of analogous to why we always see only one side of the Moon or geosynchronous satellite orbits for example.
Just an idea that crossed my mind when thinking about this fascinating 'discovery'. :-)

The brown dwarf has only 0.034% of the Sun's mass, according to the C's. This would place their common center of gravity just 1% of the Sun's radius outside the Sun's center. So while technically correct, in practice it is as if the brown dwarf simply orbits around the Sun.
When viewed from our perspective, while from companion's perspective it's as the Sun orbits around the companion.
"Relativity", as one great Quantum Quirk image visualized. Unfortunately, don't know how to Search SOTT for specific QQ images so to find it and post it here as an example.
Also, that Sun-companion barycenter 'distance' comes from purely gravitational considerations. Do we really know it is like that if electromagnetic interactions are included in the story?
 
Regarding the almost "synchronicity" of orbits' durations, of companion around the Sun and the Sun around the Pleiades, in very simplified manner it can be explained or visualized as 'connected' movements, i.e. while the Sun makes the round around Pleiades, companion in that time makes the round around the Sun, all the while being in relatively same position in regard to the system Sun-Pleiades. In other words, if the companion is on outer side of the three body system for example, which is IIRC called "opposition", that is if they form the 'line' Pleiades-Sun-companion in that order looking from the 'center' out, that 'configuration' stays like that throughout the whole Sun's orbit around the Pleiades.
It would be kind of analogous to why we always see only one side of the Moon or geosynchronous satellite orbits for example.
Just an idea that crossed my mind when thinking about this fascinating 'discovery'. :-)

I visualized it differently, in my mind the companion was spinning like a spiral around the Sun, but I like your visualization too. :-)
 
I visualized it differently, in my mind the companion was spinning like a spiral around the Sun, but I like your visualization too. :-)
Maybe more to the point analogy would be Lagrange points L1 and L2 (Wikipedia link), i.e. objects and satellites placed there, and their orbits around the Sun together with the Earth, while always staying in the same relative position to Sun-Earth system.
Of course, that visualization works only if companion orbits the Sun in the same 'plane' where Sun orbits Pleiades. If not, then your spiral seems more appropriate 'image'. :-)
 
Of course, that visualization works only if companion orbits the Sun in the same 'plane' where Sun orbits Pleiades.
The solar system plane (including the brown dwarf) is tilted by 60 degrees to the galactic plane, but what is interesting is that the Pleiades are almost on the solar system ecliptic plane (within 4 degrees). So the potential orbit around the Pleiades being in the same plane as the solar system ecliptic plane seems quite likely actually.
 
Yes, I also couldn't understand the precession. That's why I did a lot of research in the previous two years on this topic, but I just couldn't find anything that would give me any definitive answers. Until I finally found these videos that just make sense to my ordinary human mind. Like they said in the video, no advance equations are needed for this, only a good visualization of the movement of the solar system through the galaxy.
I'm pretty sure I looked and looked and looked... And realized nothing was satisfactory. These guys did a great job bringing forth the issues and explaining the anomalies. For those of us who are not technical but visual/intuitive, it feels liberating.

I wouldn't get lost in the details without a closer look or more research, but I would appreciate the entire flow of the imagery. It takes 26 million years to make one spin forward. It just makes you suddenly very humble about the entire cycle and our moment in time.

It feels like starting to perceive the difference between Darwinism and the Intelligent Design research.

I'm sure there are more details on other videos, and their work would have to be supported if they can be persuaded to run a couple of hypothetical simulations :whistle:

I hope to get some "down" time to watch at least the rest of the precession series.
 
It feels like starting to perceive the difference between Darwinism and the Intelligent Design research.

Yes, with the standard cosmology there is not much complexity in the Universe other than simple orbiting of planets around stars, or stars around the center of a galaxy. But with this model, it makes everything much more interesting!

I'm sure there are more details on other videos, and their work would have to be supported if they can be persuaded to run a couple of hypothetical simulations :whistle:

I hope to get some "down" time to watch at least the rest of the precession series.

I watched the entire series and unfortunately there is not much more information. The whole gist of it is in those videos that I posted. What is interesting is that Jim mentioned that he was inspired by some new age source that he tried to debunk but found out that it's true. I presume that this new age source could be some kind of channeled material.
 
I watched the entire series and unfortunately there is not much more information. The whole gist of it is in those videos that I posted. What is interesting is that Jim mentioned that he was inspired by some new age source that he tried to debunk but found out that it's true. I presume that this new age source could be some kind of channeled material.

I'm reminded about the Pleiades/Taurus, tori, torus... And the esoteric teachings, both dubious and legit ones. I took some of Laura's posts from various threads where she summarized this:
There is an even greater mystery here regarding the Pleiades. In the cave of Lascaux, there is a prehistoric image of an Auroch, which is the largest picture in the whole assembly of images, and is painted almost entirely on the ceiling of the cave. Above the back of the Auroch, a strange figure of a cluster of six floating points can be seen. The distribution of the dots does not seem to be haphazard, but rather shows a clear structural element. It looks, in fact, like an exact portrayal of the constellation Taurus with the star cluster of the Pleiades placed precisely as they actually relate to the constellation. The Navajo in America have also portrayed the Pleiades in exactly this same six-star arrangement in modern times, as handed down to them by their ancestors.[5]

The constellation Taurus was originally a complete image of a bull in the sky. The Babylonians called it the heavenly bull, and the Pleiades were recognized as the “bristle on the neck of the bull.” At some point, the bull was cut in half to create Aries and Cetus, the whale.

The Lascaux cave paintings are estimated to be 17,000 to 22,000 years old, dating to the early Magdalenian period of the Upper Paleolithic era. This is related to "Plato Prehistorian" by Mary Settegast.

Then, there's Martin Sweatman who proposes in "Prehistory Decoded" that ancient cave art and megalithic carvings, including those at Göbekli Tepe, encode astronomical knowledge using a prehistoric zodiac system. Taurus—the constellation associated with the bull—is a key symbol representing the radiant point of the Taurid meteor stream, a debris field from a fragmented comet.

So, it appears that the same date is being described in the ancient tales of the Hyperboreans that we find concealed in the elements of the tauroctony. The question is, of course, was the tauroctony intended to convey any deeper messages?

So, no matter how fancy it is drawn, you can see that the bull and Perseus both face left in the sky, when you are looking up. But on the Tauroctony, they are both facing right even if Perseus' head is turned backward.

Now, as far as I can see, this is either because the artist copied his images from the Farnese globe, or something very like it, or the images were deliberately reversed AS A STATEMENT or a clue to the observer who would know that it meant something.

Maybe it was a way to convey this 26 million orbit "around" the Pleiades, this "giant Birkland current" path, AND our solar system's position relative to it, where it looks like these constellations are on the right.

The Pleaides/Taurus was important for the ancients. And looking how we hypothetically loop forwards along the Universe "around" the Pleaides makes you just wonder about it.

Stumble upon this quote on Fomenko:

This bit about Cassiopeia was just fascinating (and it is just a BIT!)

THE CONSTELLATIONS OF CASSIOPEIA AND THE THRONE WERE DRAWN AS CHRIST SITTING ON HIS THRONE IN THE MIDDLE AGES

The Apocalypse says: “After this I looked, and there before me was a door standing open in heaven… and there before me was a throne in heaven with someone sitting on it. And the one who sat there had the appearance of jasper and carnelian” (AP 4:1–3). The person sitting on the throne can be seen on almost every mediaeval star chart – in the Zodiaque expliqué ([544], Volume 1, page 81, ill. 36), for instance, or on the star charts of A. Dürer ([544], Volume 4, page 204), on the map of Al-Sufi ([544],Volume 4, page 250, ill. 49), and so forth. Figures 3.7 and 3.8 provide one such image.

All of these maps depict Cassiopeia enthroned. The enthroned figure can be seen on many star charts of the XVI century, usually in the centre of the Milky Way. The Apocalypse indicates that there is a rainbow that encircles the throne: “A rainbow, resembling an emerald, encircled the throne” (AP 4:3). The rainbow is a sufficiently precise image for the luminous Milky Way that spans the night sky like an arch.

A straightforward comparison of the description of the “enthroned person” with a gemstone (we are told that it “had the appearance of jasper and carnelian”) strengthens the impression that the images of the Apocalypse are taken from the celestial sphere. Indeed, the comparison of stars with luminous gems is perfectly understandable and natural. The association of the constellation of Cassiopeia with Christ, which the Apocalypse actually refers to, was sometimes explicitly depicted on mediaeval maps. For example, the book of Radinus ([1361]) contains a picture of a throne with the crucified Cassiopeia upon it. The back of the throne serves as a cross, and the hands of the figure are pinioned to it. This is obviously a version of the Christian crucifix. (See fig. 3.9.) The figure of a king on a throne can also be seen on the Egyptian star charts ([1162] and [1077]). In figs. 3.10 and 3.11 one sees a number of Egyptian maps, which make it evident that the Egyptian astronomical symbolism is amazingly close to the European, which implies the two astronomical schools are related.

Therefore, the Apocalypses contains references to the constellation of Cassiopeia, which was actually perceived as the “stellar image” of Christ (the King) enthroned in the Middle Ages. 6. THE MILKY WAY According to the Book of Revelations,“a rainbow, resembling an emerald, encircled the throne.”(AP 4:3) Emerald is a bluish-green gemstone. One sees a “rainbow” encircling the constellation of the Throne on every mediaeval and contemporary star chart. The constellation of the Throne, with “a person enthroned” is always surrounded by the luminous strip of the Milky Way ([1162], [1077] and [1361]).

TWENTY-FOUR SIDEREAL HOURS AND THE CONSTELLATION OF THE NORTHERN CROWN The Apocalypse says: “Surrounding the throne were twenty-four other thrones, and seated on them were twenty-four elders. They were dressed in white and had crowns of gold on their heads” (AP 4:4). Any complete astronomy textbook points out that in the days of yore the sky was divided into twentyfour wing-shaped segments, that is, into twenty-four meridional sectors which converge at the poles of the celestial sphere. (See [542], page 44, or 544, Volume 1, page 7, ill. 6, for instance). These sectors are also called sidereal hours, or direct stellar ascension hours. The twenty-four hours define the celestial coordinate system, which can clearly be seen in the mediaeval image of the celestial globe in Zacharias Bornman’s book (fig. 3.12). Thus, each “elder”of the Apocalypse is apparently a star hour in the equatorial system of coordinates, which is the division standard for the celestial sphere in astronomy. The white clothing of the “elders” simply reflects the white colour of the stars in the sky. The golden crowns apparently refer to the constellation of the Northern Crown, situated close to the zenith, that is, exactly above the heads of all twenty-four “elders”, or hours, or sectors (fig. 3.13).

8. LEO, TAURUS, SAGITTARIUS, PEGASUS The Apocalypse says: “Also before the throne there was what looked like a sea of glass, clear as crystal. In the centre, around the throne, were four living creatures, and they were covered with eyes, in front and in the back”(AP 4:6–7). This is a description of the celestial sphere which surrounds the constellation of the Throne and is strewn with stars (or “eyes”). The initially obscure reference to a place “around the throne” becomes intelligible: the actual constellation of the Throne is being referred to, as well as the smaller stars scattered all across the background. But what does “… were four living creatures, and they were covered with eyes…” mean? This becomes clear from a casual glance at the star chart.Moreover, in the following passage of the Apocalypse it is clearly said that: “the first living creature was like a lion, the second was like an ox, the third had a face like a man, the fourth was like a flying eagle” (AP 4:7). Lion (Leo) is a zodiacal constellation visited by the sun before the beginning of autumn. (See, for example, the mediaeval maps by Dürer and Grienberger ([1162]). See also figs. 3.4, 3.3 and 3.14)

One of the reasons I find it so fascinating is because I noticed that Cassiopeia was at the "end of the Milky Way" so to say - the Chemin de St. Jacques. I also see the figure in the Last Supper as I described in Secret History. Fomenko's material on this just adds weight to what I was seeing though I'm not quite sure what it all means ultimately. But obviously, Da Vinci knew these things because he put Cassiopeia in the Last Supper as clear as anything.

Cassiopea does seem to "crown" the outer edge of this 26 million orbit.

Here's a post containing excerpts about the mythology around Taurus/The Bull from "When Zarathustra Spoke", "Dawn and Twilight of Zoroastrianism", "The Origins of the World's Mythologies" by Witzel, and "Plato The Prehistorian" by Settegast

 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom