Earth Changes and the Human-Cosmic Connection

[Persej]

If the Sun, most probably together with its companion, i.e. as a binary system, spins also around Pleiades as suggested, it implies that Pleiades are in some way barycenter of at least that solar 'circular' motion. It thus also implies that the Sun and its binary system, possibly with other objects and systems orbiting the same barycenter, are in some way 'gravitationally' connected to Pleiades.

Yes, except that the theory is that they are electromagnetically connected, not gravitationally. They are parts of the giant plasma filament structure.

Haven't checked the videos you posted yet, so maybe it's explained there in more details.

Yes, you have to see the videos to understand it.

Thanks for posting them anyway, super interesting subject.

I wish I found it sooner, but better ever than never.

 

[axj]

FWIW, the duration of companion's orbit is also the duration of sol's orbit, both orbiting in fact around common center of gravity or barycenter, AFAIK

The brown dwarf has only 0.034% of the Sun's mass, according to the C's. This would place their common center of gravity just 1% of the Sun's radius outside the Sun's center. So while technically correct, in practice it is as if the brown dwarf simply orbits around the Sun.

 

[SasaM]

Yes, except that the theory is that they are electromagnetically connected, not gravitationally. They are parts of the giant plasma filament structure.

That's why 'gravitationally" was in quotation marks in that post.

Regarding the almost "synchronicity" of orbits' durations, of companion around the Sun and the Sun around the Pleiades, in very simplified manner it can be explained or visualized as 'connected' movements, i.e. while the Sun makes the round around Pleiades, companion in that time makes the round around the Sun, all the while being in relatively same position in regard to the system Sun-Pleiades. In other words, if the companion is on outer side of the three body system for example, which is IIRC called "opposition", that is if they form the 'line' Pleiades-Sun-companion in that order looking from the 'center' out, that 'configuration' stays like that throughout the whole Sun's orbit around the Pleiades.
It would be kind of analogous to why we always see only one side of the Moon or geosynchronous satellite orbits for example.
Just an idea that crossed my mind when thinking about this fascinating 'discovery'.

The brown dwarf has only 0.034% of the Sun's mass, according to the C's. This would place their common center of gravity just 1% of the Sun's radius outside the Sun's center. So while technically correct, in practice it is as if the brown dwarf simply orbits around the Sun.

When viewed from our perspective, while from companion's perspective it's as the Sun orbits around the companion.
"Relativity", as one great Quantum Quirk image visualized. Unfortunately, don't know how to Search SOTT for specific QQ images so to find it and post it here as an example.
Also, that Sun-companion barycenter 'distance' comes from purely gravitational considerations. Do we really know it is like that if electromagnetic interactions are included in the story?

 

[Persej]

Regarding the almost "synchronicity" of orbits' durations, of companion around the Sun and the Sun around the Pleiades, in very simplified manner it can be explained or visualized as 'connected' movements, i.e. while the Sun makes the round around Pleiades, companion in that time makes the round around the Sun, all the while being in relatively same position in regard to the system Sun-Pleiades. In other words, if the companion is on outer side of the three body system for example, which is IIRC called "opposition", that is if they form the 'line' Pleiades-Sun-companion in that order looking from the 'center' out, that 'configuration' stays like that throughout the whole Sun's orbit around the Pleiades.
It would be kind of analogous to why we always see only one side of the Moon or geosynchronous satellite orbits for example.
Just an idea that crossed my mind when thinking about this fascinating 'discovery'.

I visualized it differently, in my mind the companion was spinning like a spiral around the Sun, but I like your visualization too.

 

[SasaM]

I visualized it differently, in my mind the companion was spinning like a spiral around the Sun, but I like your visualization too.

Maybe more to the point analogy would be Lagrange points L1 and L2 (Wikipedia link), i.e. objects and satellites placed there, and their orbits around the Sun together with the Earth, while always staying in the same relative position to Sun-Earth system.
Of course, that visualization works only if companion orbits the Sun in the same 'plane' where Sun orbits Pleiades. If not, then your spiral seems more appropriate 'image'.

 

[axj]

Of course, that visualization works only if companion orbits the Sun in the same 'plane' where Sun orbits Pleiades.

The solar system plane (including the brown dwarf) is tilted by 60 degrees to the galactic plane, but what is interesting is that the Pleiades are almost on the solar system ecliptic plane (within 4 degrees). So the potential orbit around the Pleiades being in the same plane as the solar system ecliptic plane seems quite likely actually.

 

[Gaby]

Yes, I also couldn't understand the precession. That's why I did a lot of research in the previous two years on this topic, but I just couldn't find anything that would give me any definitive answers. Until I finally found these videos that just make sense to my ordinary human mind. Like they said in the video, no advance equations are needed for this, only a good visualization of the movement of the solar system through the galaxy.

I'm pretty sure I looked and looked and looked... And realized nothing was satisfactory. These guys did a great job bringing forth the issues and explaining the anomalies. For those of us who are not technical but visual/intuitive, it feels liberating.

I wouldn't get lost in the details without a closer look or more research, but I would appreciate the entire flow of the imagery. It takes 26 million years to make one spin forward. It just makes you suddenly very humble about the entire cycle and our moment in time.

It feels like starting to perceive the difference between Darwinism and the Intelligent Design research.

I'm sure there are more details on other videos, and their work would have to be supported if they can be persuaded to run a couple of hypothetical simulations

I hope to get some "down" time to watch at least the rest of the precession series.

 

[Persej]

It feels like starting to perceive the difference between Darwinism and the Intelligent Design research.

Yes, with the standard cosmology there is not much complexity in the Universe other than simple orbiting of planets around stars, or stars around the center of a galaxy. But with this model, it makes everything much more interesting!

I'm sure there are more details on other videos, and their work would have to be supported if they can be persuaded to run a couple of hypothetical simulations

I hope to get some "down" time to watch at least the rest of the precession series.

I watched the entire series and unfortunately there is not much more information. The whole gist of it is in those videos that I posted. What is interesting is that Jim mentioned that he was inspired by some new age source that he tried to debunk but found out that it's true. I presume that this new age source could be some kind of channeled material.