oming
moksha said:
I think the EU guys seems to be saying that the electrical interaction is much more destructive and common than impact related ones. In their view, the craters on the moon and the valleys of mars for example were created more by electrical interactions than comets impacting their surface. I'm not sure if Thornbill et al have read the works of Firestone and others extensively.
either ways, I guess we shall soon find out.
I think the point here is that electric interactions between bodies (planet vs even a small or regular comet highly charged) are much, much more common than actual impacts and therefore the claim that most of the landscapes have been formed by those interactions. That does not mean there are no craters created by direct impacts. So both crews can be right and I think they are.
If the potential danger was only coming from direct impacts of lonely big bodies, we could probably sleep happily, hoping that probability is somewhat low. But when it comes to electric discharges, and even more so with humans (electrically active on many levels), we as a species should be running around pretty scared upon realization what the hell we are doing/causing here with our behaviour and what sort of disaster we are attracting upon us
- many little "devils" coming at once.
But then, that's what was meant to be. Above is reflected below and vice versa. Most of us are sleeping rats and get what we deserve. Nothing wrong with that in the grand cosmic scheme. And if some of us find the way out, it will be through the process of learning and hard work. Anyone up for having fun? ;)
>> suggestion to the mods >>
Shouldn't this thread be merged with the little forgotten Electric Universe Theory?
_http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic,1574.0.html