The Living Force
If this is correct, then the idea that Starlink could ever be profitable is laughable. I wonder if Starlink serves some other purpose that they don't tell us about.
If you watched the video chances are likely that the American taxpayer will carry the burden of bringing this immense project to fruition. Why put up 42.000 satellites in orbit when 3 can do the job just as well from a further range. None of this makes sense. Unless it serves another purpose they aren't telling us.
Apparently, the G5 towers and Starlink complement each other.
The More Satellites Up In The Sky. The Stronger 5G Will Be.
And then there is this session.
Session 22 February 1997
Q: (L) Is HAARP in operation at the present time?
A: Yes, in its early stages.
Q: (T) Is the spreading of all these communication towers out across the country the equivalent of a HAARP program on a continental scale?
A: Back up system.
Q: (L) So, they don't need the towers to operate the HAARP system, but they are there as the backup?
A: Towers serve dual and lateral purposes.
Does Starlink tie into HAARP?