SOTTREADER
The Living Force
So what do people think about vaccine acceptance and the high vaccination rates driving the evolution of covid into a virus that is getting more and more specialised at infecting cells? Whilst it doesn't appear that the case fatality rate of covid is getting worse, it does appear that highly vaccinated communities have higher infection rates and drive the emergence of "variants of concern". Israel and UK are two examples where infection rates have been quite high despite the 95%+ vaccination take up. Where this all ends is not known. GVB is of the view that those not vaccinated are acting to dampen the emergence of variants.
So, someone can say you shouldn't be scared of the jab because the adverse effects rate is "statistically rare", however, what about the longer term consequences of the evolution of the virus and the jabs role in this? Unless people now think GVB and other scientists like him are wrong, the jab will damage your ability to mount an effective innate immune response and even adaptive response to emerging variants. So there's also considerations of consequences to the immune system long term.
We're still at the outset of this jab rollout and indeed long-term consequences can't be known yet.
Continued mass vaccination will only push the evolutionary capacity of SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein beyond the Omicron version | Voice for Science and Solidarity
Neither Key Opinion Leaders (KOLs) nor public health (PH) understand anything related to the evolutionary kinetics of this pandemic...
www.voiceforscienceandsolidarity.org
It is undeniable that mass vaccination will only drive the virus to fully exploit its evolutionary capacity, including – if needed – its ability to use alternate receptor domains on permissive cells. The fitness cost that may come with such a dramatic mutation is likely to be rewarded with enhanced pathogenicity. I am truly afraid that these dynamics will eventually allow for the natural selection of individuals with uncompromised innate immunity while eliminating those without it. While such natural selection would lead to an eradication of SARS-CoV-2 as innate immunity sterilizes the virus and blocks transmission, the consequences would be unimaginable – the price paid for ending the pandemic by virus eradication is not comparable to the one paid for by generating herd immunity and allowing the virus to enter an endemic state. Those who are enforcing mass vaccination are opting for the former instead of the latter, an act that will be remembered as the deadliest sin ever.
It can therefore be argued that opting to not get jabbed, and enduring stress now, no matter how unimaginable, could pay dividends later IF the situation goes south. If people are talking about the "higher game", those who maintain health now will be in a better position to help those who will have compromised health later. If we're thinking strategy, the strategy is to target the long-term. Remember, we're early into the jab rollout, in an experiment never done before and
- Infection rates are up up up and seem to ignore seasonality now due to these stupid jabs
- All cause mortality rates are now above expected averages in highly vaccinated countries e.g. the UK.
Remember, the unjabbed can always choose to get jabbed but the jabbed can never choose to get unjabbed. That's a crucial distinction. Just to hammer this home - the whole point of a vaccine is to TRAIN your immune system and the effects are LONG lived - this is why this distinction is important. The immune system won't be easily "untrained".