This is an interesting take @Joe. My question is, how much do you know about GVBs point of view on this subject i.e. "mass non-sterilising vaccination + high infection pressure". Asking as I don't want to make assumptions and not sure if you think his view is credible.
I think his view is credible, but he's only talking about the prolongation of the infectiousness of SARS-CoV-2 as a result of very specific targeting of one area of the virus (spike protein) by vaccination, in contrast to broad targeting by our natural immune systems of many proteins and epitopes of the virus which include not just infectiousness but virulence (if any) (note: the spike protein is responsible only for infection).
Targeting of one specific area of the virus via vaccination causes that specific area to mutate in response, providing little or no immune response/recognition to the rest of the virus and leaving it, essentially, fully functional and unmutated. This means that when that 'new' variant with a mutation only on the spike protein spreads through the mostly vaccinated population, it will activate the immune system again, providing "cases" and the opportunity for "the science" the media and govt. to continue the hysteria, vaccine rollout etc.
In addition, the immune response provoked by vaccination provides only short lived antibodies with little or no memory cell immunity. But these short lived antibodies can and do still bind to the virus (to little or no effect) preventing natural innate antibodies from interacting with the virus and providing more robust and long term natural immunity.
We see this in the fact that most cases today are in the vaccinated. Now, the plausible narrative around that is that 'of course most people 'getting covid' will be in the vaccinated, because most people are vaccinated', but that doesn't explain the LARGE number of vaccinated coming down with covid. That should NOT happen if the vaccines actually work
as they say they do. But they don't.
This process of preventing natural immunity and pushing the virus to become endemic is what the lockdowns are all about, or at least what they achieve: keeping the virus relatively 'new' to most of the population and preventing it from becoming pretty inoffensive.
Notice that the 'omicron' variant was notable for its large number of mutations (62 with 32 on the spike protein) compared to previous variants, and note also that it was described as being a 'nothing burger' precisely because of the large number of mutations i.e. errors, making it less efficient in doing what it is designed to do. This particular variant and its plethora of mutations was possibly the result of it coming into contact with the unvaccinated, whose immune systems targeted the entire virus, causing all those mutations and thus a significant reduction in efficacy. In South Africa, where it allegedly emerged, only 7.5% of the population are vaccinated. Alternatively (and again if it developed in South Africa), it's possible that the mutations occurred in HIV patients there (20% of the population of SA). Given that the spike protein appears to have had elements of HIV added to it, HIV antiviral drugs may have caused some of these mutations on the spike protein.
Remember, mutations are 'errors' because they are random, it is very unlikely that errors improve functionality. Try inserting 'random mutations' or changes to a text for example, like randomly changing one letter in several words, and see if it reads better or worse.
The real problem, as outlined by the Cs and others, and as I mentioned before, is recombination of the mRNA spike protein with another, otherwise relatively benign, adenovirus that has been with the human population for a long time and to which it has natural immunity, but will no longer have due to the recombination with the spike protein. One possibility, that would be pretty ironic, is that parts of the lab designed spike protein on SARS-CoV-2 could recombine with the HIV virus or even the spike protein on the HIV virus, to create a pretty nasty critter.
Anyway, it's all speculation because it's all very complicated (6D designers are pretty smurt!) and it seems pretty clear that our arrogant 3D scientists, who are really complete novices when it comes to virology (that is only several decades old) are playing with fire.
Although even there you're talking about an "intelligent" decision, which isn't the case with random mutations of viruses and bacteria etc. So human stupidity could be likened to random mutations. Both result in less efficiency, and the experience of chaos at the human level.
