Re: Anatoly Timofeevich Fomenko
I don't have time for it either, but I do think that the weight of evidence falls on Wilkens' side. I think it's an interesting idea and I'm interested in hearing how you propose to do it.
turing_machine said:<snip>
Wilkens arguments do convince me, they're logical and compelling, but maybe his facts are wrong, or cherry-picked. Or maybe other logical and compelling arguments prove Troy is even more likely in Turkey, but Wilkens did not mention these.
It takes a specialist to sift through those two possibilities.
The scholar experts I contacted refused to counter Wilken's arguments or facts, but invariably insisted he is wrong (just don't ask why, we have no time for that).
Wilkens himself refuses to answer my (well-intended) e-mails since years.
So I thought of this:
Let's do some stats.
I don't have the time for that ;D but maybe you do, please let me know. I have a way to produce an OBJECTIVE assessment of the Troy in UK hypothesis. No need to trust someone's word, no need to even have an opinion beforehand, and -yieeha!- no need to know anything about history or archeology or esoterism ... But you need time, googlemaps and stats.
I first post this to probe if anybody has any interest in this out there (while typing the rest offline)
My next post will explain the method exactly.
bye
I don't have time for it either, but I do think that the weight of evidence falls on Wilkens' side. I think it's an interesting idea and I'm interested in hearing how you propose to do it.