Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore collapses after ship struck it, sending vehicles into water

[Mark7]

Whether or not this is an accident, significant events seem to attract stacked coincidences. There may be something more than just 'pattern recognition run amok' therefore, although many instances of that will be extant. Also, we have the idea that the PTB often signals an event somehow as part of some cosmic contract of free will vs. good and evil.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1772733157197910506

https://twitter.com/x/status/1772654026011603109

There's a lesson here I think.

 

[Mark7]

Whether or not this is an accident, significant events seem to attract stacked coincidences

It's hard to win the lottery, but somebody does.

 

[Ketone Cop]

RUSSIA DID IT!!

"Huge Problem": Pentagon's Rapid Wartime Response Cargo Ships Trapped In Baltimore After Bridge Collapse | ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

_____________
"Two high-speed military cargo ships are stuck in the Port of Baltimore following Tuesday morning's collapse of the 1.6-mile-long Francis Scott Key Bridge. "
______________
"The US Maritime Administration (MARAD) Ready Reserve Force vessels include:

• The Cape Washington, a Cape W Class roll-on/roll-off vessel.
• The Gary I. Gordon, a Gordon-class roll-on/roll-off vessel.
• The SS Antares (T-AKR-294), a Algol-class fast sealift vehicle cargo ship.
• The SS Denebola (T-AKR-294), another Algol-class fast sealift vehicle cargo ship.

According to the military blog The War Zone (TWZ), Algol class vessels are "some of the fastest cargo vessels of their general size anywhere in the world." These ships are part of the RRF, a subset of vessels within MARAD's National Defense Reserve Fleet (NDRF) that provide surge sealift capability to the Pentagon for overseas conflicts."
_____________
"Wong quoted John Konrad, CEO of gCaptain, who warned the stuck RRF vessels are a "huge problem if a war starts [but] not much of a problem if the next few months are peaceful." "
______________
"The current readiness of the RRF fleet is unknown. And just like that, part of America's RRF fleet was taken out not by a missile or suicide drone, but a container ship that allegedly suffered a catastrophic 'electric issue'. America's enemies are taking note."
_______________

If Israel or Ukraine did this they just hampered themselves, so Occam's Razor says it must be Putin!! Or so the media will spin it!!

This disaster just gets more interesting and surreal by the minute!!

 

[Voyageur]

If I had to guess, I'd say it's something natural that occurs which could be covered by human activities, such as a meteor strike blamed on nukes or global power outages caused by cosmic forces that are blamed on cyber attacks. I keep going back to Clube and Napier and what they said about cosmic forces being covered by human activities, and how many things the "elites" have concocted to get humanity to believe it's THEM doing "evil things" to spread fear and command obedience - instead of the universe just going about its business.

With as Pierre reminds, the human conscious connection.

These 'big' things stand out:

(Joe) Was there something at a mass consciousness level being expressed in the fact that this fire almost completely burned down a town called Paradise in California?

A: Yes. California is no longer "paradise" and will shortly look more like hell.

Q: (L) Well, let me backtrack here... Was the collapse of that underground chamber a harbinger or a trigger that will start some kind of chain reaction of events on the planet that are going to travel around the globe the same way the waves traveled around the globe?

A: Close! Works for us!

Q: (Joe) If something like that collapses in on itself, if that happened on the continental shelf off the coast of California, it would fall into the ocean!

(Scottie) Finally!

A: Yes

Q: (Chu) How large are we talking about for that big "sinkhole"?

A: Size of Lake Superior.

Q: (L) Well, Jesus, it would have to be big to send waves around the whole planet and ...

(Pierre) For 20 minutes.

(Scottie) That's BIG.

(Andromeda) They felt it near Hawaii.

(Pierre) And New Zealand.

(L) Was this chamber something like a passageway through which... I mean, I've seen pictures of these things through volcanoes... lava tunnels or tubes. Was it something like a lava tube?

A: Yes!

Q: (Pierre) It was a chamber in the lower layers of the crust, in the mantle that fell in the lava?

A: Yes

Q: (Pierre) Whoa...

(Joe) Did it effectively create a hole in the ocean floor?

A: No

Q: (L) Imagine a tube like a vacuum cleaner hose that got smashed. It would still have its top and bottom.

(Joe) But this would be very deep, so...

(L) What if what is above is what collapsed down? When you have a sinkhole, that's what happens.

(Joe) But you probably have a lot of sinkholes going on around the world that don't manifest on the surface as things open up.

(L) And then eventually one day... That's creepy.

To the bridge at hand:

More or less agree with Ketone Cop's post from the Nova Scotian, and would add a few things.

Concerning warnings and navigable waters (and as a data points), still trying to understand the key 'initial' course alterations; yes the power was cut near the bridge, hence engines, and above we have mention of backup power for Nav (yet not front electrical bow thrusters according to the post linked to). From the bearing track below, there are two slight south bearing alterations, that if maintained, brings the ship relatively close to the south pillar, and that might have been fine, however, was there enough safe room or, was it initially set wrong, and how would that happen...

Here is the trajectory from the analysis from the video @Ketone Cop provided:



It is a relatively straight bearing after the harbour turn, with again, what appears to be very slight bearing adjustments south coming out of the harbour turn. The only post incident relationship one might say - if the bearing had stayed true, why chart so close to the south pillar superstructure? Don't know (perhaps there were just weak initial course adjustments set against a straight bearing shot out, and that should have been easy to lay the track for the middle of the bridge span - a safety factor).

From Marine Pilots, it is written here on course alterations (the information just lays down the concepts and what can go wrong):

"Concepts associated with execution of large alteration of courses for larger vessels in Confined waters or in Harbour limits."

The alteration in this instance (and slight) may be typical to the original harbour turn to safe track - increasing seed and further adjustments. Not speaking of the obvious out of control alteration near the bridge when the engines failed:

When a vessel alters her course while turning, there are various forces that act on the vessel to causeher to turn. To understand the dynamics of the turning the ship, we have to understand the following:

a. Relation between ROT and Speed
b. Paths traversed by bow, stern and pivot point
c. Relation between Heading and COG
d. Lateral Traverse (Xr & Xm) of the stern due to Inertia of rest and motion
e. References to be monitored during turning

a. Relation between ROT and Speed

In restricted waters or in harbours, the navigator has to follow a designed turning path. There is not much room to deviate from the designed path. The designated path is proximate to shallows and dangers. There is always a risk of running on to danger of getting aground and or collision.

For execution of a good turn in restricted waters, vessel has to keep right speed in proportion the right ROT.

Let’s assume,
r = Radius of the turn,
V = Speed in m/s
@ = Turn Angle,
t = Time taken to complete the turn,
d = Distance travelled on a circular path
ROT = Rate of turn of vessel in degrees / second
w= Distance from wheel over point to the point where vessel actually starts turning

Thus, ROT= @/t V= d/t, > V/d = ROT/@ > ROT= V@/d
Also, d=r@ > ROT = @/t= d/r*t = V/r > ROT=V/r

From above linear equations it is clear that the ROT is directly proportional to speed of vessel, V
If Vessel making a speed of V has to turn a angle of @ at a Rate of Turn - ROT, ROT has to be directly proportional to speed V. If a vessel is making more speed, her rate of turn has to be more and the vice versa.


When vessel moves from position-1 to position -2 the distance covered and angle turned by the vessel are the same in both the diagram. But the speed in one diagram is V1 and another is V2. So the ROT in one diagram should be different from other one.

V1 /V2 = ROT1 / ROT2 > ROT2 = (V2/V1)*ROT1

Thus to make a particular turning path, the ship handler has to adjust her speed and ROT accordingly to get a designated turning path. If the vessel is making a lesser speed the rate of turn (or Swing) has to be slower and if the sped is more the rate of turn has to be higher for the vessel to follow the planned path.

b. Paths traversed by Bow, Stern and Pivot Point

While vessel is making a turn in open waters with abundant sea-room, the paths traverse by the bow stern and pivot point matters a little to the ship handlers. But when the sea room is very less, in a range of few metres, it is very important to understand the difference in the paths traversed by bow, stern and pivot point.

At the beginning of the turn, the path of the stern is of much interest to the handler as the stern moves away from the path towards the probable danger at the stern. Bow is supposed to be in safe waters as the bow is turning towards the new course of the vessel.

However towards the end the alteration, the path of the bow is important as the bow would move away from the new course once she overshoots the course. The stern is still coming and yet to come to the new course.



Regarding the paths traversed by the Stern, PP and Bow, the following observations are clear from above diagram:
1. The stern starts moving away from the original path in opposite direction of the alteration of course for some time and then the stern starts moving in the direction of alteration.
2. PP keeps on moving on the same course for some time till the time the inertia of rest is overcome by the PP in her original course. After the inertia of the rest is overcome, the PP starts moving in the direction of alteration on a circular locus.
3. The bow immediately starts moving in the direction of the alteration away from the original course. This helps the ship handler in minding where the bow or the stern exactly be landing while altering the course in a restricted waters. This helps the ship handler in preventing the bow or stern to come closer to any navigational hazard in proximity.

c. Relation between Heading and COG

[... skip]

Towards the end of alteration of course, once the vessel reaches her final course, there is still a lag exists between the heading and the COG. The stern still moves away from the settled new course of the vessel due to the “inertia of motion” away from the newly attained course. The stern keeps on moving from the new course within the period of TLe till it reaches maximum. This is “later altraverse of the stern due to inertia of Motion”(Xm). This would land the stern off the centre line of the course. If there is not much sea room available at the stern on the opposite side of the turn, this could cause a significant disaster if not controlled properly. The classic example of a disaster due tothis is the accident of container vessel M.V. Milano Bridge in the Port of Busan in Apr 2020.

This “lateral traverse of the stern due to inertia of motion (Xm) during TLe is dangerous and pose serious threat to the vessel and environment in restricted waters, channels and harbours. This is due to following reasons:
1. The inertia of motion for large and loaded vessels is very high. This is even higher when moving at a higher speed. To control this inertia of motion possibly the handler may reduce speed in advance for loaded or larger vessels.
2. The time period of TLe is relatively unknown to the handler. The time period may be longer or shorter varies from vessel to vessel. During this period there is a degree of uncertainty in the position of the vessel as it continuously keeps on changing.
3. If there is effect of weather exists at the time of alteration, the amount of set generated by the external force e.g. current or wind etc. is unknown to the handler in the final course of the vessel. Though the direction of wind remains same relatively, the current may be different in the new course. And with the changed course, the relative direction and strength of the combined external forces with respect to the heading of the vessel would be quite different. Thus the amount of set is unknown to the handler. Though the pilot handles the vessels regularly and they can expect the amount of set on a new course. This varies with time in a diurnal range, month of the year, local disturbances in the weather system, strength and direction of tidal stream. There is a certain degree of uncertainty in this regard.
4. This set so generated due to external forces adds up the “lateral traverse of the stern due to inertia of motion” would cause a great amount of uncertainty on the positioning of the vessel in the new course.
5. The time to give correction is also very critical. If not acted swiftly vessel will land upon danger.

Due to above reasons it is very important to understand and take corrective action for this so as to keep the vessel in safe waters all the time during large alteration of courses in restricted waters.

[...]

Conclusion
As pilots execute large alterations of fairly larger vessels within harbour limits at appreciable speed the momentum of vessel involved is fairly large. If not properly executed alterations within very narrow sea room, the potential risks to the vessel as well as the harbour infrastructures are very high. Such improper alterations would damage the vessel as well as the port infrastructure with loss amounting to millions of dollars. Off late it has been observed that many accidents are happening while such alterations of couse in harbour limits. Thus it is advisable the ship handlers and pilots must understand the theory behind the alteration of courses in harbour limits. I hope this would help the min execution of alterations with much ease and confidence with reduced risks to the property and life on board!

Okay, so again, there was (from video analysis) really no question of course alterations as the above paper discusses (good background though), it was just a straight shot coming out of a harbour turn heading for a bridge that should have had an aligned safety factor built in.

1. the original bearing track appears to be tightly aligned to the south pillar (prior to engine failure). Why was that? Was it a failure of the initial "designed turning path" or something else?
2. the engine fails (why, don't know, the timing/location could not have been worse as the speed suddenly changed from 8-9 knots <).
3. with the engine power out, this does not necessarily mean the rudder caused the changed bearing, it means a sudden speed change (the bow dips, the stern rises if decelerating fast enough). The influence added of the speed change (there was little wind it appears), would be the water current flow against the hull (which was mentioned by the Nova Scotian). If sufficient, that could push the bow relatively quickly under a lose of power. Being already relatively tight to the south pillar on the track, it did not take much of an alteration to cause this disaster.



#2 (engine fail) the track alteration that may have resulted, primarily due to loss of speed, and again, the water current may have done the rest.

Still don't like the initial 'set' bearing track, I mean, why do that with a ship this size when there was plenty of distance away from the south pillar to safely navigate?

From the above "...alteration of courses for larger vessels in Confined waters or in Harbour limit" paper, these accidents indeed happen, and yet globally each day/month/year, sees thousands of these maneuvers without fail.

Human error? Would say it is likely. Mechanical error - most defiantly. Procedural error? Don't know the scope.

 

[hlat]

I was wondering recently if it has anything to do with the upcoming "nova". Basically, within the next few months, there is to be a recurrent Nova in a binary start system 3,000 light years from here, where one star is like our sun and the other is a white dwarf and when they come close enough to interact, the white dwarf absorbs energy or mass from the other and eventually creates a big nuclear explosion which we see in the sky as a new star for a short period of time.

Just wondering it it might also produce some kind of cosmic radiation or something that may cause some 'disturbances' on the planet.

That sounds like what Charles Fort wrote about back in those days: a new star appearing in a nebula and crazy things happening on Earth at the same time.

Why not in Pelosi's congressional district with a major infrastructure destruction?

San Francisco?

 

[Konstantin]

I was wondering recently if it has anything to do with the upcoming "nova". Basically, within the next few months, there is to be a recurrent Nova in a binary start system 3,000 light years from here, where one star is like our sun and the other is a white dwarf and when they come close enough to interact, the white dwarf absorbs energy or mass from the other and eventually creates a big nuclear explosion which we see in the sky as a new star for a short period of time.

Just wondering it it might also produce some kind of cosmic radiation or something that may cause some 'disturbances' on the planet.

Is this GPS signal problem caused by the same thing?

Airlines report GPS signal jamming: Russia gets the blame

GPS interference is hitting aircraft navigation systems in the Baltics as well as in other conflict regions.

www.politico.eu

and this ship collision in Turkey

Out-of-control container ship crashes into three cranes

Video footage shows large vessel toppling the huge structures at Kocaeli port in Turkey

www.tradewindsnews.com

And the latest Baltimore bridge collapse after a collision with a ship?
I don't know if there is any pattern or connection, but it looks interesting.

 

[candasiri]

Based on the idea that previous changes were JFK and 9/11, which carried profound changes for our global society, I think we can presume that the next one will be something major. Any ideas what? They did say watch the "land, sea and sky", which suggests something other than political skullduggery like the previous two. So maybe not a major economic collapse. And not nukes in Russia or Ukraine, or China/Taiwan kick off. Maybe something more like a major quake? Or a significant meteorite strike?

Many months ago, I had one of the most vivid dreams of my life that I think involved the Dome of the Rock Mosque/Jerusalem. The vision was of many people praying, trading, and living in a small area. There was ocean I believe although I know Jerusalem does not border water. Maybe the next false flag up Israel's sleeve is going to be big--involving land, sea and sky. When just googling land, sky and sea the following came up:
Cuius est solum, eius est usque ad coelum et ad inferos - Wikipedia

I have a feeling with this event, a wider conflict may erupt.

"whoever's is the soil, it is theirs all the way to Heaven and all the way to Hell." Israel is surely taking the soil all the way to hell.

 

[Ellipse]

One person that is out there on twitter pushing the Cyberattack angle and narrative is Laura Logan. She supposedly has insider US intel people, both active and retired, telling her that the accident was a deliberate attack on critical infrastructure.

For he record, her Wikipedia page here.

Here is the transcript of an interview of her. I found it interesting because she puts into context the accident and join the dots. If hazardous materials need effectively to be routed through an another path, it can be an opportunity to create more accidents because of overload, stress, security measure bypassing and so on.

If a lot of this kind of "accidents" happen everywhere , it's perhaps what the C's refereed to when they said "Watch the skies and land and oceans."

Fundamentally I think it's very difficult for us to know what happened due to the sophistication of the tech nowadays. It can be very similar to what the C's said about what was used in the 9/11 situation. If you manage to install remote control devices in keys points of the boat control system, you can use it when the opportunity is good. Eventually you have trained an AI to manoeuvre a ship like this and hit your target.

- We need an investigation. What is your investigation telling you?

- Well, I have a better question for you, Steve.
Why are you coming to the mic telling the country that it's not terrorism when your
own intelligence agencies are telling you it is?
And I know they are, because I didn't make this up.
These are not my words, right?
I'm talking to people who are on the inside, some who are on active duty, some who are
retired, and everyone, literally, from critical infrastructure in Department of Homeland Security
to the intelligence agencies, they know there's no other...
This is a cyber attack on a critical infrastructure corridor for the United States.
This is, for those people who think this is just a river, this is in Baltimore, what does this matter?

You don't know anything about what you're talking about.
The I-94 corridor on the eastern seaboard is literally what connects the north and south.
When I talk about hazardous materials, this is a brilliant, well-planned strategic attack
on one of the most important supply chains in the United States of America.

The only other one is in the western side in California.
That's the only one that's busy.
And what you have done, you now have shut it down.
And when I talk about hazardous materials, what are we talking about here?
This is refined fuels, right?
This is propane gas.
This is diesel.
This is fuel.
This is flammable materials.
This is oversized loads, nitrogen, chemicals.
Everything that you need for your economy to move has literally just been shut down
for four to five years.

And how did they do it?
They knew that they had to target one of two main anchor points on that bridge.
There are two load-bearing pylons that any structural engineer can identify that are
on the end of each side of the bridge.
These are the ones that are thicker and stronger than anything else on that bridge.
And when you hit one of those pylons, when you take that out, the reason you see so much
of that bridge collapse instantly is you just brought 50% of the span of that bridge coming
crumbling down.
And what you don't see beneath the surface of the water sea is absolutely catastrophic.
It is a structural nightmare and a logistical nightmare because you have the entire bottom
part, the concrete part of that bridge, and you don't know the extent of the structural
damage to that, and you won't know it until you pull all of that infrastructure out of
there and you get to look at it.
And so you're talking three to five years at best, and what you're talking about here
is probably building a new bridge.
So what you have effectively done now, you've shut down the I-95 corridor that's above ground,
so now you're going to have to go north to New York, you're going to have to go south
to North Carolina, and your trucks, your hazardous materials are going to have to go around Baltimore
now.
They're not going to be able to go through it.

And what else did you do?
You shut down the sea corridor, the shipping corridor, because now the port is shut down, right?
And so all those tankers that are out at sea that have hazardous materials on them, those
are going to have to all be rerouted.
And why can you not move hazardous materials through the tunnel?
Why is this such a big deal?
Because they created that bridge because hazardous materials, for example, oversized loads, they
don't fit in the tunnel system.

And there's other loads that are so dangerous that they require, A, they require a permit.
It takes time to get a permit.
It costs money to get a permit.
It requires an escort, right?
You've seen it on the highways sometimes.
You've seen when you have these massive oversized loads and they've got escorts all around them,
these huge convoys.
Well, what do you do on one of the busiest corridors in the United States?
You don't shut it down in the day so this can happen.
That means you can only move this stuff at night, which automatically impacts the amount
of traffic that you can use.
The tunnel is going to be overloaded.
This is what you call death by a thousand cuts.
It is an absolutely catastrophic attack on critical infrastructure, and you cannot see
it because a cyber attack is unseen, just like the attack on 2020 on the voting machines
that you cannot see.

- Okay, I want to go, you just had this big thing with the FBI talking about what the
Chinese Communist Party's cyber hacking unit that they've been monitoring for 10 years
and now they're saying it's out of control.
Are your sources telling you that they feel there's enough information out there that
it is a cyber attack and is it a state actor or non-state actors?

-100%. Yes, they are saying that this is a cyber attack.
You didn't have a terrorist group board the ship and commandeer it and take it over.
You had somebody hack into the systems on board the ship, the GPS system, and reroute
that ship.
They did it in the middle of the night because they didn't want the crew to be awake.
They didn't want everybody to be on full high alert.
They wanted everybody to be asleep and you trying to wake people up and rouse people
because when I spoke to one individual who knows, who has, let's just say he worked in
Baltimore for many, many years and was there when that bridge was opened.
He knew when he looked at the security camera video of the harbor, the long version, the
seven minutes, he knew from the start of that video when he looked at that ship that it
was not in the channel.
You need to be in the channel to make that turn, to have any chance of making that turn.
So now you're traveling.
That is a river that flows pretty quickly, Steve, even under normal circumstances, right?
And at a certain point you're committed.
That ship is heavy.
The load is heavy.
The water is flowing at a certain speed.
You've got very little room to maneuver.
So at a certain point there was absolutely nothing that they could do to stop that ship
from the course that it was on because they were not in control of it and they had all
of these other factors coming into play.

So when terrorism and counterterrorism experts look at this, when people who know critical
infrastructure, when, you know, there's a number of different people that I've spoke
to, cyber people, when they look at it, they know exactly what they're looking at.
And so it's extraordinary that anybody could come out now when they haven't had time to
do an investigation, when I know for a fact that they're getting people inside their agencies
that are telling them what they're telling me, and they're making public statements that
completely contradict what anybody who knows this terrain, who knows it, and I don't just
mean the physical terrain, I mean the cyber terrain and the terrorism terrain and the,
you know, the critical infrastructure terrain and all of that.

I mean, I've talked to people whose job after 9/11 was to identify if you were al-Qaeda
and you wanted to capitalize on that attack, how would you do it?
They were the people that came up with the term "death by a thousand cuts."
And what you're looking at now is exactly what they feared terrorist groups would do
to really exploit the advantage that they had after 9/11, because you are bringing the
United States to its knees step by step from within.

- Laura, how can people follow you on this?
We'd love to have you back on the next couple days.
How do people, social media, podcast, all of your information, your writing, where do
people go?

- You can find me on X. I'm putting most of this information out on X.
And I want, you know, I really want to emphasize, Steve, strongly, we are in an undeclared war
right now.

And these are not my words.
I'm not making this up.
This is coming from people who really know and who ordinarily would never, ever talk
to me.
But we've reached a point in this city, I think, you know, if you look at the quote
of one of the intelligence analysts that I spoke to, right?
I'm just going to read it to you very, very briefly, okay?
It's not long, and it really sums it up.

He said, "They have figured out how to bring us down.
As long as you stay away from the teeth of the U.S. military, you can pick the U.S. apart.
We are arrogant and ignorant, a lethal combination.
Obama said they would fundamentally change America, and they did.
We are in a free-fall ride on a roller coaster right now, no brakes, just picking up speed."

And I would urge people, watch very carefully the people that tell you that this attack
doesn't matter.
Stop following them on Twitter.
Discount everything they say because they're either totally ignorant and useless or they
are a plant.
And there's a lot of Anons out there, right?
And I follow a lot of Anons, and I appreciate and respect the work that they're doing.
But we're in a moment of truth now.
We have very, very little time.
When you start to shut down hazardous materials and the shipping of fuel, you know what that
means.
It means everything goes up.
It means food goes down.
The access to food and critical infrastructure, that means that goes down, prices go up.
This is catastrophic for the American people, and it's catastrophic for this country.
But it is a financial and economic attack.

If you're not going to see tanks rolling down the street, stop looking at the type of conventional
war and saying to yourself, "Well, if I don't see this, then it means we're okay."
People need to understand what they're looking at.
And for those people who say, "Well, the FBI, isn't it interesting?
Christopher Wray just put this big counterterrorism guy, he put him in charge of the FBI office
of Baltimore just yesterday, and this is the guy that's out in front of the cameras already."
Well, isn't that amazing, right?
Do you believe in coincidences?
I don't.
I don't believe in coincidences anymore.
None of this happens by chance.
This happens by design.

And the problem that we have is that people in power in this country are complicit in
the breakdown of American infrastructure and America's defenses.
And Steve, this is one thing that's really important for people to understand.
If you step back from this for one single moment, you will notice a pattern developing
here.
We left behind $80 billion of equipment in Afghanistan.
Nobody said we had to do that.
There was no one with a gun to the administration's head saying, "Get out of Afghanistan by this
date."
They said, "Oh, we made a deal with the Taliban."
Oh, wait a minute.
You made a deal with a bunch of terrorists?
You're the world's superpower.
You chose a timeline and you chose an exit that resulted in handing $80 billion of advanced
military equipment to your enemies.
Well, what did that do?

It reduced the advantage that America had on the battlefield because you narrowed the
gap by giving them technology that spent years, cost the taxpayers hundreds of millions, if
not billions of dollars to develop.
You gave that to your enemies.
What did the Taliban do?
They gave it to Russia.
They gave it to China.
They gave it to Iran.
They gave it to whoever they needed to do to reverse engineer it and figure out how
to use it.
Then what do you have?
Years later, remember under Obama when the drone went down?
There was a stealth drone that went down over Iran and the Obama administration chose not
to recover it.
Well, I know people who were on a team of American intelligence operatives doing other
work.
They were on the ground in Iran.
They were literally within less than an hour away from that drone.
They had it within arm's reach.
They could have gone and recovered it and they were told to stand down.
The Obama administration left that stealth technology in the hands of the Iranians.

Fast forward years later, what do you have happening in Iraq?
Oh, you have an attack on a U.S. base where a number of U.S. soldiers died and it's not
detected on the radar?
Oh, yeah, because you were using a stealth drone that you reverse engineered.
So this has been going on for a very, very long time now.
It started under Obama.
It was interrupted by Trump and it was continued under the Biden administration.
I know somebody else who was in Yususuk who was horrified when he was seconded to the
State Department to find that we had turned over satellite monitoring systems that were
our counter nuclear proliferation technology.
The guy running that program in the State Department was playing cards on his computer
and he was ordered to stand down by his superior offices.
There's not a direction that you can look in, Steve, where we have our leaders, people
in power, have been systematically dismantling the defenses of the United States of America.
And this attack is a wake up call.
Open your eyes and realize what you are facing because they cannot afford for this election
to take place.
They cannot afford for Donald Trump to come into power and there's absolutely nothing
they will do.
There was nothing, they will stop at nothing to prevent that from happening.
And Donald Trump is just a life raft.
This is not about one man.
You can't gamble everything on one man and think he's got the power to fix it all.

This is so much bigger than just Donald Trump, but he's a life raft and without that life
raft, you have no chance.

- Lara Logan, thank you very much. Amazing. Look.

Laura Logan : effondrement du pont de Baltimore

Twitter

odysee.com

 

[Ellipse]

To complete my post, I would say that a lot a of problems are happening in the skies with planes at the moment too, especially Boeing one.

Samples:

Engine trouble diverts international United flight to Denver from its Paris flight path

An international United flight headed to Paris was diverted to Denver Thursday after the crew reported trouble with one of the plane’s engines.

www.denverpost.com

Of course this one:

Boeing 737 loses external panel mid-flight, lands safely in Oregon in latest plane incident

A Boeing 737-800 lost an external panel mid-flight Friday — the latest issue involving one of the manufacturer’s planes that was only discovered when it landed at an Oregon airport, acc…

nypost.com

Cannot list all here but there was other accidents involving Boeing which happened between those two.

Russian planes have problems too:

Russian Military Jet Crashes Into Sea Off Annexed Crimea - The Moscow Times

A Russian military plane crashed on Thursday into waters off the coast of annexed Crimea, the Moscow-installed governor of Sevastopol said.

www.themoscowtimes.com

Russia claims the flight was carrying prisoners of war, Ukraine claims it was missiles. Here's what we know

Russia accused Ukraine of downing a military plane near the Ukrainian border Wednesday, saying all 74 people on board were killed including dozens of Ukrainian service members being transported for a prisoner swap.

edition.cnn.com

On the land we know that a lot of cattle plants are destroyed or take fire since some time.

Samples:

Texas dairy farm explosion kills 18,000 cows

Animal welfare activists say the incident is "by far" the deadliest barn fire in recent memory.

www.bbc.com

Beef Trade Lower Following News of Fire at National Beef Processing Plant in Kansas

Beef trade was down after news of a fire at the National Beef processing facility in Liberal, Kansas. Company officials said the fire was in the loading dock and was contained within hours. No injuries were reported. Officials are continuing to assess damages.

www.dtnpf.com

MSN

www.msn.com

Bloomberg - Are you a robot?

www.bloomberg.com

I even saw on the Net a map maintained by someone with all the fires on plants.

So before this boat accident, the missing place for such events was the sea. Although we had the Ever Given blocking the Suez Canal.

 

[JEEP]

If a lot of this kind of "accidents" happen everywhere , it's perhaps what the C's refereed to when they said "Watch the skies and land and oceans."

To complete my post, I would say that a lot a of problems are happening in the skies with planes at the moment too, especially Boeing one.

On the land we know that a lot of cattle plants are destroyed or take fire since some time.

"in the skies" - you beat me to it! After reading your first post, I definitely thought of all the plane issues that have recently occurred. And for sure, all the attacks upon our food production, not just cattle - chickens/eggs/pigs/sheep - plus even deer/elk/moose being found to have wasting disease more and more. But that's not all - the attack on farming and even growing a garden! And the attack on fossil fuels vs "green" energy that doesn't even come close to providing essential energy needs. So maybe all that covers "On the land". As for the oceans - Suez canal/Panama canal/Red Sea/Black Sea are very prominent issues now - does the FSK bridge collapse add to that - maybe. It's possible more visible/blatant attacks will diminish these and thus, show that they are what the Cs were referencing.

A Coast Guard briefing report states, concerning the vessel losing power, that "a harbor pilot and assistant were onboard and reported power issues, multiple alarms on the bridge, and loss of propulsion prior to the incident."

Anybody know anything about multiple alarms on the bridge? Did they go off because they detected an imminent collision or something else? From the quoted sentence above, it seems they were activated before the ship sent a warning there was going to be a collision.

It occurred to me that I mistakenly made the wrong association. Not the FSK bridge, but the bridge of the ship!

The Bridge of a ship is the command center through which all communication, work requests, and information is relayed. It is the superstructure at the top of the ship that gives a clear view of the ocean on all sides.

And so, the alarms were activated on the ship! What exactly were they indicating besides the power loss - likely indicators that the ship was out of control by all the means necessary to maintain that control.

Added: Additional thought - Obama i.e. Deep State i.e. Team anti-Christ

 

[Mark7]

Watch the skies and land and oceans.

It looks like they/4dSTS may be intensifying the attacks on infrastructure globally. Perhaps there will be an increase in their DEW laser attacks, explosions, etc. They may also have some more magical exotic new toys of mayhem they are itching to try out. Whatever happens, we can probably be assured that the explanation for it will not be the complete truth - a second part of their magic trick. The third part of their magic trick will be what they advise people to do in response - perhaps like Gaza on a global scale.

 

[JEEP]

Cuius est solum, eius est usque ad coelum et ad inferos - Wikipedia

To expand from wiki:

Cuius est solum, eius est usque ad coelum et ad inferos (Latin for "whoever's is the soil, it is theirs all the way to Heaven and all the way to Hell")[1] is a principle of property law, stating that property holders have rights not only to the plot of land itself, but also the air above and (in the broader formulation) the ground below. The principle is often referred to in its abbreviated form as the ad coelum doctrine.[2]

In modern law, this principle is still accepted in limited form; the rights are divided into air rights above and subsurface rights below. Property title includes to the space immediately above and below the ground – preventing overhanging parts of neighboring buildings – but do not have rights to control flights far above the ground or in space. In dense urban areas, air rights may be transferable (see transferable development rights) to allow construction of new buildings over existing buildings.

At common law, property owners held title to all resources located above, below, or upon their land.

As the name describes, the principle is that a person who owns a particular piece of land owns everything above and below it as well. Consequently, the owner could prosecute trespass against people who violated the border but never actually touched the soil. As with any other property rights, the owner can sell or lease it to others, or it may be taken or regulated by the state.

At common law, property owners held title to all resources located above, below, or upon their land. Exception - someone else could own the mineral rights to your property and proceed to mine without your approval/permission.

"the owner could prosecute trespass against people who violated the border but never actually touched the soil." This has come up regarding people flying drones over/hovering above people's property.

"or it may be taken or regulated by the state." People lose property by eminent domain all the time plus the seizure of private property due to drug law violations as has occurred around the use/purchase/sale of marijuana. And, one can have their property taken away if you either fall behind or simply don't pay your taxes. So, when Klaus says "you will own nothing and be happy" . . . we really don't own anything now as the state can take it away if you don't keep paying! Only the elite/super rich can avoid that reality although it looks like Ditty might become an exception!

Sean "Diddy" Combs' properties were raided by federal authorities earlier this week amid sex-trafficking allegations.

 

[Natus Videre]

It looks like they/4dSTS may be intensifying the attacks on infrastructure globally. Perhaps there will be an increase in their DEW laser attacks, explosions, etc. They may also have some more magical exotic new toys of mayhem they are itching to try out.

A year later, the plan is in full swing!

Session Date: February 25th 2023
(Joe) Just a follow-up on the East Palestine train accident: Was the reason that train was derailed on purpose to cause a toxic spill, was that in order to further left-right divisions in America?
A: Yes

Q: (Joe) That was the primary goal?
A: Not necessarily. If you are going for terror, depopulation, and general mayhem, you gotta start somewhere.

 

[mabar]

Seems that we are going to pay more attention with ships.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1774074345200947206

 

[Lil Discusted Fact]

Here is the original formulation of the poem that became the Star-Spangled Banner. It seems noteworthy that the song's melody was borrowed from a drinking song sung in a Dionysian English drinking society, called "Anacreon in Heaven." The mysterious 2nd paragraph beginning "On the shore..." seems particularly relevant. It is also noteworthy that the word Dali has near-infinite etymologies/meanings, and, while I may eventually be able to connect it to the figure Henry Clay, thus far the most tangible correlation I can make is that Salvador Dali's name functions here as a symbol of Spanish influence in the extremely relevant events of the Burr conspiracy, the famous case that Francis Scott Key worked on for years as a lawyer, wherein Burr had planned, with the help of Spain and a cabal of financially interested parties, to form a separate nation from the Southwest United States. Burr fled to Spanish Florida when his plan failed. Francis Scott Key's participation (opposite the famous lawyer Henry Clay, who somehow defended Burr, an obvious traitor, to incredible effect) in the process of routing this inner-cabal plot in the aftermath of the Louisiana Purchase mirrors in some ways the successful routing of the British attack on Fort McHenry that is described in the song (though Burr wasn't successfully convicted).