François: Gurdjieff and Mouravieff

François said:
... so unseless to think about 8 (density, whatever) as this is enough to apprehend 7 (more or less 2) [joke here]


... but yes I am going to continut to investigate on the 7...

Maybe this investigation would continue nicely following an investigation of level 3.
 
François said:
... so unseless to think about 8 (density, whatever) as this is enough to apprehend 7 (more or less 2) [joke here]


... but yes I am going to continut to investigate on the 7...

Cool. From the perspective of an "hermetic journey", in a universe full of circular feedback loops, all roads eventually lead to the destination, OSIT. :)
 
Jerry said:
François said:
... so unseless to think about 8 (density, whatever) as this is enough to apprehend 7 (more or less 2) [joke here]


... but yes I am going to continut to investigate on the 7...

Maybe this investigation would continue nicely following an investigation of level 3.

Actually in my view that's true. If you make your law of three to be physical - variable physicality - spiritual (3 - 9 - 6 in Enneagram Numbers) which geometrically is a line segment with an origin then expand that to a hexagon with an origin (1-2-4-9-8-7-5) then you have three physical densities, the variable one, then three spiritual ones. If you look at the way the Cs match densities to centers, in my view you can actually plot that hexagon with origin. Densities (and even centers) though do seem to be a very complex thing that only in a very general sense follows the law of 7. There are in- between densities and physics and psychology and biology and geology; all sorts of "ology" details that add to that very general law of 7 pattern.
 
Hi Bud,

'Hermetic' > I like this word :)
'in a universe full of circular feedback loops' > do you mean I am going round and round in circles :) :huh:
 
François said:
'in a universe full of circular feedback loops' > do you mean I am going round and round in circles :) :huh:

Not at all. Maybe I should have said "in a universe full of feedback loops where everything is interconnected, any starting point can be as good as any other if the journey is about learning."

That's a good thing, OSIT. Apologies for the confusion. :)
 
Ok fine !, Bud, English/US language is not my native one, so sometimes I could misunderstand some specific expressions, and then I often prefer clarifying asap (dictionary or direct question - not to add any question mark...), better (thanks for quick answering)...
 
François said:
By the way, Bud, I don't understand your forum avatar picture, what does it mean, if this is possible to say?

Hi François,

I know you are addressing Bud, however I did want to point out a thread you may not have seen before: Our Forum Avatars. Enjoy! :)
 
Jerry said:
Imagine, if you will, a student in the third level of elementary education questioning the structural order of the school he is in, proposing an alternative.
I did it then and I'll do it now. Bad comparison.
 
I agree with you hjackson.

May I add:

Imagine, if you will, a student in the third level of elementary education questioning the structural order of the school he is in, proposing an alternative.


1)
questioning the structural order of the school : ...the desire to know, increase the knowledge is not bad, is n't it, I think...

2)
proposal an alternative :... I just wish to try to understand, I have no pretention to propose any alternative... :huh:
 
I'd like to add more. In fact I am questioning the order of this school (our density). I'd like to be in one that's less STS. Maybe a completely altruistic person would have no preference. But I'm not completely altruistic, so I'll contribute by taking the alternate path to being completely selfish and materialistic, which is what is presented to most people here, and attempt to learn and be less STS, instead of trying to learn the lessons presented to me of Try and Become a Corporate Overlord AKA the American Dream.
 
Densities are conciousness. We have seven densities because that is conciousness from all to nothing. You don't need 19 densities consisting of rocks, the conciousness of rocks fits within one density.
 
Cassiopaean Glossary said:
According to esoteric science, the laws of 3 and of 7 apply at all scales but the form and locus of occurrence is not identical.
http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?action=post;topic=24586.45;last_msg=283524


So it can't be 19, it is 7.

This is my free desire to work out on 7, and question on 'magic' 7,
like : do angels have really wings? question I certainly asked when very young..

ggm080605l.jpg
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom