These transcriptions are super but in one or two of them I've had to remove tonnes of "mm-hms", "ehms", "yeahs" and "uhms"! Unless somebody says 'yeah' or similar in response to a direct question, then that level of super-detailed transcribing actually confuses, rather than clarifies, readers' ability to understand what's being said. If we transcribe literally, people who are hard of hearing and rely on the transcript won't understand what's going on. As part of doing that, transcribers have license to 'put words in our mouths' to clarify points.
What you could do is read back to yourself what you've just transcribed, then ask yourself: "Ok, now does that make sense in writing?" If not, change the transcript to make it grammatically correct and/or remove things that are redundant to the point being made. You don't have to go overboard with rewriting stuff either. It's more about leaving out superfluous stuff. A classic example is when someone starts to say something, then quickly restarts their point. Those first few words don't need to be transcribed.
Example:
Harrison, in the Information Theory show, said at one point: "The philosopher Alfred Whitehead, he had, he said something interesting..." --> Just delete the part prior to the point where he reformulated what he was going to say: "The philosopher Alfred Whitehead, he had, he said something interesting..." So now it looks like this: "The philosopher Alfred Whitehead said something interesting..."
The transcripts are lots of work and very long already - we can afford to cut corners and save our own time, and listeners/readers' time!
Thanks all,
Niall