Imminent Alien Disclosure?

Doesn't seem that Napoleon's experience did him much good considering the big mistakes he went on to make.
It is possible that you was experience this initiation but in a natural way, since in a session you ask the C's what that experience was in which you left and entered your body.

The C's answered something like "people usually call it death" (I am paraphrasing from memory).

In any case, Napoleon's objectives seem to be in line with what was dictated by 4D STS, so like any instrument when it was no longer needed it was discarded.
 
Actually, the pyramidal form serves no function; it has no effect. It is an arrangement for concentration as well as diffraction of upward spiraling light energy, as used by the mind/body/spirit complex.
For the first time reading this entire exchange from RA it strikes me as New Age BS - the Cs are not so wordy and they have given a different purpose for the pyramids.
 
Doesn't seem that Napoleon's experience did him much good considering the big mistakes he went on to make.
It also seems likely that the Great Pyramid does not "work" anymore as far as providing initiation experiences, or maybe only to a much lesser degree. Plus, there was probably more to be done than just laying in the sarcophagus for some time.
 
It also seems likely that the Great Pyramid does not "work" anymore as far as providing initiation experiences, or maybe only to a much lesser degree. Plus, there was probably more to be done than just laying in the sarcophagus for some time.
Much like Stone Henge and many other constructs from ancient times, they have ceased to function as originally intended- and also were dependent on the ability of the people who built them to make them work. According to the Cs the people sang to the stones of the henge, causing them to resonate in such a way a bridge between realities was created, bringing them all that they needed for their existence. Monks in Tibet are said to be able to levitate large stones by singing in certain tones- and so on. These structures needed active participation to function otherwise they were to the unknowing mere inert heaps of stone or whatever.
 
Doesn't seem that Napoleon's experience did him much good considering the big mistakes he went on to make.
One must wonder whether he was a psychopath. There is a story that when he was in Egypt surveying the battlefield after one of his victories, an officer commented on the number of French dead. He is alleged to have replied "That is nothing. One night's whoring in Montmartre will replace all of these" (or words to that effect). Pretty callous you would think given those men died for him.​
 
Much like Stone Henge and many other constructs from ancient times, they have ceased to function as originally intended- and also were dependent on the ability of the people who built them to make them work. According to the Cs the people sang to the stones of the henge, causing them to resonate in such a way a bridge between realities was created, bringing them all that they needed for their existence. Monks in Tibet are said to be able to levitate large stones by singing in certain tones- and so on. These structures needed active participation to function otherwise they were to the unknowing mere inert heaps of stone or whatever.
Maybe scientist and researcher Travis Taylor has part of the answer in the phonon-photon interaction:

Forget the nonsense about Merlin though.
 
For the first time reading this entire exchange from RA it strikes me as New Age BS - the Cs are not so wordy and they have given a different purpose for the pyramids.
A pyramid is a tetrahedral shape and can be viewed as a prism or half of a diamond. Hence, although I take your point about the wordiness of the Ra explanation the C's did once say this:​

Q: (L) What is the "philosophers stone?"

A: Idea center.

Q: (L) How can this idea center be accessed?

A: Many ways: meditation is the best.

Q: (L) Is there any visual image of the philosopher's stone that one could use to access it in meditation?

A: Yes. Diamond or prism.


As you can see from the above, the C's are much more succinct in their explanations.
 
Lizzies ingeniously inserted a critical backdoor exploit into the Christian Defense Software with making people worship and hold dear the Orion STS Crucifix / Cross symbol, close to their hearts.

Logically therefore - via 'Christian Cosmic Symbolism' - cross-spitting freemasons declared themselves enemies of Lizard. And devout god-fearing Catholics kissing their crosses declared themselves friends-servants of the Lizard. With the Bible containing a mere 20% truth, then exorcists loudly shouting incantations with holding their crosses toward the possessed - at least in the movies - to drive out the demon must have looked not only ineffective, but like trying to drive away a hungry goat with holding out a large tasty cabbage. Probably lower rank demons [less aware / less knowledgeable] were confused and the higher rank demons [more aware / more knowledgeable probably] may have been simply amused at the dichotomy. In reality however, successful exorcists probably used other symbols and words - as a conductive medium - to project forward their spiritual force and drive out the demon.

The Key 20% truth content of the Bible however is what interests me greatly. For example the entire core structure of The Holy Mary account and her life and her selfless sacrifices - how she did NOT ask for anything in return - , demons admitted THAT was, what drove them crazy! Exorcists had special secret rites / passages, unpublished: obviously because these were effective, but probably controversial to public Catholic doctrine. That is the most powerful exorcist incantations may have been apocryphal:

Father Malachi Martin - during his many radio show appearances - gave away a couple of these super effective exorcism-methods that must have been well tested, because he swore these worked best!
Similar to how guarding mechanisms, protective practices work during true channelings, real seances, I think.

Logically-exclusive thus protective declarations, same as logical set management in mathematics. Same as the logically excluding LawSpeak in corporate contracts and software use agreements, why we must answer by clicking YES, when they offer us: - Do you want to use this software?

Decades ago - probably for this occasion - I specially saved one potent Malachi-recommendation (recited on a C2C radio show 30 years ago for a caller). Its a highly effective short exorcism declaration, which hits home - strikes the intended target - right to the core of the demons heart / existence. Here it goes:

Shall be assertively declared towards the demon.

- O, Creature of God! In the Name of God, who created You [!] and in the Name of Jesus, who saved Me [!], I exorcise You!!!

- "Spit that into their eye. They hate it!" - said Malachi with elation. He must have tried this out with great success during his many exorcisms.

One devout Christian man is mentioned being chased down by Bigfoot almost catching him and as soon as he desperately started his emergency prayer to Jesus from the bottom of his heart, as Bigfoot was reaching for him and crashing the bushes right behind him, it, the monster suddenly disappeared!

So I think showing a demon-repellent spiritually assertive stance - radiating devout power toward the Shady Invaders - can not only drive out monsters, but effectively may chase away aliens and Lizzies as well. Probably depends on the spiritual force of the defender, how deeply she / he is connected to - The Holy Spirit of The Christ as an ubiquitous Cosmic Entity. How well this deepest spiritual connection the attacked is able to summon forth in an emergency.
If you check it out, there is somewhere in the transcripts an exchange with the C's where they tell Laura about the mechanics of exorcism. From memory, the bottom line is that the faith of the priest in his power to cast out the demon is paramount.​
 
Napoleon Bonaparte was a Freemason and I believe he lay in the so called sarcophagus in the King's Chamber in the Great Pyramid at Giza overnight, an experience which he claimed changed him.
Sources for all three claims? That he was a freemason, that he did woo-woo in Giza, and that he claimed it changed him.
 
Sources for all three claims? That he was a freemason, that he did woo-woo in Giza, and that he claimed it changed him.
Was Napoleon a Freemason?
Historians have no documents that can confirm this, but there are some undeniable facts that prove Napoleon's strong affiliation with Freemasonry. Thanks to Napoleon, Freemasonry spread throughout Europe. He made Freemasonry go from being a secret society, as it was until then, to almost an official state religion and united all the French lodges in the Grand Orient of France. On his native island of Corsica, Bonaparte grew up surrounded by Freemasons. His father and three brothers were Freemasons, so there was certainly a lot of talk about Freemasonry.

The youngest brother, Jerome Bonaparte (1784-1860), was initiated into Freemasonry at the age of 17 in the Mir lodge in the east of Toulon.
His Masonic career developed rapidly. A year later, in 1801, he became Grand Master of the Grand Lodge of Westphalia and in 1807 Napoleon made him King.
The eldest brother, Joseph Bonaparte (1768-1844), was initiated into the Lodge La Parfaite Sincérité (Perfect Sincerity) in eastern Marseille. In 1804 he became Grand Master of the Grand Orient of France and King of Naples, then King of Spain.
Finally, Louis Bonaparte (1778-1846), father of the future Napoleon III, served as Deputy Grand Master from 1803 to 1806, before being succeeded by Jean-Jacques Regis Cambasseres.
Napoleon's wife, Empress Josephine de Beauharnais (1763-1814), was initiated into a women's lodge in Strasbourg and held the office of Grand Master for some time.
Eugène de Beauharnais, Josephine's only son from her first marriage, at the age of 24, whom his stepfather had given the title of Viceroy of Italy, became the founder of the Grand Orient of Italy and the High Council of Italy.
Napoleon's support for Freemasonry in Europe caused an unprecedented stir. Many soldiers, politicians, nobles and citizens wanted to become members of Freemasonry. Twenty-two of Napoleon's thirty marshals, five of the six members of the Imperial Military Council and six of the nine government ministers were Freemasons. Bonaparte's reign can be considered the golden age of Freemasonry. In the 18 years he was in power, the number of Masonic lodges in France increased from 300 to 1,220, of which a large part were military lodges. Napoleon saw Freemasonry as a powerful tool for uniting the army, which was very useful for his European ambitions.

During his military operations in Europe, the International Brotherhood was an ideal instrument. Freemasonry, however, responded to the Emperor with reciprocity. Busts of the Emperor were installed in many Masonic temples and any criticism of his government was considered a provocation.
In 1801 the Loge Bonaparte was founded in Paris with the main aim of glorifying the name of the Emperor. The lodge successfully survived Napoleon's exile and death and was not closed until 1871. It withstood the reactionary years thanks to its careful renaming as the Lodge of Moderation.

It was the military, subordinates of Bonaparte, who participated in the Egyptian expedition that brought Freemasonry to the banks of the Nile. General Kleber founded the Loge Isis in Cairo, also founded by Napoleon.

But the question remains. Although Napoleon made Freemasonry a part of his government policy, was he an active Freemason?
If he wanted to become a member, he would immediately receive the highest and most honorable title of the Order.
If we know Napoleon's character, the answer to this question is quite clear: it was not enough for him to be "first among equals" - he had to be "above" equality. The Bonaparte family came from an old Florentine aristocratic family. Napoleon had every right to add the title of count to his surname, but he never took advantage of this opportunity.
But he did not want to be called a friar either.
For the same reason, Napoleon once renounced the title of marshal - it was enough for him to be "de facto" commander-in-chief of the French army. Ranks and titles did not appeal to him at all. Napoleon was only interested in absolute power.
After being crowned Emperor of France, Napoleon achieved his ambition.
He called the imperial throne "a piece of wood" and, sitting at the table with the nobility of Europe, he sometimes remarked,
"When I had the honor of being a junior lieutenant..." .

After becoming Emperor, Napoleon remained very involved in Masonic affairs.
At the place of the execution of King Louis XVI, he had an obelisk erected with a Masonic symbol, a five-pointed star. A bee, a Masonic symbol, was used in the creation of his personal imperial coat of arms. The bee is a very old symbol. In ancient Egypt, it accompanied the goddess Isis and had many meanings. For Napoleon, the bee meant the willingness to sacrifice for the country and the capacity for rebirth.

Shortly after Napoleon came to power, on June 22, 1799, a memorandum of nine articles was signed between the two French Grand Lodges, in which rules were set out. In particular, the Honorable Master was stripped of his exclusive privileges. A system of election of officers was established, mandatory for all lodges. Only a few lodges of the Scottish Rite refused to adhere to the Memorandum.

Thus, the fragmented French Freemasonry developed into a unified and homogeneous system, fully supported by Napoleon. Soon the "Regulator of Freemasonry" was published, a set of rules and rituals for the lodges of the Grand Orient of France.
The lodges of the Scottish Rite also introduced appropriate changes to their rules, but this took three years. Consequently, the rituals were still not identical, but there was a single Supreme Council of the 33rd degree. The decisions of this council were binding. The Emperor could influence all decisions, since in the meantime the High Council was chaired by his elder brother Joseph, who had become the Grand Master.

The "Regulation of Freemasonry", which unified the activities of the Freemasons, became a document that organically continued Napoleon's reforms, along with the Constitution, the Civil Code, the system of universal education, a single system of state awards (the Order of the Legion of Honor), etc.
 
Was Napoleon a Freemason?
Historians have no documents that can confirm this, but there are some undeniable facts that prove Napoleon's strong affiliation with Freemasonry. Thanks to Napoleon, Freemasonry spread throughout Europe. He made Freemasonry go from being a secret society, as it was until then, to almost an official state religion and united all the French lodges in the Grand Orient of France. On his native island of Corsica, Bonaparte grew up surrounded by Freemasons. His father and three brothers were Freemasons, so there was certainly a lot of talk about Freemasonry
Not interested in a copy-paste from the internet!

Gimme sources!
 
Back
Top Bottom