Imminent Alien Disclosure?

[Approaching Infinity]

I am working my way through the video gradually but does he explain at any point why this program was called 'Immaculate Constellation'. Is it a pun on the 'Immaculate Conception', a title linked to the Blessed Virgin Mary? It just seems odd.​

You would have to ask whatever spook created the name, which is probably impossible. Different agencies have different protocols when it comes to program and project naming conventions. However, one speculation I saw on Twitter proposed that immaculate refers to the quality of intelligence, and constellation refers to the "constellation" of intelligence platforms and programs associated with the program.

 

[MJF]

You would have to ask whatever spook created the name, which is probably impossible. Different agencies have different protocols when it comes to program and project naming conventions. However, one speculation I saw on Twitter proposed that immaculate refers to the quality of intelligence, and constellation refers to the "constellation" of intelligence platforms and programs associated with the program.

Well that makes some sense. Curiously, the Blessed Virgin Mary is connected to the constellation of Virgo (for obvious reasons). It made me wonder if someone was trying to draw attention to that constellation for some particular reason.

 

[mabar]

You would have to ask whatever spook created the name, which is probably impossible. Different agencies have different protocols when it comes to program and project naming conventions. However, one speculation I saw on Twitter proposed that immaculate refers to the quality of intelligence, and constellation refers to the "constellation" of intelligence platforms and programs associated with the program.

Clearly it's more about different agencies, different protocols, but... won't she realize that this makes it look -to say the least-ridiculous? ...is not a parody account, though.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1856804644275589603

 

[aragorn]

I watched the last half or so of the hearings yesterday, and the whole thing was somewhat underwhelming. Being realistic, I guess this is not a surprise, but the 'adventurous' side of me would've liked at least some 'bombshells'. Okay, maybe one of the bigger 'crackles' was the mentioning and sharing of the Immaculate Constellation thing. Maybe there were other biggies in the first half of the hearing that I missed, but based on posts on X on the topic this appears not to be the case.

The whole disclosure thing seems at times schizofrenic: we have these whistleblowers and promoters of disclosure who have worked in these secret groups, who write books and appear on hearings – but because they're restricted in what they can say because of sworn oaths of secrecy, we never get to the meat of the matter. They keep 'dancing around' the various details, and the whole thing gets nowhere. I do understand that peeps like Elizondo don't want to end up in prison or have his family threatened because of breaking his oaths, but the tiptoeing still appears unproductive, almost ridiculous.

 

[MJF]

I watched the last half or so of the hearings yesterday, and the whole thing was somewhat underwhelming. Being realistic, I guess this is not a surprise, but the 'adventurous' side of me would've liked at least some 'bombshells'. Okay, maybe one of the bigger 'crackles' was the mentioning and sharing of the Immaculate Constellation thing. Maybe there were other biggies in the first half of the hearing that I missed, but based on posts on X on the topic this appears not to be the case.

The whole disclosure thing seems at times schizofrenic: we have these whistleblowers and promoters of disclosure who have worked in these secret groups, who write books and appear on hearings – but because they're restricted in what they can say because of sworn oaths of secrecy, we never get to the meat of the matter. They keep 'dancing around' the various details, and the whole thing gets nowhere. I do understand that peeps like Elizondo don't want to end up in prison or have his family threatened because of breaking his oaths, but the tiptoeing still appears unproductive, almost ridiculous.

I know what you mean. I attach a link to part of Michael Shellenberger's testimony where he speaks of a white orb that surfaced off the coast of Kuwait and was filmed for 13 minutes. Wouldn't it have been great if he could have shown that film at the hearing. That would have ben a bombshell. See: MSN​

 

[MJF]

For what it is worth, I attach a pdf of the testimony of Mike Gold to the Congressional Committee. Gold served as the National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s (NASA’s) Associate Administrator for Space Policy and Partnerships, Acting Associate Administrator for the Office of International and Interagency Relations, and Senior Advisor to the Administrator for International and Legal Affairs. However, he made it clear that he was giving his evidence purely in a private capacity.​

See: https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Written-Testimony-Gold.pdf

Perhaps the fact that this follow-up hearing is even happening does serve a useful purpose in destigmatising the subject of UAP's since the hearing shows that it is now being taken more seriously, This in itself may encourage people to come forward who in the past would have stayed silent for fear of ridicule. Gold makes this point in his testimony:

The topic of UAP is often discussed in the context of national security and defense. This is certainly justifiable due the nature of the phenomena. However, it’s important to ensure that America’s and the world’s civil and commercial sectors are not left out of this importantdialogue. Agencies such as NASA have much to offer when it comes to understanding UAP, and this was a major finding of our IST report. However, before NASA, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), or the commercial space sector can effectively assist in resolving the UAP issue, we must first, as a nation, overcome the pernicious stigma that continues to impede scientific dialogue and open discussions.​

II. Combatting the Stigma

NASA is an agency that operates on data. Data is the lifeblood of NASA and science in general. Without data, nothing can be achieved. This is why the stigmatization of the UAP phenomena is so harmful. The stigma prevents scientific inquiry, the best tool that we have to understand anomalies, from being fully applied. For example, the NASA IST was fortunate to hear the testimony of Lt. Commander Alex Dietrich, a decorated fighter pilot (Bronze Star and Air Combat Medal) who encountered a UAP while conducting training exercises with the USS Nimitz Carrier Strike Group off the coast of California. Commandeer Dietrich was mocked by her colleagues, and the issue was ignored by her superiors, and the incident went years without any investigation. If not for the work of the Advanced Aerospace Weapon Systems Applications Program (AAWSAP), Commander Dietrich’s experience may have been lost to history. This is a prime example of how the stigmatization of UAP prevents the gathering of invaluable data that represents our best and only chance to understand the phenomena. For NASA, or any scientific organization to properly engage on the UAP topic, this stigma must be eliminated.

Just the fact that this hearing is taking place is helping to combat the stigmatization of UAP. Again, kudos to the Committee for tackling this topic, and the more hearings like this one that take place on Capitol Hill, the more free a wide variety of experts from government, academia, and the private sector will be to openly research and contribute to the understanding of UAP.

Small steps maybe but progress all the same.​

 

[tschai]

Here it is.

Also worth checking out:
Large pyramid triangle UFO videos 51 years apart. Commenters say its a triangle balloon: tetroon.

Thank you lilies- finally got a chance to watch it. Hard to tell what it is for sure, but definitely weird.

 

[tschai]

The pyramid thing was interesting as well- Love Josh Gates and George Knapp (I know some people have a lot of problems with those guys, but I find them entertaining and take away what I can from what they bring to the table) Let’s ask this guy and get his opinion.

 

[tschai]

View attachment 103604View attachment 103604View attachment 103604View attachment 103604The pyramid thing was interesting as well- Love Josh Gates and George Knapp (I know some people have a lot of problems with those guys, but I find them entertaining and take away what I can from what they bring to the table) Let’s ask this guy and get his opinion.

Sorry only one pic of grey was supposed to pop into my post. Still trying to get the hang of the media thing.