Imminent Alien Disclosure?

[Approaching Infinity]

I am working my way through the video gradually but does he explain at any point why this program was called 'Immaculate Constellation'. Is it a pun on the 'Immaculate Conception', a title linked to the Blessed Virgin Mary? It just seems odd.​

You would have to ask whatever spook created the name, which is probably impossible. Different agencies have different protocols when it comes to program and project naming conventions. However, one speculation I saw on Twitter proposed that immaculate refers to the quality of intelligence, and constellation refers to the "constellation" of intelligence platforms and programs associated with the program.

 

[MJF]

You would have to ask whatever spook created the name, which is probably impossible. Different agencies have different protocols when it comes to program and project naming conventions. However, one speculation I saw on Twitter proposed that immaculate refers to the quality of intelligence, and constellation refers to the "constellation" of intelligence platforms and programs associated with the program.

Well that makes some sense. Curiously, the Blessed Virgin Mary is connected to the constellation of Virgo (for obvious reasons). It made me wonder if someone was trying to draw attention to that constellation for some particular reason.

 

[mabar]

You would have to ask whatever spook created the name, which is probably impossible. Different agencies have different protocols when it comes to program and project naming conventions. However, one speculation I saw on Twitter proposed that immaculate refers to the quality of intelligence, and constellation refers to the "constellation" of intelligence platforms and programs associated with the program.

Clearly it's more about different agencies, different protocols, but... won't she realize that this makes it look -to say the least-ridiculous? ...is not a parody account, though.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1856804644275589603

 

[aragorn]

I watched the last half or so of the hearings yesterday, and the whole thing was somewhat underwhelming. Being realistic, I guess this is not a surprise, but the 'adventurous' side of me would've liked at least some 'bombshells'. Okay, maybe one of the bigger 'crackles' was the mentioning and sharing of the Immaculate Constellation thing. Maybe there were other biggies in the first half of the hearing that I missed, but based on posts on X on the topic this appears not to be the case.

The whole disclosure thing seems at times schizofrenic: we have these whistleblowers and promoters of disclosure who have worked in these secret groups, who write books and appear on hearings – but because they're restricted in what they can say because of sworn oaths of secrecy, we never get to the meat of the matter. They keep 'dancing around' the various details, and the whole thing gets nowhere. I do understand that peeps like Elizondo don't want to end up in prison or have his family threatened because of breaking his oaths, but the tiptoeing still appears unproductive, almost ridiculous.