In that measure, EMF is not the sole cause of this, but it does contribute to the idea that the "programming is complete", especially pairing that with the fact that there are more sources of EMF than ever before. The programming in part stops others from acquiring further knowledge, and muddies one's ability to critically think and see analog nuances, rather than a digital 0 or 1.
I think EMF can definitely be a factor, but I think it's secondary actually, I personally would probably place it far down the list below diet and mental hygiene for instance. Because if one's ability to see reality, seek truth or question one's thinking is a consequence of an external factor, then one doesn't really posses that internally to begin with, OSIT.
There will probably be a very big difference in how the instinct of self-preservation works for someone focused only on the physical body for physical survival and well-being than for someone who has an awareness of the soul and the associated responsibility to learn.
For example, some people, even though they know what the truth is, will deny it because it interferes with their career. You can't make money on the truth.
And some people change their attitude when they learn the truth although they will lose materially.
This is a very good point actually, because for one, there's a big difference in choosing compliance for a larger goal while being aware that one is being lied to, or that the reason they're asking one to be compliant is a lie, and believing the lie or choosing not to question the narrative and fall into compliance that way. A good example is mask wearing, one could wear It knowing it's a lie or one could wear it because one didn't question it. I think there's a huge difference.
On the first, one might look superficially much like everyone else, but it's a conscious choice of strategic action in order to attain an aim, feeding one's family, keeping one's job, etc. It's in these instances when not taking oneself so seriously goes a long way, and allowing oneself to loose a battle or two for the larger goals one may have, is achieved this way, being strategically adaptable.
On the second however, I think there's a lot of interesting phenomena going on, some individuals are simply authoritarian, and they will follow whatever the authority figure dictates, so.. fair enough. But there's another group who senses the deception, but just isn't willing, or isn't able to withstand the stress it implies, to go there, and separate themselves from the crowd, or feel isolated, or admit that the authorities are lying and all that it implies.
And I think that narratives not only set themselves in us at an intellectual level, there's an emotional component to it. And so do figures of authority, and I think that some people have an emotional entanglement with their leaders, or the notion of a leader and would rather look the other way than face the heartbreak that it would imply to catch them lying, for one, and to catch them hurting us.
And so, not that there's a need for masochism, because that can be just a pleasant psychological place for someone to ignore reality, but learning always hurts, and so one must have the capacity and the ability and the willingness to withstand some pain, very deep at times, in order to learn...and all of us are wired to avoid pain at all costs.
And as I type this, I realize that some of this is what's involved in what Andrew Lobaczewski called the Paramoralisms that take over a population of a Pathocracy... because people quickly go from "I do not wish to know I am being lied to/hurt/hurting someone" when evidence is easy enough to ignore, to "I do not care I am being lied to/hurt/hurting someone else" justifying an otherwise immoral act in the name of sustaining the narrative.
So, that's why it's such a tricky place to be, and no one can be brought there... each person needs to choose this by themselves, and test their own limits. Because we are wired in such a way, that we can bring ourselves to a place where we're willing to twist and sacrifice our values, in order to ignore reality for a little bit longer, like a snooze button. And I am sure that if we all looked hard enough, we'd all find parts of outlives where we've behaved just in such a way.
And the other thing that I wanted to add is related to something that Mark Twain is supposed to have said: "If you tell the truth, you don't have to remember anything".. which is probably not quite accurate, but you don't have to remember what you invented+the truth, and I seem to remember it being mentioned elsewhere that believing lies damages the brain, and I have always thought that it's related to that.. that is, the effort it takes to destroy information, or to conceal it and hide it.
I have sometimes thought that, perhaps, there's a brain physical structure that is harmonious with reality, and it flows as reality flows and when it is aligned with truth, or the sincere intent to approach life searching for it, it's a solid structure, like a tree. Believing lies, is like taking an axe to the branches of that tree and little by little destroying it, so the brain structure becomes fragmented... but it's just my own little theory.
Sorry for the lengthy post, hope the above made sense.
), in order to live in the present on a higher level of awareness, ie to see more of the unseen. So thank you everyone, who participated in this thread, so far. Hopefully there will be further additions.
More seriously, there is also something to that. Rigidity of thought is an impediment to continuous learning. In order to incorporate new information, some flexibility is required, where one revises old views and old information and contextualize them. This flexibility is paired to discipline, otherwise it's chaotic fluidity which leads to nonsense and total collapse. Rigidity of thought blocks new updates of information from the universe. When one clings to some temporary conclusion or certainty regardless of reality, there is no movement towards truth.
