Is the new strain of HIV related to the vaccination?

The question I have is the following: can one be declared to have AIDS with the 3 injections simply by the demonstration of a blood test showing a strong decrease of the immune system? In this case we can assume that it is not the HIV that has developed into AIDS via the injections but the strong decrease of lymphocytes without this being necessarily due to the disease (but that the media could say so).

Another question, could having sex with a person vaccinated 3 times without protection (I am talking about a person who had no sexually transmitted disease before the injections) be dangerous? Because if I go even further, would taking the risk of loving a vaccinated person become dangerous too? (this is quite a radical point of view and very divisive but I thought it was worth asking to discuss it)
 
The question I have is the following: can one be declared to have AIDS with the 3 injections simply by the demonstration of a blood test showing a strong decrease of the immune system? In this case we can assume that it is not the HIV that has developed into AIDS via the injections but the strong decrease of lymphocytes without this being necessarily due to the disease (but that the media could say so).
From what I had been understanding, yes. Both ways, awakening dormant HiV and decrease in the immune system. Not for everyone, I would like to asume.

Found this and, from what we had observed on the psycopath behavior government of Australia...

Coronavirus vaccine trials run by UQ and CSL abandoned due to false positive HIV results

And...
Version 2.0’ of UQ COVID-19 vaccine to start clinical trials in 2022
Speaking at an online scientific symposium on Friday, UQ Professor Paul Young said they were well down the road to developing a new version of their vaccine candidate, using the same molecular clamp technology.
Professor Young told the meeting that after the initial version 1.0 vaccine was abandoned in December 2020 because of cross-reactivity issues with HIV screening tests, he fully expected the international funding body that initially backed the research, to request he and his team move on to other projects.

However, in a Zoom call shortly after announcing to the world that they had failed in their initial push for an Australian-developed COVID-19 vaccine, the vaccine’s backers told him to go back and try again.
The UQ team had initially been backed by the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, a global partnership launched in 2017 to develop vaccines to stop future epidemics, and then partnered with pharmaceutical company CSL to manufacture the vaccine.

Version 1.0 had performed well in the initial clinical trials, giving well over 90 per cent coverage against the Wuhan strain of the virus, using a molecular “clamp” to hold a protein in a shape that mimicked part of the spike protein seen on the outside of SARS-CoV-2, which caused the body to make antibodies for the virus.
However, the actual clamp molecule used was sourced from the HIV virus because it was very effective and the researchers didn’t have time to look for a better candidate.

Although there was no risk of contracting HIV from the small molecule, it did set off HIV screening tests, something the researchers did not initially think would happen.

Professor Young said they briefly considered pressing forward with the vaccine anyway and using a work-around, but ultimately decided against it because the AstraZeneca and Pfizer vaccines were more advanced in their development.

“What tipped us over in the end was not wanting to cause vaccine hesitancy,” he said.


“And so the right decision was made at that particular time. Whether that was the right decision, given the fullness of time, I don’t know.

“But we’ve turned it around and found a successful alternative, so that we’re very pleased with, and we will progress with that.”

Professor Young said they had developed around 20 new versions of the vaccine, using a different molecule for the “clamp” used to hold the spike protein together.

He said they would be entering clinical trials in 2022, with work being done on animal models in the near future.

“Not surprisingly, we’re looking at a number of different variants including Delta, and the new clamp is working well,” he said.

Professor Young said he had been heartened by the massive outpouring of public support for the UQ vaccine project, both from the project’s commercial partner CSL, and the Queensland and federal governments, not to mention many private philanthropic investors.

Another question, could having sex with a person vaccinated 3 times without protection (I am talking about a person who had no sexually transmitted disease before the injections) be dangerous? Because if I go even further, would taking the risk of loving a vaccinated person become dangerous too? (this is quite a radical point of view and very divisive but I thought it was worth asking to discuss it)
It would be interesting to discuss it... Had been thinking as well in the unleash/promoting/favoring agenda gender ideology of the LGTBtcetera, with this particular issue.
 
Will be in Spanish, though.
#Invitation_to_seminar_on_HIV_and_vaccines 070222

Dear Akasha Community members:

I want to invite you to a talk I will be giving on Friday, February 11, at 6 pm (Central Mexico time) to talk about the relationship between HIV infections, AIDS and inoculations against COVID-19. It is a complex topic, with uncertainty, but for the good of the people and to maintain integrity in science, it must be addressed and discussed. The talk is entitled "The incredible, plausible and sad story of post-vaccine immunosuppression and the soulless narrative".

There will be question and answer session at the end. Hopefully the topic will be of interest to you and you will find the time to connect (it will be delivered live on facebook live; you do not need to have an account to watch it, just log in at the appointed time at Akasha Comunidad). It will be recorded and uploaded to Odysee for those who cannot connect.

I send you greetings and wish you a free and happy day, Karina AW

Translated with www.DeepL
 
A sidenote

I remember a snippet from older reportages and interviews (such as Dr Kary Mullis and Dr Duesberg) something regarding hiv testing: that when it was positive, doctors would then make T-Cell count. If low, you would be declared having developed AIDS.


Here comes a twist:

For example if you during the day take a wonderful long sunbath at the beach, and then would go to the doctor in order to get a T-Cell count test, it would show a ”too low” T-Cell count - and the diagnosis would be interpret as having AIDS. (Of course on the next day your T-Cell count would be back to normal)

Imagine the consequences of testing peope who are not aware (or doctors for that matter) of the pitfalls in such tests…

Like a coin with (at least) two sides.
 
Then there is this article posted originally here back in December 2020:

Does this mean that they "missed" this sign in other clinical trials... or perhaps ignored it?
 
Don't worry, I didn't misinterpret. Luc Montagnier is one a few whistle-blowers in the manuctured coronavirus hysteria.
My first thought was... I do wish Dr Montagnier would go a little bit further than "implying". Because, if anyone would know what an HIV looks like, it would be him! :lol: 🥇🥇🥇 He won a Nobel Prize for it..... The same one that Robert Gallo and Anthony Fauci tried to gazump him out of.
 
RFK Jr. makes a pretty strong case in his latest book that the HIV virus has little, or nothing, to do with 'full blown' AIDS. He doesn't say it explicitly but from the evidence he goes through it is, IMO, evident that while there might be in some cases a correlation between HIV and AIDS the causation has never been proved. From the passages in the book it appears that the most likely culprit for serious AIDS in the 1980's and 90's was the 'popper' drug used widely in the gay communities, and perhaps more significantly the lethal AIDS drug AZT that was promoted by the medical mafia.
Male to male sex, plus the 'popper' drug (a vasodilator) in the mix, made transmission of the HIV virus far more likely between partners. My question would be why would a different type of HIV (from the African one) turn up in the homosexual population in ... San Francisco? Was it by accident or design?

This was questioned also by Kary Mullis – he famously said that he tried for years to find any scientific study that would show evidence of the HIV-AIDS connection but he there was not one single study to be found. And, also, in RFK:s book he writes that Luc Montagnier also later retracted his view on the dangerousness of the HIV virus.
I think there was a link between HIV attacking the Helper T Cell. When the number of those Helper T cells got below a certain amount, the person was unable to mount an immune response to even the most benign and/or common of viruses and bacteria (and many of the uncommon ones, too). This became known as AIDS. I find it really interesting that the current Covid "vacca vacca" does the same thing to the immune system that HIV does (it wrecks it, among other things). So I wonder what it is doing to our Helper T Cells?
 
Male to male sex, plus the 'popper' drug (a vasodilator) in the mix, made transmission of the HIV virus far more likely between partners. My question would be why would a different type of HIV (from the African one) turn up in the homosexual population in ... San Francisco? Was it by accident or design?


I think there was a link between HIV attacking the Helper T Cell. When the number of those Helper T cells got below a certain amount, the person was unable to mount an immune response to even the most benign and/or common of viruses and bacteria (and many of the uncommon ones, too). This became known as AIDS. I find it really interesting that the current Covid "vacca vacca" does the same thing to the immune system that HIV does (it wrecks it, among other things). So I wonder what it is doing to our Helper T Cells?
I'll have to look this up, and I could be completely mistaken, but what I understood from RFK:s book was that the popper drug did something bad to the individuals' immune system but it was not directly caused by the HIV virus; AIDS didn't become prevalent in the gay community because the HIV virus was spreading but because those who got AIDS were all using poppers and then died mostly because they were described AZT.

As I said, I could have understood this uncorrectly, but I do suspect that the resurrection of modern 'HIV tests' and all the 'HIV talk' is a red herring meant to distract us, once again.
 
My first thought was... I do wish Dr Montagnier would go a little bit further than "implying". Because, if anyone would know what an HIV looks like, it would be him! :lol: 🥇🥇🥇 He won a Nobel Prize for it..... The same one that Robert Gallo and Anthony Fauci tried to gazump him out of.
Dr. Montagnier passed away yesterday at the age of 89 years old.😔
May he rest in peace.
 
It has been published on France Soir:


It's confirmed by the Director of Publication of France Soir:

"As Director of Publication, it was under my responsibility and an article was being written."


The MSM is totally silent.

"
Why the Gafam with the help of the media hide the death of Pr Montagnier?
When we search on Google, we come across a single false article from an obscure Mediamass newspaper.
Propaganda tries to destabilize us by creating an alternative truth. They lie to us!
"

 
Last edited:
During a movie break I let lose a search regarding death of Dr. Montagnier and found this interesting.

Sun May 09 2021

Medical professionals on the frontlines of the COVID-19 battle in this country should today pause just long enough to draw inspiration from a national hero whose pioneering work during another pandemic earned international acclaim.

Professor Courtenay Felix Bartholomew, a physician and medical researcher died yesterday at age 89, leaving behind a body of work that contributed significantly to advances in the diagnosis and treatment of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) which causes acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (Aids).

Not only did he diagnose the first case of Aids in the English-speaking Caribbean, but as founder and director of the Medical Research Foundation of T&T (MRFTT), Prof Bartholomew led HIV vaccine trials and research.

Prof Bartholomew was an associate of Dr Luc Montagnier who received the Nobel Prize in Physiology in 1983 for identifying the virus that causes Aids and then again in 2008, for his efforts in the fight against HIV and Aids.


PS: Click on the "Professor Trini" text who wrote the single comment under this articles to read some interesting comments by
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom