Is the new strain of HIV related to the vaccination?

Yep, and further control, they could then declare that this variant of HIV is not only more contagious but it's transmitted in other ways, like through the air or skin contact or whatever. If this catches on and falls on the hands of the "right" team, they could create a whole new wave of histeria that could last for years again.
Yes, and as it is highly plausible that one of the main agendas is to do a complete remake of health care (it's already well on its way), where your health is monitored 24/7 by 'wearables' and where AI is your 'doctor' that says what kind of medicine/vaccine you'll need, the HIV scare and its solution...a mRNA based HIV/AIDS vaccine, fits like a glove.

In one of the recent UK Column episodes they talked about this in length – giving examples of what they're now talking about at the NHS meetings. It's all about 'a new era of medicine and health care', 'precision medicine', 'constant health monitoring to "prevent" cancer...by detecting it earlier' etc. And now Bill Gates has come out with a new book in which he lays out his "solutions" so that, as he puts it, "pandemics will be a thing of the past". From what I heard, his "solutions" are exactly the same as above, some kind of AI driven technocratic precision medicine nightmare.

I've been thinking that maybe this is one of the reasons why 'they' don't mind anymore if the masses perceive that the Covid plandemic wasn't handled in the 'best possible' way. Because...tadaa(!)...we have the solution! We just need to ramp up the (health) survaillance and everything else even more, and pandemics will be a thing of the past! :cool2:
 
don't know if it's related or not, but I was told (don't have TV or radio to verify) that there's a new campain against AIDS here, something like "2022 without AIDS". That would be a funny coincidence indeed.
Prince Harry has jumped on that bandwagon as well during the HIV awareness week. A few days ago he said that that everyone should be tested for HIV . :rolleyes:

Interestingly, the lady that makes all kinds of videos about Harry and Meghan mentioned that former rugby England captain Gareth Thomas was 'pressured into' revealing that he is HIV positive in 2019. Thomas then went on to launch his HIV initiative in 2020. Plus, recently Lady Di's work in that field has been visited again by some media. All very timely. Thomas's claim is interesting, though. He said that he can't transmit HIV 'in any way, shape or form'.

The bit about HIV/AIDS begins @14.22 minutes:

 

A leading HIV researcher and at least five other delegates to a major AIDS conference are among the 298 people who died on board the Malaysia Airlines flight MH17, which crashed on 17 July. The Boeing 777 airliner was flying from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur when it was shot down by a surface-to-air missile over eastern Ukraine, killing all of those on board. The 20th International AIDS Conference is being held from 20 to 25 July in Melbourne, Australia. Exactly how many delegates were on board flight MH17 has yet to be confirmed. The International Aids Society (IAS), which is organizing the conference, initially believed dozens had perished, but has now revised this figure down to “at least six”.
I'm almost certain this is just a coincidence. ;-)

 
Prince Harry has jumped on that bandwagon as well during the HIV awareness week. A few days ago he said that that everyone should be tested for HIV . :rolleyes:
Oh lord, if I am not mistaken, one of the ways to test for HIV is the infamous PCR tests, which we know how reliable they are. If the vaccines had that adenovirus that could create false HIV positives, and at the same time are causing immunodeficiency due to their spike protein, then I can only imagine that HIV could turn into the new covid, with positive tests popping up all over the place in younger and younger people.

And, the thing with HIV that makes it different than Covid is that covid would either go away or kill you, HIV is more insidious a form of control and manipulation, as it requires a life long treatment for people with no symptoms, or perhaps their only symptom would be low immunity which they think would be caused by their HIV but that could be in reality be caused by the vaccines and their boosters and as such, if my present speculation is correct, they would have managed to create a problem and sell us the solution at a global scale.

Maybe I am jumping too far ahead, but the PTB have never managed to disappoint me.
 
There is a different take on AIDS triggered by vaccines on one of the non-mainstream science blogs (badly machine translated from Polish to English):
(...) In our opinion, there is a significant likelihood that anti-S antibodies (S1 / RDB) CAN bind to the CD4 T cell receptor or that - especially when multiple doses of vaccines are taken as a process of multiple immunization with the same antigen - see our previous article on TCR rearrangement into T lymphocytes and generation of aiCD4+ stimulating strong auto-immunogenic responses of CD8+ lymphocytes / CD4+ T lymphocytes may become auto-reactive towards their own CD4 protein, targeting themselves also by a CD8+ lymphocyte response.
If this is the case, even with the lower affinity of the antibody for these "smaller" epitopes, compensated by the higher titre of the anti-S antibody generated on the basis of vaccines, it cannot be ruled out without careful studies that also many doses of the vaccines lead to the elimination of CD4+ T cells and a situation similar physiologically to AIDS.
What a mess... :huh:

Oh lord, if I am not mistaken, one of the ways to test for HIV is the infamous PCR tests, which we know how reliable they are.
There are a lot of "home kits" that are designed to react with HIV antibodies. I'm wondering how those tests will work against anti-S antibodies, especially in recently boosted persons (from the article above):
(...) homologies between the S protein and HIV proteins can cause SARS2 antibodies to react with HIV proteins (gp120 and / or gp41), which in itself would not even be a bad thing and would increase the resistance to HIV of people who have been infected or have taken the vaccine also due to the same molecular mimicry which would correspond to the cross-reactions between SARS2 and HIV proteins - it is possible that one of the epitopes from this "multi-epitope peptide vaccine" which - theoretically - is bS, triggers antibodies (ABS) destructive CD4+ T cells.
 
Last edited:
And in the article above, you can read following sentence:

While the World Health Organization (WHO) 🤮 has given HIV an “epidemic” status, many argue that it should be called a “pandemic” because of the millions of people worldwide living with HIV.

“We shouldn’t give up on the last pandemic [HIV] just because we’re fighting the COVID-19 pandemic,” said Smith. “So I really applaud the investigators for looking at new technology to come up with an HIV vaccine, one that we still haven’t gotten even after almost 40 years of trying.”

There is an embedded link which, refers to another article from 6 July 2021 called "Why aren't diseases like HIV and malaria, which still kill millions of people a year, called pandemics ?" - written by Peter Sands. 🧐
Peter Sands is the executive director of the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria based in Geneva, Switzerland.

Wikipedia lists him as "Peter Sands (banker)" and...
Peter Alexander Sands (born 8 January 1962) is a British banker, and the executive director of the Global Fund to fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria. He was the chief executive (CEO) of Standard Chartered from November 2006 to June 2015.

Well, isn't that just quaint:

Hello, World Economical Forum 🤮 WHO 🤮 Pandemic 🤮 renewed HIV 🤮 under the (V)AIDS umbrella 🤮, new mRNA HIV vaccines 🤑, banking 🤑 WEF 🤮, Global Fund 🤑 Probably another City of London lackey, to keep the hidden power structure intact (as was spoken about in the Grand Jury, Day 1 proceeding about "Historical Background" in which the City of London plays a major roll in the global whereabouts.

Peter_Sands_-_World_Economic_Forum_on_East_Asia_2009.jpg

mRNA HIV "vaccines" ?

I wonder - if the hiv is an endogenous retrovirus, dormant as a part of our human genome.... then adding a couple of mRNA HIV vaccines together with it's toxic nanolipids and probably some PEG in it, too... wouldn't that interfere with our genome, and/or create strange reactions ? And let's say that it is part of our genome somehow - and now you disrupt that balance ... Wouldn't the immune system potentially misfire or activate other endogenous viral interferences ? :umm:

And science has not even managed to eliminate the toxicity of ANY nano particles to the human body... Not to mention the other ingredients, like the negative charged nanolipids, which are extremely oxidative to any cell (which get damaged and often commit suicide) - but on a scale of million to billion cells (creating huge amounts of cell debris, which the immune system also can misfire against).

Frankly; I can only see Pandora's Box further being opened in anything that has to do with mRNA / genetic altered "vaccines".
 
Oh lord, if I am not mistaken, one of the ways to test for HIV is the infamous PCR tests, which we know how reliable they are. If the vaccines had that adenovirus that could create false HIV positives, and at the same time are causing immunodeficiency due to their spike protein, then I can only imagine that HIV could turn into the new covid, with positive tests popping up all over the place in younger and younger people.

And, the thing with HIV that makes it different than Covid is that covid would either go away or kill you, HIV is more insidious a form of control and manipulation, as it requires a life long treatment for people with no symptoms, or perhaps their only symptom would be low immunity which they think would be caused by their HIV but that could be in reality be caused by the vaccines and their boosters and as such, if my present speculation is correct, they would have managed to create a problem and sell us the solution at a global scale.

Maybe I am jumping too far ahead, but the PTB have never managed to disappoint me.
It's all about who owns the companies supplying the 3 gene snippets used as the PRIMERS.

Which PCR matches up and copies these 'PRIMERS' and gives a positive within a certain threshold of copy runs (cycles)

Three primers are used to try and not get false positives. 3/3

The sequences should be mostly unique to the pathogen, but DNA is very generic. It's only 4 bases: AGCT and the primer code length 10-12

basically if one bought up the right companies, you could set whatever primers you wanted. Roche for example
 
It's all about who owns the companies supplying the 3 gene snippets used as the PRIMERS.

Which PCR matches up and copies these 'PRIMERS' and gives a positive within a certain threshold of copy runs (cycles)

Three primers are used to try and not get false positives. 3/3

The sequences should be mostly unique to the pathogen, but DNA is very generic. It's only 4 bases: AGCT and the primer code length 10-12

basically if one bought up the right companies, you could set whatever primers you wanted. Roche for example
And if you had two or three, you'd have positive results for as long as they're needed.
 
I don't think it has been posted here (sorry if I mistaken). Isn't it "funny" ?

As 'funny' - or weird - as this? Maybe HIV isn't as profitably as Covid?
 
As 'funny' - or weird - as this? Maybe HIV isn't as profitably as Covid?
Covid vaccine you can make people take multiple times, similar to flu vaccine. I'm not sure HIV vaccine can be that way and I'm not sure they can mandate it either really.
 
So today my work announced they are supplying at-home HIV test kits to the citizens of the Province free of charge .... plot thickens

Wonder what primer is used to give a positive. Who owns the testing company and if it's just a cover for the incoming autoimmune shitstorm
That's random, I mean within the context of the current discussion it is probably expected and understandable, but it's also random.

Though I suppose it is also the next step in getting inside people's minds and attempt to control their behavior in even deeper and more intimate ways. First it was covid and who do you hang around with, given how HIV is transmitted, now they're trying to invade the space of "who are you intimate with?". It's truly insidious.
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom