Is the new strain of HIV related to the vaccination?

If their intention is to mount a covid2 operation with HIV, they can manipulate information. Now that people are familiar with things like variants and the need for a test to know if one is sick, a narrative an be built around some flimsy notions. Millenials a promiscuous, HIV travels through toilets (they said that about covid as well), a new variant of HIV that can be transmitted magically if you don't wear a mask, etc. With all the stupid things they have invented so far, they can be tempted to invent even stupider things.
Also, they established the vaccine religion, and the idea that taking a "vaccine" for an illness one is not likely to contract is pro-science, no matter what the heretics say.
 
This is a video. captured and archived by two English brothers from Yorkshire, their father was a sheep farmer, they have not drank the cool-aid, and winding their way to a real fresh drink, called reality, They are very humorous, an only and English person, somewhat knowledgeable concerning the English dialect can understand, but they make me want to laugh my socks off, especially their pronunciation. hey have a trove of videos, fromn he past, I suggest checking out the site, for those interested.

This is the website Podcasts – Sheep Farm

The reason for this post is an old video from 2009 House of numbers discussing the inaccuracy and methodology of AIDs, testing, the same inability can be applied to our current situation. Many faces from the past are have emerged in our lives today to give "Scientific: advice on our current pandemic.

Aptly named IMO House by Numbers

 
This is a video. captured and archived by two English brothers from Yorkshire, their father was a sheep farmer, they have not drank the cool-aid, and winding their way to a real fresh drink, called reality, They are very humorous, an only and English person, somewhat knowledgeable concerning the English dialect can understand, but they make me want to laugh my socks off, especially their pronunciation. hey have a trove of videos, fromn he past, I suggest checking out the site, for those interested.

This is the website Podcasts – Sheep Farm

The reason for this post is an old video from 2009 House of numbers discussing the inaccuracy and methodology of AIDs, testing, the same inability can be applied to our current situation. Many faces from the past are have emerged in our lives today to give "Scientific: advice on our current pandemic.

Aptly named IMO House by Numbers


This was an interesting video on HIV diagnostic testing. It flirts a little bit toward the end with the theory that HIV doesn't exit (although lots interviewed do not share that view), but otherwise a lot of the criticisms about cross-reactivity, low specificity (i.e. inverse false positive rate), and the extent to which demographic and epidemiological assumptions about the prevalence of HIV in certain populations influence how test results are interpreted. For example, if you are gay or live in a poor inner city, a rapid antigen test is considered sufficient to declare you HIV positive; whereas if you lived in an affluent environment and tested positive, you would be advised to ignore it on the basis that HIV prevalent is low. Different criteria used between countries also mean that an ELISA or Western Blot test interpreted in the UK will diagnose someone with a different HIV status than if the same raw data was interpreted in the USA. Interesting stuff.
 
Here is a translation of a speech given by Luc Montagnier a few weeks before his death:

Nobel Laureate Luc Montagnier: the non-vaccinated will save humanity

Professor Luc Montagnier, French virologist and Nobel laureate, said that the non-vaccinated will save humanity. Here is his speech in full, which was delivered at protests against the health pass in Italy this weekend. He was welcomed like a hero in Milan.

by Rrose Sélavy
January 19, 2022

"There are images, also extraordinary for me, of small bacteria even in the intestine, which are full of viruses. And it's a battle between bacteria and viruses, which must be defeated even with proper diet and hygiene. It is not only the vaccine that will cure it, but it is the combination of treatments that will eliminate this disease. There has been a huge strategic mistake, something has been synthesized and isolated, a huge strategic mistake.

Contrary to what was said at the beginning, these vaccines do not protect absolutely, and that comes slowly. This is scientifically recognized by all today.

I ask all my colleagues to absolutely stop vaccinating with this type of vaccine.

Doctors today are perfectly aware of what I am saying, and therefore they must intervene immediately because the future of humanity is at stake. Many countries have abandoned treatments, there are not only vaccines, there are drugs that have not been used and that work very well, like antibiotics.

It depends on you, especially on you who are not vaccinated, to save humanity tomorrow. Only the non-vaccinated can save the vaccinated.


Vaccinated people who, in any case, will contact the medical centers to be saved.

We must avoid listening to and giving voice to those who have no right to do so and let science speak. I repeat: it is the unvaccinated who can save humanity.

At the beginning, the big pharmaceutical companies were very interested in vaccines for economic reasons.

The research is still going on, and I and my whole team are still researching this virus. The research does not stop, we are not there yet. Man will win if he focuses on the law of nature and only on that. Every citizen is free and must also follow political ideas, take advantage of the next elections to express your opinion.

What would I say to a young person of today? You must absolutely act, each of you, and find the truth hidden behind the lies. Long live freedom.

Translated with DeepL
 
If their intention is to mount a covid2 operation with HIV, they can manipulate information. Now that people are familiar with things like variants and the need for a test to know if one is sick, a narrative an be built around some flimsy notions. Millenials a promiscuous, HIV travels through toilets (they said that about covid as well), a new variant of HIV that can be transmitted magically if you don't wear a mask, etc. With all the stupid things they have invented so far, they can be tempted to invent even stupider things.
Also, they established the vaccine religion, and the idea that taking a "vaccine" for an illness one is not likely to contract is pro-science, no matter what the heretics say.
Two years ago I would have said that there's absolutely no way that what you're describing would come to pass because it's so ridiculous that no one would buy it at all, but here we are today and I am not so certain and hopeful in common sense any longer.

Covid restrictions are being dropped the world over, slowly sure, but they do seem to be preparing people for a summer of "back to normal" and that does have me wondering if this HIV will be the sequel.

Here is a translation of a speech given by Luc Montagnier a few weeks before his death:
Thanks for sharing Pierre, that was short and sweet but rather inspiring.
 
I recognize that many in this thread are fully aware of the terms and what they mean, but just for the sake of nailing things down for clarity...


AIDS = Acquired ImmunoDeficiency Syndrome

This is an umbrella term! Not a single-cause ailment.

It describes the condition where a body's ability to deal with bio-pathogens is degraded to the point where any garden variety bug has free reign and can move through a host without opposition. "Acquired" means you didn't start out in this poor state of affairs, but that your life and times took you through enough toxic experiences of one sort or another to wear down your defenses. It should be repeated that, logically speaking, there needn't be any assumed single cause. Doctors observe you, "This poor subject's immune system is a sorry mess!", and can accurately tick off the AIDS box on your chart with a clear conscience regardless of whatever it was that brought you coughing and miserable to their office.


HIV = Human Immunodeficiency Virus

I noted with interest that one definition I found while searching for the correct spelling happened to pluralize and display the word "Viruses" rather than "Virus". An accurate, albeit, uncommon assessment. -HIV is another umbrella term which could (and should) be attributed to any virus which attacks white blood cells and/or other critical components of the immune system.

This is important!


The general public has a strong tendency, baked right into their operating system, to mythologize complicated ideas into easily digestible nuggets in order to create an efficient means of understanding and navigating reality.

This is not a bad thing for the most part; we live and breathe stories for a reason. -They are an extremely efficient means of not getting eaten by tigers, of responding appropriately to bad actors, bad weather, bad food, bad mating practices, bad.., everything. They tell us how to live successfully, healthily, how to socially interact for best outcomes. Stories are a way to communicate real experiences which one individual might have had, sharing the fruits of that knowledge across entire cultures, effectively inoculating an entire species against danger through the use of abstract ideas. It's bloody brilliant! Rats and cows and bugs and trees don't have the cognitive hardware for abstract thinking, so story-telling isn't an option, but humans come pre-installed with the capability.

The problem is...

Mythology deals exclusively in the spectrum of broad generalizations rather than specific details. It fails when it comes to the transmission of granular information, and worse, our technological society has learned about itself and how to subvert this particular form of communication in order to propagate false knowledge.

When it comes to populations making informed decisions about medicine or other complicated technologies, Story Telling and Mythology are woefully ill-equipped for the job.

The result is that most people are walking around with brochure level understandings of medicine.

And again, for the sake of clarity...

When I say, "brochure level understandings", I am referring to those colorful card stock pamphlets we see stacked next to cash registers and on doctor's waiting tables, designed to be freely picked up by any person pausing for a moment in their day. The text and images in a brochure are meant to be absorbed quickly, the brochure author knowing that they will have, on average, about three seconds to hook a potential reader's attention, and once hooked, can count on no more than twenty or thirty seconds of actual focus. The message has to hit fast, hard and stick. With luck, the brochure might make it to a second reading by the genuinely curious and find itself posted on a refrigerator door, but in general, the information is uniformly of a particular quality.

A well-designed brochure attempts to engage those parts of the reader's brain which compute quickly, connect to pre-existing mythology nuggets, "cartoonifying" complex subjects down to actionable ideas.

Most medical narratives sold to the public, while not necessarily presented on glossy card stock, work in this same manner. They come in the form of Stephen Colbert jokes and (cringe) song & dance numbers. They come in sound bites and Twitter riffs, bus shelter posters and political slogans.

In that sphere of mythological thinking, the terms, "AIDS" and "HIV" become single entities with pseudo personalities, cartoon villains, (actual characters drawn with eyeballs in some cases!), which can be effectively plugged into other ideas to create false deductive outcomes, which then proceed into actions in the real world.

The problem is that even when otherwise diligent people sit down to really crank through the available information on a subject in an effort to divine Objective Reality, oftentimes, without their noticing, these mythological constructs will manage to slip through their cognitive filters along with real facts and completely derail what might otherwise be effective thinking.

"The HIV virus might have mutated..." Whups! What do you mean, "THE virus? Which one? Are you referring to the fake virus upon which the AIDS epidemic was pinned and which was really just a normal part of the cellular communication system? Or are there some other species of bug out there which actually attack white blood cells and which can be transmitted between hosts? What are we talking about here?"



In summation...

When the public is hit with a tsunami of HIV/AIDS related propaganda, we can expect them to respond with cartoon thinking. They will believe that there is a one malignant virus which causes AIDS. The truth is granular and complicated. There may be some bugs out there which can be transmitted and which do harm to elements of the immune system. The covid vaccines (and other toxins) may have done damage to the immune system and thus open people up to broad spectrum infection, resulting in a generalized condition which will be labeled "AIDS".

As with a great deal of mythology, the responses people have to a message of warning are often wired tightly into our concepts of MORALITY and INJUSTICE, and how those social responses might be best adapted to counter the dangers.

The result is that people will naturally gravitate towards the use of non-scientific solutions to problems which, paradoxically, emerged from scientific exploration.

-All of which most of us know already.

I just wanted to really pin it down. Crystalize it, so to speak..
 
Last edited:
The way we viewed AIDS when I was a kid was that it was a 'condition' whereas an individual becomes susceptible to become ill when in contact with any pathogen, even a pathogen that would not normally make one sick without this condition. If the injections destroy the immune system in certain individuals, the term VAIDS ("Vaccine"-induced Acquired Immuno-Deficiency Syndrome) is indeed appropriate, regardless of the internal mechanisms leading to the condition.
 
I just wanted to mention that now the "Protect the ones you love, get tested for HIV" ads have started to pop everywhere now... I do think that we're about to enter a new stage of whatever shenanigans they're preparing for us.
 
I wonder if the percentage of people who will develop AIDS is increasing due to the negative FRV the world has been subjected to in the past few years. HIV propaganda has scared a lot of people and has also ruined many lives due to inaccurate tests, destructive medication, social stigma, etc. The resurgence of this virus is resurrecting traumatic collective memories, which the PTB enjoy manipulating.

I can't even imagine the emotional shockwave that the world will experience once the soul-smashing truth comes out.
I would be interested to know if the figures have changed, seeing as the C's said this 26 years ago. Maybe the advent of the Covid vacca-vacca will change the percentage of people getting AIDs? We already know that it's likely that this "vaccine" has a negative effect on the immune system.... just like HIV.
 
In case someone was wondering how vaccines can trigger positives in test for other pathogens:
View attachment 55310
That is interesting, and it makes sense actually. They took a snapshot in time of a virus that evolves rapidly, and what they did with it was to use it to modify the immunity on people going forward via a vaccination. It's like they took a vehicle that is designed to respond to the road ahead and taught it to only turn left, to only respond in one way to every single thing out there.

That would create complications with any other virus or bacteria out there.

It's like giving Alzheimers disease to our immune system, it forgets its own language and how it dealt with daily life. It's tragic.

Now, it is also true that this hasn't happened to a large degree, considering the vaccine incidence the world over, or maybe it's about to happen, but given the amount of things we encounter as a species daily, it really hasn't had as large an impact as it could have, though it may be a matter of time.

But I was reminded of what has been said elsewhere about the effect that believing lies has on your being. Beyond the very physical act of potentially harming yourself with an experimental vile, there's also the psychological and emotional aspect of doing something not only ignoring its dangers, but indeed believing it to be the complete opposite of what it actually is.

it sounds a lot like lying to yourself and lies are destructive no matter where, and in terms of information and structure in our bodies, the very act of believing a lie and lying to ourselves can be far more destructive to our entire being. And some of these diseases, might be related to that, we're destroying or renouncing to the informational structure of our immune systems.

Then there's the poetic tragedy of cardiac issues, and this is just a funny observation, it's like some of the people who have had these terrible results are quite literally heart broken at the betrayal perpetrated by their own selves.

Just a few thoughts that occurred to me.
 
The result is that most people are walking around with brochure level understandings of medicine.
we're destroying or renouncing to the informational structure of our immune systems.
I just wanted to highlight these phrases because together they kind of explain how ignorance is used to destroy our health (and maybe have always been used to manipulate and destroy...)
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom