Israel-Palestine War: Hamas Breaks Out of Gaza, Israel Responds With Genocide

Power Outages Across Israel Traced to Production Fault Amid Cyber Attack Fears​

Production Fault, not Cyber Attack
The Israel Electric Corporation clarified that the cause of the outages was not a cyber incident but a production fault. They explained that the shutdown of two power production units led to load shedding, which resulted in the outages. The National Cyber Directorate echoed this explanation, confirming that no cyber incident had been recognized.



Israel has possibly the best cyber army to prevent attacks of this type. If they happen, it is because they want them to happen.
 
IOF message is clear, terrorize the Palestinians and the world in the same sending, they still do not realize that they also send messages to the univers, I would like to believe that they universe will not be condescending. Apparent justice, I just want them to stop. 😕

‼️FIELD EXECUTIONS, MASS DETENTIONS.


Alarming footage of Israeli forces turning a stadium in Gaza into a mass detention camp. The video shows the detention of hundreds of civilians, including women, elders, and BABIES.


@EuroMedHR has confirmed that the Israeli forces are carrying out field executions against civilians in Gaza after forcibly removing them from displacement centers and stripping them.

Edited a word
 
Last edited:
Douglas Murray just makes my blood boil. What a condescending, self-righteous, psychopathic liar.

Cenk didn't do a good job of representing the Palestinian cause, but at least his conscience is still intact.

Make sure you have a barf bag in case you decide to put yourself through this ordeal.

 
@Ðekel , just wanted to thank you for explaining better in the last three pages of this thread. I think I understand better now. I was one of the ones who took your posts as "propaganda", but now that you have stated your position, it's clear.

And in reply to your question, I think that it's not worth it to go to protests and such if it can put you at risk. Because you can help others who are asking only if you stay alive and safe. And you may be in a very interesting position to do so, if ever needed. FWIW.

As for being witnesses when effects aren't noticeable, that has been one of our lessons, yes. You start off hoping for a change, and then, you sit back and enjoy the show, as the Cs say. From our perspective, it's not what I'd call "enjoyable", but I get their meaning. And, at levels that we aren't always aware off, it does make a difference when we do our best to See. So, it's not wasted, just because we can't take direct action.

Just as example, 15 years ago hardly anyone knew about psychopathy or ponerology. Nowadays, that knowledge has spread quite a lot, and people still write to us saying how much that helped them understand the world, their lives, themselves, etc. So, it's just a "grain of salt" in an ocean of lies, but you never know how many ripples that will create. I may be too optimistic, but that gives me hope. Not for the whole of humanity, and not even for particular nations who have a specific path and their own lessons, as sad as it is to witness it. But in the sense that it shows there IS some free will, and that if we put the information out there, those who wish to align themselves with it, and are in a position to do so, will.
 
As for being witnesses when effects aren't noticeable, that has been one of our lessons, yes. You start off hoping for a change, and then, you sit back and enjoy the show, as the Cs say. From our perspective, it's not what I'd call "enjoyable", but I get their meaning. And, at levels that we aren't always aware off, it does make a difference when we do our best to See. So, it's not wasted, just because we can't take direct action.
Thank you for this @Chu

The part I bolded is my lesson now. Sometimes I have glimpses of the "sit back" part but as you stated, not the "enjoy the show" part.

It's hard to sit back when we see that things need to drastically and quickly be done. But it has become obvious that this is fighting fire with fire.

Whenever the canons and such are brought out we try to get out of dodge, but of course they corral the crowd before shooting.

I have been steering clear of the crowded / areas that can be fenced off recently.

Sometimes it feels as though the "little" picture and the big picture don't mesh. Sort of like Relativity and quantumn mechanics
 
Every time I hear some US politicians talk, what comes to mind is the saying "those whom the gods want to destroy, they first make them mad" (paraphrasing). I think the assassination of the Iranian general falls within the provocation of Iran (like the bombing of Syria and Lebanon) to push the US and its vassals into a war on Iran. Maybe (speculation) they have something in mind for their final solution in Gaza, Palestine or the Levant in general that requires the eyes of the world looking towards Iran rather than towards Palestine.
 
@Ðekel , just wanted to thank you for explaining better in the last three pages of this thread. I think I understand better now. I was one of the ones who took your posts as "propaganda", but now that you have stated your position, it's clear.

Same here, thank you for explaining, @Ðekel.

But also, the fact that we cannot actually stop the murder and bloodshed sort of takes the bite out of taking a stand against it.

Taking a stand against any injustice and genocide does not necessarily mean that we have to be out in the streets. I think it starts first by fiercely opposing it in our hearts and then by finding creative ways to add "our voice" to the message being broadcasted by others who feel the way we do. We add to the frequency we want to send out, so to speak. When I share and like on social media, for example, I feel as if I am fighting against the disinformation war with comrades, encouraging each other to go on, sharing little glimpses of hope, helping each other feel we are not alone. And especially in Israel, the people who feel the way you do are probably more in need of this support than anyone else. You will know best who needs it the most, I am only aware of the Break the Silence group.

So social media sharing and support, writing, videos, poetry, art, music, etc, each can be a little string connecting with all the others from all over the world to carry our message out in the cosmos. And even if our "little" has no directly visible effects on what is going on, our message to the universe is clear. And then it's up to the universe to do the rest, to do what's best, in all its wisdom. In the end, even if nothing came out of it, we can look back and feel that we did the best we could, we stood with truth and all that is human and courageous and beautiful and good, and we can watch our life review in the afterlife with a clearer heart.

But I am pretty sure that something always comes out of it.

I hope this helps inspire you a bit. :flowers:
 
Speculation:

Several reasonable commentators have recently said that the Israeli experiment is over. That there is no way what today is called “Israel” can remain in the middle east. Leaving quickly or slowly, but they cannot remain in the region.

If so…, where do they go?

One commentator said, there has always been a location in Russia called the Jewish Autonomous region that they could go to, and many of “the Israeli citizens” have dual citizenship, so they could disperse to their “other” country. Or better put, “return” to their country of origin.

Since the problem is likely hiding in the Zionist-club, the baddies could simply switch their jerseys and hide in another culture, flag or religion. And…Hey! I hear Argentina has just become available. Why not go there? A whole new continent to molest.

The people they are hiding among now, could simply be thrown to wolfs to take the blame.

Switching jerseys is not unprecedented remember the Marrano’s secretly infiltrating the Catholic church in the 1400s? I believe it was the Marrano’s the sailed with Columbus and started what we call today Mexico.


"What is the Jewish autonomous region?"

"In 1934, the Jewish Autonomous Oblast was formed in the Russian Far East to show that, like other national groups in the Soviet Union, Russian Jews could receive a territory in which to pursue cultural autonomy in a socialist framework."

Marranos is one of the terms used in relation to Spanish and Portuguese Jews who converted or were forced by the Spanish and Portuguese crowns to convert to Christianity during the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, but continued to practice Judaism in secrecy or were suspected of it, referred to as Crypto-Jews.

When Hernando Cortes conquered the Aztecs in 1521, he was accompanied by several Conversos, Jews forcibly converted to Christianity during the Inquisition of 1492. Conversos, or Anusim, immigrated en masse to La Nueva Espagna (present day Mexico) and some estimate that by the middle of the 16th century, there were more of these crypto-Jews in Mexico City than Spanish Catholics.
One of the most famous Marrano Jews of modern times was Pope Paul VI (family name Montini). He was expelled from Rome in the 1950's by Pope Pius XII for conducting secret negotiations with communist leaders without Vatican approval, after Pius XII was tipped off by the CIA. Pope Pius famously said he would never be made a cardinal over his dead body, which is what then happened. When Pius XII was succeeded by the more liberal John XXIII, Montini was called back to Rome and made a cardinal, later succeeding Pope John as Pope Paul VI. He would preside over the disastrous Second Vatican Council in the 1960's and would introduce under his own papal authority a completely new rite of Mass in the vernacular in 1970. Why mention any of this? Well when he promulgated this new rite of Mass, he did so by choosing to wear the Ephod, the vestments of a Jewish High Priest. To this day, I have never found an explanation for why he did this. I can only think he was deliberately signalling a connection to his Marrano Jewish ancestors. Given the poisonous fruits of Vatican 2, which continue to this day with the current incumbent of the see of Peter throwing his lot in with the New World Order and the United Nations, I can only think he was taking some sort of revenge for the Inquisition and the forced conversion of his ancestors.

Let us not forget that an English London Times reporter in Russia during the Russian Revolution reported that 90% of the Bolshevik leadership were Jewish. So, is it really surprising that "In 1934, the Jewish Autonomous Oblast was formed in the Russian Far East to show that, like other national groups in the Soviet Union, Russian Jews could receive a territory in which to pursue cultural autonomy in a socialist framework."

Then there was the strange case of Lord Northcliffe (Alfred Charles William Harmsworth) who was that aforementioned reporter's boss*, since he part owned The London Times as well as owning the entirety of the influential British Daily Mail newspaper. He was avowedly anti-Zionist and opposed to the Balfour Declaration. He would mysteriously fall ill shortly after his visit to Palestine in 1921 leading to his eventual death in August 1922, which proved to be a critical loss for Palestinians seeking supporters in the British press. It has been argued, however, that Northcliffe's editorial attacks on the Balfour Declaration would have gained more weight had they also spread to The Times but presumably he did not have the same degree of editorial control over The Times as he did over the Daily Mail.

*Northcliffe was also the boss of the author and commentator Douglas Reed who wrote the Controversy of Zion, a book that has been mentioned before on this Forum and is well worth reading.

Northcliffe met with and was much influenced by Jacob Israël de Haan (31 December 1881 – 30 June 1924) a Dutch Jewish literary writer, lawyer and journalist who emigrated to Palestine in 1919, and was assassinated in Jerusalem in 1924 by the Zionist paramilitary organization Haganah for his anti-Zionist political activities. Ironically de Haan had started out as an enthusiastic Zionist supporter but changed his mind after living in Palestine among the Arabs.
This is a description of de Haan prior to his departure for Palestine:

In 1919, two years after the Balfour Declaration, this Poet of the Jewish Song took the next logical step and emigrated to Palestine "anxious to work at rebuilding Land, People and Language" as De Haan put it to Chaim Weitzman in his application for a passport. The same letter assumed his stance with aplomb. False modesty was never one of his faults... De Haan wrote: "I am not leaving Holland to improve my condition. Neither materially, nor intellectually will life in Palestine be equal to my life here. I am one of the best poets of my Generation, and the only important Jewish national poet Holland has ever had. It is difficult to give up all this."... The Palestine De Haan entered on a bitter stormy winter day in January 1919 was above all an intricate country. Arguably it had the most confusing political conditions of that politically complicated moment when the Versailles Peace Conference was about to begin. One might call it a natural habitat for this cranky man. It was the "twice promised country," to the Arabs in the Arab Revolt T. E. Lawrence existentialised in The Seven Pillars of Wisdom, and to the Jews (or rather in practice the Zionists) by the Balfour Declaration calling for the creation of a "Jewish homeland". De Haan arrived there as an ardent, even fanatical, Zionist. Indeed, the first secret Zionist report about him refers to his ranting anti-Arab remarks made at a party...​

De Haan wrote extensively on the subject of Eretz Israel and Zionism even before he moved there in 1919, when he settled in Jerusalem teaching at a new law school, the Jerusalem Law Classes, established by the Government of Palestine in 1920, and sending articles to the Algemeen Handelsblad ("General Trade Journal"), one of the most important Dutch daily newspapers, and the De Groene Amsterdammer ("The Green Amsterdam Weekly"), a liberal weekly.

De Haan rapidly became more religiously committed. He was angered by Zionist refusals to cooperate with the Arabs.

At first he aligned himself with religious Zionism and the Mizrachi movement, but after meeting Rabbi Yosef Chaim Sonnenfeld, leader of the ultra-conservative Haredi Jewish community, he became the political spokesman of the Haredim in Jerusalem and was elected political secretary of the Orthodox community council, Vaad Ha'ir. De Haan endeavoured to get an agreement with Arab nationalist leaders to allow unrestricted Jewish immigration into Palestine in exchange for a Jewish declaration forgoing the Balfour Declaration.

The secular Zionist establishment would not allow the established Haredi community in Palestine to be represented in the Jewish Agency in the 1920s. In response, the Haredim founded a branch of the Agudath Israel political organisation in Jerusalem to represent their interests in Mandate Palestine. The leader of the Haredi Jews in Palestine at the time, Rabbi Yosef Chaim Sonnenfeld, chose de Haan to organise and represent the Haredi position as their foreign minister, on a diplomatic level equal to that of the secular Zionists. When Lord Northcliffe, a British publisher, was about to visit the Middle East, De Haan went to Alexandria, Egypt to present the case of Palestine's Haredim before he reached Palestine:​
He spoke about the tyranny of the official Zionist movement. The journalists of the Northcliffe party gleefully reported all that back home. As a result of this contact, De Haan was appointed correspondent for the Daily Express, a one-penny paper that made much of everyday scandals. Already in Dutch circles he was the reputed volksverrader, traitor of his own people, and now his views spread throughout Great Britain and its Global Empire. Although his messages were short and few compared to his articles in the Handelsblad (the news from the Middle East in the Daily Express was more concerned with the mysteries of the tomb of Tutankhamun in the Valley of the Kings in Egypt than with the intricate Palestine politics) the Zionist authorities both in Palestine and London became very worried. There was a great potential danger from these critical reports from a Jew who actually lived and worked right on this hot spot.
De Haan, speaking on behalf of Agudath Israel, even opposed the British authorities allocating separate benefits to the Zionist-led Yishuv.

In August 1923, De Haan also met in Amman with the Hashemite leader Emir Hussein bin Ali, and his son, Emir Abdullah, the future king of independent Transjordan, seeking their support for the Old Yishuv (the pre-Zionist Jewish community in the Holy Land), explaining the Haredi Jewish opposition to the Zionist plans of founding a state, and supporting the establishment of an official Palestinian state within the Emirate of Transjordan as part of a federation. De Haan made plans to travel to London in July 1924, with an anti-Zionist Haredi delegation to argue against Zionism.

As part of his anti-Zionist activity, De Haan was just about to leave for London when he was assassinated in Jerusalem by the Haganah on the early morning of 30 June 1924. As he exited the synagogue at the Shaare Zedek Hospital on Jaffa Road, Haganah member Avraham Tehomi, who was dressed in white, approached him and asked him for the time, then shot him three times and ran away from the scene. De Haan died minutes later.

For more see: Jacob Israël de Haan - Wikipedia

Another source mentions that Lord Northcliffe’s Daily Mail published a series of articles in 1923 that presented a hitherto uninformed British readership with details of official promises made to the Arabs in 1915-16 of post-war independence for Palestine in exchange for their support in the struggle against the Ottoman Empire in the Middle East, something that London later reneged on. In 2015, historian William Mathew published a book consisting of this series of articles from the Daily Mail of 1923.

These articles by the journalist Joseph Jeffries, a former war correspondent who had recently undertaken his own investigations in Palestine, appraising the government`s pro-Zionist policies, are vivid in their documentation, wit, and argumentative power, and have now been published in edited, annotated form by the Institute for Palestine Studies, Washington D.C., under the title The Palestine Deception, 1915-1923. The McMahon-Hussein Correspondence, the Balfour Declaration, and the Jewish National Home .

For more on this see: The Palestine Deception, 1915-1923, by William Mathew - Balfour Project
Jeffries` commentary opens tersely, going straight to fundamentals:

“Palestine to-day presents perhaps one of the finest opportunities which have ever been given to a British Government for repentance, even if that repentance be only for the deeds of its immediate predecessors in office [the Lloyd George Coalition, 1916-22], who erred greatly. When , in the course of the war, our late Cabinet had to decide what should be the fate of the Holy Land, and especially what part Great Britain was to play in there, surely only one course was open to them. That was to be just and straightforward; to determine that at least on that sacred soil each word they uttered bear nothing but its plain meaning, and each act be done for no other reason than the reason they openly gave. What they did was the exact opposite”.

It was demonstrably a fact, he wrote, that the only territorial exclusions McMahon outlined in his proposals to Hussein were the lands to the west of a Syrian line joining Aleppo in the north through Homs and Hama to Damascus in the south (roughly coterminous with present-day Lebanon, and north-west Syria), where there were large Christian and Druze communities as well as developing French imperial concerns. It was Britain`s particular wish, McMahon wrote, “to act without detriment to the interests of her Ally, France”. Hussein disliked these exceptions, pointing out that the people in question were Arab for the most part, but in the end agreed that this north-western corner of the Levant could form no part of the independent polity.

What particularly scandalised Jeffries was that the British colonial secretary, Winston Churchill, in his White Paper of June 1922, had casually asserted that Palestine also lay to the west of the Aleppo-Damascus line, on the specious grounds that a so-called vilayet of Ottoman Damascus had run all the way down to the Red Sea. In short, virtually the entire Mediterranean coast seemed now to be excluded. “Get an atlas of your own out”, Jeffries instructed. “There is no vilayet of Damascus; it does not exist! Naturally, it is not to be found in the McMahon text; if you read you will see the word used is `district` (moukataa in the Arabic). As in English, it is a word of loose general meaning, with the sense of the immediate surroundings of a city….A pretty position for a British Minister. He had invented a province and invented a territory….And the word of England?…In the waste-paper basket…”.

I should point out here that Winston Churchill was a great supporter of Zionism, perhaps not surprising really since his mother Lady Randolph Spencer-Churchill (née Jennie Jerome), was Jewish and he was also friends with another leading Zionist supporter, the American financier Bernard Baruch (a man who would claim during a Congressional hearing in the 1950's that he was the most powerful man in the United States of America, which to some extent was collaborated by then President Dwight D. Eisenhower who when opening a park named after Baruch's father declared that Baruch was the man to whom he owed everything, as he had taken a young 'birdshot' Colonel under his wing and made him into the President of the USA).

Given that Churchill did probably more than anyone else to destroy the British Empire that he supposedly so admired and wished to preserve, betraying a group of Arabs in Palestine would be small beer by comparison. It would also sit well with his later betrayal as British Prime Minister of the Government of Poland in exile and King Peter of Yugoslavia. So the Arabs of Palestine find themselves in good company. Yet somehow the Churchill myth still survives since as recently as 2002 he was voted by a BBC poll of the British people as the 'Greatest Briton' who ever lived.​
 
Same here, thank you for explaining, @Ðekel.



Taking a stand against any injustice and genocide does not necessarily mean that we have to be out in the streets. I think it starts first by fiercely opposing it in our hearts and then by finding creative ways to add "our voice" to the message being broadcasted by others who feel the way we do. We add to the frequency we want to send out, so to speak. When I share and like on social media, for example, I feel as if I am fighting against the disinformation war with comrades, encouraging each other to go on, sharing little glimpses of hope, helping each other feel we are not alone. And especially in Israel, the people who feel the way you do are probably more in need of this support than anyone else. You will know best who needs it the most, I am only aware of the Break the Silence group.

So social media sharing and support, writing, videos, poetry, art, music, etc, each can be a little string connecting with all the others from all over the world to carry our message out in the cosmos. And even if our "little" has no directly visible effects on what is going on, our message to the universe is clear. And then it's up to the universe to do the rest, to do what's best, in all its wisdom. In the end, even if nothing came out of it, we can look back and feel that we did the best we could, we stood with truth and all that is human and courageous and beautiful and good, and we can watch our life review in the afterlife with a clearer heart.

But I am pretty sure that something always comes out of it.

I hope this helps inspire you a bit. :flowers:
I concur. Think of the 'butterfly effect' where a butterfly flaps it wings and later a tornado occurs in some far off location.

In chaos theory, the butterfly effect is the sensitive dependence on initial conditions in which a small change in one state of a deterministic nonlinear system can result in large differences in a later state. This effect was even graphed by mathematician and meteorologist Edward Norton Lorenz and yes, the result even looks like a butterfly.

1703607191865.png

A plot of Lorenz's strange attractor for values ρ=28, σ = 10, β = 8/3. The butterfly effect or sensitive dependence on initial conditions is the property of a dynamical system that, starting from any of various arbitrarily close alternative initial conditions on the attractor, the iterated points will become arbitrarily spread out from each other.​
 
The above is found in Arabic and uploaded on December 18, 2023. After machine, translation, the title of the 40+ minute recording is:
President al-Assad’s speech on political matters during a meeting of the Central Committee of the Arab Socialist Baath Party
Here is a translation of other sections, done by MEMRI, YouTube link. What they write about the video, has a summary and transliteration, along with screenshots:
Syria | Special Dispatch No. 11030
December 20, 2023

Syrian President Bashar Al-Assad said that the Jews "who came to Palestine," are pagan converts from Khazars, and not the People of Israel, in a December 18, 2023 speech posted on Syrian Arab news Agency on YouTube. He said that there is no evidence that six million Jews died in the Holocaust and that the Nazis did not employ a special method of torture or killing for the Jews, who were killed just like other victims of World War II. Al-Assad continued to say that the Holocaust was "politicized" and used as a false pretext to transfer the Jews from Europe to Palestine. He also claimed that America was the one who supported the rise of the Nazi in Germany between the world wars.

To view the clip of Syrian President Bashar Al-Assad, click here or below:
[...]
President Bashar Al-Assad: "Most of us do not know that the rise of Nazism between the two world wars happened with American support. The question on everybody's mind is: 'How is it that despite the German collapse and European constraints, Nazism was allowed to rise and build an army?' It was done with American support, money, loans, and investments.
[...]

"There is no evidence that six million Jews were killed [in the Holocaust]. Perhaps there were holocausts, nobody denies this.
[...]
"True, there were concentration camps, but what shows you that this is a politicized issue, and is not a humanitarian issue, and is not real, how come we talk about these six millions, and not the 26 million Soviets who were killed in that war? Are those six millions more precious? The same acts were everywhere. There was no method of torture or killing specific to the Jews. The Nazis used the same method everywhere. However, this issue was politicized, in order to falsify the truth, and later to prepare for the transfer of the Jews from Europe to other areas, or [rather] to Palestine.
[...]
"The Jews who came to Palestine are Khazar Jews, from east of the Caspian Sea. They were pagans who converted to Judaism in the eighth century. They emigrated to Europe, and from there, came to this region. They have nothing to do whatever with the [ancient] people of Israel."

As could be expected, the statements from Assad met with opposition. Below is an example from i24NEWS
i24NEWS is an international 24-hour news television channel located in Jaffa Port, Tel Aviv, Israel.[1] It broadcasts in French, English, and Arabic. The English channel offers a weekly broadcast in Spanish, as well. The channel's owner is Patrick Drahi, and the CEO is Frank Melloul.
Patrick Drahi is an example of someone who is Israeli, not because he lives there or has more than mythical roots in the area.
Patrick Drahi (French pronunciation: [patʁik dʁai]; Arabic: باتريك دراحي; Hebrew: פטריק דרהי; born 20 August 1963) is an Israeli billionaire magnate and investor with interests in media and telecoms.[1] A former French citizen,[1] he has been living in Switzerland since 1999.[2] He is the founder and controlling shareholder of the European-based telecom group Altice, listed on the European Euronext Stock Exchange and Patrick Drahi also owns 24.5%[3] of BT Group.

Drahi was born in Casablanca, Morocco to a Jewish family. When he was 15 years old, the family moved to Montpellier, France.[4] His parents are both maths teachers. Drahi has an engineering degree from École Polytechnique in Paris, and a post-graduate degree in optics and electronics from Télécom Paris.[5][6]
Here is what i24News writes:
Syrian President Assad denies Holocaust and accuses U.S. of funding Nazis in controversial speech
i24NEWS
December 20, 2023 at 03:09 PM latest revision December 20, 2023 at 03:18 PM
Assad misrepresented the scale of the Holocaust and dismissed the specificity of the atrocities committed against the Jewish population

In a speech earlier this week, Syrian President Bashar Assad made shocking and baseless claims, denying the Holocaust and accusing the United States of funding the German Nazi party.
The video of the speech, translated and published by the Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI), reveals Assad telling a crowd that 'there is no evidence that six million Jews were killed during the Holocaust.'

Assad questioned the politicization of the Holocaust issue, arguing, "True, there were concentration camps, but what shows you that this is a politicized issue, not a humanitarian one and not a real one, is that we talk about these six million, but why don’t we talk about the 26 million Soviets who were killed in that war? Are the six million more precious?"

This post can't be displayed because social networks cookies have been deactivated. You can activate them by clicking Manage Preferences.
While acknowledging the loss of life among the Soviets during World War II, Assad misrepresented the scale of the Holocaust and dismissed the specificity of the atrocities committed against the Jewish population.

Further delving into conspiracy theories, Assad asserted that the Holocaust issue was politicized to falsify the truth and prepare for the transfer of Jews from Europe to other areas, specifically to Palestine. He contended 'that modern Jews have no connection to the people of Israel' and suggested the debunked theory that modern Jews are descended from the Khazars, a Turkic people from Eastern Europe and Central Asia.

The international community has long recognized the Holocaust as a historical fact,
and Holocaust denial is widely condemned.

He claimed during his speech riddled with historically inaccurate lies that, "there was no specific method of torture or killing specific to the Jews. The Nazis used the same methods everywhere."

Assad goes on to publicly and inaccurately question, “How was it that despite the German collapse and European constraints, Nazism was allowed to rise and build an army? It was done with American support, money, loans and investments.”
The agency refers to "international community" and "historical fact". It is up to the reader to decide whether it is worthwhile investigating some of the assertions more closely. Below are some attempts

Assad and the origin of the Jews now living in Israel
The origin of the Jews living in Israel is more complicated, as revealed by the significant number of posts on the forum that mention Khazar, Khazars, and Khazaria. Other topics are Ashkenazi, Sephardic, Mizrahi.
Here are some links to articles about different groups:
Understanding the Sephardi-Ashkenazi Split from www.huffpost.com
5 surprising differences between Ashkenazi and Sephardic Jews from jewishunpacked.com
Poland – Ashkenazim with Sephardic ancestry? from sephardicgenealogy.com
Ashkenazi, Sephardic, and Hasidic Jews: What’s The Difference? (Explained) from allthedifferences.com
Ashkenazic and Sephardic Jews from www.jewfaq.org
Ashkenazic And Sephardic Jewry from www.jewishhistory.org
Ashkenazi and Sephardic Jews from www.chabad.org
They have this information box:
  • There are several subgroups of Jews with different culture and traditions:
  • Ashkenazic: Descendants of Jews from France, Germany and Eastern Europe
  • Sephardic: Descendants of Jews from Spain, Portugal, North Africa and the Middle East
  • Mizrachi: Descendants of Jews from North Africa and the Middle East
  • Other subgroups are Yemenite, Ethiopian and Oriental
For comparison, here are the Wikis to Ashkenazi Jews. Sephardic Jews, Mizrahi Jews, Mizrahi Jews in Israel, Ashkenazi Jews in Israel. His short generalization about the origins of the Jews living in Israel does not hold, though elements may have merit, at least many people with Jewish faith but with mixed origins were convinced, also by the Holocaust narrative to go to Israel.

The Holocaust
The Wiktionary has:
The noun is derived from Middle English holocaust (“burnt offering”) [and other forms],[1] from Anglo-Norman holocauste, Old French holocauste, olocauste (modern French holocaust), from Late Latin holocaustum, from Ancient Greek ὁλόκαυστον (holókauston), the neuter form of ὁλόκαυστος (holókaustos, “wholly burnt”), from ὅλος (hólos, “entire, whole”) (ultimately from Proto-Indo-European *solh₂- (“whole”)) + καυστός (kaustós, “burnt”) (from καίω (kaíō, “to burn, burn up”); further etymology uncertain, possibly from Proto-Indo-European *keh₂w-).[2][3]
Noun[edit]
holocaust
(plural holocausts)
  1. (religion) An offering or sacrifice to a deity that is completelyburned to ashes. [from 13th c.] coordinate term ▲hypernym ▼quotations ▼Coordinate term: moirocaust
  2. (by extension)
    1. (religion, also figuratively) A complete or large offering or sacrifice. synonym ▲quotations ▼Synonym: hecatomb
    2. Complete destruction by fire; also, the thing so destroyed. quotations ▼
    3. (figuratively)
      1. Extensive destruction of a group of animals or (especially) people; a large-scalemassacre or slaughter. quotations ▼
        a nuclear holocaust
      2. Alternative letter-case form of Holocaust (“the systematicmass murder (democide or genocide) of Jews (and, more broadly, of disabled people, homosexuals, Romanis, Slavs, and others) perpetrated by NaziGermany shortly before and during World War II”); hence, the state-sponsored mass murder of a particular group of people in society. [from 20th c.]
Usage notes[edit]
  • According to the Oxford English Dictionary,[2] use of the word Holocaust to refer to the mass murder of Jews by Nazi Germany dates back to 1942. By the 1970s, “the Holocaust” was often synonymous with the Jewish exterminations. This use of the term has been criticised because it appears to imply that there was a voluntary religious purpose behind the Nazi actions, which was not the case from either the perspective of the Nazis or the victims. Hence, some people prefer the term Shoah, which is Hebrew for “catastrophe”.
The search string on the Forum gives the first 200 hits, and that is since 2022. Alternatively one can search for Holocaust, in the title only and that gives more than 30 threads, though not all are dedicated to the Jews that died. There are at least two Wikis The Holocaust (only Jews) and Holocaust victims include more. The first has the standard 6 million, which appeared after WWII as an unassailable number. This put Jews at the top of the official victims list:

Estimates of victims
VictimsMurderedSource
Jews6 million[1]
Gentiles (non-Jews)
Soviet civilians4.5 million[2]
Soviet POWs3.3 million[3][1]
Poles1.8 million[4][5][1]
SerbsMore than 310,000[6][7]
Disabled people270,000[8]
Romani250,000–500,000[1][9]
Freemasons80,000[10][11]
Slovenes20,000–25,000[12]
Homosexuals5,000–15,000[13]
Spanish Republicans3,500[14]
Jehovah's Witnesses1,700[1][15]
Total17 million
Again, this can be supplemented by comparing with all loss of life. From World War II casualties
1703356664540.png

In both Germany and Japan there were significant civilian losses, many German and Japanese civilians were caught in firestorms. This was said to be from Dresden:
1703602818523.png
1703602749871.png
An empire rose on their charred bodies and ashes, but was this necessary to win the war? On the other hand, given such a tradition, no wonder what Israel is doing in Gaza has the support of the Western Victors of WWII.

Western Allies Terror-bombed 70 German Cities by 1945
The Ardennes Offensive, beginning in December 1944, would not have been possible had Allied leaders directed their pilots more regularly towards bombardment of German industrial plants, communication signals and transportation lines.

Instead, from 1940 British and later American airmen were ordered to implement “area bombing”; in plain English, the destruction of cities and residential areas which entailed, as was known, the deaths of noncombatants like women, children, along with the elderly. This was a particular brand of Anglo-Saxon warfare, which had prior agreement in the highest levels of Allied government circles.

Shortly after becoming Britain’s prime minister in May 1940, Winston Churchill had said,
“this war is not against Hitler or National Socialism, but against the strength of the German people, which is to be smashed once and for all, regardless of whether it is in the hands of Hitler or a Jesuit priest”.
By the spring of 1945, Allied aircraft had terror-bombed a remarkable 70 cities across Germany – killing around 600,000 of the Reich’s civilians, the majority of whom were mothers and children, coupled with those too old to fight – along with destroying countless hospitals, schools and historical buildings. In contrast, the Luftwaffe’s Blitz of Britain killed less than 10% of the above total, about 40,000 people.

Of the 70 German cities firebombed, 69 of them endured the obliteration of 50% or more of their urban areas.
What Churchill says about the Germans is interesting. Was his wish fulfilled or does it continue to this day in another form: Biden's attack on Nord Stream pipelines was aimed at Germany - Seymour Hersh

The Wiki for Strategic bombing has:
The development of the B-29 gave the United States a bomber with sufficient range to reach the Japanese home islands from the safety of American bases in the Pacific or western China. The capture of the Japanese island of Iwo Jima further enhanced the capabilities that the Americans possessed in their strategic bombing campaign. High-explosive and incendiary bombs were used against Japan to devastating effect, with greater indiscriminate loss of life in the firebombing of Tokyo on March 9–10, 1945 than was caused either by the Dresden mission, or the atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima or Nagasaki. Unlike the USAAF's strategic bombing campaign in Europe, with its avowed (if unachievable) objective of precision bombing of strategic targets, the bombing of Japanese cities involved the deliberate targeting of residential zones from the outset. Bomb loads included very high proportions of incendiaries, with the intention of igniting the highly combustible wooden houses common in Japanese cities and thereby generating firestorms.[54][55][56][57]

The final development of strategic bombing in World War II was the use of nuclear weapons. On August 6 and 9, 1945, the United States exploded nuclear bombs over Hiroshima and Nagasaki, killing 105,000 people and inflicting a psychological shock on the Japanese nation. On August 15, Emperor Hirohito announced the surrender of Japan, stating:
Moreover, the enemy has begun to employ a new and most cruel bomb, the power of which to do damage is indeed incalculable, taking the toll of many innocent lives. Should We continue to fight, it would not only result in an ultimate collapse and obliteration of the Japanese nation but also it would lead to the total extinction of human civilization. Such being the case, how are We to save the millions of Our subjects; or to atone Ourselves before the hallowed spirits of Our Imperial Ancestors? This is the reason why We have ordered the acceptance of the provisions of the Joint Declaration of the Powers.
Following the link to Bombing of Tokyo (10 March 1945)
On the night of 9/10 March 1945, the United States Army Air Forces (USAAF) conducted a devastating firebombing raid on Tokyo, the Japanese capital city. This attack was code-named Operation Meetinghouse by the USAAF and is known as the Great Tokyo Air Raid in Japan.[1] Bombs dropped from 279 Boeing B-29 Superfortress heavy bombers burned out much of eastern Tokyo. More than 90,000 and possibly over 100,000 Japanese people were killed, mostly civilians, and one million were left homeless, making it the most destructive single air attack in human history. The Japanese air and civil defenses proved largely inadequate; 14 American aircraft and 96 airmen were lost.
The site, Civilian casualties of strategic bombing, has a list of towns, and the number of civilians killed. Next to some, it says firestorm, which is a general concept, that covers both natural and manmade causes including firebombing. To get an idea of how firebombing developed:
In the early days of bombing our notion, like that of the Germans, was to spread an attack out over the whole night, thereby wearing down the morale of the civilian population. The result was, of course, that an efficient fire brigade could tackle a single load of incendiaries, put them out, and wait in comfort for the next to come along; they might also be able to take shelter when a few high explosives bombs were dropping. ... But it was observed that when the Germans did get an effective concentration, ... then our fire brigades had a hard time; if a rain of incendiaries is mixed with high explosives bombs there is a temptation for the fireman to keep his head down. The Germans, again and again, missed their chance, as they did during the London blitz that I watched from the roof of the Air Ministry, of setting our cities ablaze by a concentrated attack. Coventry was adequately concentrated in point of space, but all the same, there was little concentration in point of time, and nothing like the fire tornadoes of Hamburg or Dresden ever occurred in this country. But they did do us enough damage to teach us the principle of concentration, the principle of starting so many fires at the same time that no firefighting services, however efficiently and quickly they were reinforced by the fire brigades of other towns could get them under control.

— Arthur Harris[3]
To give an idea of what Arthur Harris meant with his reference to Hamburg and Dresden can be found in the Wiki on Firestorm:
The incendiary effects of a nuclear explosion do not present any especially characteristic features. In principle, the same overall result with respect to destruction of life and property can be achieved by the use of conventional incendiary and high-explosive bombs.[55] It has been estimated, for example, that the same fire ferocity and damage produced at Hiroshima by one 16-kiloton nuclear bomb from a single B-29 could have instead been produced by about 1,200 tons/1.2 kilotons of incendiary bombs from 220 B-29s distributed over the city; for Nagasaki, a single 21 kiloton nuclear bomb dropped on the city could have been estimated to be caused by 1,200 tons of incendiary bombs from 125 B-29s.[55][56][57]

It may seem counterintuitive that the same amount of fire damage caused by a nuclear weapon could have instead been produced by smaller total yield of thousands of incendiary bombs; however, World War II experience supports this assertion. For example, although not a perfect clone of the city of Hiroshima in 1945, in the conventional bombing of Dresden, the combined Royal Air Force (RAF) and United States Army Air Forces (USAAF) dropped a total of 3441.3 tons (approximately 3.4 kilotons) of ordnance (about half of which was incendiary bombs) on the night of 13–14 February 1945, and this resulted in "more than" 2.5 square miles (6.5 km2) of the city being destroyed by fire and firestorm effects according to one authoritative source,[58] or approximately 8 square miles (21 km2) by another.[30]

In total about 4.5 kilotons of conventional ordnance was dropped on the city over a number of months during 1945 and this resulted in approximately 15 square miles (39 km2) of the city being destroyed by blast and fire effects.[59] During the Operation MeetingHouse firebombing of Tokyo on 9–10 March 1945, 279 of the 334 B-29s dropped 1,665 tons of incendiary and high-explosive bombs on the city, resulting in the destruction of over 10,000 acres of buildings—16 square miles (41 km2), a quarter of the city.[60][61]

In contrast to these raids, when a single 16-kiloton nuclear bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, 4.5 square miles (12 km2) of the city was destroyed by blast, fire, and firestorm effects.[47] Similarly, Major Cortez F. Enloe, a surgeon in the USAAF who worked with the United States Strategic Bombing Survey (USSBS), said that the 21-kiloton nuclear bomb dropped on Nagasaki did not do as much fire damage as the extended conventional airstrikes on Hamburg.[62]
In short, Assad is right in considering that the holocaust included more than Jews, especially the losses to those that sacrificed the most against those that killed the Jews, and that was the Soviet Union. But many others were burned too by those who now support the bombing of Gaza, like the US.

America helped the Nazis?
Without going into details, Assad is not wrong in indicating that the rise of Germany, after WWI also, was helped along by American financial interests. At least initially, it was good business, at least for a few. Below are some links:

New revelations shed light on Nazi roots of House of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha
How Americans supported and inspired the Nazis
The fascinating history of eugenics
1920s eugenics exhibit reveal the elitist mindset
Holocaust 2.0: Eugenics and the War on Terror
There is also this book, perhaps even more interesting:
51 Documents: Zionist Collaboration With the Nazis

Assad's claims about the Jews, the Holocaust, and America are risky if he wanted to cozy up to the West, but he does not, and what has he got to lose, given that the Syrian Golan Heights are occupied by Israel, that Syria is bombed frequently by the same country, and partly occupied in the north and east, from where the most valuable resource areas for oil are controlled by American aligned forces that carry off the oil for no cost, justifying it as a matter of promoting western freedom and democracy, though President Trump was a bit more honest. Assad sees it probably as his duty to protect Syria, and its people, and prepare them for what might come, whether he will be with them or not. He chooses to steel his people, hoping they will not suffer the same fate, as the people in Gaza.
 
The above is found in Arabic and uploaded on December 18, 2023. After machine, translation, the title of the 40+ minute recording is:
President al-Assad’s speech on political matters during a meeting of the Central Committee of the Arab Socialist Baath Party
Here is a translation of other sections, done by MEMRI, YouTube link. What they write about the video, has a summary and transliteration, along with screenshots:



As could be expected, the statements from Assad met with opposition. Below is an example from i24NEWS

Patrick Drahi is an example of someone who is Israeli, not because he lives there or has more than mythical roots in the area.

Here is what i24News writes:

The agency refers to "international community" and "historical fact". It is up to the reader to decide whether it is worthwhile investigating some of the assertions more closely. Below are some attempts

Assad and the origin of the Jews now living in Israel
The origin of the Jews living in Israel is more complicated, as revealed by the significant number of posts on the forum that mention Khazar, Khazars, and Khazaria. Other topics are Ashkenazi, Sephardic, Mizrahi.
Here are some links to articles about different groups:
Understanding the Sephardi-Ashkenazi Split from www.huffpost.com
5 surprising differences between Ashkenazi and Sephardic Jews from jewishunpacked.com
Poland – Ashkenazim with Sephardic ancestry? from sephardicgenealogy.com
Ashkenazi, Sephardic, and Hasidic Jews: What’s The Difference? (Explained) from allthedifferences.com
Ashkenazic and Sephardic Jews from www.jewfaq.org
Ashkenazic And Sephardic Jewry from www.jewishhistory.org
Ashkenazi and Sephardic Jews from www.chabad.org
They have this information box:

For comparison, here are the Wikis to Ashkenazi Jews. Sephardic Jews, Mizrahi Jews, Mizrahi Jews in Israel, Ashkenazi Jews in Israel. His short generalization about the origins of the Jews living in Israel does not hold, though elements may have merit, at least many people with Jewish faith but with mixed origins were convinced, also by the Holocaust narrative to go to Israel.

The Holocaust
The Wiktionary has:


The search string on the Forum gives the first 200 hits, and that is since 2022. Alternatively one can search for Holocaust, in the title only and that gives more than 30 threads, though not all are dedicated to the Jews that died. There are at least two Wikis The Holocaust (only Jews) and Holocaust victims include more. The first has the standard 6 million, which appeared after WWII as an unassailable number. This put Jews at the top of the official victims list:

Estimates of victims
VictimsMurderedSource
Jews6 million[1]
Gentiles (non-Jews)
Soviet civilians4.5 million[2]
Soviet POWs3.3 million[3][1]
Poles1.8 million[4][5][1]
SerbsMore than 310,000[6][7]
Disabled people270,000[8]
Romani250,000–500,000[1][9]
Freemasons80,000[10][11]
Slovenes20,000–25,000[12]
Homosexuals5,000–15,000[13]
Spanish Republicans3,500[14]
Jehovah's Witnesses1,700[1][15]
Total17 million
Again, this can be supplemented by comparing with all loss of life. From World War II casualties
View attachment 88279

In both Germany and Japan there were significant civilian losses, many German and Japanese civilians were caught in firestorms. This was said to be from Dresden:
View attachment 88444
View attachment 88443
An empire rose on their charred bodies and ashes, but was this necessary to win the war? On the other hand, given such a tradition, no wonder what Israel is doing in Gaza has the support of the Western Victors of WWII.

Western Allies Terror-bombed 70 German Cities by 1945
The Ardennes Offensive, beginning in December 1944, would not have been possible had Allied leaders directed their pilots more regularly towards bombardment of German industrial plants, communication signals and transportation lines.

Instead, from 1940 British and later American airmen were ordered to implement “area bombing”; in plain English, the destruction of cities and residential areas which entailed, as was known, the deaths of noncombatants like women, children, along with the elderly. This was a particular brand of Anglo-Saxon warfare, which had prior agreement in the highest levels of Allied government circles.

Shortly after becoming Britain’s prime minister in May 1940, Winston Churchill had said,
“this war is not against Hitler or National Socialism, but against the strength of the German people, which is to be smashed once and for all, regardless of whether it is in the hands of Hitler or a Jesuit priest”.
By the spring of 1945, Allied aircraft had terror-bombed a remarkable 70 cities across Germany – killing around 600,000 of the Reich’s civilians, the majority of whom were mothers and children, coupled with those too old to fight – along with destroying countless hospitals, schools and historical buildings. In contrast, the Luftwaffe’s Blitz of Britain killed less than 10% of the above total, about 40,000 people.

Of the 70 German cities firebombed, 69 of them endured the obliteration of 50% or more of their urban areas.
What Churchill says about the Germans is interesting. Was his wish fulfilled or does it continue to this day in another form: Biden's attack on Nord Stream pipelines was aimed at Germany - Seymour Hersh

The Wiki for Strategic bombing has:
The development of the B-29 gave the United States a bomber with sufficient range to reach the Japanese home islands from the safety of American bases in the Pacific or western China. The capture of the Japanese island of Iwo Jima further enhanced the capabilities that the Americans possessed in their strategic bombing campaign. High-explosive and incendiary bombs were used against Japan to devastating effect, with greater indiscriminate loss of life in the firebombing of Tokyo on March 9–10, 1945 than was caused either by the Dresden mission, or the atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima or Nagasaki. Unlike the USAAF's strategic bombing campaign in Europe, with its avowed (if unachievable) objective of precision bombing of strategic targets, the bombing of Japanese cities involved the deliberate targeting of residential zones from the outset. Bomb loads included very high proportions of incendiaries, with the intention of igniting the highly combustible wooden houses common in Japanese cities and thereby generating firestorms.[54][55][56][57]

The final development of strategic bombing in World War II was the use of nuclear weapons. On August 6 and 9, 1945, the United States exploded nuclear bombs over Hiroshima and Nagasaki, killing 105,000 people and inflicting a psychological shock on the Japanese nation. On August 15, Emperor Hirohito announced the surrender of Japan, stating:
Moreover, the enemy has begun to employ a new and most cruel bomb, the power of which to do damage is indeed incalculable, taking the toll of many innocent lives. Should We continue to fight, it would not only result in an ultimate collapse and obliteration of the Japanese nation but also it would lead to the total extinction of human civilization. Such being the case, how are We to save the millions of Our subjects; or to atone Ourselves before the hallowed spirits of Our Imperial Ancestors? This is the reason why We have ordered the acceptance of the provisions of the Joint Declaration of the Powers.
Following the link to Bombing of Tokyo (10 March 1945)
On the night of 9/10 March 1945, the United States Army Air Forces (USAAF) conducted a devastating firebombing raid on Tokyo, the Japanese capital city. This attack was code-named Operation Meetinghouse by the USAAF and is known as the Great Tokyo Air Raid in Japan.[1] Bombs dropped from 279 Boeing B-29 Superfortress heavy bombers burned out much of eastern Tokyo. More than 90,000 and possibly over 100,000 Japanese people were killed, mostly civilians, and one million were left homeless, making it the most destructive single air attack in human history. The Japanese air and civil defenses proved largely inadequate; 14 American aircraft and 96 airmen were lost.
The site, Civilian casualties of strategic bombing, has a list of towns, and the number of civilians killed. Next to some, it says firestorm, which is a general concept, that covers both natural and manmade causes including firebombing. To get an idea of how firebombing developed:
In the early days of bombing our notion, like that of the Germans, was to spread an attack out over the whole night, thereby wearing down the morale of the civilian population. The result was, of course, that an efficient fire brigade could tackle a single load of incendiaries, put them out, and wait in comfort for the next to come along; they might also be able to take shelter when a few high explosives bombs were dropping. ... But it was observed that when the Germans did get an effective concentration, ... then our fire brigades had a hard time; if a rain of incendiaries is mixed with high explosives bombs there is a temptation for the fireman to keep his head down. The Germans, again and again, missed their chance, as they did during the London blitz that I watched from the roof of the Air Ministry, of setting our cities ablaze by a concentrated attack. Coventry was adequately concentrated in point of space, but all the same, there was little concentration in point of time, and nothing like the fire tornadoes of Hamburg or Dresden ever occurred in this country. But they did do us enough damage to teach us the principle of concentration, the principle of starting so many fires at the same time that no firefighting services, however efficiently and quickly they were reinforced by the fire brigades of other towns could get them under control.

— Arthur Harris[3]
To give an idea of what Arthur Harris meant with his reference to Hamburg and Dresden can be found in the Wiki on Firestorm:
The incendiary effects of a nuclear explosion do not present any especially characteristic features. In principle, the same overall result with respect to destruction of life and property can be achieved by the use of conventional incendiary and high-explosive bombs.[55] It has been estimated, for example, that the same fire ferocity and damage produced at Hiroshima by one 16-kiloton nuclear bomb from a single B-29 could have instead been produced by about 1,200 tons/1.2 kilotons of incendiary bombs from 220 B-29s distributed over the city; for Nagasaki, a single 21 kiloton nuclear bomb dropped on the city could have been estimated to be caused by 1,200 tons of incendiary bombs from 125 B-29s.[55][56][57]

It may seem counterintuitive that the same amount of fire damage caused by a nuclear weapon could have instead been produced by smaller total yield of thousands of incendiary bombs; however, World War II experience supports this assertion. For example, although not a perfect clone of the city of Hiroshima in 1945, in the conventional bombing of Dresden, the combined Royal Air Force (RAF) and United States Army Air Forces (USAAF) dropped a total of 3441.3 tons (approximately 3.4 kilotons) of ordnance (about half of which was incendiary bombs) on the night of 13–14 February 1945, and this resulted in "more than" 2.5 square miles (6.5 km2) of the city being destroyed by fire and firestorm effects according to one authoritative source,[58] or approximately 8 square miles (21 km2) by another.[30]

In total about 4.5 kilotons of conventional ordnance was dropped on the city over a number of months during 1945 and this resulted in approximately 15 square miles (39 km2) of the city being destroyed by blast and fire effects.[59] During the Operation MeetingHouse firebombing of Tokyo on 9–10 March 1945, 279 of the 334 B-29s dropped 1,665 tons of incendiary and high-explosive bombs on the city, resulting in the destruction of over 10,000 acres of buildings—16 square miles (41 km2), a quarter of the city.[60][61]

In contrast to these raids, when a single 16-kiloton nuclear bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, 4.5 square miles (12 km2) of the city was destroyed by blast, fire, and firestorm effects.[47] Similarly, Major Cortez F. Enloe, a surgeon in the USAAF who worked with the United States Strategic Bombing Survey (USSBS), said that the 21-kiloton nuclear bomb dropped on Nagasaki did not do as much fire damage as the extended conventional airstrikes on Hamburg.[62]
In short, Assad is right in considering that the holocaust included more than Jews, especially the losses to those that sacrificed the most against those that killed the Jews, and that was the Soviet Union. But many others were burned too by those who now support the bombing of Gaza, like the US.

America helped the Nazis?
Without going into details, Assad is not wrong in indicating that the rise of Germany, after WWI also, was helped along by American financial interests. At least initially, it was good business, at least for a few. Below are some links:

New revelations shed light on Nazi roots of House of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha
How Americans supported and inspired the Nazis
The fascinating history of eugenics
1920s eugenics exhibit reveal the elitist mindset
Holocaust 2.0: Eugenics and the War on Terror
There is also this book, perhaps even more interesting:
51 Documents: Zionist Collaboration With the Nazis

Assad's claims about the Jews, the Holocaust, and America are risky if he wanted to cozy up to the West, but he does not, and what has he got to lose, given that the Syrian Golan Heights are occupied by Israel, that Syria is bombed frequently by the same country, and partly occupied in the north and east, from where the most valuable resource areas for oil are controlled by American aligned forces that carry off the oil for no cost, justifying it as a matter of promoting western freedom and democracy, though President Trump was a bit more honest. Assad sees it probably as his duty to protect Syria, and its people, and prepare them for what might come, whether he will be with them or not. He chooses to steel his people, hoping they will not suffer the same fate, as the people in Gaza.

Assad's words sure go against historical orthodoxy. Not being familiar myself with any sort of alternative history of the holocaust, I was actually pretty shocked to see this response from the C's when I first read it:

July 29, 2006

Q: (Perceval) Did the Nazis use gas chambers to kill Jews?

A: No.


Q: (Perceval) How many Jews in total were killed by the Nazis in the Holocaust?

A: 3.2 million.

Q: (Mr. Scott) Did they kill them by other means?

A: Yes. Shooting, starvation, experiments, diseases including deliberate infection for experiment.

Q: (Mr. Scott) Well that’s pretty funny because, if there were no gas chamber, Israel can go in and kill as many Arabs as they want and no one can ever say “you’re doing what Hitler did” because they’ll say “no, we’re not using gas chambers” we’re not that horrid, and yet it never happened.

(Galahad) Yeah, but essentially it’s the same list of items that they have on track for the rest of us today.

Assad has a good point when he talks about the 26 million Soviets who died in WW2 that are just plain erased from the records. Just yesterday I mentioned it to my Mom, and she had never heard of it. We're not taught that in the West. I do think Assad goes too far in saying that the holocaust is not a humanitarian and not a real issue, which it obviously was, even if it didn't happen according to the general narrative.
 
It seems to be too early to say it was Iran, but the propaganda machine is already in motion.

One killed in car explosion in Netanya in possible hit attempt​

A car exploded in the central city of Netanya earlier this morning, killing one person in an incident being treated as a possible assassination, the Israel Police says in a statement.

Traces of explosive materials were found at the scene, the statement says, adding that the evidence has been transferred to a forensic identification laboratory for further investigation.


An unidentified Israeli man was assassinated by a car bomb in Netanya

The IDF ordered media not to publish any details.

It appears that Iran killed a high-ranking person in Israel, perhaps in the IDF or Mossad.
 
'Netanyahu wants completely destruction of Gaza.'

Hamas must be destroyed – Netanyahu

26 Dec, 2023
The Israeli prime minister listed the group’s annihilation and the enclave’s demilitarization among conditions for peace in Gaza

srael will not cease its military operation in Gaza until Hamas is defeated, the entire Palestinian enclave “demilitarized,” and its inhabitants “deradicalized,” prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu has insisted.

He emphasized the need for a buffer zone along Gaza's perimeter, with Israeli security officials overseeing goods entering from Egypt.

The Israeli military campaign was triggered by a Hamas assault on October 7, resulting in at least 1,200 deaths and the abduction of around 240 individuals. Dozens of them have been released as part of prisoner swaps.

Netanyahu’s government responded with airstrikes and a ground operation, causing significant casualties, with over 20,000 Palestinians killed, including a substantial number of children and women. Another 53,000 have been reported injured.

Israel’s tactics have faced criticism from the United Nations and international humanitarian organizations. Its European and US allies have recently called for increased efforts to protect civilian lives.

In his opinion piece for the Wall Street Journal published on Monday, Netanyahu wrote: “Hamas must be destroyed, Gaza must be demilitarized, and Palestinian society must be deradicalized.” These are the “three prerequisites for peace between Israel and its Palestinian neighbors in Gaza,” the prime minister argued.

According to the official, only the complete dismantling of Hamas’ military capabilities, as well as its political power structures in Gaza, could guarantee that the tragic events of October 7 would not be repeated.

He went on to claim that the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) are operating “in full compliance with international law,” accusing Hamas militants of using “Palestinian civilians as human shields.” Netanyahu urged the international community to place the blame for any Palestinian casualties exclusively on Hamas.

The prime minister also expressed skepticism over the Palestinian Authority’s ability to demilitarize and deradicalize Gaza, adding that “for the foreseeable future Israel will have to retain overriding security responsibility” over the enclave.

Earlier this month, the head of the Hamas political bureau, Ismail Haniyeh, stated that the militant group is open to negotiations with Israel as long as the latter agrees to the creation of an “independent [Palestinian] state with Jerusalem as its capital.

Meanwhile, Prime Minister Netanyahu made it clear a day prior that his government would not “repeat the mistake of Oslo” – a 1993 peace accord that created a roadmap for a sovereign Palestinian state.

26.12.2023

26 December 2023
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom