As Ark points out, this is exactly the game that Judy Andreas and her side-kick Marsha "Mothmars" McClelland play. What is more, there is a purpose to this type of game even if those who are sent in to play it are not conscious of what they are doing.Judy Andreas said:People who name call and point fingers are playing right into the NWO's agenda....and that's a game I will not play.
And notice, I am being generous by leaving open the door that Judy and Marsha are not conscious agents. But agents they are. I think that the reader will be able to easily see how people like Judy and Marsha work in the following excerpt from my article on How to Spot COINTELPRO Agents, slightly edited for our purposes here:
Obviously, Judy is not a really good agent because she is so obvious. Nobody would pay somebody as obvious as Judy and Marsha . That is why I tend to think that she could be unaware of many factors of what she is saying and doing.There are two main ways to gain control of the target: guilt or glory.
A simple example is the method that Judy Andreas, Rense, etc use:
They accuse people who have noticed things about them: "You're dividing the
movement."
This invites guilty feelings. Many people can be controlled by guilt.
The agents begin relationships with targets behind a well-developed mask of
"dedication to the cause." Because of their often declared dedication,
(and actions designed to prove this), when they criticize the target, he or
she - being truly dedicated to the movement - becomes convinced that
somehow, any issues are THEIR fault. This is because a truly dedicated
person tends to believe that everyone has a conscience and that nobody
would dissimulate and lie like that "on purpose." It's amazing how far
agents can go in manipulating a target because the target will constantly
make excuses for the agent who regularly declares their dedication to the
cause. Even if they do, occasionally, suspect the agent, they will pull
the wool over their own eyes by rationalizing: "they did that
unconsciously... they didn't really mean it... I can help them by being
forgiving and accepting " and so on and so forth.
The truth is that a target who sees that the movement is ineffective, and
counterproductive needs to find a better way to work and leaving the
movement will NOT "divide" something that is working well. If it is NOT
working well, leaving the movement may, in fact, help to sort out the sheep
from the wolves.
The second ploy, "glory," the agent will tell the target:
"You're a leader!"
(This was used by Daryl Bradford Smith and others on John Kaminski.)
This is designed to enhance the target's self-esteem. His or her
narcissistic admiration of his/her own altruistic intentions increase as he
or she identifies with and consciously admires the altruistic declarations
of the agent which are deliberately set up to mirror those of the activist.
This is "malignant pseudoidentification." It is the process by which the
agent consciously imitates or simulates a certain behavior to foster the
target's identification with him/her, thus increasing the target's
vulnerability to exploitation. The agent will simulate the more subtle self-
concepts of the target.
Activists and those who have altruistic self-concepts are most vulnerable to
malignant pseudoidentification especially during work with the agent when
the interaction includes matter relating to their competency, autonomy, or
knowledge.
The goal of the agent is to increase the target's general empathy for the
agent through pseudo-identification with the target's self-concepts.
The most common example of this is the agent who will compliment the target
for his competency or knowledge or value to the movement. On a more subtle
level, the agent will simulate affects and mannerisms of the activist which
promotes identification via mirroring and feelings of "twinship". It is
not unheard of for activists, enamored by the perceived helpfulness and
competence of a good agent, to find themselves considering ethical
violations and perhaps, even illegal behavior, in the service of their
agent/handler.
The target's "felt quality of perfection" [self-concept] is enhanced, and a
strong empathic bond is developed with the agent through his/her imitation
and simulation of the victim's own narcissistic investments. [self-concepts]
That is, if the target knows, deep inside, their own dedication to the
cause, they will project that onto the agent who is "mirroring" them.
The target will be deluded into thinking that the agent shares this feeling
of identification and bonding. In an activist/social movement setting,
the adversarial roles that activists naturally play vis a vis the
oppressors, fosters ongoing processes of intrapsychic splitting so that
"twinship alliances" between activist/target and agent may render whole
sectors or reality testing unavailable to the target. They literally "lose
touch with reality."
Individuals who deny their own narcissistic investments [do not have a good
idea of their own self-concepts and that they ARE concepts] and consciously
perceive themselves (accurately, as it were) to be "helpers" endowed with a
special amount of altruism are exceedingly vulnerable to the affective
(emotional) simulation of the accomplished agent.
Empathy is fostered in the target through the expression of quite visible
affects. The presentation of tearfulness, sadness, longing, fear, remorse,
and guilt, may induce in the helper-oriented activist a strong sense of
compassion, while unconsciously enhancing the target's narcissistic
investment in self as the embodiment of goodness.
The agent's expresssion of such simulated affects may be quite compelling to
the observer and difficult to distinguish from deep emotion.
It can usually be identified by two events, however:
First, the individual/target who has analyzed his/her own narcissistic roots
and is aware of his/her own potential for being "emotionally hooked," will
be able to remain cool and unaffected by such emotional outpourings by the
agent. As a result of this unaffected, cool, attitude, the Second event
will occur: The agent will recompensate much too quickly following such an
affective expression leaving the activist with the impression that "the
play has ended, the curtain has fallen," and the imposture, for the moment,
has finished. The agent will then move quickly to another activist/victim.
Now, you have to understand that these things are done via "second nature"
in some types of individuals. There is no effort, it is seamless. Unless you
are really, REALLY well developed internally, there is almost no way you can
detect this sort of thing.
Unfortunately, Judy is Jewish and John Kaminski, (having issues himself) seems to have blamed the problem on her Jewishness and I think that is what sent him over the edge on the subject of Jews. What we all need to keep clearly in mind is that this is NOT due to Judy being Jewish, it is quite simply due to those things Andzrej Lobaczewski describes in his book "Ponerology." Yes, people who are not aware of psychopathy like this are instruments of evil in our world, but many of them can be helped. In this world of people ignorant of true psychology, that's not very likely any time soon.