Complexity
Padawan Learner
Have you ever been wrong about something important in your life?
Not to this extent, no.
Have you ever been wrong about something important in your life?
Have you actually listened to anything JBP was saying after he took the vaccine? Sounds like you didn't.How do you know he's not just back tracking like vast swathes of the media in general? Because they were wrong to begin with, how can he be so "intelligent" and yet so wrong about blatant totalitarian propaganda, dodgy vaccine studies, the trampling of civil liberties, false flag emergency use powers, and billions of pounds of money flowing in profits?
He's either intelligent enough to spot the greatest con in modern history, or he's not - you can't have it both ways.
I view your counter argument as rationalisation for supporting a shill.
He's either intelligent enough to spot the greatest con in modern history, or he's not - you can't have it both ways.
In this particular case - the law of three applied - I think he was right to call Page out. She is in the spotlight, her transitioning was proudly and widely announced. Through her status, she has some influence - especially on a topic that spreads like fire through social contagion recently. The people who truly suffer from gender dysphoria and would have transitioned would have done it anyway, no matter who said what and where, and have been doing it for quite a while. What's happening these days though, is that a lot of confused, depressed, perhaps on the spectrum, perhaps suffering from mental illness kids, are made to believe that if they take the hormones and cut parts of their body, they will finally feel better and they will fit in. It's obviously not Page's fault, to begin with, but she is an influencer. Probably a victim herself, of attention-seeking narcissism or just trying to work through her own mental illness or handled by sinister Holywood forces, who knows. If Peterson's comment can make some people think and perhaps save a couple of kids from the transitioning hole, I think it was worth it, even if Page feels offended by it.
How do you know he's not just back tracking like vast swathes of the media in general?
He's either intelligent enough to spot the greatest con in modern history, or he's not - you can't have it both ways.
I get kind of a Monday Morning Quarterback, vibe from your posts. It is easy from your armchair to critique those that are actually playing the game. Peterson is actually out there playing the game, in a most hostile environment, doing the best with whatever information and knowledge he has at the moment. Not easy to do. Like most humans, he has made some mistakes. But I get the feeling that his heart is in the right place, and that is what is important to me.Not to this extent, no.
I had some shrooms and too many beers at the same time, then identified as my bedroom desk. An interesting experience for sure, but not one recommended for permanence."Good Morning Norway (GMN) has published an interview with Yorund Victoria Alme, 53, a working man who now identifies himself as a disabled woman. Alme, senior credit analyst Handelsbanken in Oslo. In an interview, he said that he always wanted to be born a paralyzed woman.
Norway Jolund Victoria Alme from Oslo. Actually a man who somehow became a woman over time. Medically, he is perfectly healthy. But his brain refuses to believe that he can walk. He identifies as a woman whose legs no longer work. On Norwegian television, such people are respectfully called "trans-disabled"."
View attachment 66683
Original Facebook post.
Aside from a handful of tweets talking about the vaccine supply in Canada in the months prior to this, this video is the first time I could find Peterson openly talking about the vaccine and the COVID situation in general. Notice that the seeds for what he would later come out and say in November 2021 in his "stupid me" confession regarding mandates, vaccines, and lockdowns were already present in his thinking in June 2021.
So, in a sense, he never really backtracked because he was never fully "on program". He just wasn't fully against the program from the start. Which is understandable, I think, considering his health and family issues at the time as well as his background in academia and trust in the medical profession.
These systems are now shaking. We’re compromising them seriously with this unending and unpredictable stream of restrictions, lockdowns, regulations and curfews. We’re also undermining our entire monetary system, with the provision of unending largesse from government coffers, to ease the stress of the COVID response. We’re playing with fire. We’ve demolished two Christmas seasons in a row. Life is short. These are rare occasions. We’re stopping kids from attending school. We’re sowing mistrust in our institutions in a seriously dangerous manner. We’re frightening people to make them comply. We’re producing bureaucratic institutions that hypothetically hold public health in the highest regard, but subordinating all our properly political institutions to that end, because we lack leadership, and rely on ultimately unreliable opinion polls to govern broadscale political policy. I’ve never seen breakdown in institutional trust on this scale before in my lifetime.
For what it's worth I agree with Whitecoast. I remember seeing large swaths of both Peterson's 'fans' and those that hate him jump on him for the Benzo situation.How do you know he's not just back tracking like vast swathes of the media in general? Because they were wrong to begin with, how can he be so "intelligent" and yet so wrong about blatant totalitarian propaganda, dodgy vaccine studies, the trampling of civil liberties, false flag emergency use powers, and billions of pounds of money flowing in profits?
He's either intelligent enough to spot the greatest con in modern history, or he's not - you can't have it both ways.
I view your counter argument as rationalisation for supporting a shill.
But lets not forget who saved his a$$ when his drugged state was getting out of control, with no help in sight in the West.I think it would be very difficult for him to criticize Israel to any great capacity considering so many of his friends and allies are Jewish like Shapiro, Saad and Rubin. He has so many groups against him that if you add the Jewish population to it, which, as a whole is extremely powerful, hypersensitive to the slightest criticism and relentlessly go on the attack for any perceived threat, he'd be wiped out. I read that speech as him asking Israelis to be better than what they are and yes, in some sense appealing to their sense of 'specialness' as a reason to do so. But it will most likely fall on deaf ears and his understanding of geopolitics and the role Israel plays on the world stage and chaos in the Middle East probably leaves a lot to be desired.
Yepp, this situation is very interesting. I recall when he went ballistic on stage, but did not follow the situation as this neighborhood does not interest me.One interesting intersection I found between Ellen/Elliot Page and Kanye West (the conversation starts in this thread here) was having the "A-list Celebrity Personal Trainer" Harley Pasternak, who also did a 2 year stint as a scientist at Defense and Research Development Canada . The same person who threatened to institutionalize Kanye and deprive him of his kids for supporting Trump. So there is definitely a handler in the picture vis-a-vis Page. Other clients include Lady Gaga, Gwyneth Paltrow, and Bono to name a couple lunatics.
View attachment 66694
How do you know he's not just back tracking like vast swathes of the media in general? Because they were wrong to begin with, how can he be so "intelligent" and yet so wrong about blatant totalitarian propaganda, dodgy vaccine studies, the trampling of civil liberties, false flag emergency use powers, and billions of pounds of money flowing in profits?
He's either intelligent enough to spot the greatest con in modern history, or he's not - you can't have it both ways.
I view your counter argument as rationalisation for supporting a shill.
Originally the girls were called Rosebuds, but were renamed by Lord Baden-Powell after the girls had complained that they did not like their name. Their name comes from the story "The Brownies" by Juliana Horatia Ewing, written in 1870. In the story two children, Tommy and Betty, learn that children can be helpful brownies instead of being lazy boggarts.
Girl Guides of Canada is changing the name Brownies
Girl Guides of Canada to rename Brownies branch as part of its commitment to diversity, equity and inclusion
GGC takes meaningful action to help remove barriers for racialized girls
Toronto, ON, [November 15, 2022] – Today Girl Guides of Canada (GGC) announced it is renaming Brownies (group for girls ages seven and eight) — an important and necessary step to creating an inclusive and equitable space where every racialized girl in Canada feels like they belong and are welcomed in Guiding.
“As the leading organization for girls and women in Canada, it’s critical that we listen to girls’ voices and take action when they speak up,” says Jill Zelmanovits, CEO, Girl Guides of Canada. “We heard from several members and former members that the name Brownies has caused them personal harm, so we are changing the name of this branch to further remove barriers for belonging for racialized girls and women. It is clear that this change is the right thing to do – Girl Guides cannot be represented by a term that causes any girl harm.”
With more than 100 years of history in Canada, Girl Guides has evolved in many ways as a means of reaching and empowering girls and women across the country from updating programming to reflect the desires and interests of girls in the moment, to championing girls’ voices around sexism, feminism and equality, and pay equity. In 2015, GGC formally announced that trans girls are welcome in Guiding, and in 2019, it released a new simplified uniform of a t-shirt or tunic, designed with input from girls that embraces the richness of its members’ diversity and reduces barriers to belonging.
“Our commitment to diversity, equity and inclusion at Girl Guides calls on us to listen to the lived experiences of racialized girls and take action to safeguard these commitments,” says Zelmanovits. “It’s imperative that no part of Guiding causes harm to the girls we serve. Updating this branch name is not only the right thing to do, it is necessary to make Girl Guides a place where racialized girls feel safe, welcome and included.”
While the name of the branch will be updated, girls ages seven and eight will still experience the sense of discovery and accomplishment in this branch. To prepare for the change, which will take effect in September 2023, GGC has consulted with racialized members, past members and the community and will be calling on current members to help decide on a new branch name.
“As with all our Girl Guide branches, we know this branch is special to many of our members and former members. Our program activities and badges will remain the same. The focus for all girls in Guiding remains on fun, friendship, exploring her world and sharing new experiences – this will not change” says Zelmanovits. “We look forward to creating new experiences together which makes all girls feel welcome.”