List of questions

[Muxel]

Tertium Organum. I took that bit from the final chapter of The Wave. (Use Ctrl + F to find it on the page) :)

 

[H-KQGE]

Archaea i would suggest reading all of the wave series. For me it was essential reading & was before i was even aware of the cass site, forum & the rest. It has a wealth of information & as Laura has said, there's a lot of background information that helps make sense of many sessions where someone dipping into just or mainly session excerpts for the latest "news updates" from the C's, wouldn't understand. And there's nothing wrong with re-reading the material several times. For example, for the first time in 3 or 4 years i have gone several months without reading any of the wave books or "high strangeness", & in that length of time i've read them around 8 or 9 times each.

They served me well & kept a lot of concepts fresh in my mind for daily analysis. Then again i only stopped using a public computer in May after 2 years of only being able to read snippets of the diet & health section. Upon joining after getting my Kindle, i now tackle all i couldn't before & this will take a lot of time but i refuse to speed read or rush, skipping things that are clearly very very important. It's like skimming the LWB section or the keto pages for example. To just make wholesale life altering changes without understanding the context (people's individual trial & errors) of the material is setting oneself up for a fall IMO.

As i said in the beginning, this is just a suggestion so you can be confident that you know & understand what's actually going on.
I'll offer 2 examples to conclude this post. 1: because i was so ill, i moved along too quickly in the paleo transition as i felt desperate. Even though i cut almost everything out over a few months i now know i should've taken a little longer, adding to the discovery of haemochromatosis i really suffered in the paleo "2nd phase" (where people feel rough after transition then might revert back to the SAD) & am only getting over it. I had actually read the threads & the numerous warnings but i still went ahead. Currently that's my biggest mistake. 2:not a mistake but a realization & understanding that not only will i ever catch up with the long-time members, there isn't any need. Just reading the recommended books & threads is plenty enough & i know how i learn, things of the nature discussed on this forum aren't really taught "on the outside" in the way it should so although i might know a bit of this & that on some topics, to know & understand & to be able to be an active participant, i need to take time for the info to sink in. I also need to take time to hone the skill of exploring large volumes of complex materials, helping myself to help others & all that. Now i'm a slow reader for the 1st time & my speed reading is reserved, awkward adjusting for sure but necessary.

I'm not faulting you for asking questions, it just seems as though you're diminishing the importance of doing thorough reading, & the thorough reading of some key material that has been recommended to all of us - many times.

 

[Archaea]

I don't believe you're really seeing how arrogant, aloof and self-important your postings are here on this thread. Perhaps like me there could be some deeper feelings of rejection coupled with elevating the "important" members here. Maybe its something like that, if not though its worth reflecting on how you're coming across and thinking about why that might be.

Well, I don't think that being aloof is a bad thing, to me it's like being light and fluffy. Arrogance on the other hand is a bad thing IMO, and I don't want to be arrogant, but maybe I just can't see it, I'll have a go at trying to see how I came across as arrogant to others and have a think about my thoughts and feelings about what I wrote.

I do have a problem with self importance, and try as I might it comes through when I communicate with people, I'm still working on that.

I absolutely disagree here and would really recommend you read ALL of it, even if it means you read parts again. As others previously remarked: The answers are indeed there.

Do you know casssessions? It has a fine search function...

M.T.

I don't know casssessions, what is it?

Archaea, if you can't take the time to read what is recommended to you, or you think it is "a deprogramming tool", then, why ask these questions that you most likely wouldn't like the answers to anyway, other than that way you don't have to actually work to learn the answers? What, exactly, are you fishing for?

Since this forum is based on the Cs, Gurdjieff and Mouravieff, along with other 4th Way teachings, and you don't seem to be collinear with most of these things, why are you even here?

Good questions, I'm still thinking about them.

I'm not faulting you for asking questions, it just seems as though you're diminishing the importance of doing thorough reading, & the thorough reading of some key material that has been recommended to all of us - many times.

Hi H-kqge, this might come back to my arrogance/self importance problems, I honestly didn't think that asking some questions would be a bad thing, I think it was my introduction that put people off.

Hi Muxel,

Thank you for attempting to answer my questions. :)

* How do they know that all is one and one is all? i.e. Do they know from experience or did they follow some kind of logic?
The idea of them arriving at that conclusion by some brand of logic is interesting, but I don't think this question matters much. They are 6th density after all.

True, the level of comprehension required to understand their understanding could well be beyond 3D. I once had a string of logic about the all is one thing. It goes like this, our consciousness is connected to our brains, our brains use waves when they're working, so consciousness is waves, and quantum mechanics describe matter with a wave function, so everything is conscious, and if everything is conscious then everything is one. That was my thinking, but as time went on I began to think that there were gaps in my reasoning and I gave up on it.

* Does contemplating the nature of the prime creator and how it relates to the self lead to the spirit?
Contemplating this could have been said to be a "spiritual" activity for me

You literally are the "figments" of someone's imagination, and nothing more!

long before I came across the term "Prime Creator."

I've found that keeping in mind that "everything that ever exists is within you" while walking around the shops or whatever seems to be conducive to "creating" events, if that makes sense.

* Are they aware of such a thing as an assemblage point?
Glossary entry here

So does that mean the consensus on this forum is that it does exist in real terms, or that it doesn't, or undecided?

* What did they mean by "See" and "seer?" Is it like what's in Castaneda's books? Or is it something else?
"The union of the heart and intellectual higher centers" : higher abilities, graduation to 4th density...

Spirituality is not something opposed to “intellectuality” or “emotionality.” It is only their higher flight. Reason has no bounds.

… In a man the growth of reason consists in the growth of the intellect and in the accompanying growth of higher emotions: aesthetic, religious, moral – which, as they grow, become more and more intellectualized; moreover, simultaneously with this the intellect becomes impregnated with emotionality and ceases to be “cold.” Thus, “spirituality” is the merging together of the intellect and the higher emotions; the emotions are spiritualized from the intellect.

This doesn't seem to suggest that "seeing" is related to the senses, but is a "knowing" that exists outside of the "reason" or intellectual centre. If this is the case could this then lead to seeing being related to the senses?

* Is the human aura related to electric charge in some way?
I think everything has to be intertwined in a human: genetic, aural, karmic, electric, soul...

Okay, so do you think it's possible to heal the body with electric charge?

* Is being in a state where you don't have to eat (see Gerald Pollack presentation in this thread (http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic,31363.0.html) he talks about people who don't eat food) a desirable state?
Whatever anyone says, I think it's been established that we need to eat to live. Unless our cosmic environment changes and reality drastically rearranges itself, I say carry on eating food.

Right, but there have been people who live without having to eat food.

* Is there a "natural" way/method for dissolving blood clots that they are aware of?
Chelation? I don't know, I'll have to google this.

I Googled chelation, it said that it's a therapy for removing heavy metals from the blood, but it's not about dissolving blood clots. Blood clots dissolve naturally from stuff in the blood called plasmin, but the only thing that I know of that releases plasmin are things called tissue plasmin activators, which are medical drugs. There are also thrombolytics, but they're also medical drugs.

I'm interested to know whether there's something native to the human body, which someone could take to dissolve blood clots. My thinking is that it's probably plasmin, but where do you get that?

* What am I missing with my CC interpretations?
Be patient, keep trying.

... They come into your reality to show you that the reasoning mind cannot control all of the data, much as it would like to. ....

... Basically, they exist to force reality to move - to get you feeling rather than thinking. Most who explore these circles think their way through the circles rather than feel their way through them. ...

That's an interesting quote, and I like the idea that the CC's communicate to the whole body, not just the intellect. It also reminds me of something Seth say's in the Seth books, he say's that all objects in the world have an emotional component to them which is ultimately what gives them their reality. So if that's true, I think it would be interesting to access the emotional components of CC's.

* How does the astronomical interpretation fit in?
I guess it fits only where it fits! Not all crop circle patterns have to do with astronomy.

Okay, but the astronomical CC's seem to me to use the same symbol set as the non-astronomical CC's.

* Is my super-secret theory of physics accurate?
That is between you and the C's.

I'm finding myself more and more eager to share it, but if it's correct it might not be safe and if it's incorrect it's a waste of time...

* Are windows what Seth (by Jane Roberts) called co-ordinate points?
I wonder if it's easier to put aside the term "dimension" and approach this using the concepts of "realities" and "densities".

Q: (L) Physicists talk about multi-dimensional universes. ... How many dimensions does the true universe have?

A: Not correct concept. Should be: How many universes does the “true” dimension have?

Q: (L) All right, then. I think that from a previous session we were told that the number of universes was not countable. Is that correct?

A: Infinite, maybe, but more to the point: variable and selective.

Q: (L) Explain variable and selective, please?

A: For those who know how, universes can be created at will in order to transmodify reality merge.

Q: (L) What is a reality merge?

A: What does it sound like?

Another interesting part to this I think is dreams, what is their reality? Do they exist as another universe in and of themselves? If so, then maybe a reality merge would be like having two dreams at once which start to interfere with each other and then become one single dream.

* Do windows exist at points where gravity cancels?
Unstable gravity waves.

Maybe.

* Did the Philadelphia experiment and project Montauk involve windows?
I'm confident this is a yes. How could it not be?

I too think this is a yes, but then it might not be...

* Will the Wave interact with windows and/or the grid somehow?
The Wave is the realm border i.e. it is a "window," isn't it? The window of all windows, lord of them all.

I don't know, maybe the wave is a window. My understanding after writing my response 3 questions up is that it's a barrier between dreams. ;)

* Are sunspots related to windows?

* Will the Earth's grid be different in 4D?
Does Jupiter have a grid? I wonder.

Good question.

* If wishful thinking becomes reality in 4D, then would it be possible to travel to other planets using only a telescope?
Could be. Or, "traveling" would become an obsolete term. You could be anywhere and everywhere. The planet you see through the telescope might not be the same planet when you get there.

Right, because if space and time are variable in 4D, the universes would be variable and selective.

 

[Vic]

Hmmm....

Wowser. I had some misgivings about my get snotty program post. But myyy word. Seems like something going down here I'm oblivious of. Y'all talking to Archaea as if y'all are old friends. Or an arch Nemesis...

I don't think there is anything going down here that you're oblivious to, unless I'm oblivious to it also...

:) :) :)

:D Love those emoticons. I can understand why you and Al Today use them in the above. Let's dismiss the newbie upstart - who does he think he is, eh? Don't respond to him directly, but put a subtle dig in. Or I'm paranoid. But there is a valid point in that response - self-importance. I have it, but often don't see it until afterwards. I can see it in my original post. Looking forward to the disappearance of my self importance.

But I think you and Al Today's response is full of self importance also. Might be worth looking at. Or not :)

 

[Al Today]

Hmmm....

Wowser. I had some misgivings about my get snotty program post. But myyy word. Seems like something going down here I'm oblivious of. Y'all talking to Archaea as if y'all are old friends. Or an arch Nemesis...

I don't think there is anything going down here that you're oblivious to, unless I'm oblivious to it also...

:) :) :)

:D Love those emoticons. I can understand why you and Al Today use them in the above. Let's dismiss the newbie upstart - who does he think he is, eh? Don't respond to him directly, but put a subtle dig in. Or I'm paranoid. But there is a valid point in that response - self-importance. I have it, but often don't see it until afterwards. I can see it in my original post. Looking forward to the disappearance of my self importance.

But I think you and Al Today's response is full of self importance also. Might be worth looking at. Or not :)

@Vic.
Definitely so. Continually. 'Tis a long hard battle and sometimes I am full of human emotion that slides out. Am I correct in seeing sarcasm within a judgemental derogatory reply? Was this an attemp to be hurtful, mean or were you just making fun of the lower class? And your point is?

 

[Minas Tirith]

I don't know casssessions, what is it?

The transcripts from 1994 to 2002 in a downloadable .exe file. But I can't find the link anymore ...

M.T.

 

[Vic]

Hmmm....

Wowser. I had some misgivings about my get snotty program post. But myyy word. Seems like something going down here I'm oblivious of. Y'all talking to Archaea as if y'all are old friends. Or an arch Nemesis...

I don't think there is anything going down here that you're oblivious to, unless I'm oblivious to it also...

:) :) :)

:D Love those emoticons. I can understand why you and Al Today use them in the above. Let's dismiss the newbie upstart - who does he think he is, eh? Don't respond to him directly, but put a subtle dig in. Or I'm paranoid. But there is a valid point in that response - self-importance. I have it, but often don't see it until afterwards. I can see it in my original post. Looking forward to the disappearance of my self importance.

But I think you and Al Today's response is full of self importance also. Might be worth looking at. Or not :)

@Vic.
Definitely so. Continually. 'Tis a long hard battle and sometimes I am full of human emotion that slides out. Am I correct in seeing sarcasm within a judgemental derogatory reply? Was this an attemp to be hurtful, mean or were you just making fun of the lower class? And your point is?

No, I think, to all your questions, Al. I'm looking at my post now. I'm doing so with all the objectivity I can muster. Subjectivity is of no benefit to me whatsoever. Hang on ... yes, judgemental. There is a bit of judgemental in there. No sarcasm though. No intention to be hurtful or make fun either. As for the 'lower classes' I don't know what you mean. I am an ex street drunk, much-frequenter of police cells, and have been round many blocks in my 54 years.

What you see is what you get.

How about you?

 

[Muxel]

True, the level of comprehension required to understand their understanding could well be beyond 3D. I once had a string of logic about the all is one thing. It goes like this, our consciousness is connected to our brains, our brains use waves when they're working, so consciousness is waves, and quantum mechanics describe matter with a wave function, so everything is conscious, and if everything is conscious then everything is one. That was my thinking, but as time went on I began to think that there were gaps in my reasoning and I gave up on it.
What is consciousness? Who are you? Am I in your "universe"/consciousness or are you in mine?

You could read:
(1) this post
(2) Mind and Cosmos by Thomas Nagel
(3) "The Living Stream" by Alister Hardy
(4) "The 5th Option" by Bryant Shiller

I've found that keeping in mind that "everything that ever exists is within you" while walking around the shops or whatever seems to be conducive to "creating" events, if that makes sense.
From "Why You Don't Create Your Own Reality" by Michael Topper

Initiated alignment of will with the creative Whole doesn't guarantee "smooth personal circumstances"; on the contrary, look at the story of every adept, examine the events surrounding the Masters known to history. Rather it ensures that such events will possess the character of an authentic teaching-demonstration, to all who have the Soul to see. It ensures the Will of the Whole is always done, regardless the partiality and prejudice by which that Whole may be perceived in any given case.

So does that mean the consensus on this forum is that it does exist in real terms, or that it doesn't, or undecided?
Don't spend too much time on it. This forum certainly doesn't. File it away in your mind as a theoretical concept and if you come across anything, mystic or scientific, that verifies/corroborates it you'll have a better understanding of what Castaneda was actually talking about.

This doesn't seem to suggest that "seeing" is related to the senses, but is a "knowing" that exists outside of the "reason" or intellectual centre. If this is the case could this then lead to seeing being related to the senses?
Read chapter 4 of the Eíriú-Eolas - Guide/FAQ. Also read here and here.

Okay, so do you think it's possible to heal the body with electric charge?
That is something techno-spiritual IMO and we aren't there yet.

Right, but there have been people who live without having to eat food.
Therefore food is not a necessary requirement for life? Not correct logic. Think of those people as crop circles... they're the anomalies who show you that there is more to this reality than you are told. You don't have to go out of your way to be one!

I'm interested to know whether there's something native to the human body, which someone could take to dissolve blood clots. My thinking is that it's probably plasmin, but where do you get that?
What about: nattokinase. (Did you have a stroke or have DVT?) In any case prevention is better - do the Diet and supplement with some magnesium. Your body has the natural ability to break down clots.

That's an interesting quote, and I like the idea that the CC's communicate to the whole body, not just the intellect. It also reminds me of something Seth say's in the Seth books, he say's that all objects in the world have an emotional component to them which is ultimately what gives them their reality. So if that's true, I think it would be interesting to access the emotional components of CC's.
Can you provide me with a quote if you have it? I haven't read the Seth material.

Okay, but the astronomical CC's seem to me to use the same symbol set as the non-astronomical CC's.

The ring with "spokes" could mean radiance, so that would be our sun. The brown dwarf would be the other one: "dark." And both are connected, indicating mutual orbit and possibly even that binary systems are the "default" in our universe.

OR

The "spoked ring" being our solar system with our sun at the center, and the dark star being "outside" of the solar system yet connected to the sun. Put gravity aside and think in terms of plasma cosmology... they're electrically connected!

Telling us that planets are connected to something...? Transmitting/receiving something from "out there"?

This means "common origin." Therefore, family.

The little one is disconnected and located "behind" the largest one. So, "buried memory."

Another interesting part to this I think is dreams, what is their reality? Do they exist as another universe in and of themselves? If so, then maybe a reality merge would be like having two dreams at once which start to interfere with each other and then become one single dream.
This isn't the answer you are looking for, but do read it first.

Then:

Q: (L) At what level of density do these thought centers have their primary focus?

A: Thought centers do not have primary focus in any level of density. This is precisely the point. You are not completely familiar with the reality of what thoughts are. We have spoken to you on many levels and have detailed many areas involving density level, but thoughts are quite a different thing because they pass through all density levels at once. Now, let us ask you this. Do you not now see how that would be possible?

I think that the above description matches Carl Jung's schema of the conscious ego surrounded and interpenetrated by the personal unconscious which in turn is surrounded and interpenetrated by the collective unconscious. The collective unconscious is made up of all that exists - it is timeless and spaceless. More accessible parts of the collective unconscious include (but not limited to) the social unconscious belonging to the cultural milieu one grows up in, family unconscious spanning across multiple generations, as well as certain mythological motifs and symbols which cut across cultures.

I think System2 in this schema belongs primarily to the activity of the conscious ego characterized by deliberate attention and thinking. System1 is that part of the personal unconscious which influences the conscious ego. The "field of self-aware gestalts" are what Jung called "archetypes" transcending time and space which "entangle" with the personal unconscious and the conscious ego. The C's terminology would be "thought forms" I guess.

As the collective unconscious is characterized by archetypes (for the sake of categorization in the psychological aspect), the personal unconscious contains complexes. Of interest to us are complexes which are split off parts of the consciousness due to early trauma. These are not integrated in the conscious ego. Such complexes drive obsessions or other rigid, inflexible behavioral patterns (programs) which seem to have a life of its own mostly overwhelming the relatively weak ego consciousness. Most of the psychological work is geared towards integrating these complexes which tend to act in an autonomous and maladaptive manner to the current reality.

However, based on the information from the Cs, we now have some idea that the fourth density (equivalent to the fifth dimension in mathematical terms), is a para-physical realm of archetypes, and that these archetypal groupings may be the arbiters of human, societal, and national interactions as conceived, and created by mass thought or vice versa! We may merely be the actors in an archetypal play that is written, cast, directed and produced from some other layer of reality. It may be that there are set pieces we each play, and perhaps these cumulative events of humans in this world are the energies that express the balance or imbalance of forces or beings at higher levels.

So sunspots are electric current channels?
Electric Sunspots

 

[Archaea]

Hi Muxel,

Sorry for the late reply, I took my time reading the links you posted...

What is consciousness? Who are you? Am I in your "universe"/consciousness or are you in mine?

I think consciousness is the little man that lives inside people's heads and looks out through their eyes... although that is a bit of a recursive statement. I think that is the soul and that there is only one little man that goes around and around creation experiencing himself. So in the objective reality I am just a shell for the little man, and all is one and one is all, and we would both be in our universe.

From "Why You Don't Create Your Own Reality" by Michael Topper

Initiated alignment of will with the creative Whole doesn't guarantee "smooth personal circumstances"; on the contrary, look at the story of every adept, examine the events surrounding the Masters known to history. Rather it ensures that such events will possess the character of an authentic teaching-demonstration, to all who have the Soul to see. It ensures the Will of the Whole is always done, regardless the partiality and prejudice by which that Whole may be perceived in any given case.

This is interesting because maybe we all do get what we want, it's just that sometimes we don't know what we want at the time. Sometimes I look back at my past and think that it went really well and it probably couldn't have been better, but at the time I was thinking "this sux, why can't things be like this or that." This makes me think that when it comes to creating our reality maybe our future selves have a say in what's happening to us now, and we lack the wisdom of our future selves and therefore don't appreciate it. I also think this might be related to our STS natures.

Don't spend too much time on it. This forum certainly doesn't. File it away in your mind as a theoretical concept and if you come across anything, mystic or scientific, that verifies/corroborates it you'll have a better understanding of what Castaneda was actually talking about.

OK, I've filed it away. :)

Therefore food is not a necessary requirement for life? Not correct logic. Think of those people as crop circles... they're the anomalies who show you that there is more to this reality than you are told. You don't have to go out of your way to be one!

I think that's a really good point, I didn't think of that. I thought that since in 4D we don't eat, that maybe not eating was a stage we would have to go through to get there with our current "shells."

What about: nattokinase. (Did you have a stroke or have DVT?) In any case prevention is better - do the Diet and supplement with some magnesium. Your body has the natural ability to break down clots.

I've read about nattokinase, I think it's too slow, as with a lot of those natural enzymes, I guess I was just looking for a quick fix. I'm curious as to why you mentioned magnesium, does it prevent blood clots?

Can you provide me with a quote if you have it? I haven't read the Seth material.

I found this quote at http://amasci.com/freenrg/pyrexp1.html#back it's from the book Seth speaks by Jane Roberts, but it's about co-ordinate points and I don't think it's the bit that I was thinking about when I brought it up. However, I think the bit that I was thinking about is from the same book.

Each thought or emotion therefore exists as an electromagnetic energy unit or as a combination of these under certain conditions, and often with the help of coordinate points, they emerge into the building blocks of physical matter. This emergence into matter occurs as a physical "result" regardless of the nature of any given thought or emotion. Mental images, accompanied by strong emotion, are blueprints therefore upon which a corresponding physical object, or condition or event, will in your terms occur.

Okay, but the astronomical CC's seem to me to use the same symbol set as the non-astronomical CC's.
...

I like your thinking on the interpretations of the crop circles, I think it's unencumbered. However, I'm curious, do you think you could find the meanings of other crop circles using the same method?

So sunspots are electric current channels?
Electric Sunspots

Interesting article, it suggests that sunspots are magnetic vortices, so I still think they might be windows...

 

[globalgrrl]

Re: Blood Clots

DMSO is said to dissolve blood clots when used in a cream of 70% or higher. It can be taken orally too, but it makes your breath smell fishy/garlicky.

http://strideintohealth.wordpress.com/2012/12/12/dmso-or-dimethyl-sulfoxide-by-walter/

 

[gottathink]

The reason I decided to make this post comes down to what I think of as the mystery of existence (i.e. Why is there something instead of nothing?) and how the C's might relate to it, do they know the answer, or is it still ultimately a mystery to them?

I have wondered this a lot myself. It perplexed me from a young child.
Many years ago, one day after ruminating on this for some time, a simple thought occurred to me. That 'existence' became conscious of itself and it was pretty lonely. So in this became 'creation' enabling separation into individuals.

I am struggling to communicate my idea, I am not great with words and as I have not read the entire Wave series my idea may be way of base and I don't know it. So apologies if I am ignorant, it is an original thought that comforted me at the time.

As for the blood clots,I had my own experience with previously very viscous blood that would clot up every time I would have a blood sample taken to check Iron etc. It worried me a lot as my family has a history of strokes. At the time I already had been gluten free for a while, I cleaned up my diet further along the dietary guidelines recommended here and other sources. My blood flows beautifully now when I get a blood test.

So just a bit of work and patience I would think. I hope that is helpful.

 

[Archaea]

DMSO is said to dissolve blood clots when used in a cream of 70% or higher. It can be taken orally too, but it makes your breath smell fishy/garlicky.

http://strideintohealth.wordpress.com/2012/12/12/dmso-or-dimethyl-sulfoxide-by-walter/

Hi globalgrrl,

Thanks for pointing DMSO out, I'm always interested in new ideas. :)

I had a look at the Wikipedia page for DMSO (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimethyl_sulfoxide) and it say's that DMSO can be dangerous:

Early clinical trials with DMSO were stopped because of questions about its safety, especially its ability to harm the eye. The most commonly reported side effects include headaches and burning and itching on contact with the skin. Strong allergic reactions have been reported.[full citation needed] In high concentrations, DMSO can be fatal to humans.[full citation needed] Industrial-grade DMSO is sometimes contaminated with other substances. DMSO can cause contaminants, toxins, and medicines to be absorbed through the skin, which may cause unexpected effects. DMSO is thought to increase the effects of blood thinners, steroids, heart medicines, sedatives, and other drugs. In some cases this could be harmful or dangerous.[22] It is a developmental neurotoxin.[25]

In Australia it is listed as a schedule 4 poison, and a company has been prosecuted for adding it to products as a preservative.[26]

A schedule 4 poison means that it's only available through prescription. And because I live in Australia it's unlikely that I'd be able to get it anyway...

As for the blood clots,I had my own experience with previously very viscous blood that would clot up every time I would have a blood sample taken to check Iron etc. It worried me a lot as my family has a history of strokes. At the time I already had been gluten free for a while, I cleaned up my diet further along the dietary guidelines recommended here and other sources. My blood flows beautifully now when I get a blood test.

So just a bit of work and patience I would think. I hope that is helpful.

I think you're right, that also reminds me of this snippet from the sessions. From Session 21 December 2012 (http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic,29988.msg387170.html#msg387170):

(L) I see... Okay, so there are a couple questions I have here. First question is for a friend of ours, who has got a detached retina and she's really suffering. She wrote me and asked me some questions about it, but I can't find the message that she sent to me. I wrote to her and asked her and she didn't get it here in time before the session. So, I'd just like to ask for anything about her eyes. Is there any suggestion you can make for her to end her suffering?

A: S*****, you had symptoms of issues for many years, it is not possible to get a quick fix especially with the way you drag your feet while expecting fast action from others and the body. Go... Near... Listen... Look... Wait... Be persistent through the difficulties. You need mainly very strict diet control with ZERO slips, and vitamin E occasionally and primrose. Your gut needs to heal before anything else. That can take time.

Q: (L) So, if she gets her gut healed, her body will sort itself out in some way?

A: Yes.

So I think that's the best option at this stage. :)

I have wondered this a lot myself. It perplexed me from a young child.
Many years ago, one day after ruminating on this for some time, a simple thought occurred to me. That 'existence' became conscious of itself and it was pretty lonely. So in this became 'creation' enabling separation into individuals.

I've thought the same thing, but I'm not sure whether existence would feel lonely, I think that might just be a product of the human condition. I remember Don Juan or Don Genero from the Castaneda books saying that for a warrior at a certain point being alone didn't mean being lonely. Although I have to admit I really don't know how existence feels at the point of it's creation.

The reason I asked that question was because I learned the ideas about the creator and how all is one from the C's and Ra material. And even though I've convinced myself it's true through various exercises in logic, I'm still curious as to how they know, i.e. whether it's through experience or logic or something else. Muxel made the point, however, that the concepts involved in their knowledge of the creator might be beyond me, so I'll just do my best to continue to learn. :)

 

[Nienna]

DMSO is said to dissolve blood clots when used in a cream of 70% or higher. It can be taken orally too, but it makes your breath smell fishy/garlicky.

http://strideintohealth.wordpress.com/2012/12/12/dmso-or-dimethyl-sulfoxide-by-walter/

Hi globalgrrl,

Thanks for pointing DMSO out, I'm always interested in new ideas. :)

I had a look at the Wikipedia page for DMSO (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimethyl_sulfoxide) and it say's that DMSO can be dangerous:

You may want to check out the thread we have here on the forum about DMSO. Things are not always the way the mainstream establishments say they are. ;)