Massive explosion reported in Chinese city of Tianjin

[Kisito]

The services were about to discover
_http://www.naturalnews.com/050816_Tianjin_explosion_space-based_weapons_military_retaliation.html#

 

[Ruth]

The services were about to discover
_http://www.naturalnews.com/050816_Tianjin_explosion_space-based_weapons_military_retaliation.html#

An interesting theory. Unfortunately, I think the Chinese would react in a similar way (martial law) if they were embarrassed by a failure in safety and due process which has end up killing so many of their own citizens through carelessness and neglect. I wonder what really happened?

 

[Kisito]

The services were about to discover
_http://www.naturalnews.com/050816_Tianjin_explosion_space-based_weapons_military_retaliation.html#

An interesting theory. Unfortunately, I think the Chinese would react in a similar way (martial law) if they were embarrassed by a failure in safety and due process which has end up killing so many of their own citizens through carelessness and neglect. I wonder what really happened?

I also do not know what happened, but the cabal or Illuminati, could have concealed bombs in some strategic parts of the earth. They could well threaten the states.

 

[mabar]

And, as expected I suppose, first rain at Tianjin leaved white foam on the streets.

First rainfall since Tianjin explosion leaves city covered in mysterious white foam

The first rainfall to wash over Tianjin since a series of blasts struck a warehouse in the Binhai district last week has sparked a new wave of concern as an unidentified white foam has appeared on the streets.

Some who made contact with it are reporting a burning sensation on their face and lips, while others are reporting a stinging sensation on their arms. Some have said they experienced an itchy sensation, according to a NetEase News report.

Meteorological experts said Monday that rainfall would no longer pose direct danger to people's health, according to a CCTV News report.

However, authorities had expressed concern that the downpour, aside from hampering rescue efforts, would spread harmful substances across the city, after around 700 tons of sodium cyanide—a toxic chemical that creates a combustable substance when it meets with water—was found at the blast site. -I suppose authorities had already containend such materials/chemical substances, etc ... that was one of the explanations I read at the beginning ... fireworkers pour down water and ... kaboom!

Officials today said that at least 40 types of dangerous chemicals were detected at the blast zone, including 800 tons of ammonium nitrate and 500 tons of potassium nitrate, the Guardian reports.

Bao Jingling, chief engineer for the Tianjin Environmental Protection Bureau, previously said in an NBC News report that "if there is rain, it will produce hydrogen cyanide, so we are monitoring it closely," adding that the military's anti-chemical warfare division had been sent to the site on Sunday and the situation "currently...isn't very serious". no???

Hydrogen cyanide gas is described by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as being a “rapidly fatal” toxic chemical that can reduce the body's ability to use oxygen.

In preparation for the rain, authorities reportedly built cofferdams around a 100,000-square-meter core area of the explosions which will be continually reinforced to prevent contaminated water from flowing out, Xinhua said.

Local monitoring centers reported a normal air quality reading in the city, and the Tianjin deputy mayor in charge of work safety said at a press conference yesterday that sodium cyanide within a three-kilometer radius of the core blast site would be neutralized by yesterday evening.

A total of 114 people have been confirmed dead with 70 more missing after two huge explosions and one smaller blast ripped through a warehouse storing hazardous materials last Wednesday.

 

[Mikey]

https://homment.com/China-Tianjin-Explosion-mindestens-3000tTNT-nuklear-nicht-21t

Article in German saying that explosion was 3000t TNT minimum, not just 21t TNT. Also provided is a Google Earth image comparison showing that the crater is located where formerly there was only simple storage of containers. I expected huge chemical facilities there. Unless of course the image comparison is wrong, but some features do indeed match.

Article also says that explosion was very near the National Supercomputer Center:

http://www.epochtimes.de/Mediensperre-ueber-Stadt-der-Toten-Tausende-in-Tianjin-vermisst-a1262105.html

This article in German talks about inofficial numbers of 1400 dead and 700 missing.

 

[Niall]

The services were about to discover
_http://www.naturalnews.com/050816_Tianjin_explosion_space-based_weapons_military_retaliation.html#

Haha, reading Mike Adams' stuff is like reading the latest 'Sorcha Faal'! Very entertaining stuff from the disinformation services.

He could be right about one thing though: the force of the explosion appears to have come from below ground.

 

[Joe]

Very interesting, although just because there was no containers there in Nov. 2014 doesn't mean they didn't arrive after that date. Even so, I highly doubt the "700 tons of sodium cyanide" story. That sounds like a cover up to explain it away for people. They are so lucky this happened in a port area where they could plausibly claim that massive amounts of chemicals were involved. What really happened I think was similar to that explosion on a beach in Rhode Island a few weeks back. Gas and plasma.

Here are a couple of high res images. Kniall just mentioned that there seems to be merit to Adams' idea that the cracking around the edge of the crater, seen in these images, is indicative of a underground explosion. His main claim of a US 'space-based weapon' however is interesting, not that it is really likely, but that people seem to always want to assign a direct human origin to these events. Maybe that feels safer to people than the alternative: that the earth is 'opening up' and major earth changes are upon us. After all, evil people can theoretically be stopped or have a limit to their evilness. But how do you stop the earth from going through a period natural and very violent cycle of change?

 

[Mikey]

https://homment.com/China-Tianjin-Explosion-mindestens-3000tTNT-nuklear-nicht-21t

This article calculates ca. 4400 t-TNT based on the crater diameter of ca. 90 meters. Used formula from study: "Craters produced by explosions on the soil surface" http://cimec.org.ar/ojs/index.php/mc/article/viewFile/713/675 . Haven't verified myself.

 

[Niall]

Here is a close up:

Source:
http://deutsche-wirtschafts-nachrichten.de/2015/08/15/china-riesenkrater-und-neue-explosionen-in-tianjin/

It reminds me of those 'exploding crater-holes' in Siberia. I wonder how deep this Tianjin crater is.

 

[Niall]

FYI, Mike Adams is getting his ideas from Jim Stone, this article in particular:

_http://theunhivedmind.com/wordpress3/did-the-rod-of-god-weapon-hit-tianjin/

Stone is certifiable, but there could be merit to what he writes here:

...the fracture pattern around the crater proves a sub ground burst. [...] A slightly subsurface detonation would explain why camera sensors did not get strange artifacts. And if it was not a nuke, it was something else incredibly huge, but not a fuel air bomb because fuel air bombs will not leave craters.

If the blast happened at ground level, almost all of the energy would go upwards and the blast would not have made a large deep crater, especially one large enough and deep enough to make that lake.

We don't know yet how deep that lake is.

If you look to the right hand side of the lake, you can see fracture patterns in the earth, which were caused by the earth being compressed sideways and not downwards. This would only be done with a sub surface blast. After the blast, the earth bounced back towards the center of the lake, which opened up the cracks.

 

[Mal7]

Unless of course the image comparison is wrong, but some features do indeed match.

It seems like possibly too many features match between the November 2014 and August 2015 Google photos? It looks to me like there is a street, with the exact same vehicles in the exact same positions in both photos. It is clearer on this photo, without the captions obscuring some parts of the photos:

http://homment.com/China-Tianjin-Explosion-mindestens-3000tTNT-nuklear-nicht-21t

 

[Niall]

Note that the earliest reports about what first drew firefighters to the site concerned containers, not warehouses, being on fire:

http://news.yahoo.com/huge-explosions-chinas-tianjin-port-area-kill-17-020339168.html

The cause of the blasts was being investigated but Xinhua said several containers caught fire beforehand.

Concerning the subsequent two large explosions, it's interesting that the Chinese authorities, while under fire for being cagey about what happened, were prepared to suggest this:

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-33896292

State broadcaster China Central Television (CCTV) said a shipment of explosives had detonated but this was not confirmed.

We suspect that the real reason for their uncertainty is due to the fact that something natural, but extremely unusual, happened there.

 

[Niall]

It seems like possibly too many features match between the November 2014 and August 2015 Google photos? It looks to me like there is a street, with the exact same vehicles in the exact same positions in both photos. It is clearer on this photo, without the captions obscuring some parts of the photos:

I think that's because the image on the left (site damage) is superimposed on the same image shown right (see attached).

How sure are we that the two synch up correctly?

 

[Niall]

On the whole, I'd say that reports concerning air quality - both at the site and over the broader area - don't suggest a particularly toxic atmosphere resulting from the explosions. This report is from the day after the incident:

Air quality normal after Tianjin blasts: authorities
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2015-08/13/c_134513482.htm

Toxic fumes detected in the air after blasts ripped through the Tianjin Binhai New Area are within national standards, Wen Wurui, head of the city's environmental bureau said.

At 4 p.m., police detected high densities of toxic gases, including sulfur dioxide, carbon monoxide and nitrogen oxides, within 500 meters of the fire, but they were not detected 2 km from the fire, the headquarters said.

The city began to monitor air and water quality immediately after the blast, setting up 17 monitoring stations for air and five for water.

Discharge into the sea has been closed as the water is tested, Wen added.

At 4 a.m. Thursday, less than 2 milligrams per cubic meter of epoxyethane, a carcenogenic gas, was found in the most polluted area. It is considered hazardous at 5 milligram per cubic meter.

At 5:30 a.m., the concentration of methylbenzene and volatile organic compounds, both harmful gases, slightly exceeded safety standards.

As of 11 a.m., all toxic gas indicators were within their normal range.

Specialized anti-chemical warfare troops are on site.

Note the video at the end of this article:

http://www.citylab.com/weather/2015/08/satellites-spot-the-tianjin-explosions-foul-brown-cloud/401303/

You can see the dark plume from the Tianjin site is dwarfed by what is thought to be grey smoke from wildfires. I can't find reports of wildfires in Manchuria (northeast China) but wildfires are raging around Lake Baikal, near the Russia-Mongolia border:

http://siberiantimes.com/ecology/casestudy/news/n0352-siberia-on-fire/

We suspect the overall massive increase in wildfires along northern latitudes is being fueled by increased methane outgassing, which could well be a parallel phenomenon to 'Earth opening up' in Tianjin.

 

[Cosmos]

We don't know yet how deep that lake is.

Here they say 7,5 meters:

http://www.ibtimes.co.in/photos/aerial-photos-huge-crater-400-metres-wide-found-tianjin-blast-site-3738-slide-27358

Crater at Tianjin Blast site has a depth of 7.5 metres & a width of 400 metres.
credit: News.CN

But 400m wide seems to be way to large, if the photo analysis that Data posted is right.