Mother of all gushers - BP Oil Disaster in Gulf of Mexico

Well 'Top Hat' didn't work, 'Top Kill' didn't either.

_http://www.cnn.com/2010/US/05/29/gulf.top.kill.failure.reax/index.html?hpt=T1

Seems like trusting a giant oil company isn't doing much good. Saddly I'm not surpised.
 
Hello to all---

I have been trying (operative word, "trying") to get a handle on my feelings of grief and despair throughout this drama of the spill and all of the sick attempts to quell it. I awoke quite early this morning with an "epiphany" that for quite some time our civilization has been insidiously attacked through various methods (our food, the ETFs, our water supply, corporate media, etc.) and now what better way to strike at the heart of us all with an occurrence that for me has totally challenged my faith and my ability to see good come from it. This, to me, seems to be a blatant and really UGLY demonstration of the utter lack of regard for all that has made this life beautiful. I think one of the primary reasons this is so is that when I think of challenges to my way of life, I perceive an "act of God" to be something more easily rallied around where we as humans are able to connect and support one another.

This insidious attack on all that represents our ability to live peaceful, healthy lives by "forces" unknown carries with it such layers of just that -- not knowing.

So, actually, what I am striving for here is some sense of a foundation for my life right now. I find that all of my minutes are pervaded with this heavy sadness and, as I posted earlier, ever since this happened, I have had lots of trouble breathing deeply and am quite aware of restrictions in my diaphragm and abdomen.

If I may sum this up -- I feel as though I am in a period of personal transformation with this immediate challenge and usually when this happens it is because of something more immediate and personal. This is showing to me clearly the interconnectedness of us all and how what affects some of us, affects ALL of us.

I keep hearing the parroting of so many people when they've said (referring to the war in Iraq), "better to fight them over there than here," and this is bringing to life for me what many others around the world have been confronted with throughout their entire life -- the simple struggle to just survive.

There -- I've voiced how I've been feeling. As a person with a vocation of assisting others with the goal of relaxation and stress relief, it's really an OPPORTUNITY lately to be relaxed and stress-free myself.
 
There's just something about April:

Waco Branch Davidians attack - April 19, 1993

Oklahoma City bombing - April 19, 1995

Columbine shooting - April 20, 1999

BP Oil Rig explosion - April 20, 2010

:(
 
Mike Adams of Natural News fame has a very interesting theory that potentially sheds some light on BP's behaviour regarding the oil well disaster. He thinks that BP may be intentially avoiding plugging the leak. Instead they want to siphon off the crude oil and sell it, potentially making billions of dollars in comparison to which any compensation paid to the people of the Gulf Coast and other affected aresas will pale into insignificance.

Read the full article at: Is BP trying to cap the Gulf oil well, or keep it flowing? (opinion)
 
Well control' problems reported in March, BP e-mails show.


"We are in the midst of a well control situation on MC 252 #001 and have stuck pipe. We are bringing out equipment to begin operations to sever the drillpipe, plugback the well and bypass," Scherie Douglas, a BP regulatory advisor, told the district engineer for the U.S. Interior Department's Minerals Management Service in a March 10 e-mail.

ttp://edition.cnn.com/2010/US/05/31/oil.spill.probe/index.html?hpt=T2
 
Endymion said:

"To collapse the well and plug it for good would destroy BP's chance to siphon off oil and sell it for profit (until at least August, when the pressure relief wells are expected to be completed). And that is perhaps the single most important reason why oil is still flowing out of that well right now."

They're not going to plug the leak because then they might not be allowed to continue drilling the "relief well" which will make them billions. The vast majority of the US population doesn't even understand the severity of the leak. BP is committing mass murder in plain sight.

I think this entire catastrophe may well be designed to kill the gulf entirely, making it suitable for nothing else but mining. Don't forget that there are oil pockets under the state of Florida, which they can't get to as long as people are living on top of it and the glades are protected habitat.

Once all the wildlife is dead, the people have been forced to move, and the national economy is in tatters,they will be free to drill wherever they choose in the region. It will take years to get to that point, but they DO plan that far ahead.
 
_http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/may/30/oil-spills-nigeria-niger-delta-shell
Nigeria's agony dwarfs the Gulf oil spill. The US and Europe ignore it

The Deepwater Horizon disaster caused headlines around the world, yet the people who live in the Niger delta have had to live with environmental catastrophes for decades

We reached the edge of the oil spill near the Nigerian village of Otuegwe after a long hike through cassava plantations. Ahead of us lay swamp. We waded into the warm tropical water and began swimming, cameras and notebooks held above our heads. We could smell the oil long before we saw it – the stench of garage forecourts and rotting vegetation hanging thickly in the air.

The farther we travelled, the more nauseous it became. Soon we were swimming in pools of light Nigerian crude, the best-quality oil in the world. One of the many hundreds of 40-year-old pipelines that crisscross the Niger delta had corroded and spewed oil for several months.

Forest and farmland were now covered in a sheen of greasy oil. Drinking wells were polluted and people were distraught. No one knew how much oil had leaked. "We lost our nets, huts and fishing pots," said Chief Promise, village leader of Otuegwe and our guide. "This is where we fished and farmed. We have lost our forest. We told Shell of the spill within days, but they did nothing for six months."

That was the Niger delta a few years ago, where, according to Nigerian academics, writers and environment groups, oil companies have acted with such impunity and recklessness that much of the region has been devastated by leaks.

In fact, more oil is spilled from the delta's network of terminals, pipes, pumping stations and oil platforms every year than has been lost in the Gulf of Mexico, the site of a major ecological catastrophe caused by oil that has poured from a leak triggered by the explosion that wrecked BP's Deepwater Horizon rig last month.

That disaster, which claimed the lives of 11 rig workers, has made headlines round the world. By contrast, little information has emerged about the damage inflicted on the Niger delta. Yet the destruction there provides us with a far more accurate picture of the price we have to pay for drilling oil today.

On 1 May this year a ruptured ExxonMobil pipeline in the state of Akwa Ibom spilled more than a million gallons into the delta over seven days before the leak was stopped. Local people demonstrated against the company but say they were attacked by security guards. Community leaders are now demanding $1bn in compensation for the illness and loss of livelihood they suffered. Few expect they will succeed. In the meantime, thick balls of tar are being washed up along the coast.

Within days of the Ibeno spill, thousands of barrels of oil were spilled when the nearby Shell Trans Niger pipeline was attacked by rebels. A few days after that, a large oil slick was found floating on Lake Adibawa in Bayelsa state and another in Ogoniland. "We are faced with incessant oil spills from rusty pipes, some of which are 40 years old," said Bonny Otavie, a Bayelsa MP.

This point was backed by Williams Mkpa, a community leader in Ibeno: "Oil companies do not value our life; they want us to all die. In the past two years, we have experienced 10 oil spills and fishermen can no longer sustain their families. It is not tolerable."

With 606 oilfields, the Niger delta supplies 40% of all the crude the United States imports and is the world capital of oil pollution. Life expectancy in its rural communities, half of which have no access to clean water, has fallen to little more than 40 years over the past two generations. Locals blame the oil that pollutes their land and can scarcely believe the contrast with the steps taken by BP and the US government to try to stop the Gulf oil leak and to protect the Louisiana shoreline from pollution.

"If this Gulf accident had happened in Nigeria, neither the government nor the company would have paid much attention," said the writer Ben Ikari, a member of the Ogoni people. "This kind of spill happens all the time in the delta."

"The oil companies just ignore it. The lawmakers do not care and people must live with pollution daily. The situation is now worse than it was 30 years ago. Nothing is changing. When I see the efforts that are being made in the US I feel a great sense of sadness at the double standards. What they do in the US or in Europe is very different."

"We see frantic efforts being made to stop the spill in the US," said Nnimo Bassey, Nigerian head of Friends of the Earth International. "But in Nigeria, oil companies largely ignore their spills, cover them up and destroy people's livelihood and environments. The Gulf spill can be seen as a metaphor for what is happening daily in the oilfields of Nigeria and other parts of Africa.

"This has gone on for 50 years in Nigeria. People depend completely on the environment for their drinking water and farming and fishing. They are amazed that the president of the US can be making speeches daily, because in Nigeria people there would not hear a whimper," he said.

It is impossible to know how much oil is spilled in the Niger delta each year because the companies and the government keep that secret. However, two major independent investigations over the past four years suggest that as much is spilled at sea, in the swamps and on land every year as has been lost in the Gulf of Mexico so far.

One report, compiled by WWF UK, the World Conservation Union and representatives from the Nigerian federal government and the Nigerian Conservation Foundation, calculated in 2006 that up to 1.5m tons of oil – 50 times the pollution unleashed in the Exxon Valdez tanker disaster in Alaska – has been spilled in the delta over the past half century. Last year Amnesty calculated that the equivalent of at least 9m barrels of oil was spilled and accused the oil companies of a human rights outrage.

According to Nigerian federal government figures, there were more than 7,000 spills between 1970 and 2000, and there are 2,000 official major spillages sites, many going back decades, with thousands of smaller ones still waiting to be cleared up. More than 1,000 spill cases have been filed against Shell alone.

Last month Shell admitted to spilling 14,000 tonnes of oil in 2009. The majority, said the company, was lost through two incidents – one in which the company claims that thieves damaged a wellhead at its Odidi field and another where militants bombed the Trans Escravos pipeline.

Shell, which works in partnership with the Nigerian government in the delta, says that 98% of all its oil spills are caused by vandalism, theft or sabotage by militants and only a minimal amount by deteriorating infrastructure. "We had 132 spills last year, as against 175 on average. Safety valves were vandalised; one pipe had 300 illegal taps. We found five explosive devices on one. Sometimes communities do not give us access to clean up the pollution because they can make more money from compensation," said a spokesman.

"We have a full-time oil spill response team. Last year we replaced 197 miles of pipeline and are using every known way to clean up pollution, including microbes. We are committed to cleaning up any spill as fast as possible as soon as and for whatever reason they occur."

These claims are hotly disputed by communities and environmental watchdog groups. They mostly blame the companies' vast network of rusting pipes and storage tanks, corroding pipelines, semi-derelict pumping stations and old wellheads, as well as tankers and vessels cleaning out tanks.

The scale of the pollution is mind-boggling. The government's national oil spill detection and response agency (Nosdra) says that between 1976 and 1996 alone, more than 2.4m barrels contaminated the environment. "Oil spills and the dumping of oil into waterways has been extensive, often poisoning drinking water and destroying vegetation. These incidents have become common due to the lack of laws and enforcement measures within the existing political regime," said a spokesman for Nosdra.

The sense of outrage is widespread. "There are more than 300 spills, major and minor, a year," said Bassey. "It happens all the year round. The whole environment is devastated. The latest revelations highlight the massive difference in the response to oil spills. In Nigeria, both companies and government have come to treat an extraordinary level of oil spills as the norm."

A spokesman for the Stakeholder Democracy Network in Lagos, which works to empower those in communities affected by the oil companies' activities, said: "The response to the spill in the United States should serve as a stiff reminder as to how far spill management in Nigeria has drifted from standards across the world."

Other voices of protest point out that the world has overlooked the scale of the environmental impact. Activist Ben Amunwa, of the London-based oil watch group Platform, said: "Deepwater Horizon may have exceed Exxon Valdez, but within a few years in Nigeria offshore spills from four locations dwarfed the scale of the Exxon Valdez disaster many times over. Estimates put spill volumes in the Niger delta among the worst on the planet, but they do not include the crude oil from waste water and gas flares. Companies such as Shell continue to avoid independent monitoring and keep key data secret."

Worse may be to come. One industry insider, who asked not to be named, said: "Major spills are likely to increase in the coming years as the industry strives to extract oil from increasingly remote and difficult terrains. Future supplies will be offshore, deeper and harder to work. When things go wrong, it will be harder to respond."

Judith Kimerling, a professor of law and policy at the City University of New York and author of Amazon Crude, a book about oil development in Ecuador, said: "Spills, leaks and deliberate discharges are happening in oilfields all over the world and very few people seem to care."

There is an overwhelming sense that the big oil companies act as if they are beyond the law. Bassey said: "What we conclude from the Gulf of Mexico pollution incident is that the oil companies are out of control.

"It is clear that BP has been blocking progressive legislation, both in the US and here. In Nigeria, they have been living above the law. They are now clearly a danger to the planet. The dangers of this happening again and again are high. They must be taken to the international court of justice."
 
Since we like to look at worst case scenarios, try this one on for size. (And this doesn't even mention hurricanes). Btw, I'm not endorsing this guy, given that he is clearly an anti-semitic nutjob, but his theory on the spill is interesting.

doctorjamespwickstrom.blogspot.com/2010/05/what-u-s-scientists-are-forbidden-to.html

What you are about to read, is what the scientists in the United States are not allowed to tell you in great fear of the Obama administration. They are under the threat of severe repercussions to the max.. Scientists confirming these findings cannot be named due to the above, but what they believe, they want to be known by all.

Take a U. S. map, lay it flat and measure inland just the minimum 50 miles of total destruction all around the Gulf of Mexico as to what you will read below. The carnage to the United States is so staggering, it will take your breathe away. Should what the scientists, who are trying to warn everyone about, is even close to be true... all of Florida will be completely destroyed and everyone and everything on it. You decide!! Everyone has the right to read what I have just written in this article, as well as to what is written below by the scientists who the Obama administration and BP are trying to shut up. Please share with as many as you can.

Dr. James P. Wickstrom

SUMMARY OF WHAT IS HAPPENING

The estimated super high pressure release of oil from under the earth's crust is between 80,000 to 100,000 barrels per day. The flow of oil and toxic gases is bringing up with it... rocks and sand which causes the flow to create a sandblasting effect on the remaining well head device currently somewhat restricting the flow, as well as the drilled hole itself.

As the well head becomes worn it enlarges the passageway allowing an ever-increasing flow. Even if some device could be placed onto the existing wellhead, it would not be able to shut off the flow, because what remains of the existing wellhead would not be able to contain the pressure.

The well head piping is originally about 2 inches thick. It is now likely to be less than 1 inch thick, and thinning by each passing moment. The oil has now reached the Gulf Stream and is entering the Oceanic current which is at least four times stronger than the current in the Gulf, which will carry it throughout the world within 18 months..

The oil along with the gasses, including benzene and many other toxins, is deleting the oxygen in the water. This is killing all life in the ocean. Along with the oil along the shores, there will be many dead fish, etc. that will have to be gathered and disposed of.

SUMMARY OF EXPECTATIONS

At some point the drilled hole in the earth will enlarge itself beneath the wellhead to weaken the area the wellhead rests upon. The intense pressure will then push the wellhead off the hole allowing a direct unrestricted flow of oil, etc.. The hole will continue to increase in size allowing more and more oil to rise into the Gulf. After several billion barrels of oil have been released, the pressure within the massive cavity five miles beneath the ocean floor will begin to normalize.

This will allow the water, under the intense pressure at 1 mile deep, to be forced into the hole and the cavity where the oil was. The temperature at that depth is near 400 degrees, possibly more. The water will be vaporized and turned into steam, creating an enormous amount of force, lifting the Gulf floor. It is difficult to know how much water will go down to the core and therefore, its not possible to fully calculate the rise of the floor.

The tsunami wave this will create will be anywhere from 20 to 80 feet high, possibly more. Then the floor will fall into the now vacant chamber. This is how nature will seal the hole. Depending on the height of the tsunami, the ocean debris, oil, and existing structures that will be washed away on shore and inland, will leave the area from 50 to 200 miles inland devoid of life. Even if the debris is cleaned up, the contaminants that will be in the ground and water supply will prohibit re-population of these areas for an unknown number of years.
 
Excellent pictures of how the oil is affecting the shoreline in Louisiana.

http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2010/05/oil_reaches_louisiana_shores.html
 
So apparently, BP's playbook here was used 30 years ago, with the exact same results:
http_://www._youtube.com/watch?v=GHmhxpQEGPo

http_://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ixtoc_I_oil_spill
 
IF BP was interested in plugging the spill, this sounds like the way to go, but maybe not with a nuke, but something more conventional?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CpPNQoTlacU
 
Perceval said:
This will allow the water, under the intense pressure at 1 mile deep, to be forced into the hole and the cavity where the oil was. The temperature at that depth is near 400 degrees, possibly more. The water will be vaporized and turned into steam, creating an enormous amount of force, lifting the Gulf floor. It is difficult to know how much water will go down to the core and therefore, its not possible to fully calculate the rise of the floor.

The tsunami wave this will create will be anywhere from 20 to 80 feet high, possibly more. Then the floor will fall into the now vacant chamber. This is how nature will seal the hole. Depending on the height of the tsunami, the ocean debris, oil, and existing structures that will be washed away on shore and inland, will leave the area from 50 to 200 miles inland devoid of life. Even if the debris is cleaned up, the contaminants that will be in the ground and water supply will prohibit re-population of these areas for an unknown number of years.

:cry: Add to this the upcoming hurricane season, and there is a big chance that a lot of people are going to be completely devastated soon.
 
Andromeda said:
Perceval said:
This will allow the water, under the intense pressure at 1 mile deep, to be forced into the hole and the cavity where the oil was. The temperature at that depth is near 400 degrees, possibly more. The water will be vaporized and turned into steam, creating an enormous amount of force, lifting the Gulf floor. It is difficult to know how much water will go down to the core and therefore, its not possible to fully calculate the rise of the floor.

The tsunami wave this will create will be anywhere from 20 to 80 feet high, possibly more. Then the floor will fall into the now vacant chamber. This is how nature will seal the hole. Depending on the height of the tsunami, the ocean debris, oil, and existing structures that will be washed away on shore and inland, will leave the area from 50 to 200 miles inland devoid of life. Even if the debris is cleaned up, the contaminants that will be in the ground and water supply will prohibit re-population of these areas for an unknown number of years.

:cry: Add to this the upcoming hurricane season, and there is a big chance that a lot of people are going to be completely devastated soon.

I wrote to Allen West, co-author of "The Cycle of Cosmic Catastrophes" about this scenario and he replied to my question "Is this scenario possible?":

Allen West said:
No. I worked as an oilfield geophysicist on hundreds of wells, and I know for a fact that what he is saying is highly imaginative, but totally wrong. While it is true that there are serious dangers from the pollution and from other leaks in the well casing, there are zero risks of the scenario he describes.

But then, the planet is doing a lot of weird things lately, so who knows???
 
Laura said:
I wrote to Allen West, co-author of "The Cycle of Cosmic Catastrophes" about this scenario and he replied to my question "Is this scenario possible?":

Allen West said:
No. I worked as an oilfield geophysicist on hundreds of wells, and I know for a fact that what he is saying is highly imaginative, but totally wrong. While it is true that there are serious dangers from the pollution and from other leaks in the well casing, there are zero risks of the scenario he describes.

But then, the planet is doing a lot of weird things lately, so who knows???

Well, that IS somewhat comforting to know. Although there's still hurricane season to contend with, and all this chemical pouring and burning :curse: on top of the oil, is poisoning a lot of people. Not to mention the land, animals and water. :( That thing is almost twice the size of Florida!
 
Back
Top Bottom