Mother of all gushers - BP Oil Disaster in Gulf of Mexico

Laura said:
That suggests to me that the Gulf stream warmth is NOT making it over here. It's backing up along the U.S. Eastern Seaboard and cranking up the thermostat over there. I dunno why it is so hot in Russia. I'll have to study that for a bit. I just know it is Sept/Oct weather here and has been nearly all summer.

I have never seen the ocean temperature off New Jersey as high as it has been this year. It reached 77 degrees F., remained there for several weeks and is still at 76. My impression was also that the Gulf Stream had lost it's impetus and warm water was piling up along the coast instead of heading off across the Atlantic as before.
 
An article discussis the stall of the jet strem, as well, the comments to what observation's and thoughts are given to the article.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1302225/Blocked-jetstream-blame-freak-weather-Russia-Pakistan.html

Blocked' jetstream to blame for freak weather in Russia and Pakistan, say scientists
By NIALL FIRTH
Last updated at 11:36 AM on 12th August 2010

Comments (189)
Add to My Stories
A massive heatwave in Russia and the current devastating floods in Pakistan could be linked by the unusual behaviour of the jetstream, scientists believe.

The jetstream is the high-altitude wind that circles the globe from west to east and normally pushes a series of wet but mild Atlantic lows across Britain.

But meteorologists who study the phenomenon say that it is producing unusual holding patterns which keep weather systems in one place and produce freak conditions.

Enlarge
A satellite map which shows the intense heat that has built up over Russia after the jetstream has been held up due to Rossby waves

The jetstream is being held by the Rossby waves that normally produce its distinctive wave-like pattern.

These powerful spinning wind currents are caused by the Earth’s shape and rotation and push the jet stream from east to west at high altitudes.

Now scientists believe that Rossby waves are acting against the jetstream’s usual pattern, holding it in place, according to a report in New Scientist.

Since mid-July, when it would normally be moving eastwards the jetstream has been held in one place as strong Rossby waves push against it.

When the jet stream is held in one place it traps the weather systems that are caught between its meanders. Warm air is sucked north to the ‘peaks’ while cold air travels to the ‘troughs’.

Professor Mike Blackburn of the University of Reading believes that a blocked jetstream could be behind a heatwave in Japan which killed 60 and the sudden end to warm weather in the UK.


A satellite image from this afternoon shows smoke from wildfires burning in Russia. The red dots indicate active fires. Scientists believe the jetstream could be to blame


Pakistani flood survivors evacuate a flooded area in Bssera village near Muzaffargarh today

In Pakistan, the blocking event took place at the same time as the summer monsoon, with tragic consequences.

Floods triggered by heavy monsoon rain over much of Pakistan began nearly two weeks ago and have killed around 1,600 people and forced more than two million from their homes.

Many survivors from flooded villages have lost their stores of food as well as crops and livestock and are surviving on relief handouts.

In Russia, the immobile jetstream pulled in hot air from Africa creating stifling conditions and horrendous smog in Moscow.

Hundreds of wildfires have been burning across three time zones. Prime Minister Vladimir Putin yesterday boarded a fire-fighting plane to dump water on blazes close to Moscow, where the smoke has caused thick smog

Scientists are still unclear as to the cause of ‘blocking events’ although there have been some research that linked them to low solar activity.

Enlarge
A graph for 24 - 30th July which shows a succession of meanders along the jet stream, with a northward meander (ridge of high pressure) over the Atlantic, a southward meander (trough of low pressure) over Europe. Here the jet splits, around a large 'blocking' anticyclone over western Russia. On the eastern side of this anticyclone, air moves into the southward meander (trough) close to Pakistan from quite far north

Enlarge
A graph from the same period over a number of years shows what scientists would normally expect over this period with calmer winds and fewer 'trapped' weather patterns


Print this article Read later Email to a friend
Share this article:

Facebook
TwitterDigg itRedditFarkDel.icio.usNewsvineNowpublicStumbleUponMySpace
Comments (189)
Here's what readers have had to say so far. Why not debate this issue live on our message boards.

The comments below have not been moderated.

NewestOldestBest ratedWorst rated
View all
Not sure what Professor Mike Blackburn means by heatwave in Japan.
This year has been pretty average, in fact cooler than usually!
- Ann, Tokyo, 15/8/2010 00:07
Click to rate Rating 4 Report abuse
- TheDailyMale, Wokingham,Berkshire,

May I ask what you do for a living, or is that too intrusive? You see, I am now retired, but I was a working scientist for many years. And the cosy atmosphere you describe is certainly nothing I've experienced. To start with, when you submit reserach for scruitiny, you do not choose who scruntinises. Typically scrutiny begins within your own organisation, but, believe me, the environment is both challenging and competitive. After all, you may all be up for the same promotion next year. Your research is then sent outside your own organisation for scrutiny. Again, you do not choose who scrutinises. And nor does your organisation. And this is even more competitive and challenging.

I wonder what other professions would allow themselves ot be scrutinised in this way? Are you scrutinised in this way in the work that you do?

As I said, I do not recognise the atmosphere of cosy back-scratching you describe. Thank goodness.
- Dermot, Dublin, 14/8/2010 21:07
Click to rate Rating 1 Report abuse
No. But it is done under public scrutiny and reviewed by others

Peter, Wales

'Others' meaning those 'on message' or objective people whether 'on message' or not ?

Its the difference between "9 out of 10 cat owners" and "9 out of 10 cat owners who expressed a preference" .... 2 quite different statistics !
- TheDailyMale, Wokingham,Berkshire, 14/8/2010 20:10
Click to rate Rating 7 Report abuse
btw there is no greenhouse effect. All substances gain and lose heat energy at a rate directly related to their thermal conductivity and specific heat. They can not receive heat energy from a substance which is at a lower temperature. And CO2 is not a problem.

- Martin, Lutterworth, 14/8/2010 17:33

May I suggest a short course on the history of science. The Green House Effect was according to Wikipedia

"discovered by Joseph Fourier in 1824, first reliably experimented on by John Tyndall in 1858, and first reported quantitatively by Svante Arrhenius in 1896".

Of course, maybe the climate scientist's conspiracy started over 100 years ago.
- Philip, Bletchley, 14/8/2010 19:29
Click to rate Rating 23 Report abuse
- TheDailyMale, Wokingham,Berkshire,

No. But it is done under public scrutiny and reviewed by others. And it is based on the scientifc methodology. In addition to which, many different scientists in many different institutions tackle the same subject. All trained in the subject.

On the other hand, we could simply accept that e.g. Martin, Lutterworth has opinions which are just as valid as those of the people who carry out this research. And publish etc.

Is that the way you feel we should operate? That the opinions of scientists should be treated in exactly the same way as those of people who have done no research, have no scientific training, do not have any detailed understanding of the subject and demonstrate their basic lack of knowledge whenever they speak?

If this is how you feel, next time you are ill why not ask the supermarket checkout operative for advice? Why use a solicitor? A mechanic? A dentist?

Just ask the bloke down the pub. Or Martin.
- Peter, Wales, 14/8/2010 19:15
Click to rate Rating 6 Report abuse
- chas freeman, penzance cornwall, 14/8/2010 18:27

I'm glad you raised this, chas. Because it is a huge opportunity to introduce many of our fellow posters to the murky world of Lord Monckton and his cronies, such as Benny Peiser. In the interests of balance, I am sure, chas, that you would also like to point our fellow posters to the detailed rebuttal of Schulte's paper, which you have no doubt read. You have read the rebuttal haven't you, chas? Or have you fallen for one of the oldest tricks in the denier book: publish rubbish and hope people are gullible enough to accept it at face value? Surely not, chas? Not a bright chap like you with a scientifc background.

Google John Mashey's critique of Schulte's paper. It is a very interesting read. It not only highlights the methodological flaws in Sculte's approach, but it also explains who he is being sponsored by. And how they behaved. And how totally and utterly unreliable Schulte's work is.

Thanks, chas.
- Dermot, Dublin, 14/8/2010 19:00
 

Attachments

  • Blocked-jetstream-blame-freak-weather-Russia-Pakistan.jpg
    Blocked-jetstream-blame-freak-weather-Russia-Pakistan.jpg
    110.5 KB · Views: 4
  • A graph from the same period over a number of years .jpg
    A graph from the same period over a number of years .jpg
    61.5 KB · Views: 4
  • A graph for 24 - 30th July which shows a succession of meanders along the jet stream,.jpg
    A graph for 24 - 30th July which shows a succession of meanders along the jet stream,.jpg
    77.9 KB · Views: 7
  • Pakistani flood survivors evacuate a flooded area in Bssera village near Muzaffargarh today.jpg
    Pakistani flood survivors evacuate a flooded area in Bssera village near Muzaffargarh today.jpg
    33.2 KB · Views: 3
Russia Burns (Radiation Alert)

Summer inferno spreads ever closer towards Russian capital.

August 13, 2010 by Mark Sircus
Filed under Breaking News

"A hasty evacuation of diplomatic staff from foreign embassies, like a stampede, began in Moscow. Many embassies are trying to hide the evacuation for political reasons. Mass evacuation of the embassies of Canada and Poland was officially reported at night on August 7. Russia is sending 10,000 children and hundreds of elderly to Bulgaria and the Ukraine to save them from the smoldering heat and overpowering smog in Moscow, the city’s Mayor, Yriy Luzhkov, announced Tuesday. Seventeen regions of Russia are currently aflame. Seven of them, including the Moscow region, have declared a state of emergency"...............................................

http://intotheashes.imva.info/breaking-news/russia-burns-radiation-alert
 

Attachments

  • clip_image002_0087-2small.jpg
    clip_image002_0087-2small.jpg
    86.7 KB · Views: 7
I wonder what type of weather machine one would need to create a blockade directly over a nation's capital. Perhaps it is a message to play nice or suffer greater calamities; a show of force, perhaps, unrelated to the oceanic conveyor system.

Just trying to think outside the box.

Gonzo
 
One site that published the Italian scientists' work on the Gulf of Mexico loop has added an update in the comments section to the original article:

http://socioecohistory.wordpress.com/2010/07/17/gulf-of-mexico-loop-current-broken-risk-of-global-climate-change-by-bp-oil-spill/

There are some comments here that the eddy which has formed is a natural, recurring phenomena – nothing to worry about…

After reading the article, I emailed the author, Gianluigi Zangari, who promptly and courteously replied to me.

I am condensing his replies to me for brevity.

* I asked if there was further news, and GZ said he was working on an update – anyone who wants to, can email him and request a link when the work is complete. His email is: gianluigi.zangari(at)lnf.infn.it

*I asked if there was any improvement in the Gulf Stream loop break, and GZ said no, in fact, it was getting worse.

*Then I mentioned the “natural, recurring event” hypothesis for the current eddy (no pun intended). GZ said that his team had been monitoring the Gulf Stream since 2001, and the situation we face today is a new, never seen previously event.

If the Gulf Stream does not return to at least close to its normal flow pattern, it will have catastrophic, and global consequences. The situation warrants our closest attention, and media coverage as it evolves.

The natural forces involved are so vast, that we humans can do nothing now to alter the outcome, except to prevent ALL future oil spills, and perhaps, pray…

Replies to me are welcome from all readers. :)

John Hechtman
 
Laura said:
Mauna Kea, at 13,803 feet above sea level, is in a sense the tallest mountain in the world because it rises 30,000 feet from the sea floor. Dormant for thousands of years, it once featured a large glacier on its massive peak at the height of the last ice age about 21,000 years ago. As the ice age ended and the global climate warmed, the glacier began to disappear.

However, the new research found that the glacier on Mauna Kea began to re-advance to almost its ice age size about 15,400 years ago. That coincides almost exactly with a major slowdown of what scientists call the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation, or AMOC, in the North Atlantic Ocean.
Interesting and scary that this is another piece of data that fits with what was written about in 'Cycles of Cosmic Catastrophe' that the world was hit by a comet that caused an ice age on the earth because the AMOC was messed up. Might be the only thing we can do now besides spread as much information as possible about the psychopaths that got us into this mess is to pray and help those we can. Reading the end of this thread, the recent 'Connecting the Dots' and reading 'The Living Planet' has opened my eyes even wider that we are in big trouble.
 
Gonzo said:
I wonder what type of weather machine one would need to create a blockade directly over a nation's capital. Perhaps it is a message to play nice or suffer greater calamities; a show of force, perhaps, unrelated to the oceanic conveyor system.

Just trying to think outside the box.

Gonzo

It is also possible that considering the following quote, jetstream's unusual pattern is related somehow to the possible changes in Earth's rotation.

These powerful spinning wind currents are caused by the Earth’s shape and rotation and push the jet stream from east to west at high altitudes.

Now scientists believe that Rossby waves are acting against the jetstream’s usual pattern, holding it in place, according to a report in New Scientist.
 
Keit said:
Gonzo said:
I wonder what type of weather machine one would need to create a blockade directly over a nation's capital. Perhaps it is a message to play nice or suffer greater calamities; a show of force, perhaps, unrelated to the oceanic conveyor system.

Just trying to think outside the box.

Gonzo

It is also possible that considering the following quote, jetstream's unusual pattern is related somehow to the possible changes in Earth's rotation.

These powerful spinning wind currents are caused by the Earth’s shape and rotation and push the jet stream from east to west at high altitudes.

Now scientists believe that Rossby waves are acting against the jetstream’s usual pattern, holding it in place, according to a report in New Scientist.

Remember how Jupiter lost one of its belts recently?

It's latitude kinda corresponds with the jet stream here on Earth (only it happened in the southern hemisphere).

I wonder if what ever happened to Jupiter's belt is equivalent to what's happening with the jet stream here?
 
Speaking of "blockades" or, in this case, attractors:

http://www.sott.net/articles/show/212489-Alien-meteorites-hit-Bosnian-man-s-house-six-times

London, July 20 (ANI): A man in Bosnia, whose house has been struck six times by meteorites, suspects that aliens are targeting him.

Radivoje Lajic, 50, said it is unbelievable that his home in the northern village of Gornji Lajici will be hit six times, with the latest strike being just a month ago.

“I am obviously being targeted by extraterrestrials. I don’t know what I have done to annoy them but there is no other explanation that makes sense,” the Sun quoted him as saying.

“The chance of being hit by a meteorite is so small that getting hit six times has to be deliberate. If you rule out the possible, then the impossible must be true,” he said.

The first meteorite fell on his house in November 2007, and since then one space rock has hit the house every year for the last four years, and that too whenever there is heavy rainfall.

Lajic has had to put up a steel girder reinforced roof on the house to protect himself.

Belgrade University experts have analysed the rocks and have confirmed they are meteorites, and they are now investigating magnetic fields to work out why they keep falling on the house.

“I did not know what the strange-looking stones were at first, but I have since had them all confirmed as meteorites by experts at Belgrade University,” Lajic said.

“I have no doubt I am being targeted by aliens. They are playing games with me. I don”t know why they are doing this.

“When it rains I can’t sleep for worrying about another strike.

“But these meteorites have brought happiness to our family as well, as we’ve met different people from around the world that were interested in it.

“And I have had so many visitors that I plan to make a small museum in my back garden.

“But I don’t have all the meteorites. I sold one to a University in the Netherlands which I used to pay for the steel roof,” he added. (ANI)

Strangely, in searching around for another version of this story that I saw somewhere else that was slightly different, I found the following from 2008:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-558478/Under-attack-The-owner-house-struck-times-meteorites-fears-aliens-targeting-him.html#ixzz0wnkb3HJM
Last updated at 01:02 10 April 2008
Under attack: The owner of a house struck five times by meteorites fears aliens are targeting him

A Bosnian man whose home has been hit an incredible five times by meteorites believes he is being targeted by aliens.

Experts at Belgrade University have confirmed that all the rocks Radivoje Lajic has handed over were meteorites.

They are now investigating local magnetic fields to try and work out what makes the property so attractive to the heavenly bodies.

But Mr Lajic, who has had a steel girder reinforced roof put on the house he owns in the northern village of Gornja Lamovite, has an alternative explanation.

He said: "I am obviously being targeted by extraterrestrials. I don't know what I have done to annoy them but there is no other explanation that makes sense.

"The chance of being hit by a meteorite is so small that getting hit five times has to be deliberate."

The first meteorite fell on his house in November last year and since then a further four have smashed into his home.

The strikes always happen when it is raining heavily, never when there are clear skies.

He said: "I did not know what the strange-looking stones were at first but I have since had them all confirmed as meteorites by experts at Belgrade University.

"I am being targeted by aliens. They are playing games with me.

"I don't know why they are doing this. When it rains I can't sleep for worrying about another strike."
 
As per: http://www.spaceweather.com/ lot of big chunks will pass by earth.

Upcoming Earth-asteroid encounters:
Asteroid Date(UT) Miss Distance Mag. Size
2002 CY46 Sep 2 63.8 LD 16 2.4 km
2010 LY63 Sep 7 56 LD 18 1.2 km
2009 SH2 Sep 30 7.1 LD 25 45 m
1998 UO1 Oct 1 32.1 LD 17 2.1 km
2005 GE59 Oct 1 77 LD 18 1.1 km
2001 WN5 Oct 10 41.8 LD 18 1.0 km
1999 VO6 Oct 14 34.3 LD 17 1.8 km
1998 TU3 Oct 17 69.1 LD 15 5.3 km
1998 MQ Oct 23 77.7 LD 17 1.9 km
2007 RU17 Oct 29 40.6 LD 18 1.0 km
2003 UV11 Oct 30 5 LD 19 595 m
3838 Epona Nov 7 76.8 LD 16 3.4 km
2005 QY151 Nov 16 77.7 LD 18 1.3 km
2008 KT Nov 23 5.6 LD 28 10 m

Notes: LD means "Lunar Distance." 1 LD = 384,401 km, the distance between Earth and the Moon. 1 LD also equals 0.00256 AU. MAG is the visual magnitude of the asteroid on the date of closest approach.


On August 16, 2010 there were 1142 potentially hazardous asteroids.

Potentially Hazardous Asteroids (PHAs) are space rocks larger than approximately 100m that can come closer to Earth than 0.05 AU. None of the known PHAs is on a collision course with our planet, although astronomers are finding new ones all the time.

List of PHAs is here: http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/iau/lists/Dangerous.html and it's pretty large.

According to SpaceWeather.com the Perseid meteor shower peaked on August 12th around 1800 UT with a maximum of 140 meteors per hour (ZHR).

BTW we had on August 13 - Was triple Conjunction with the Moon. The planets Venus, Mars, and Saturn were close to the thin, crescent moon on that evening.

PS: Why man from Bosnia had such bad luck with meteors crushing on his house for 6 times is really puzzling.
 
Ljubica said:
Potentially Hazardous Asteroids (PHAs) are space rocks larger than approximately 100m that can come closer to Earth than 0.05 AU. None of the known PHAs is on a collision course with our planet, although astronomers are finding new ones all the time.

It is comets and cometary fragments that we have to worry more about. The problem is that they are made of dark and fluffy materials and thus, except for the really big ones, are next to impossible to spot before it is too late. In the last few years, there have been an increasing number of "near misses" that were only discovered as the objects passed Earth.
 
Bobo08 said:
Ljubica said:
Potentially Hazardous Asteroids (PHAs) are space rocks larger than approximately 100m that can come closer to Earth than 0.05 AU. None of the known PHAs is on a collision course with our planet, although astronomers are finding new ones all the time.

It is comets and cometary fragments that we have to worry more about. The problem is that they are made of dark and fluffy materials and thus, except for the really big ones, are next to impossible to spot before it is too late. In the last few years, there have been an increasing number of "near misses" that were only discovered as the objects passed Earth.

Agree, but ever increasing chart of newly found PHAs is showing how much crowded is the space around the earth and getting even more crowded day by day.
 
Here is an interesting video that makes the case for two wells and even deeper BP deception.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oaf998FwQVI&feature=related

Its titled: A Tale of Two Wells (Dedicated to Matt Simmons R.I.P.)


Mod's note: Link activated for the benefit of the members of this forum since it is not a disinfo site.
 
From Mother Jones http://motherjones.com/special-reports/2010/09bp-oceans

also http://motherjones.com/enviroment/2010/09/bp-ocean-gulf-time-bombs

BP, Energy, Environment

Tue Aug. 10, 2010 3:00 AM PDT
Read also: The rest of this special report and MoJo's complete BP coverage.

WE'RE SWINGING ON ANCHOR this afternoon as powerful bursts of wind blow down through the Makua Valley and out to sea. The gales stop and start every 15 minutes, as abruptly as if a giant on the far side of the Hawaiian island of Oahu were switching a fan on and off. We sail at the gusts' mercy, listing hard to starboard, then snapping hard against the anchor chain before recoiling to port. The intermittent tempests make our work harder and colder. We shiver during the microbursts, sweat during the interludes, then shiver again from our own sweat.

I'm accompanying marine ecologist Kelly Benoit-Bird of Oregon State University, physical oceanographer Margaret McManus of the University of Hawaii-Manoa, and two research assistants aboard a 32-foot former sportfishing boat named Alyce C. On the tiny aft deck, where a marlin fisher might ordinarily strap into a fighting chair, Benoit-Bird and McManus are launching packages of instruments: echo sounders tuned to five frequencies; cameras; and a host of tools designed to measure temperature, salinity, current velocity, chlorophyll fluorescence, and zooplankton abundance, all feeding into computers lashed into the tiny forward cabin.
Advertise on MotherJones.com
Despite the impressive technology crammed aboard the boat, its deployment is pure 19th century. At any given time, two of us man the aft winch, launching the equipment overboard by hand, feeding out dual lines of nylon and coaxial cable, slowly wearing calluses into our gloves as we ease the instruments through the water column at roughly 33 feet per minute. Six feet shy of the bottom, 74 feet down, the rig is hauled back up, collecting data the whole way. The process is repeated around the clock for the next 24 hours, a procedure either monotonous or meditative, depending on your frame of mind. Near the bottom, McManus calls, "Making a mark." She might as well be calling "mark twain."

But whereas old-time riverboat captains sounding with lead-weighted ropes were gleaning information about safe shipping channels and shifting sandbars, we're sounding for signs of life. To the untrained eye, the incoming echo soundings appear as waves of blue, green, and yellow scrolling horizontally across our computer monitors. To the trained eye, they appear as layers of life flooding in on darkness. Benoit-Bird points toward the screens, each one tuned to read the sonar signature of a different-size life form. "That layer is zooplankton," she says. "And that layer is fish." Suddenly, I can see a crude facsimile of the migrations of the nighttime sea.

Creatures living in the deep scattering layer of the Gulf of Mexico include juveniles like this octopod. Lantern fish like this one are a keystone species in the marine food web. DSL species like hatchetfish have light-emitting organs.
Photos: Octopod and Hatchetfish: Dante Fenolio/Photo Researchers Inc.; Lantern fish: Paulo de Oliveira/PhotolibraryMost of the marine life familiar to us at the surface inhabits the epipelagic zone, the sunlit realm, stretching down to about 600 feet. Yet many whales, dolphins, seals, sea turtles, sharks, manta rays, billfish, and smaller predatory fish are nocturnal hunters, dependent on the mysterious movements of a vast community of organisms known as the deep scattering layer (pdf), or DSL. This aggregation of life forms was unknown until the 1920s, when early hydrographers mapping the ocean with sound encountered a daytime "seafloor" around 3,300 feet, which rose perplexingly toward the surface at night. Named for its echo-reflecting signature, the DSL was eventually recognized by marine biologists in 1948 to be layers of living creatures hiding on the cusp between perpetual twilight and darkness.

What the echo sounders of old were actually picking up were the billions of swim bladders (buoyancy floats) of the fish inhabiting the dark realm of the DSL—primarily lantern fish, bristlemouths, and hatchetfish. These fish, generally between one and twelve inches long, are endowed with the usual fishy hardware of fins, scales, lateral lines, and tails. But their habit of hiding in the darkness by day and chasing darkness upward at night led to the development of extraordinarily large eyes and organs, known as photophores, capable of producing light—usually a weak blue, green, or yellowish light—the color and pattern of which signal the fish's species and gender, as well as information used in shoaling and other communications we don't understand. The photophores also create a camouflage known as counterillumination. By adjusting internal dimmer switches, these mesopelagic ("middle sea," or twilight zone) fish match the slightest overhead ambient light level—be it the faint glow of the sun or moon—making their silhouettes less visible to predators above and below.

DSL species rise at night—some to waters as shallow as 30 feet deep—for a variety of reasons: Some are avoiding the daytime surface hunters; others are avoiding the nocturnal hunters of the DSL who don't rise (like lancetfish); still others are saving energy by spending their days in a sleeplike state prompted by the frigid waters. (The alternative, living only at the warm surface, produces a fast metabolism requiring more food.) Krill, among the most abundant and important invertebrates of the DSL, rise at night to graze on the pastures of the sea: single-celled phytoplankton, plants that survive only in the sunlight zone.

The lantern fish, bristlemouths, hatchetfish, and crustaceans of the DSL are believed to account for 80 percent of all the biomass in the mesopelagic zone, with lantern fish alone making up some 660 million tons of living fish—perhaps the greatest distribution, population, and species diversity of all ocean fish on the planet. The mesopelagic fauna also includes many kinds of squid, krill, and siphonophores and ctenophores (jellyfish-like animals), as well as worms, sea butterflies, and larvae that comprise the DSL zooplankton. The vast life of the deep scattering layer supports the surface life above it, including the $172 billion global seafood and aquaculture industries (pdf).


Click on the image to expand to full size.It's no wonder then that most of the predators of the sunlit sea make their living diving to meet the DSL, which rises like a great dumbwaiter from the deep bearing every manner of seafood delicacy on a platter of darkness. No wonder, too, that the DSL is being eyed by the fishing industry as the last great resource to be exploited.

Not long after dark, dolphins show up on the data stream, monopolizing the monitors with bold red and orange signatures. These are spinner dolphins who've spent the daytime hours resting in shallow coastal waters, hiding from sharks, sleeping with eyes wide open and their echolocation shut down. During the couple of years in the '90s I spent filming a documentary about spinners, darkness marked the frustrating end of our workday, the time we were forced to leave the school behind, to listen wistfully to the sounds of their leaps and spins as they splashed on an ocean surface we could no longer see. They were racing offshore to begin diving into the deep scattering layer. This much we knew. But in filmmaking parlance, it was called "dip to black." Because what the dolphins did down there in the dark was unknown, and seemingly unknowable.

JUST ABOUT THE TIME WE drop anchor off Oahu, and unbeknownst to us, a catastrophe is being unleashed 4,400 miles and five time zones away, in the Gulf of Mexico. A mile below sea level, methane is shooting up the experimental well drilled by the Deepwater Horizon rig, exploding at the well's head, killing 11 workers, and igniting a firestorm. After 36 hours of a raging inferno—and still unknown to any of us—the rig will sink and open a valve to the gargantuan reservoir of the Macondo oil field, estimated to contain perhaps as much as 1 billion barrels, or 42 billion gallons, of crude.

Though it won't be understood for weeks, the Deepwater Horizon is different from any other spill in human history. The extreme technology used to drill at unprecedented depths lacks the extreme safety equipment and protocols needed to stave off disaster. BP, gambling at the border of controllable engineering, has lost spectacularly in its bid to be the deepest and cheapest driller of them all.

And no one is ready for it. Not the Minerals Management Service, catering submissively to BP's laughable Gulf oil-spill "plan," a document featuring wildly inaccurate wildlife assessments (including walruses and other species nonexistent in the Gulf) and an on-call expert who's been dead for years. Not the scientists whose research is paid for by the oil cowboys. Not the environmental groups, who did not foresee the stupendous potential for cataclysm on oil's farthest frontier. Not the media, who almost entirely ignored the sneak preview offered last year by the blowout of the West Atlas rig drilling in the Timor Sea off Australia—a disaster that required five attempts at a relief well and 74 days to stanch. Far offshore, far from sight, far beyond the typical royalty-paying boundaries, BP and its partners have transformed themselves into modern-day pirates, operating beyond law or conscience. Their reckless quest has endangered and perhaps condemned not just the Gulf Coast, but the largest, richest, most pristine, most biologically important, and last completely unprotected ecosystem left on Earth: the deep ocean.

Despite an ever-expanding estimate of the volume of the spill, relatively little oil washes ashore at first, and only a small portion ever will. Instead, trapped in the deep, the oil fouls the ocean's twilight and dark zones: the mesopelagic and the bathypelagic (bathos: deep). After April 20, the dumbwaiter rising through the waters of the Gulf of Mexico will be ascending an ocean fouled with a toxic broth of oil, methane, chemical dispersants, and drilling mud. The relatively small amounts of oil washing ashore, and the relief felt when the surface oil began to dissipate, hardly account for the devastation being wrought in the dark world beyond our sight.
 

Attachments

  • hidden-damages-620[1].jpg
    hidden-damages-620[1].jpg
    95 KB · Views: 19
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/breaking-news/bp-oil-spill-more-damaging-widespread-than-first-thought-study/story-e6frf7ko-1225906417606
BP oil spill 'more damaging, widespread' than first thought - study
NEARLY 80 per cent of the crude oil released into the Gulf of Mexico remains in the area's ecosystem, researchers at the University of Georgia concluded yesterday in a report that contradicted the rosier estimates of the Obama Administration.
Up to 3.2 million barrels of the toxic substance have not been cleaned up, the independent researchers found - higher than the estimates given by the federal scientists working for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the Department of Interior.

"The oil is still out there, and it will likely take years to degrade," marine sciences professor Charles Hopkinson concluded.

Scientists from both the Obama Administration and University of Georgia (UGA) agreed it was likely that 4.9 million barrels of oil gushed out of the Macondo well after the BP-leased Deepwater Horizon rig exploded on April 20, killing 11 people.

But the Obama Administration's account of what happened next to the oil at the well site located 50 miles off the coast of Louisiana is disputed by the UGA study.

Start of sidebar. Skip to end of sidebar.
.End of sidebar. Return to start of sidebar.
Its researchers criticise Federal scientists for releasing their conclusions with supposedly scant and unverifiable data.

The NOAA report declined to give a single figure for oil that remained in the Gulf, though its piecemeal estimates of each cleanup component were more generous than the UGA report.

UGA scientists made their own estimates for variables such the evaporation rate of oil that came into contact with the atmosphere, and the degradation rate of oil compounds in the Gulf.

They suggested that US Government scientists may have underestimated the dangers that the oil poses to local communities.

For example, oil that was dispersed as micro-droplets, for instance, may still be "highly toxic," the study said.

"The most toxic components of crude oil are the least likely to be naturally degraded," the report said.

Even some of the oil that all parties agreed was released and subsequently purged could still be a threat, according to the study.

Oil that was evaporated into the atmosphere, for one, could still be a danger for years to come, it said.

Impact on health

Meanwhile, another study published overnight in the Journal of the American Medical Association suggested the spill's impact on human health is subtle and may not be seen immediately.

For clues to both the short-term and the long-term health effects of the oil spill, researchers studied cases associated with previous oil spills, all of which the authors noted, were far smaller than the Deepwater Horizon spill.

They discovered for example, that workers on the 1989 Exxon-Valdez spill in Alaska have, years later, a higher prevalence of chronic airway diseases.

Clean-up workers tend to suffer most because they are exposed to volatile organic compounds, chemicals that tend to evaporate when they reach the water's surface.

These compounds, such as benzene, are known to cause respiratory problems and are linked to certain cancers.

But, the researchers from the Department of Medicine at the University of California-San Francisco wrote that the potential health impacts extend beyond the workers on oil spills.

Nearby residents, too, may develop health problems either by exposure to crude oil in the water or by chemicals in the air. There also exists the possibility that seafood and drinking water in those communities may become contaminated.

The consequences are not only physical.

People exposed to the Exxon Valdez spill also proved, years later, to have high rates of depression and post-traumatic stress disorder, the study concluded.
 
Back
Top Bottom