Burma Jones said:
Also, if anyone is up for transcribing the new videos, the effort would be greatly appreciated. If you can, break the transcription up into a subtitle length on each line. That doesn't have to be a sentence, necessarily. You can break long sentences, but try to keep logical groups of words together. The lines can be longer than traditional movie subtitles due to the way YouTube displays them, so length isn't a huge issue. Just make it readable.
Hi,
I've transcribed the first of the new videos, The End of the World. Hope that helps:
Zachariah Sitchin, long may he rest in peace,
did a great disservice to the alternative community,
because he just didn't research deep enough
and he certainly wasn't the expert that he claimed he was.
There is evidence for clusters or swarms of comets.
There is a certain circumstantial evidence
for the existence of a companion sun
or a companion star to our sun
a brown dwarf or some other form of dark star.
There are many more reasonable
and even acceptable explanations
for what was meant by Nephilim
or what was meant by Annunaki.
Some of these other explanations and interpretations
may actually be a little scarier
than what Sitchin came up with.
But what Sitchin doesn't have
in any way, shape, form or fashion,
is a track record of making accurate predictions.
Cassiopaeans, on the other hand,
have a pretty good track record.
So ... no track record, track record
Lots of wild claims, no track record
Rational explanations, track record.
Research that confirms.
No research that confirms.
Sitchin, Cassiopaeans, ok?
That's the first thing.
Second thing is they say yes
This time is different because
this time it happens along
with a change of the cosmic environment.
Does that mean that there is not going to be
any cataclysm, no I don't think so,
but I think what that means
is that there is a possibility for some people
to move into another realm of existence
without necessarily experiencing
total annihilation.
I think that even an earth that split away,
by whatever means it happens,
from the current one we know,
would still have to do that under cataclysmic conditions
because throughout all the records,
throughout all the history
of any kind of transitions
or manifestations of great changes
in any kind of environment of the earth,
it has always been cataclysmic.
Whether the end result was for the positive
or for the negative.
And if you think about it there,
you know just in practical terms,
if you read the book
The vegetarian myth by Lierre Keith,
you will understand that as it is,
if there were no comets,
if there was no impending ice age,
if none of these, if there were no aliens
or you no invasion,
if there was nothing else going on in our world,
we are doomed to extinction
because of agriculture.
We have raped and pillaged this planet.
Once we got done using up all the nutrients in the topsoil
and all the agricultural land on the planet
then we started feeding that soil
with petroleum based fertilizers
We are now coming to the end
of the petroleum based fertilizer.
So once there is no longer fertilizer,
once there is no longer topsoil,
then that means there is no longer food
and this agricultural existence
that we changed into at the end of the last ice age
brought in hierarchy,
it brought in psychopathy
it brought in disease
it brought in, you know,
all the things that, you know,
we are heir to in our civilization.
We are taught from infancy, you know,
we're good, you know,
agriculture was the greatest invention,
it was not, it was the raping of our planet.
It was the destruction of our planet.
So, even without all of these other
metaphysical or cosmic events,
we are doomed to annihilation,
most of us,
because there is not going to be food
to feed 7 billion people
period, end of discussion, full stop.